由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Immigration版 - [合集] 求助:Eb1a NOID
相关主题
求助:employment verification letter递485需要EMPLOYMENT LETTER 吗?
EB1A file I485 还需要 employment verification letter 么?请教:485的employment letter需要是permanent position么?
EB1A的485面试问题同志们, EB1A 需要 employment verification letter 吗
EB1B Employment Verification Letter or Offer Letter485 紧急求助
[485 rfe]Employment Verification Letter问题我们应该马上递485吗?
Timeline: 140 EB1A TSC PP Approved after NOID申请EB1A 的I-485必须要employment letter吗?
EB-1b permanent position offer letter的问题请问:EB1A 485 employment letter 是必需的吗?
申请485,这样一封非正式的offer letter 可行吗请教一个employment letter 问题(J1 status)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: eb1a话题: noid话题: position
进入Immigration版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
r******s
发帖数: 925
1
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
jocelyni (Jocelyn) 于 (Mon Mar 21 13:55:21 2011, 美东) 提到:
补充一下背景:
美国phD,毕业后在美国top牛小薄厚,已经两年了。递EB1a的时候是薄厚一年半的事。
那时候文章7,第一作者的只有2,没有CNS文章,citation是逐年增加的(当时是80多吧)
claim publication, contribution, media都承认了
review没有claim,因为当时只有10左右吧,结果也承认了。
推荐信6封。
总的来说我毕业时间不长,文章数目有限,case算弱的。所以totality上不知道具体该怎么加强。现在citation和review
的数目都有增加,还有一片挂名的CNS文章投了很可能会发(当然无法在30天内发出来)。但既然claim的都已经承
认,我是不是就不该再纠缠这些了?记得以前看人说凡认可的表示感谢就好了,多说还多错。
除了再厚脸皮找人写推荐信吹自己top %(不知道能不能找到人写这种信),也想不到其他了。非常希望得到大家的指
点!谢谢!!!
---------
等了半年多,结果这样,太打击了。。。还请版上的牛人帮忙指点,我该如何回复。
claim了3条都承认了,然后final merit determination和evidence you are coming
to the US to continue to work
in the area of extraordinary ability没过
具体是这样说的:
USCIS has evaluated the evidence on an individual basis and determined that
you have met at least four
critieria found at xxxx.. USCIS has then examined the record in its totality
, and made a final merits
determination. The record does not demonstrate that you have reached a level
of expertise indicating that
your are one of that small percentage who have risen to the top of your
field of endeavor. Furthermore, the
evidence does not show that your achievements have gained you sustained
national or international acclaim
in your field.
......
You have not established that you are coming to the US to work as in the
field of endeavor, that will permit
you to apply expertise in this area. The record omits either copies of
contract(s), evidence of prearranged
commitments as contracts, or your own statement detailing plans on how you
intend to continue your work
in the US.
Finally, you have failed to establish that your entry into the US will
substantially benefit prospectively the
US. The requirement that your entry substantially benefit prospectively the
US indicates that Congress does
not intend for aliens with extraordinary ability to immigrate to the US and
remain idle. ... in this instance,
you have failed to satisfy the burden of proof. Given your failure to
satisfy any of the statutory
requirements, your substantial benefit cannot be automatically assumed.
倒霉的遇到了director #293
真是逐条分析啊,原来还想着rfe就多攒点证据。但是3条都承认的情况下怎么证明有足
够的merit???
我现在是在top牛小做薄厚的,实验室方向稍微有点变化但是大领域没变,不理解为什
么说我“idle”???而且这个
contract作为eb1a要求也太过了吧,要怎么在现有基础上证明coming to the US to
work as in the field of
endeavor, that will permit you to apply expertise in this area???
大家出出主意吧,之前DIY觉得已经把能弄的都弄上去了,实在是不知道还有什么能补
充的。我是不是该索性不恢复等
杯具,然后重新file呢
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
newnew11 (new) 于 (Mon Mar 21 14:02:53 2011, 美东) 提到:
不太懂,关注并祝福~~~~~

that
totality
level
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
lilybaby (lily) 于 (Mon Mar 21 14:05:30 2011, 美东) 提到:
bless.......
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
lab (天冰大果) 于 (Mon Mar 21 14:20:41 2011, 美东) 提到:
你现在是在美国做薄厚么?
that
totality
level
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
cococa (可可) 于 (Mon Mar 21 14:27:30 2011, 美东) 提到:
再补充吧,应该没问题。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
maxmartin (Jake) 于 (Mon Mar 21 14:32:19 2011, 美东) 提到:
The requirement that your entry substantially benefit prospectively the
US indicates that Congress does
not intend for aliens with extraordinary ability to immigrate to the US and
remain idle. ... in this instance,
you have failed to satisfy the burden of proof. Given your failure to
satisfy any of the statutory
requirements, your substantial benefit cannot be automatically assumed.
