b*******H
发帖数: 830 | 1 以前在这里询问过几次了，目前在准备response letter, 又有几个问题。还请大家耐
心地看完并回复一下两个问题：
1.在CLAIM老三项中，要求补CONTRIBUTION的材料。但律师说要把原来没有CLAIM的几项
也加进去。自觉地这样会不会画蛇添足？
2.有过RFE的专家们一般在CONTRIBUTION这一块回复多少页的文字。感觉也就三五页的
事。但看过几个模板，包括本站的，都是几十页，很恐怖。肚子没那么多的墨水啊。 |
b*******H
发帖数: 830 | |
k******e
发帖数: 8870 | 3 1. quite not agree with your attorney. there's really no need to add other c
laims. all other materials not used before could be used to support what are
challenged.
2. some ppl suggest to treat RFE as an original petition, other recommend ju
st address the IO's questions point to point. again, the length should not m
atter that much. what does matter is to make everything clear and to the poi
nt!
good luck!
【在 b*******H 的大作中提到】
: 以前在这里询问过几次了，目前在准备response letter, 又有几个问题。还请大家耐
: 心地看完并回复一下两个问题：
: 1.在CLAIM老三项中，要求补CONTRIBUTION的材料。但律师说要把原来没有CLAIM的几项
: 也加进去。自觉地这样会不会画蛇添足？
: 2.有过RFE的专家们一般在CONTRIBUTION这一块回复多少页的文字。感觉也就三五页的
: 事。但看过几个模板，包括本站的，都是几十页，很恐怖。肚子没那么多的墨水啊。
|
b*******H
发帖数: 830 | 4 very professional suggestion.
I appreciate it.
c
are
ju
m
poi
【在 k******e 的大作中提到】
: 1. quite not agree with your attorney. there's really no need to add other c
: laims. all other materials not used before could be used to support what are
: challenged.
: 2. some ppl suggest to treat RFE as an original petition, other recommend ju
: st address the IO's questions point to point. again, the length should not m
: atter that much. what does matter is to make everything clear and to the poi
: nt!
: good luck!
|
j****t
发帖数: 1663 | 5 1.claim 老三样比较保险
2.页数应人而异，认真回复IO的每一条问题就行！ |
b*******H
发帖数: 830 | 6 严重同意。
顺便再发几点不解，是对站里的模板的：
1.OBJECTIVE DOCUMENTS.感觉应该用那些网站，评论，或证书之类比较客观的材料来回
答。而不是用“I am the first...."。不过那样就真地干巴巴的了。
2. 其他两项就纯粹是引用和推荐信了。
如此下来，也就三五页的事。但会比较心虚。毕竟成功的模板是洋洋洒洒几十页啊。
【在 j****t 的大作中提到】
: 1.claim 老三样比较保险
: 2.页数应人而异，认真回复IO的每一条问题就行！
|
