m*******r
发帖数: 240 | 1 http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/10/09/world/09nobel.html?sort=oldest
Well, at least this year's Nobel Peace Prize is less of a joke than last
year's Nobel Peace Prize...
However, I must question the motives behind the committee's awarding of this
year's Peace Prize. Are they awarding the Prize objectively; i.e. has there
been any tangible result from Mr. Liu Xiaobo's activities that actually
contributed to world peace? Or are they (the Nobel Committee) just trying to
send a message to the Chinese government and China?
Frankly, I think the Chinese government should be awarded the Peace Prize.
Their ability to pull their country out of poverty without engaging in any
wars (*cough* US warmongering *cough*) has been a great contribution to
world peace in itself....
Recommend Recommended by 146 Readers | w****k
发帖数: 6244 | 2 丢人现眼
this
there
to
【在 m*******r 的大作中提到】
: http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/10/09/world/09nobel.html?sort=oldest
: Well, at least this year's Nobel Peace Prize is less of a joke than last
: year's Nobel Peace Prize...
: However, I must question the motives behind the committee's awarding of this
: year's Peace Prize. Are they awarding the Prize objectively; i.e. has there
: been any tangible result from Mr. Liu Xiaobo's activities that actually
: contributed to world peace? Or are they (the Nobel Committee) just trying to
: send a message to the Chinese government and China?
: Frankly, I think the Chinese government should be awarded the Peace Prize.
: Their ability to pull their country out of poverty without engaging in any
| x*********g
发帖数: 11508 | 3 我觉得评论得挺好的啊，为什么说丢人现眼？
【在 w****k 的大作中提到】
: 丢人现眼
:
: this
: there
: to
| c******k
发帖数: 8998 | | h*******u
发帖数: 15326 | | b*********y
发帖数: 203 | |
|
