y***o
发帖数: 145 | 1 这是真人真事， 请大家舆论支持。
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
)
Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
v. )
Los Angeles County Superior Court )
)
In re Joshua Tin )
)
----------------------------------------------------------------)
APPELLANT’S OPENING BRIEF
STATEMENT OF APPEALABILITY
This Extraordinary Writ is from a termination of the visitation right
for dependent court case In re Joshua Tin. The appellant had timely filed
the notice of appeal.
This Extraordinary Writ is asking the court of appeal to review the entire
record of the case, revise the trial court to terminate the visitation
right, and to dismiss the entire case. The reason appellant asked the appeal
court to reopen the previous appeal is because that the appellant was
informed by her trial court attorney that the appeal would be taken one or
two years, and the appellant was never contact by any her appeal attorney.
Later on, the appeal lawyer would file a motion to the court stated there
are nothing to appeal, to waive mother’s right for appeal and eventually
leading Mother Winnie Tin to lose her right to appeal on her custody for her
son Joshua Tin. This extraordinary writ is asking the court to open up the
previous appeal and give the mother a chance to have the higher court to
review the trail court legal proceedings and dismiss the entire allegation
and return Joshua Tin back home with his mother.
INTRODUCTION
A. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Joshua Tin was given birth by the birth mother Wan (aka Winnie) Tin on 11-21
-2003 under the putative marriage agreement between the mother and the LA
county superior court Judge Ernest Hiroshige in Dept 54, who had proposal
marriage to the birth mother and when the mother was conceived, they lived
together. (reporter transcript, page 2, line 28 – page 3, line 3, reporter
report page 34, line 1-6, line 13 – 16,) The birth mother believed in his
marriage proposal and accepted it with a good faith. The mother lived with
Judge Hiroshige while she still keep her own place, they were about to buy
a house in Marina Del Rey. One day, the mother found out that Judge
Hiroshige was chatting on her. They had an huge argument, judge Hiroshige
claimed that this is a man’s world one night after they had dinner. The
mother was very hurt and after hearing his statement, the mother went to
Alan Isaac’s house to share her pain. Mother called Judge Hiroshige with
Alan’s home phone until Judge Hiroshige hung up on her and never pick up
her calls. Alan Isaac try to comfort her and gave her a drink, which drugged
her and forced her to have sex that night. Mother was embarrassed to tell
Judge Hiroshige the detail of the incident. She only mentioned to Judge
Hiroshige that Alan force her but he did not finish. That is the only night,
the mother had seen Alan for that period of time.
The mother still lived with Judge Hiroshige. A month later, the mother
informed Judge Hiroshige she got pregnant, and he believed that Joshua Tin
is his child. Judge Hiroshige protest to have a child without preparation
first. And than claim he did not want her to live with him any more if she
did not get an abortion. The mother did not want to get an abortion because
her age, faith and many reasons. However, after the first tri-master, Judge
Hiroshige accepted the fact that a baby can coming at any time, it is a
blessing. Judge Hiroshige started taking his responsibility, take the mother
to see a marriage counselor with his pastor Gary Gaulton, shopping baby
item, planning to have a baby to come, accompany the mother to the hospital.
However, because his own ethical behavior, he slept with other woman as he
wish, (reporter’s transcript, page 34, line 13-16) The mother had argued
with Judge Hiroshige over and over why he had made a marriage agreement with
her, why he sleep with other woman. Judge Hiroshige answer that this is man
’s world. Judge Hiroshige would make a statement: “ look, you cannot
have sex now, what is the difference for me to sleep with someone else.” (
reporter’s transcript, page 34, line 13 – 16). When the birth mother
finally would not tolerate his verbal and mental abuse by Judge Hiroshige
and initiated reporting him to the presiding judge Duke and supervising
judge Charles McCoy. Judge Hiroshige filed a restraining order application
by lying about their relationship to the court and prohibited the mother
going LA Superior Court. ( reporter report page 48, line 9 – 13, line 27
to page 49, line 9)
In around August 2003, the mother had a lawyer to representing her to defend
her for judge Hiroshige’s accusation to the court administration personal
and claim the birth mother harassed him since Feb 2003, had the court apply
the restraining order against the birth mother. While the mother had a
lawyer representing her, the court legal counsel Brad Binco contact the
mother directly while she had a lawyer in place. After listening to the
mother, Brad Binco also asked Judge Hiroshige did not leave the mother. But
judge Hiroshige is stubborn, finally he had Brad Binco threatened and forced
the mother signed the mutual agreement. (reporter’s transcript, page 50,
line 9 – 13.) Judge Hiroshige abundant the birth mother while she was 8
month pregnant. Judge Hiroshige admitted in the criminal trial that he
assume himself is the father for Joshua Tin, he admitted that he give the
birth mother his personal check to help the mother raise the child, which is
evidence that he did lie to the court to apply the restraining order
against the birth mother.
Birth mother Winnie Tin went to the hospital gave birth to Joshua Tin on 11-
21-2003 by herself. After the c-section, the nurse took her to the patient’
s room at 11:00 pm. However she start an excessive bleeding and nobody
called the doctor until early morning. She almost lost her life. On the
birth certificated, birth mother Winnie Tin left blank on the father’s name
, because she did not know what to do as the baby was half white and half
Asian.
The birth mother was in bad for three month due to the complication of the c
-section, with excessive bleeding. Judge Hiroshige stopped by to see her on
her birth day, Jan 30th, 2004. Judge Hiroshige bought a bottle Japanese
Wine with Japanese wine glass for the mother’s birthday, and indicating
that this is selfish gift, he would like to continue the relationship with
the mother and to take his responsibility. Judge Hiroshige indicating that
the gift is kind for himself. Judge Hiroshige had meet Winnie’s nanny on
that day. Later, Judge Hiroshige arranged his pastor Gary Gaulton to do the
counseling for the mother.
