q*********u
发帖数: 280 | 1 比如利用一个ext gwt样式的网站，有登录什么的保护住，这样算是控制一下能够准许
登录的人，
那么这个合法性到底怎么算呢？ | g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 2 check its license and how you implement it.
LGPL means if you don't need to modify its source, not opening yours
is fine. Otherwise you should check its commercial license instead.
【在 q*********u 的大作中提到】
: 比如利用一个ext gwt样式的网站，有登录什么的保护住，这样算是控制一下能够准许
: 登录的人，
: 那么这个合法性到底怎么算呢？
| q*********u
发帖数: 280 | 3 Cool!
很牛的总结
的确看到LGPL在sencha的list里面
Open Source License List
License name Version(s)/Copyright Date
Academic Free License 2.0
Apache Software License 2.0
Apple Public Source License 2.0
Artistic license From Perl 5.8.0
BSD license "July 22 1999"
Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL) 1.0
Common Public License 1.0
Eclipse Public License 1.0
Educational Community License 2.0
GNU General Public License (GPL) 2.0
GNU Library or "Lesser" General Public License (LGPL) 3.0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jabber Open Source License 1.0
MIT License (As listed in file MIT-License.txt) -
Mozilla Public License (MPL) 1.0/1.1
Open Software License 2.0
OpenSSL license (with original SSLeay license) "2003" ("1998")
PHP License 3.0
Python license (CNRI Python License) -
Python Software Foundation License 2.1.1
Sleepycat License "1999"
University of Illinois/NCSA Open Source License -
W3C License "2001"
X11 License "2001"
Zlib/libpng License -
Zope Public License 2.0
check its license and how you implement it.
LGPL means if you don't need to modify its source, not opening yours
is fine. Otherwise you should check its commercial license instead.
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: check its license and how you implement it.
: LGPL means if you don't need to modify its source, not opening yours
: is fine. Otherwise you should check its commercial license instead.
|
|
