h**********5
发帖数: 1636 | 1 不好意思，是个老话题了，但是网上看到的各种版本实在令人费解
本人的485是基于已经批准的eb1a I140
1：是不是最近新规是按照140批准的日期开始算这个180天的。然后180天内不能换
employer？
2：就算拿到EAD也不行么？
3：还是说eb1a和eb1b是有区别的？
4：如果换了employer是不是直接485作废了？
多谢各位了，祝板上各位早绿 |
c******3
发帖数: 6509 | |
C********e
发帖数: 492 | 3 你只需要证明（超过50%的可信度）你将要在拿到绿卡后从事和140上同一个领域的工作。
你现在一直从事同领域的工作是最好的证明；别的方法也可以。和180天没有关系。
我稍微吐槽一下：楼主为什么不能自己读一遍新规定呢
【在 h**********5 的大作中提到】
: 不好意思，是个老话题了，但是网上看到的各种版本实在令人费解
: 本人的485是基于已经批准的eb1a I140
: 1：是不是最近新规是按照140批准的日期开始算这个180天的。然后180天内不能换
: employer？
: 2：就算拿到EAD也不行么？
: 3：还是说eb1a和eb1b是有区别的？
: 4：如果换了employer是不是直接485作废了？
: 多谢各位了，祝板上各位早绿
|
w******n
发帖数: 13202 | 4 1A的485申请收据上也写着需要180天后才能换工作。
你看你的收据就可以知道。
虽然这么说，USCIS会不会enforce就不好说了，因为有人换了也没事。所以，这个东西
，就看USCIS抓不抓。 |
h**********5
发帖数: 1636 | 5 实在感谢你的回复，新规是说PD从140开始批而不是从485RD开始批，但是还是有180天
的问题。
说实话pijiang的博客也看过了，21Act 原文也看过。感觉21act原文是说所有eb都不可
以换工作，但是pijiang的意思是原雇主不追究就没问题，但是1a不是应该没有原雇主
的问题么？
作。
【在 C********e 的大作中提到】
: 你只需要证明（超过50%的可信度）你将要在拿到绿卡后从事和140上同一个领域的工作。
: 你现在一直从事同领域的工作是最好的证明；别的方法也可以。和180天没有关系。
: 我稍微吐槽一下：楼主为什么不能自己读一遍新规定呢
|
h**********5
发帖数: 1636 | 6 回去看了下，主卡485上面有180天的提醒，副卡485没有。。。。
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: 1A的485申请收据上也写着需要180天后才能换工作。
: 你看你的收据就可以知道。
: 虽然这么说，USCIS会不会enforce就不好说了，因为有人换了也没事。所以，这个东西
: ，就看USCIS抓不抓。
|
w******n
发帖数: 13202 | 7 副卡和H4类似，比主卡和H1的自由度高
【在 h**********5 的大作中提到】
: 回去看了下，主卡485上面有180天的提醒，副卡485没有。。。。
|
g*******1
发帖数: 40 | 8 同学们：
我拷贝我的收据原文“ as a reminder, you may request to change employers
under INA 204(j) if your Form I-485 adjustment application has been pending
for at least 180 days and your underlying form I-140 is approved or is still
pending". 意思很明显是从receipt date开始算180天。不然为什么题或140 是
pending 也算呢？ 如果从I140 批准开始算，pending 肯定是不能算的。所以，为了安
全起见， 从receipt date 开始等待180天就应该可以算了。
当然，我们10月到今年4月如果还没有批，就可以换工作了。我也问了我的移民律师了
，他认为我的理解是对的。从现在的速度看，4月之前批准应该问题不大。 |
C********e
发帖数: 492 | 9 你的485收据上是一个统一的说明，不是针对eb1a，所以用的是"may"。
这里贴几个关于180天以及换工作的原文（https://www.federalregister.gov/
documents/2016/11/18/2016-27540/retention-of-eb-1-eb-2-and-eb-3-immigrant-
workers-and-program-improvements-affecting-high-skilled）
---- Retention of employment-based immigrant visa petitions. To enhance job
portability for certain workers with approved Form I-140 petitions in the EB
-1, second preference (EB-2), and third preference (EB-3) categories, but
who are unable to obtain LPR status due to immigrant visa backlogs, the
final rule provides that Form I-140 petitions that have been approved for
180 days or more would no longer be subject to automatic revocation based
solely on withdrawal by the petitioner or the termination of the petitioner'
s business. See final 8 CFR 205.1(a)(3)(iii)(C) and (D).
这里USCIS明确说了140批准180天后除非造假等原因，雇主即使withdrawal申请也不会
被revoke。
------ Validity of petition for continued eligibility for adjustment of
status. In the final rule, DHS is responding to public comment by amending
proposed 8 CFR 245.25(a), which governs the circumstances in which an
individual with a pending application for adjustment of status can move to a
job in the same or a similar occupational classification. In particular,
revisions are being made to implement DHS's current section 204(j)
portability policy and longstanding practice related to the adjudication of
qualifying Form I-140 petitions that are not approved at the time the
beneficiary's application for adjustment of status has been pending for 180
days or more.
这里明确说了如果140没批准，485pending超过180天，也可以换到相同领域的工作。
Comment. One commenter suggested changes to the regulatory text concerning
the requirement that the Form I-140 petition be approved for 180 days or
more. Specifically, the commenter recommended amending the text to make
clear that the 180-day threshold would not apply in cases in which an
applicant has a pending Application to Register Permanent Residence or
Adjust Status (Form I-485) that may provide job portability under INA 204(j)
. The commenter stated that, as proposed, the regulation would create a “
double” waiting period in the portability context, requiring the foreign
national to wait 180 days from approval of the Form I-140 petition and an
additional 180 days from filing of the application of adjustment of status
in order to be able to move to a new position. The commenter believed this
outcome would be inconsistent with congressional intent under AC21.
