由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
LosAngeles版 - 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗 (转载)
相关主题
Switch Registration to Republican Today! (转载)华人进步与平等协会(CAPE)将尽一切努力阻止SCA5 (转载)
反对SCA 5 : 请给你的ASSEMBLYMEMBER发信 (转载)Chinese American Vote for Republican candidates (转载)
Most Racist Bill in California History? SCA 5 by Democrat S (转载)南加紧盯周本立,北加紧盯方文忠,SCA5就可以灭掉!
SCA-5胎死assembly[转]加州众议会否决SCA5 首先须策反这3人 (转载)
反对SCA5, 不要浪费时间, 要这样做才有帮助, 请转发与77选区众议员Maienschein办公室主任的会谈纪要 (转载)
被一个普通白人同事的一番评论震惊了,原来华人自己是最不了解 (转载)zz男儿何不带吴钩 (转载)
越南裔共和党州议员候选人Long Pham公开表示反对SCA5 (转载)kim young领先不少嘛
加州的看过这个文章吗?耐心点准备搬家吧。看看号称包容的左派如何支持 言论自由 ! (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: democrat话题: sca话题: party话题: california话题: asian
进入LosAngeles版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
r****a
发帖数: 3249
1
【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: gelshift (kim), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:18:19 2014, 美东)
http://www.hunsweck.com/blog_skin_color_act_5_20140304
https://www.facebook.com/SayNoToSCA5
今天在facebook上看到的,文章很给力啊,说明民主党的sca5实质是抱怨Asian over
represented in college,是打击加洲最小的minority.
他那个选区什么情况啊,值得支持吗?
r****a
发帖数: 3249
2
在尔湾念过书,斯坦佛博士,共和党的帅锅。
文章道理写的很好啊。 大家支持帅锅一把。

【在 r****a 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
: 发信人: gelshift (kim), 信区: SanFrancisco
: 标 题: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:18:19 2014, 美东)
: http://www.hunsweck.com/blog_skin_color_act_5_20140304
: https://www.facebook.com/SayNoToSCA5
: 今天在facebook上看到的,文章很给力啊,说明民主党的sca5实质是抱怨Asian over
: represented in college,是打击加洲最小的minority.
: 他那个选区什么情况啊,值得支持吗?

h*****s
发帖数: 1654
3
胜率如何?
r****a
发帖数: 3249
4
形势不错。
发信人: psf (psf), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: Re: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:24:06 2014, 美东)
他那个选区就是Paul同学的老巢,D28。24%亚裔,〉50%白人。基本上是南湾经济条件
最好的地区。
D*******1
发帖数: 11303
5
说得真有水平,一针见血。 尤其这句:
“Democrat Party's approach to inequality has nothing to do with lifting up
those at the bottom and helping them succeed. But rather, it is to punish
those at the top and tear them down.”
全文如下:
This year, the California State Senate passed SCA 5, which has been
correctly dubbed "Skin Color Act 5". This bill would repeal provisions of an
anti-discrimination law, Proposition 209, which voters passed in 1996. The
main effect of SCA 5 would be to allow the University of California system
to start actively discriminating against students on the basis of race.
The goal of SCA 5 is clear. It is to cap Asian enrollment at California's
universities. Supporters of SCA 5 note that Asians are disproportionally
over-represented on college campuses, making up 36% of UC admissions while
only being 15% of the population. You would think that the academic
achievement of a racial minority, who got there solely based on merit, would
be a success story worth celebrating. But apparently the Democrat Party
doesn't think so.
The Democrat supermajority passed SCA 5 on a strictly party-line vote, 27-9.
Not one single Republican voted in favor of it. All 27 yes votes were
Democrats. It is clear that the Democrat Party's approach to inequality has
nothing to do with lifting up those at the bottom and helping them succeed.
But rather, it is to punish those at the top and tear them down. The
Democrat Party has sought for a long time to punish achievement by
equalizing outcomes. But this time, they have gone too far. This is going to
come back and bite them.
Martin Luther King Jr. said he dreamed that his kids would "one day live in
a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by
the content of their character". But the Democrat Party's attack on
California's Asian minority, which is only 15% of the population, is a blow
to King's dream. Chief Justice John Roberts got it right when he said, "The
way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on
the basis of race." If the Democrats persist in their support of racial
discrimination, they will quickly find themselves on the wrong side of
history. And the fact that SCA 5 even got this far is going to be a dark
cloud over the Democrat Party for a long time to come.
~Michael Hunsweck

【在 r****a 的大作中提到】
: 形势不错。
: 发信人: psf (psf), 信区: SanFrancisco
: 标 题: Re: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:24:06 2014, 美东)
: 他那个选区就是Paul同学的老巢,D28。24%亚裔,〉50%白人。基本上是南湾经济条件
: 最好的地区。

r****a
发帖数: 3249
6
【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: gelshift (kim), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:18:19 2014, 美东)
http://www.hunsweck.com/blog_skin_color_act_5_20140304
https://www.facebook.com/SayNoToSCA5
今天在facebook上看到的,文章很给力啊,说明民主党的sca5实质是抱怨Asian over
represented in college,是打击加洲最小的minority.
他那个选区什么情况啊,值得支持吗?
r****a
发帖数: 3249
7
在尔湾念过书,斯坦佛博士,共和党的帅锅。
文章道理写的很好啊。 大家支持帅锅一把。