My guess is citaion problem, it might be your citaion is high a few years
ago but decreased dramatically recently, just my guess since you did not
provide any background information
that
totality
level
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Greentea10 (随风飘摇) 于 (Mon Mar 21 14:40:46 2011, 美东) 提到:
Bless~
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
jocelyni (Jocelyn) 于 (Mon Mar 21 14:58:23 2011, 美东) 提到:
补充一下背景:
美国phD,毕业后在美国top牛小薄厚,已经两年了。递EB1a的时候是薄厚一年半的事。
那时候文章7,第一作者的只有2,没有CNS文章,citation是逐年增加的(当时是80多
吧)
claim publication, contribution, media都承认了
review没有claim,因为当时只有10左右吧,结果也承认了。
推荐信6封。
总的来说我毕业时间不长,文章数目有限,case算弱的。所以totality上不知道具体该
怎么加强。现在citation和review
的数目都有增加,还有一片挂名的CNS文章投了很可能会发(当然无法在30天内发出来
)。但既然claim的都已经承
认,我是不是就不该再纠缠这些了?记得以前看人说凡认可的表示感谢就好了,多说还
多错。
除了再厚脸皮找人写推荐信吹自己top %(不知道能不能找到人写这种信),也想不到
其他了。非常希望得到大家的指
点!谢谢!!!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
youyou (^右右^心里哇凉哇凉的) 于 (Mon Mar 21 14:58:42 2011, 美东) 提到:
bless
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
chengma (小猪妹妹) 于 (Mon Mar 21 15:01:27 2011, 美东) 提到:
bless. Did you include future research plan in your PL?
补充一下背景:
美国phD,毕业后在美国top牛小薄厚,已经两年了。递EB1a的时候是薄厚一年半的事。
那时候文章7,第一作者的只有2,没有CNS文章,citation是逐年增加的(当时是80多
吧)
claim publication, contribution, media都承认了
review没有claim,因为当时只有10左右吧,结果也承认了。
推荐信6封。
总的来说我毕业时间不长,文章数目有限,case算弱的。所以totality上不知道具体该
怎么加强。现在citation和review
的数目都有增加,还有一片挂名的CNS文章投了很可能会发(当然无法在30天内发出来
)。但既然claim的都已经承
认,我是不是就不该再纠缠这些了?记得以前看人说凡认可的表示感谢就好了,多说还
多错。
除了再厚脸皮找人写推荐信吹自己top %(不知道能不能找到人写这种信),也想不到
其他了。非常希望得到大家的指
点!谢谢!!!
---------
等了半年多,结果这样,太打击了。。。还请版上的牛人帮忙指点,我该如何回复。
claim了3条都承认了,然后final merit determination和evidence you are coming
to the US to continue to work
in the area of extraordinary ability没过
具体是这样说的:
USCIS has evaluated the evidence on an individual basis and determined that
you have met at least four
critieria found at xxxx.. USCIS has then examined the record in its totality
, and made a final merits
determination. The record does not demonstrate that you have reached a level
of expertise indicating that
your are one of that small percentage who have risen to the top of your
field of endeavor. Furthermore, the
evidence does not show that your achievements have gained you sustained
national or international acclaim
in your field.
......
You have not established that you are coming to the US to work as in the
field of endeavor, that will permit
you to apply expertise in this area. The record omits either copies of
contract(s), evidence of prearranged
commitments as contracts, or your own statement detailing plans on how you
intend to continue your work
in the US.
Finally, you have failed to establish that your entry into the US will
substantially benefit prospectively the
US. The requirement that your entry substantially benefit prospectively the
US indicates that Congress does
not intend for aliens with extraordinary ability to immigrate to the US and
remain idle. ... in this instance,
you have failed to satisfy the burden of proof. Given your failure to
satisfy any of the statutory
requirements, your substantial benefit cannot be automatically assumed.
倒霉的遇到了director #293
真是逐条分析啊,原来还想着rfe就多攒点证据。但是3条都承认的情况下怎么证明有足
够的merit???
我现在是在top牛小做薄厚的,实验室方向稍微有点变化但是大领域没变,不理解为什
么说我“idle”???而且这个
contract作为eb1a要求也太过了吧,要怎么在现有基础上证明coming to the US to
work as in the field of
endeavor, that will permit you to apply expertise in this area???
大家出出主意吧,之前DIY觉得已经把能弄的都弄上去了,实在是不知道还有什么能补
充的。我是不是该索性不恢复等
杯具,然后重新file呢
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
hjblue5 (Dave) 于 (Mon Mar 21 15:04:18 2011, 美东) 提到:
Bless!
