t*******h
发帖数: 71 | 1 我claim的是老三样，被RFE的是original contribution的部分。质疑的内容：
1）fall short of indicating other professionals in the beneficiary's field
have relied on the beneficiary's published material
2) the record does not establish that the beneficiary's published articles
have garnered the attention of other professionals throughout her field
3) little evidence was submitted establishing that the beneficiary's work
has already had on the field as a whole
4) without corroborating facts or statistics, it is insufficient to
establish that the beneficiary has made a contribution of major significance
to the field.
To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's contribution s are
original and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
1) objective documentary evidence of the significanc of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
2)documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently the
beneficiary's work important
3)testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance.
4)Evidence that the beneficiary's major significanct contributions has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
5)Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others
以上是我摘抄的我觉得主要的部分，希望有经验的人帮我出一下主意 |
h*****b
发帖数: 492 | 2 模板回复吧
significance
【在 t*******h 的大作中提到】
: 我claim的是老三样，被RFE的是original contribution的部分。质疑的内容：
: 1）fall short of indicating other professionals in the beneficiary's field
: have relied on the beneficiary's published material
: 2) the record does not establish that the beneficiary's published articles
: have garnered the attention of other professionals throughout her field
: 3) little evidence was submitted establishing that the beneficiary's work
: has already had on the field as a whole
: 4) without corroborating facts or statistics, it is insufficient to
: establish that the beneficiary has made a contribution of major significance
: to the field.
|
t*******h
发帖数: 71 | 3 my background: citation 175, independent testimonial letters 10, 文章6，三篇
10分左右的一作文章。
大家帮我指引一下回复的方向。
我的case是7号delivered,22号才更新，今天check邮箱才发现信已经寄到了，17号就发
出来了。
officer 1056 |
b****k
发帖数: 409 | 4 趕緊找個靠譜的律師，估計是petition letter的問題。你DIY的還是律師？good luck
！ |
t*******h
发帖数: 71 | |
l****x
发帖数: 200 | 6 看来只能继续深挖contribution, 再要推荐信啦 |
p********r
发帖数: 3243 | |
t*******h
发帖数: 71 | 8 谢谢回复的同学
本来还以为过节IO心情会好，赶着节前交上去了，没想到还是不行。 |
w******n
发帖数: 13202 | 9 多挖掘亮点吧。引用数量还是可以的，不知道找的亮点，具体实在么？ |
d*******e
发帖数: 1649 | 10 硬件条件还可以，看来是材料没有组织好的原因。应该多挖掘亮点，还有推荐信是不是
有问题？要么是没写对要么没有引用对。bless...
significance
【在 t*******h 的大作中提到】
: 我claim的是老三样，被RFE的是original contribution的部分。质疑的内容：
: 1）fall short of indicating other professionals in the beneficiary's field
: have relied on the beneficiary's published material
: 2) the record does not establish that the beneficiary's published articles
: have garnered the attention of other professionals throughout her field
: 3) little evidence was submitted establishing that the beneficiary's work
: has already had on the field as a whole
: 4) without corroborating facts or statistics, it is insufficient to
: establish that the beneficiary has made a contribution of major significance
: to the field.
|
|
|
h****4
发帖数: 634 | |
c****x
发帖数: 367 | 12 你就找楼上的pumahunter,ta都说可以过了! :)
Bless you! |
c****x
发帖数: 367 | 13 你就找楼上的pumahunter,ta都说可以过了! :)
Bless you! |
r*****n
发帖数: 753 | 14 最近很多人都认为快过年io心情会好，如果所有人都在这个时间段pp，不难想象io又会
是什么心情。模版回复，显然最近io已经身心疲惫了。好好准备深挖亮点应该没有问题。 |
t*******h
发帖数: 71 | 15 谢谢大家。考古了一下午，看大家说是routine的RFE才心安了一点。继续挖亮点吧。 |
z*******g
发帖数: 5721 | 16 我建议你找个律师吧，我推荐你找Wegreend家，他们还挺靠谱的。好好回复一下，说不
定就过了。 |
m**c
发帖数: 143 | 17 我的比你弱多了,前几天pp过了。你肯定没问题,再好好准备吧。 |
z******i
发帖数: 609 | 18 10个独立的推荐信.
这个是极其罕见的,信里面提到你对推荐人的具体贡献了么？
【在 t*******h 的大作中提到】
: my background: citation 175, independent testimonial letters 10, 文章6，三篇
: 10分左右的一作文章。
: 大家帮我指引一下回复的方向。
: 我的case是7号delivered,22号才更新，今天check邮箱才发现信已经寄到了，17号就发
: 出来了。
: officer 1056
|
t*******h
发帖数: 71 | 19 8封独立推荐信，主要是有的人一开始没回复，过了两个星期又回复说可以写。所以就
多了，当时想着多多益善就都放上了。早知道应该留下两封了。都是引用我paper或者
找我要过实验材料的。信里面也都写了对推荐人的贡献。
可能其他的部分亮点挖掘不够吧。
还有一个问题，重新要推荐信的话，可以和以前的内容有重叠吗？文章的citation集中
在两篇文章上，所以关于我工作的部分实在写不出新意来。
在写response的时候可以提到之前提供的推荐信吗？提到的时候需要在新的list上再提
供一次吗？ |