Response. DHS thanks the commenter for identifying the potential for
confusion given the text of proposed § 205.1(a)(3)(iii)(C) and (D)
and DHS's stated goal to codify and expand upon its existing policy
implementing INA 204(j). DHS proposed to allow a Form I-140 petition to
remain valid for certain purposes if such a petition was withdrawn or the
petitioner's business terminated 180 days or more after the Form I-140
petition had been approved.
This provision was intended to build upon existing DHS policies that have
governed the validity of Form I-140 petitions in the event of withdrawal or
business termination before and after beneficiaries are eligible to change
jobs or employers under INA 204(j). DHS did not intend that its regulatory
proposal would modify the existing timeframe before an individual would
become eligible to port under INA 204(j); rather, this provision was
intended to protect those individuals who are not yet eligible for INA 204(j
) portability from the automatic revocation of the approval of a Form I-140
petition that had been approved for 180 days or more. Consistent with the
intent of AC21 and DHS policy, DHS is revising the regulatory language at 8
CFR 205.1(a)(3)(iii)(C) and (D) to make clear that an approved Form I-140
petition involving withdrawal or business termination occurring 180 days or
more after either petition approval or the filing of an associated
application for adjustment of status remains approved, unless its approval
is revoked on other grounds. See final 8 CFR 205.1(a)(3)(iii).
这里是说，140批准的日期和485提交的日期，可以取较早的那个“to make clear that
an approved Form I-140 petition involving withdrawal or business
termination occurring 180 days or more after either petition approval or the
filing of an associated application for adjustment of status remains
approved”
Comment. Several commenters asked for clarification on whether individuals
granted EB-2 national interest waivers would be required to file Supplement
J.
Response. Grantees of national interest waivers will not be required to file
Supplement J. Individuals seeking immigrant visas under certain employment-
based immigrant visa categories do not require job offers from employers,
including those filing EB-1 petitions as an alien of extraordinary ability
and those filing EB-2 petitions based on a national interest waiver, which
waives the normal EB-2 job offer requirement when DHS determines that doing
so is in the national interest. See 8 CFR 204.5(h)(5) and (k)(4)(ii). An
individual classified as an alien of extraordinary ability or granted a
national interest waiver is not required to demonstrate a job offer at the
time of adjudication of the Form I-485 application and therefore would not
need to submit Supplement J (although they are not precluded from doing so).
However, USCIS may inquire whether such applicants are continuing to work
in the area or field that forms the basis of their immigrant visa
eligibility. USCIS may also assess inadmissibility by determining whether an
individual would likely become a public charge under INA 212(a)(4). USCIS
revised the Supplement J instructions to clarify that the form need not be
filed by aliens of extraordinary ability or individuals applying for
adjustment of status on the basis of a national interest waiver.
这里讲了eb1a和NIW不需要有工作，更不用提换工作了。注意这句：“An individual
classified as an alien of extraordinary ability or granted a national
interest waiver is not required to demonstrate a job offer at the time of
adjudication of the Form I-485 application”。但是，如我前面回帖所说，你需要
证明自己还在同领域工作：“However, USCIS may inquire whether such applicants
are continuing to work in the area or field that forms the basis of their
immigrant visa eligibility”。
pending
still
【在 g*******1 的大作中提到】
: 同学们：
: 我拷贝我的收据原文“ as a reminder, you may request to change employers
: under INA 204(j) if your Form I-485 adjustment application has been pending
: for at least 180 days and your underlying form I-140 is approved or is still
: pending". 意思很明显是从receipt date开始算180天。不然为什么题或140 是
: pending 也算呢？ 如果从I140 批准开始算，pending 肯定是不能算的。所以，为了安
: 全起见， 从receipt date 开始等待180天就应该可以算了。
: 当然，我们10月到今年4月如果还没有批，就可以换工作了。我也问了我的移民律师了
: ，他认为我的理解是对的。从现在的速度看，4月之前批准应该问题不大。
|
g*******1
发帖数: 40 | 10 谢谢Cannonlake 的解释。以前一直没有读这些东西。学习了：）。 如果换工作，我的
律师建议还是用transfer H1而不用工卡说是安全。 |
h**********5
发帖数: 1636 | 11 对的，以前都是按485R'd算，最近该了新规则按照140ad算了。
pending
still
【在 g*******1 的大作中提到】
: 同学们：
: 我拷贝我的收据原文“ as a reminder, you may request to change employers
: under INA 204(j) if your Form I-485 adjustment application has been pending
: for at least 180 days and your underlying form I-140 is approved or is still
: pending". 意思很明显是从receipt date开始算180天。不然为什么题或140 是
: pending 也算呢？ 如果从I140 批准开始算，pending 肯定是不能算的。所以，为了安
: 全起见， 从receipt date 开始等待180天就应该可以算了。
: 当然，我们10月到今年4月如果还没有批，就可以换工作了。我也问了我的移民律师了
: ，他认为我的理解是对的。从现在的速度看，4月之前批准应该问题不大。
|
g*******1
发帖数: 40 | 12
那就是说，我们10月递交的还是按485 RD 算。现在按 140 approval date 算。好复杂
。
【在 h**********5 的大作中提到】
: 对的，以前都是按485R'd算，最近该了新规则按照140ad算了。
:
: pending
: still
|
h**********5
发帖数: 1636 | 13 我的理解是按照新规，所有人的180天计算日期都提前了。尽管有些人可能就几个礼拜
，有些人可能会好几个月。
【在 g*******1 的大作中提到】
:
: 那就是说，我们10月递交的还是按485 RD 算。现在按 140 approval date 算。好复杂
: 。
|
