d********9
发帖数: 58 | 1 头一次接到审稿邀请， 不是我熟悉的领域。没有头绪如何写comments。
多谢大家指点。 |
n******t
发帖数: 1281 | 2 不熟悉的领域最好不要接
于人于己都不好
我接到同领域的但是不是我的direction的我都直接decline的
Be responsible
【在 d********9 的大作中提到】
: 头一次接到审稿邀请， 不是我熟悉的领域。没有头绪如何写comments。
: 多谢大家指点。
|
m******s
发帖数: 1494 | 3 如果完全不知所云， 那没法给remarks.
无论如何也得搭点边吧 |
p*******g
发帖数: 2976 | 4 don't review it. Don't acceot this kind of requests just for green card
purpose. hurt your RP... |
m********a
发帖数: 607 | |
a*****n
发帖数: 5158 | 6 my first review is similar to this,
I spent a whole week to read the revelant articles on this,
相当于writie a proposal in that direction
【在 p*******g 的大作中提到】
: don't review it. Don't acceot this kind of requests just for green card
: purpose. hurt your RP...
|
s********n
发帖数: 944 | 7 Re this post (good suggestion)!
So try it hard for your future GC and yourself!
发信人: ashdown (EB1A and NIW), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: 如何审稿非自己研究方向？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 7 14:23:02 2010, 美东)
my first review is similar to this,
I spent a whole week to read the revelant articles on this,
相当于writie a proposal in that direction |
a*****n
发帖数: 5158 | 8 and the associate editor said that I did a good review :-)
(the associate editor is in the exactly same field as I, so i guess
he does not quite understand it by himself)
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】
: Re this post (good suggestion)!
: So try it hard for your future GC and yourself!
: 发信人: ashdown (EB1A and NIW), 信区: Immigration
: 标 题: Re: 如何审稿非自己研究方向？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 7 14:23:02 2010, 美东)
: my first review is similar to this,
: I spent a whole week to read the revelant articles on this,
: 相当于writie a proposal in that direction
|
s********n
发帖数: 944 | 9 I guess many associate or Cheif editors do not care whether they understand
the munascripts or not, but make their final decision only based on reviewer
comments.
That is it!
发信人: ashdown (EB1A and NIW), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: 如何审稿非自己研究方向？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 7 15:55:53 2010, 美东)
and the associate editor said that I did a good review :-)
(the associate editor is in the exactly same field as I, so i guess
he does not quite understand it by himself) |
g********e
发帖数: 1638 | 10 My suggestion to you:
If you have the pressure for GC application, you can review this article,
but follow the following steps:
(1) check the website for the authors, see if they are expert in this field.
If they already published a large number of similar articles. Just raise
some tiny suggestions, e.g. figure plot style changes, the discussion should
be further improved and so on.
(2) if the authors are novice, find fault to reject it. This can be done
with the help of your friends who can dig |
|
|
Z***e
发帖数: 2983 | 11 不熟悉很正常
读了Ph.D，什么东西学学就知道了。心头没有底找个懂的人参谋一下。
【在 d********9 的大作中提到】
: 头一次接到审稿邀请， 不是我熟悉的领域。没有头绪如何写comments。
: 多谢大家指点。
|
b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | 12 re
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】
: Re this post (good suggestion)!
: So try it hard for your future GC and yourself!
: 发信人: ashdown (EB1A and NIW), 信区: Immigration
: 标 题: Re: 如何审稿非自己研究方向？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 7 14:23:02 2010, 美东)
: my first review is similar to this,
: I spent a whole week to read the revelant articles on this,
: 相当于writie a proposal in that direction
|
w*********2
发帖数: 5877 | 13 不是自己研究方向太正常了，除非你做的是热门方向，很多人在做，我做的review大多
数都不是自己的研究方向。我觉得Ph.D还是知识面要广一些，不能只局限于自己研究领
域。平时应该多拓宽自己的知识面，多看看别的领域的文章，而且知识面广了也容易有
更多，更新的idea。
【在 d********9 的大作中提到】
: 头一次接到审稿邀请， 不是我熟悉的领域。没有头绪如何写comments。
: 多谢大家指点。
|
s********n
发帖数: 944 | 14 Re 2 posts
发信人: Zhane (上山下乡), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: 如何审稿非自己研究方向？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 7 16:20:56 2010, 美东)
不熟悉很正常
读了Ph.D，什么东西学学就知道了。心头没有底找个懂的人参谋一下。
发信人: wildcat2002 (wildcat02), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: 如何审稿非自己研究方向？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 8 00:04:18 2010, 美东)
不是自己研究方向太正常了，除非你做的是热门方向，很多人在做，我做的review大多
数都不是自己的研究方向。我觉得Ph.D还是知识面要广一些，不能只局限于自己研究领
域。平时应该多拓宽自己的知识面，多看看别的领域的文章，而且知识面广了也容易有
更多，更新的idea。 |
d********2
发帖数: 639 | 15 1.try your best for this review,
2, ask you friend who can do it for you or give you some suggestion. |
d********2
发帖数: 639 | 16 I just doing this kind review, it is heard! |
