w******n
发帖数: 692 | 1 哪种最流行， JBOSS， Orion，还有什么别的么? |
r*****s
发帖数: 985 | 2 weblogic
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: 哪种最流行， JBOSS， Orion，还有什么别的么?
|
w******n
发帖数: 692 | 3 weblogic自己就可以了吧，为什么要加上Tomcat?
【在 r*****s 的大作中提到】
: weblogic
|
t****s
发帖数: 141 | 4 job secure
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: weblogic自己就可以了吧，为什么要加上Tomcat?
|
xt
发帖数: 17532 | 5
last time I used WebLogic server, that was version 5,
it did not do a good job.
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: weblogic自己就可以了吧，为什么要加上Tomcat?
|
d*g
发帖数: 66 | 6 对呀. 这个问题让我感觉有点confuse 了
为什么tomcat要加别的
我知道web server tomcat最好加上apache,
application server 就weblogic好了
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: weblogic自己就可以了吧，为什么要加上Tomcat?
|
w******n
发帖数: 692 | 7 tomcat is just a servlet container. As a solution as Application Server,
I know tomcat+jboss is a choice. I wonder if there are some other options.
【在 d*g 的大作中提到】
: 对呀. 这个问题让我感觉有点confuse 了
: 为什么tomcat要加别的
: 我知道web server tomcat最好加上apache,
: application server 就weblogic好了
|
r*****s
发帖数: 985 | 8 websphere is another solution, but tomcat+jboss are open source.
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: tomcat is just a servlet container. As a solution as Application Server,
: I know tomcat+jboss is a choice. I wonder if there are some other options.
|
n*m
发帖数: 23 | 9
It does. The WebLogic's RMI implementation is pretty good.
【在 xt 的大作中提到】
:
: last time I used WebLogic server, that was version 5,
: it did not do a good job.
|
n*m
发帖数: 23 | 10
Yes, you do. Don't you guys know Geronimo?
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: tomcat is just a servlet container. As a solution as Application Server,
: I know tomcat+jboss is a choice. I wonder if there are some other options.
|
|
|
n*m
发帖数: 23 | 11
No, you don't need that. Tomcat is good enough for static HTML files.
You just need to consider Apache server only when you need CGI, PHP
or any other legacy stuffs.
【在 d*g 的大作中提到】
: 对呀. 这个问题让我感觉有点confuse 了
: 为什么tomcat要加别的
: 我知道web server tomcat最好加上apache,
: application server 就weblogic好了
|
d*g
发帖数: 66 | 12 tomcat did can handle html, but not good enough when you consider to
have a http server with lots of access.
search google for apache+tomcat you will find people use tomcat as test
server..
【在 n*m 的大作中提到】
:
: No, you don't need that. Tomcat is good enough for static HTML files.
: You just need to consider Apache server only when you need CGI, PHP
: or any other legacy stuffs.
|
n*m
发帖数: 23 | 13 Yes, Tomcat is good enough for most cases. You don't run an even heavy access
web site like
google.com, do you? Tomcat is easily to handle a thousand level cocurrent
access.
【在 d*g 的大作中提到】
: tomcat did can handle html, but not good enough when you consider to
: have a http server with lots of access.
: search google for apache+tomcat you will find people use tomcat as test
: server..
|
d*g
发帖数: 66 | 14 I do not run google , but I run site with like a hundred concurrent
access. tomcat is bad at performance. The only thing I can say is
it just work, but not fast.
Here is why people do not use it as http server.(it is from tutorial, I
just paste it here without change)
Tomcat Standalone
Not as fast as Apache for static pages
Not as configurable as Apache
Not as robust as Apache
May not support functionality found only in Apache modules (e.g., Perl, PHP, security)
Mainly for development and debugg
【在 n*m 的大作中提到】
: Yes, Tomcat is good enough for most cases. You don't run an even heavy access
: web site like
: google.com, do you? Tomcat is easily to handle a thousand level cocurrent
: access.
|
t****s
发帖数: 141 | 15 Resin is far more better.
【在 d*g 的大作中提到】
: I do not run google , but I run site with like a hundred concurrent
: access. tomcat is bad at performance. The only thing I can say is
: it just work, but not fast.
: Here is why people do not use it as http server.(it is from tutorial, I
: just paste it here without change)
: Tomcat Standalone
: Not as fast as Apache for static pages
: Not as configurable as Apache
: Not as robust as Apache
: May not support functionality found only in Apache modules (e.g., Perl, PHP, security)
|
