p****d
发帖数: 16 | |
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 2 compare jsf to jsp is like compare Ford Explorer to SUV
【在 p****d 的大作中提到】
: jsp更好吗？
|
g******e
发帖数: 3760 | 3 不过他的标题还是对的。几年前做过struts和webwork，去年公司有人开始作JSF，好像
现在挺火的，那位把java front end给小结一下？
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: compare jsf to jsp is like compare Ford Explorer to SUV
|
m**c
发帖数: 192 | 4 这两个基本没有可比性
【在 p****d 的大作中提到】
: jsp更好吗？
|
w******n
发帖数: 692 | 5 You should compare JSF with AJAX framework(not those AJAX Framework based on
JSF). I like pure javascript AJAX solution. Maybe someone would suggest
stay away with javascript. That is up to you. Probably you could check the
link http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=36601 and get some idea on it.
【在 p****d 的大作中提到】
: jsp更好吗？
|
s******e
发帖数: 493 | 6 Well. JSF, struts, webwork, spring MVC, etc. are all framework. Basically
they are the implementation of fronter controller pattern with some added
features.
JSP, velocity, etc. are just view template technologies.Just like you render
ur models in pdf, excel, etc. |
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 7 I take javascript as a serious language as I have to.
That being said, it's still a pain in the ass compared to Java.
There are some stupid design in language. e.g. A list of options,
the options.length becomes undefined when there's only one element,
which just doesn't make sense and make it more difficult for programming.
The biggest pain in the ass, M$ sucks big time, they never respect
standard, and you have to do some trick here and there to make
IE compatible.
on
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: You should compare JSF with AJAX framework(not those AJAX Framework based on
: JSF). I like pure javascript AJAX solution. Maybe someone would suggest
: stay away with javascript. That is up to you. Probably you could check the
: link http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=36601 and get some idea on it.
|
a**e
发帖数: 5794 | 8 用jsp直接写界面呢？
【在 m**c 的大作中提到】
: 这两个基本没有可比性
|