【在 r****a 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
: 发信人: gelshift (kim), 信区: SanFrancisco
: 标 题: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:18:19 2014, 美东)
: http://www.hunsweck.com/blog_skin_color_act_5_20140304
: https://www.facebook.com/SayNoToSCA5
: 今天在facebook上看到的,文章很给力啊,说明民主党的sca5实质是抱怨Asian over
: represented in college,是打击加洲最小的minority.
: 他那个选区什么情况啊,值得支持吗?

h*****s
发帖数: 1654
8
胜率如何?
r****a
发帖数: 3249
9
形势不错。
发信人: psf (psf), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: Re: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:24:06 2014, 美东)
他那个选区就是Paul同学的老巢,D28。24%亚裔,〉50%白人。基本上是南湾经济条件
最好的地区。
D*******1
发帖数: 11303
10
说得真有水平,一针见血。 尤其这句:
“Democrat Party's approach to inequality has nothing to do with lifting up
those at the bottom and helping them succeed. But rather, it is to punish
those at the top and tear them down.”
全文如下:
This year, the California State Senate passed SCA 5, which has been
correctly dubbed "Skin Color Act 5". This bill would repeal provisions of an
anti-discrimination law, Proposition 209, which voters passed in 1996. The
main effect of SCA 5 would be to allow the University of California system
to start actively discriminating against students on the basis of race.
The goal of SCA 5 is clear. It is to cap Asian enrollment at California's
universities. Supporters of SCA 5 note that Asians are disproportionally
over-represented on college campuses, making up 36% of UC admissions while
only being 15% of the population. You would think that the academic
achievement of a racial minority, who got there solely based on merit, would
be a success story worth celebrating. But apparently the Democrat Party
doesn't think so.
The Democrat supermajority passed SCA 5 on a strictly party-line vote, 27-9.
Not one single Republican voted in favor of it. All 27 yes votes were
Democrats. It is clear that the Democrat Party's approach to inequality has
nothing to do with lifting up those at the bottom and helping them succeed.
But rather, it is to punish those at the top and tear them down. The
Democrat Party has sought for a long time to punish achievement by
equalizing outcomes. But this time, they have gone too far. This is going to
come back and bite them.
Martin Luther King Jr. said he dreamed that his kids would "one day live in
a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by
the content of their character". But the Democrat Party's attack on
California's Asian minority, which is only 15% of the population, is a blow
to King's dream. Chief Justice John Roberts got it right when he said, "The
way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on
the basis of race." If the Democrats persist in their support of racial
discrimination, they will quickly find themselves on the wrong side of
history. And the fact that SCA 5 even got this far is going to be a dark
cloud over the Democrat Party for a long time to come.
~Michael Hunsweck

【在 r****a 的大作中提到】
: 形势不错。
: 发信人: psf (psf), 信区: SanFrancisco
: 标 题: Re: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:24:06 2014, 美东)
: 他那个选区就是Paul同学的老巢,D28。24%亚裔,〉50%白人。基本上是南湾经济条件
: 最好的地区。

r********e
发帖数: 251
11
re

up
an
The

【在 D*******1 的大作中提到】
: 说得真有水平,一针见血。 尤其这句:
: “Democrat Party's approach to inequality has nothing to do with lifting up
: those at the bottom and helping them succeed. But rather, it is to punish
: those at the top and tear them down.”
: 全文如下:
: This year, the California State Senate passed SCA 5, which has been
: correctly dubbed "Skin Color Act 5". This bill would repeal provisions of an
: anti-discrimination law, Proposition 209, which voters passed in 1996. The
: main effect of SCA 5 would be to allow the University of California system
: to start actively discriminating against students on the basis of race.

g*********o
发帖数: 20357
12
太赞了!!!

【在 r****a 的大作中提到】
: 形势不错。
: 发信人: psf (psf), 信区: SanFrancisco
: 标 题: Re: 共和党michael同学递了投名状,为啥没人理,有28选区的吗
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 7 20:24:06 2014, 美东)
: 他那个选区就是Paul同学的老巢,D28。24%亚裔,〉50%白人。基本上是南湾经济条件
: 最好的地区。

l*********u
发帖数: 19053
13
去Like了
1 (共1页)
进入LosAngeles版参与讨论
相关主题
看看号称包容的左派如何支持 言论自由 ! (转载)反对SCA5, 不要浪费时间, 要这样做才有帮助, 请转发
response to 'income inequality' speech被一个普通白人同事的一番评论震惊了,原来华人自己是最不了解 (转载)
怎样向旁观者和媒体传达我们关于梁警官的诉求,转一篇英文的好文章越南裔共和党州议员候选人Long Pham公开表示反对SCA5 (转载)
免费电影了加州的看过这个文章吗?耐心点准备搬家吧。
Switch Registration to Republican Today! (转载)华人进步与平等协会(CAPE)将尽一切努力阻止SCA5 (转载)
反对SCA 5 : 请给你的ASSEMBLYMEMBER发信 (转载)Chinese American Vote for Republican candidates (转载)
Most Racist Bill in California History? SCA 5 by Democrat S (转载)南加紧盯周本立,北加紧盯方文忠,SCA5就可以灭掉!
SCA-5胎死assembly[转]加州众议会否决SCA5 首先须策反这3人 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: democrat话题: sca话题: party话题: california话题: asian