m******1
发帖数: 715 | | m****a
发帖数: 2593 | | i**e
发帖数: 6810 | | m****a
发帖数: 2593 | | i**e
发帖数: 6810 | | m******1
发帖数: 715 | 6 谢了。 fort Knox 牌子,性价比不错。
titan 偏贵了。 但似乎上手更快。 据说可以固定在车内伸手够的到的地方。即便是加
州也是合法的。岂不是半个CCW了?
【在 m****a 的大作中提到】
: 还是推荐 Fort knox 的，
: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0075QMCNK/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF
: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0075QJ7S8/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF
| i**e
发帖数: 6810 | 7 我理解加州只能去靶场的时候在车上，其他时候都不行
【在 m******1 的大作中提到】
: 谢了。 fort Knox 牌子,性价比不错。
: titan 偏贵了。 但似乎上手更快。 据说可以固定在车内伸手够的到的地方。即便是加
: 州也是合法的。岂不是半个CCW了?
| m******1
发帖数: 715 | 8 我也是这么认为的。这个立法更准确的解释,是要求枪弹分离,並上锁。我附近枪店有展
品。店主十分肯定这一点。
这对加州被CCW困扰不堪的弟兄们,应该是一个好消息吧?
【在 i**e 的大作中提到】
: 我理解加州只能去靶场的时候在车上，其他时候都不行
| i**e
发帖数: 6810 | 9 我理解枪弹分离，上锁是条件之一，不够。平时这样放车上也不行的。
警察截住你，发现有枪，你要能够解释为什么枪在车上。说self defense
通不过。只有说去range，去卖枪之类才行。希望我是错的。。。感觉没错
【在 m******1 的大作中提到】
: 我也是这么认为的。这个立法更准确的解释,是要求枪弹分离,並上锁。我附近枪店有展
: 品。店主十分肯定这一点。
: 这对加州被CCW困扰不堪的弟兄们,应该是一个好消息吧?
| m******1
发帖数: 715 | 10 Put in the trunk is for sure safe. But it is not a mandate by CA DOJ code.
Here is a copy of the handgun code:
================================================================
TRAVELING WITH FIREARMS IN CALIFORNIA
HANDGUNS
California Penal Code section 25610 does not prevent a citizen of the United
States over 18 years of age who is not lawfully prohibited from firearm
possession, and who resides or is temporarily in California, from
transporting by motor vehicle any pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable
of being concealed upon the person provided the firearm is unloaded and
stored in a locked container.
The term "locked container" means a secure container which is fully enclosed
and locked by a padlock, key lock, combination lock, or similar locking
device. This includes the trunk of a motor vehicle, but does not include the
utility or glove compartment. For more information, refer to California
Penal Code sections 16850.
================================================================ | m******1
发帖数: 715 | 11 16850 is the definition of "locked container".
glove compartment is not qualified as a "locked container".
A gunsafe is most likely qualified as a "locked container" :)
==================================================================
16850. As used in Sections 17740, 23925, 25105, 25205, 25135, and
25610, in Article 3 (commencing with Section 25505) of Chapter 2 of
Division 5 of Title 4, in Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 26350)
of Division 5 of Title 4, and in Chapter 7 (commencing with Section
26400) of Division 5 of Title 4, "locked container" means a secure
container that is fully enclosed and locked by a padlock, keylock,
combination lock, or similar locking device. The term "locked
container" does not include the utility or glove compartment of a
motor vehicle.
================================================================== | i**e
发帖数: 6810 | 12 WRT glove compartment is not qualified as a "locked container":
I think you are right but I really don't understand why
this is the case. It is a container (secure or not I don't
see any specific standard for it) with a key lock.
In fact my understanding is a nylon bag (like a simple backpack)
that can be locked qualifies as a "locked container."
If your car is a sedan just throw it in the trunk but
if it's an SUV or a truck I'm thinking a locked bag would
do.
【在 m******1 的大作中提到】
: 16850 is the definition of "locked container".
: glove compartment is not qualified as a "locked container".
: A gunsafe is most likely qualified as a "locked container" :)
: ==================================================================
: 16850. As used in Sections 17740, 23925, 25105, 25205, 25135, and
: 25610, in Article 3 (commencing with Section 25505) of Chapter 2 of
: Division 5 of Title 4, in Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 26350)
: of Division 5 of Title 4, and in Chapter 7 (commencing with Section
: 26400) of Division 5 of Title 4, "locked container" means a secure
: container that is fully enclosed and locked by a padlock, keylock,
| m******1
发帖数: 715 | 13 加州老枪们,这个可以吗?
【在 i**e 的大作中提到】
: WRT glove compartment is not qualified as a "locked container":
: I think you are right but I really don't understand why
: this is the case. It is a container (secure or not I don't
: see any specific standard for it) with a key lock.
: In fact my understanding is a nylon bag (like a simple backpack)
: that can be locked qualifies as a "locked container."
: If your car is a sedan just throw it in the trunk but
: if it's an SUV or a truck I'm thinking a locked bag would
: do.
|
|
