s*******g 发帖数: 1514 | 1 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shallowater (shalloWater) 于 (Wed Oct 20 16:00:40 2010, 美东) 提到:
律师写的petition letter在claim的section之后还加了一个对立的section叫“other
evidence of reference and discussion”,里面主要就是引用各个reference letter
的结尾,总结性的说我对U.S的重要性。这个有必要专门留着吗?会不会让人家以为我是
在claim 4点?专门的claim section里面claim了3点:contribution, publication,
review.我在想要不把这些总结性的东西并到contribution里面去?
谢谢!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
banCDM (蚂蚁) 于 (Wed Oct 20 16:02:33 2010, 美东) 提到:
your attorney is correct. This is very important, you can not include in others. If you know basick knowledge about EB1, you'll know why.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shallowater (shalloWater) 于 (Wed Oct 20 16:14:59 2010, 美东) 提到:
i am confused. my attorney is the one who composed the "other" section. i am
the one who is debating whether to include it or not...
or are you saying that i should KEEP the "other" section?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shallowater (shalloWater) 于 (Wed Oct 20 18:29:42 2010, 美东) 提到:
有人提点意见吗?
谢谢了
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shallowater (shalloWater) 于 (Wed Oct 20 22:01:53 2010, 美东) 提到:
唉谁给个意见阿?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
banCDM (蚂蚁) 于 (Thu Oct 21 01:33:28 2010, 美东) 提到:
二楼的答案很明确:“your attorney is correct”,你还有啥不清楚?
到移民局的网站看看EB1B的条件。律师列出的其他一项内容很重要,不能省,也不能加
到其他各项中。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shallowater (shalloWater) 于 (Thu Oct 21 09:14:29 2010, 美东) 提到:
根据这个链接里的要求
http://www.mitbbs.com/bbsann2/life.faq/Immigration/eb1/D12772331162c0/M.1273889972_2.E0/EB1b+applicable+statute
没有提什么“other evidence of reference and discussion”。 USCIS网上也没见着
,能给个链接吗?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
banCDM (蚂蚁) 于 (Thu Oct 21 11:22:33 2010, 美东) 提到:
你最好读几篇PETITION LETTER 扫盲。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
banCDM (蚂蚁) 于 (Thu Oct 21 11:54:50 2010, 美东) 提到:
your attorney is correct
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
superant (zzz) 于 (Thu Oct 21 12:11:59 2010, 美东) 提到:
你不知道现在在搞两步法了?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
shallowater (shalloWater) 于 (Thu Oct 21 12:37:11 2010, 美东) 提到:
thanks all. did not realize that.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
banCDM (蚂蚁) 于 (Mon Oct 25 16:49:54 2010, 美东) 提到:
唉,都给过意见了,“你的律师的写法是对的”为啥还问?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
tiger11117 (tiger11117) 于 (Tue Nov 2 20:38:03 2010, 美东) 提到:
额,我光看成“生活真TMD像杯白开水”了。。。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
ER6640 (BLUEOCEAN) 于 (Wed Nov 3 01:15:57 2010, 美东) 提到:
Your attorney is right. Hard evidence likes skeleton, soft evidence from
your RL is soft tissue and mussle
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
banCDM (蚂蚁) 于 (Fri Nov 12 01:10:04 2010, 美东) 提到:
1 是的, include it
2 对的,i should KEEP the "other" section |
|