w****i
发帖数: 520 | 1 大家好，在准备RFE，前几天收到一个杂志设的paper invitation （感觉是另外一个行
业）,请问大家觉得这能作为一个 "Objective documentary evidence of the
significance of your contribution to the field"
找这个objective evidence好难啊，尤其对我们这种冷门专业，冷门方向，没有多少
citation的人来说。。。
RFE看上去很多人都能过，但也看了不少人的经验说明，如果证据没有找好，很容易阴
沟里面翻船, 好担心啊。。。。。。 | w***a
发帖数: 792 | 2 no, unless you did response to the invitation and contributed a paper to the
journal. | w****i
发帖数: 520 | 3 谢谢 wenha的回答，其实这封邮件具体的内容是：
Dear Dr. xxx,
I am Bella, the editor of Journal of Food Research which is a peer reviewed,
open access journal published by Canadian Center of Science and Education.
I have read your paper titled "XXX", which was published on "International
Journal of XXX". I believe you are an expert in this area, and that is what
I am interested.
Right now, with the Next issue scheduled to publish in February 2012, it is
a great pleasure to invite you to contribute your best knowledge and
research. Your contribution will help us to establish a high standard. If
you are interested, please find the journal’s profile at: http://www.ccsenet.org/jfr and submit your manuscripts online. Or you can send your paper directly to the e-mail: j*[email protected].
Journal of Food Research publishes original research and review papers XXXXX
这个里面讲到了我是个expert,其实我就是想在这个RFE的response里面加一条证据：I
have been recognized as "expert" in the field and been invited to contribute
my best knowledge and research in related field, such as food science, it
suggests that my contribution has been influencing the field as a whole.
有点犹豫这个到底能不能成为一个objective evidence,毕竟人家说我是个expert;再说
我claim的领域完全不同于food science，这个也可以证明我的contribution
influence到了 the field as a whole嘛。。
不晓得这样的claim到底好还是不好，要不要干脆不要用？ | A**********n
发帖数: 824 | 4 As one opinion, I agree with what you thought:
"人家说我是个expert;再说我claim的领域完全不同于food science，这个也可以证明我的contributioninfluence到了 the field as a whole嘛。"
No matter whether you did anything on this invitation or not, at the moment that you received that letter, you had already had "人家说我是个expert;再说我claim的领域完全不同于food science，这个也可以证明我的contributioninfluence到了 the field as a whole嘛。".
If you can let IO believe that this journal is on the top level, this invitation must be a very good one, I think.
【在 w****i 的大作中提到】
: 大家好，在准备RFE，前几天收到一个杂志设的paper invitation （感觉是另外一个行
: 业）,请问大家觉得这能作为一个 "Objective documentary evidence of the
: significance of your contribution to the field"
: 找这个objective evidence好难啊，尤其对我们这种冷门专业，冷门方向，没有多少
: citation的人来说。。。
: RFE看上去很多人都能过，但也看了不少人的经验说明，如果证据没有找好，很容易阴
: 沟里面翻船, 好担心啊。。。。。。
| p*******l
发帖数: 2495 | 5 You can use this letter to prove your top standing in your research field (
totality). | w***a
发帖数: 792 | 6 with the detailed information and the positive comments in this email. I
think it's an objective evidence for your contribution and influence. I was
thinking those general invitation email sent to everybody. Food science is
not your field, but it is an allied field of your expertise.So I support you
to use this email in your RFE respond.
reviewed,
.
what
is
【在 w****i 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢 wenha的回答，其实这封邮件具体的内容是：
: Dear Dr. xxx,
: I am Bella, the editor of Journal of Food Research which is a peer reviewed,
: open access journal published by Canadian Center of Science and Education.
: I have read your paper titled "XXX", which was published on "International
: Journal of XXX". I believe you are an expert in this area, and that is what
: I am interested.
: Right now, with the Next issue scheduled to publish in February 2012, it is
: a great pleasure to invite you to contribute your best knowledge and
: research. Your contribution will help us to establish a high standard. If
| w****i
发帖数: 520 | 7 谢谢 wenha，pimpernel ，AdropInOcean 你们的回复和帮忙！
这几天为了这东西都愁死了，老婆等着这东西能早日出来帮她申请EAD卡， 看了网上有
些人阴沟里面翻船了，好担心自己也一样。
今天弄了一整天，感觉RFE response letter跟前几天的相比，脱胎换骨了一样，TMD这
移民局还不让我过就真的没天理了。。。 |
|
