o******l 发帖数: 108 | 1 请问外置SSD硬盘是否插上就也能使电脑快点?外置和内置是否一样?在Costco看到外
置的SSD硬盘想买个试试看不知能否让电脑快些。
懂的大牛说说看,多谢! |
F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 2
esata or USB3? they are hugely different
【在 o******l 的大作中提到】 : 请问外置SSD硬盘是否插上就也能使电脑快点?外置和内置是否一样?在Costco看到外 : 置的SSD硬盘想买个试试看不知能否让电脑快些。 : 懂的大牛说说看,多谢!
|
a***e 发帖数: 27968 | 3 没大差
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : : esata or USB3? they are hugely different
|
F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 4
from the specs, they are similar, but from my experience, esata is a lot
faster than USB3.
esata is basically sata with a different cable. with an SSD drive, I was
able to get 500MB/s speed when cloning between two SSDs. for an external
USB3 drive (non-ssd), I was only able to get ~60 MB/s (reported by iotop in
Ubuntu)
curious what other people got for USB3 external drive (ssd or non-ssd) in
terms of speed.
【在 a***e 的大作中提到】 : 没大差 : : ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13
|
a******n 发帖数: 1052 | 5 我的3.0有300 - 400 MB/s 里头用的840 evo 感觉你这个不是3.0的速度
in
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : : from the specs, they are similar, but from my experience, esata is a lot : faster than USB3. : esata is basically sata with a different cable. with an SSD drive, I was : able to get 500MB/s speed when cloning between two SSDs. for an external : USB3 drive (non-ssd), I was only able to get ~60 MB/s (reported by iotop in : Ubuntu) : curious what other people got for USB3 external drive (ssd or non-ssd) in : terms of speed.
|
F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 6
just did the following test:
copy ubuntu-14.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso (975 MB) from an SSD drive to a USB3
external drive (Seagate backup plus drive, non-ssd), it took 11.35 seconds.
iotop reported 85 MB/s, matching the speed from 975/11.35.
copying the same file to another folder on the same ssd drive took only 1.5
to 2.1 seconds, yielding a speed of 975/2.1=451 MB/s.
how long does it take for you to copy that file? you can download a similar
file from
http://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/ubuntu-releases/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04-desktop-i386.iso
【在 a******n 的大作中提到】 : 我的3.0有300 - 400 MB/s 里头用的840 evo 感觉你这个不是3.0的速度 : : in
|
a******n 发帖数: 1052 | 7 你的85MB是机械硬盘吧 ssd同一个盘拷速度很快啊,用的什么型号,也是SATA?
我的三个盘
SATA 850a (256gb满) 850b (1tb空)
USB 840 (256gb空)
SATA <-> SATA:
850 b to 850 a 1.891s 平均516 MB/s
但是如果850 b to 850 b 就要4.672s 平均209 MB/s 同时读写速度减半还多
SATA <-> USB 3.0:
850 b to 840 2.500s 平均390 MB/s
反过来
840 to 850 b 2.453s 平均397 MB/s
然后840 to 840 要5.109s 平均190 MB/s
另外试了下 SATA -> USB 3.1
SATA 850 b to 840 USB3.1 2.203s 平均443 MB/s
觉得450 MB/s可能840到顶了,3.1应该能更快些
.
5
similar
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : : just did the following test: : copy ubuntu-14.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso (975 MB) from an SSD drive to a USB3 : external drive (Seagate backup plus drive, non-ssd), it took 11.35 seconds. : iotop reported 85 MB/s, matching the speed from 975/11.35. : copying the same file to another folder on the same ssd drive took only 1.5 : to 2.1 seconds, yielding a speed of 975/2.1=451 MB/s. : how long does it take for you to copy that file? you can download a similar : file from : http://ftp.riken.jp/Linux/ubuntu-releases/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04-desktop-i386.iso
|
F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 8
that's correct. I believe it is a 2T 5400rpm mechanical drive made by
Seagate.
the SSD is also made by seagate
https://www.amazon.com/Seagate-2-5-Inch-Z-Height-Solid-ST480HM000/dp/
B00CKAOWB6
very informative! this seems to be clear - the bottleneck of using an
external drive is the max disk read/write speed, instead of the interface.
Your benchmark does show that the SATA interface can be 30% faster.
【在 a******n 的大作中提到】 : 你的85MB是机械硬盘吧 ssd同一个盘拷速度很快啊,用的什么型号,也是SATA? : 我的三个盘 : SATA 850a (256gb满) 850b (1tb空) : USB 840 (256gb空) : SATA <-> SATA: : 850 b to 850 a 1.891s 平均516 MB/s : 但是如果850 b to 850 b 就要4.672s 平均209 MB/s 同时读写速度减半还多 : SATA <-> USB 3.0: : 850 b to 840 2.500s 平均390 MB/s : 反过来
|
z****8 发帖数: 5023 | 9 你这不是废话么 瓶颈又不是USB3.0
你那个拷贝慢 瓶颈在希捷机械盘
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : : that's correct. I believe it is a 2T 5400rpm mechanical drive made by : Seagate. : the SSD is also made by seagate : https://www.amazon.com/Seagate-2-5-Inch-Z-Height-Solid-ST480HM000/dp/ : B00CKAOWB6 : very informative! this seems to be clear - the bottleneck of using an : external drive is the max disk read/write speed, instead of the interface. : Your benchmark does show that the SATA interface can be 30% faster.
|