L******r
发帖数: 141 | 1 I think this topic is worth to open a new thread.
This is for EB1A.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bao Zi please you think it's helpful.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
We have come across those questions many times, including myself.
Question(1): should I claim media report if there are some reports
about my
work, such as Faculty 1000, preview, research highlights, internet
medias,
detailed discussion about my work in review papers...
Question (2): Should I claim 'judge others' work' if I have only
reviewed 5
or 6 papers?
Typical answer to question (1):
No, this is about your work, not you. This argument is backed by Zac
Liu.
Typical answer to question (2):
No. You should have at least >10, or 15 or 20 etc.
My point is: it depends. In some situations, the answer is yes for
either
question.
However, the prerequisite is you HAVE TO meet authorship and
contribution
first.
If you only have reports about your work and don't have a good number
of
reviews, you should claim a 'media report' and file an application,
because
you don't have other options! It may be a bit risky but is not a
mission
impossible. Maybe at the time you are preparing for and waiting for
your
I140, you should look for some papers to review.
If you only have a few number of reviews and don't have other options
to
claim, you should claim a 'judge other' work' and file an application.
It
may be a bit risky but is not a mission impossible. Maybe at the time
you
are preparing for and waiting for your I140, you should look for some
reviews.
The point is that you don't do it, you get nothing. You do it, you put
$520
at the risk vs you probably get passed.
I believe IOs judge one's application based on her/his overall quality
of
the research.
For the people have both reports about your work and a good number of
reviews, you are free to claim them or put them into contribution, as
far as
you have met three.
So just do it, otherwise you get NOTHING. | l**w
发帖数: 865 | 2 I remember that Liu Law said
Reports about your works, such as those from F1000 are good for 1B, but
useless for 1A.
my
5
【在 L******r 的大作中提到】
: I think this topic is worth to open a new thread.
: This is for EB1A.
: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
: Bao Zi please you think it's helpful.
: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
: We have come across those questions many times, including myself.
: Question(1): should I claim media report if there are some reports
: about my
: work, such as Faculty 1000, preview, research highlights, internet
: medias,
| L******r
发帖数: 141 | 3 He is conservative which doesn't mean he is an authority. One thing for
sure is that he is misleading.
If you ask other lawyers, they may have different opinions.
We have seen some cases people passed by claim 'media report' using
these material for EB1A.
Again, it depends on your overall research quality.
but
【在 l**w 的大作中提到】
: I remember that Liu Law said
: Reports about your works, such as those from F1000 are good for 1B, but
: useless for 1A.
:
: my
: 5
| j*****a
发帖数: 489 | 4 我申请EB-1A, 我的媒体报道被要求:
Additional published material that relates to the beneficiary and the
beneficiary’s work in the field;
• Documentary evidence that the submitted published material was
primarily about the beneficiary and the beneficiary’s work in the field
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32097771.html
我想可以试试的. |
|
