H****g
发帖数: 14447 | 1 The court’s description of the events also conformed to the most cinematic
scenario among those making the rounds in Beijing political circles:
On the evening of November 13, 2011, Bogu Kailai went to Heywood when
he was staying in Room 1605 at Building No. 16 of the Nanshan Lijing Holiday
Hotel and drank alcoholic drinks and tea with him. After Heywood became
intoxicated, vomited and asked for a drink of water, she poured a poison
into his mouth that had been prepared beforehand and that she had given to
Zhang Xiaojun to bring along, causing Heywood’s death.
There is much about that scenario that is hard to picture. It’s difficult
to imagine a privileged, cosmopolitan lawyer—even one driven to rage as the
court suggests—not finding a solution better than getting her hands dirty.
It’s not impossible, of course, but there’s no way to know for sure
because what the court describes as “solid evidence” is unavailable to the
public. Were there fingerprints? What about Heywood’s friends’ insistence
that he did not drink alcohol?
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2012/08/the-gu-kailai-murder-trial-a-shut-and-shut-case.html#ixzz234fFod3T |
|
