|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l**x
发帖数: 86 | 1 昨天发帖说了给TSC Followup发信问进度，刚开始不给查，我又Argue了一下，今天刚
才我说回信说：
“Your case has been staged for assignment to an officer for review and
adjudication. I cannot provide you with an accurate processing time at the
moment.”
这看来是说已经分给IO了，只是扔角落了是吧？？ 只是想确认别卡在Name Check上了
，求知道流程的达人解释。
另外，看到版上另外一个2月的做了SR，回复是：
“I checked our systems, your cases are in queue awaiting to be assigned to
an Adjudication officer. Your patience is very much appreciated.”
这两个回复意思差不多吧 (貌似给我的回复还说的乐观点，我的Case已经分给IO了（
has been staged。。。）？？？。。。。。看来是同命相怜啊。。。。。 | s******4
发帖数: 1322 | 2 My understanding that likely the two cases are the same. Yours is in a queue
to be assigned to IO for decision.
If it was "has been assigned" instead of "been staged for assignment" I
would say that your case is with IO.
the
to
【在 l**x 的大作中提到】
: 昨天发帖说了给TSC Followup发信问进度，刚开始不给查，我又Argue了一下，今天刚
: 才我说回信说：
: “Your case has been staged for assignment to an officer for review and
: adjudication. I cannot provide you with an accurate processing time at the
: moment.”
: 这看来是说已经分给IO了，只是扔角落了是吧？？ 只是想确认别卡在Name Check上了
: ，求知道流程的达人解释。
: 另外，看到版上另外一个2月的做了SR，回复是：
: “I checked our systems, your cases are in queue awaiting to be assigned to
: an Adjudication officer. Your patience is very much appreciated.”
| w********y
发帖数: 269 | 3 二月那个是我发的。 两个回复看来一个意思。 这不会是官方敷衍回复吧。
我也想知道是不是name check clear了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