多吧)
该怎么加强。现在citation和review
来)。但既然claim的都已经承
还多错。
到其他了。非常希望得到大家的指
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
iq350 (iq350) 于 (Mon Mar 21 15:20:11 2011, 美东) 提到:
把你的合同,research plan都加上
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
jocelyni (Jocelyn) 于 (Mon Mar 21 15:50:08 2011, 美东) 提到:
薄厚有合同么?
让老板/秘书开个证明信可行么
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
jocelyni (Jocelyn) 于 (Mon Mar 21 15:53:21 2011, 美东) 提到:
future plan提了,但是没有说很详细,也就写了两三句话。这么说我应该展开写很多
吗?是否要具体提到打算做到什么程度的faculty之类的?
谢谢!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
analogs (analogs) 于 (Mon Mar 21 15:56:34 2011, 美东) 提到:
看我的帖子并帮我顶!
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/31904445.html
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
maxmartin (Jake) 于 (Mon Mar 21 16:35:14 2011, 美东) 提到:
I even have no future plans, it is very weird for VO to sak for those
evidence especially for EB1A, it might have something to do with how you
constructed your PL, anyway best wishes
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
eccentric (eccentric) 于 (Mon Mar 21 17:45:57 2011, 美东) 提到:
bless
多吧)
该怎么加强。现在citation和review
来)。但既然claim的都已经承
还多错。
到其他了。非常希望得到大家的指
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
pasa123 (yy) 于 (Mon Mar 21 17:48:50 2011, 美东) 提到:
bless
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
ruokey (ruok) 于 (Mon Mar 21 18:06:58 2011, 美东) 提到:
There is obviously something wrong with your PL. The loopholes are so big
that the IO easily take you down.
Suggestion: read 20 PLs of other people and find out what's wrong with yours.
多吧)
该怎么加强。现在citation和review
来)。但既然claim的都已经承
还多错。
到其他了。非常希望得到大家的指
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
brighttiger (hehehehe) 于 (Mon Mar 21 18:23:11 2011, 美东) 提到:
bless
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
jocelyni (Jocelyn) 于 (Mon Mar 21 19:53:48 2011, 美东) 提到:
可以说的更详细么,为什么说有明显的loophole?
因为是DIY,之前也参考了许许多多的PL——可能我理解能力有限还是没弄明白自己的
。如果漏洞严重,为什么又要承认我的claim呢
yours.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
jocelyni (Jocelyn) 于 (Mon Mar 21 21:27:36 2011, 美东) 提到:
顺便请教班上牛人:
和editor要推荐信的信是怎么写的?
因为原来没claim review,都是给教授写信,自我介绍贴个简历。向editor要应该不一
样吧,请问具体是怎么写的?只写我给你review过几篇文章,能不能给我写封推荐信吗?
谢谢!!!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
xunhu2000 (michael) 于 (Tue Mar 22 17:47:21 2011, 美东) 提到:
co ask
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
ruokey (ruok) 于 (Tue Mar 22 23:48:47 2011, 美东) 提到:
A PL that includes an Introduction, arguments and evidences for at least
three of the things to claim,and a Summary and/or Conclusion section is
insufficient and inadequate.(Totality can be included in or separated from
the Summary/Conclusion section.)
You need to include a seperate section for "I SEEK TO BE ADMITTED TO THE
UNITED STATES TO
CONTINUE MY WORK IN MY AREA OF EXTRAORDINARY ABILITY AND SUBSTANTIALLY
BENEFIT PROSPECTIVELY THE UNITED STATES." (two pages enough). This section
should cover some of the questions in the NOID notice.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
secondfool (secondfool) 于 (Wed Mar 23 15:07:18 2011, 美东) 提到:
you'd better to get one employment letter form your department, in which
your position should be considered as permant position.
1 (共1页)
进入Immigration版参与讨论
相关主题
请教一个employment letter 问题(J1 status)[485 rfe]Employment Verification Letter问题
大麻烦,请教!Timeline: 140 EB1A TSC PP Approved after NOID
请教employment letterEB-1b permanent position offer letter的问题
关于是否需要Employment verification Letter申请485,这样一封非正式的offer letter 可行吗
求助:employment verification letter递485需要EMPLOYMENT LETTER 吗?
EB1A file I485 还需要 employment verification letter 么?请教:485的employment letter需要是permanent position么?
EB1A的485面试问题同志们, EB1A 需要 employment verification letter 吗
EB1B Employment Verification Letter or Offer Letter485 紧急求助
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: eb1a话题: noid话题: position