During the pregnancy, Judge Hiroshige had question the mother the night when
she went to Alan Isaac’s house, if Alan Isaac had been taken advantage of
her. The mother told him what happened. Judge Hiroshige request to do a DNA
test to make sure that Joshua is his biological child. In June 2003, mother
arranged a DNA test by using the symthinsestic fluid from, send to the DNA
diagnostics center and they should be able to make a decision. However, the
report shows that Judge Hiroshige is not the biological father. (clerk
report, page 0318, DNA parentage Test report. ) At the time, Judge
Hiroshige and mother Winnie Tin had a discussion. Mother Winnie Tin told
judge Hiroshige more details that the night after Judge Hiroshige hung up on
her while the mother called him from Alan’s house, Winnie was crying and
told judge Hiroshige that Alan Isaac gave her a drink and forced her to
have the intercourse. The mother Winnie also told Judge Hiroshige that she
try to fight against Alan but she did not have any energy and she did told
Alan many times to stop, Alan did finally stop without ejaculating in her.
In addition, Alan had vasectomy. So it is impossible that Alan Isaac is the
father. Winnie cried to Hiroshige, #1, the DNA report may be wrong because
the child was not born yet, we do not know for sure that Alan is the father.
Secondly, if Alan is the biological father, you know Alan’s crazy life
style, how can he be the father for this baby? In addition, we want this
baby, we want to have family, we plan to have at least one child. It is
because we loved each other to have the baby, let raise this child together.
Hiroshige held the mother and he agreed.
Between 2005 and 2006, Judge Hiroshige and the mother try to
reconsolidate the relationship by judge Hiroshige’s pastor Gary Gaulton.
But Judge Hiroshige wants the baby Joshua Tin’s biological grandfather
Godfey Isaac and Kathleen Isaac to pay the child living expense in order for
him to marry with the mother. The reconsolidation of relationship did not
work out. In June 2006, Judge Hiroshige filed another restraining order
against the mother. A month later Judge Hiroshige started file a fraudulent
police report and claim that mother had called him with a tapped recorded
conversation and violated the restraining order. A hearing officer is a
judge from Los Angeles county, a co-worker with Judge Hiroshige, put the
mother into the custody for 15 days only because Judge Hiroshige claim the
mother called him and violate the restraining order.
In May 24, 2007, Joshua Tin end up with DCFS. When the mother was
incarcerate in jail, after she was released from the jail. The mother went
DCFS had the DTM meeting. (Clerk Transcript, PG 0009) In the meeting,
mother told social worker Joshua Tin was born due to Judge Hiroshige
initiated to have a family and proposal marriage, unfortunately, Joshua Tin
was conceived from the raped by Alan Isaac. Social worker from DCFS had very
clear picture that judge Hiroshige is the presumed father for the minor and
Alan Isaac is the natural father. Under the family code 7611 with penal
code 256.1, Alan Isaac did not have the constitutional right to be the
alleged father for Joshua Tin.
In between June and December 2007, the mother shared her difficulty by
raising Joshua alone with Dr. Winnie Hsieh, Joshua’s counselor. The mother
had fight a criminal prosecution, make a living to support herself and
Joshua. It is already difficult for anybody to raise a child along, but the
mother had taking an additional work load. She told Dr. Winnie Hsieh a lot
of times, after she finish the whole day work load, doing loans, taking
care of Joshua, clean up the house. Before the night she went sleep, her
whole body was in pain. (reporter’s report, page 51, line 24, to 28). She
needs some help. Dr. Winnie Hsieh called social worker Huichi Hsieh and
arranged meeting among those three to see if DCFS can arrange some
financial aid for the mother, or arrange Joshua to tempera to live with the
presume father Judge Hiroshige. But months pass by, DCFS provide nothing.
On December 20, 2007, the mother called Dr. Hsieh again, and cried, and
asked her if she need some help how come nobody do anything. Dr. Hsieh told
the mother being patient. Dr. Hsieh was worried and called back, the mother
did not answer the phone. Dr. Hsieh called child abuse hotline for welfare
check. Please refer to the clerk’s report page 0008, “ Per the referral,
approximately two weeks ago she attended a meeting with the mother and the
mother’s CSW to address possible childcare for her son……. The caller
reported that CSW developed a plan to work on contacting the child’s birth
father and the child’s presumed father as possible childcare providers. The
caller stated she tried to explain to the mother about being patient with
the DCFS process. The mother was upset and hung-up on her. So Dr. Winnie
Hsieh was worried and called back, but the mother did not answer the phone.
Dr. Winnie Hsieh called the Child Abuse Hotline for welfare check.
On December 20 2007, West Covina Police Officer shows up in the mother’s
house for welfare check on Joshua Tin. The mother had already put Joshua to
bed. See the police report, clerk report page 0110, “ I walked into her
bedroom and saw V/Joshua asleep under the bed covers. V/Joshua appeared
unharmed” , next page 0111, “I spoke with W/Carrillo who told me the
following: W/Carrillo is S/Winnie’s roommate, W/Carrillo works at the
school V/Joshua Attends. W/Carrillo watches V/Joshua while S/Winnie is at
work. W/Carrillo has not witnessed S/Winnie mistreated V/Joshua.”
Police officer heard the mother’s story, how she was raped by Alan Isaac
and how her boy-friend judge Hiroshige abandoned her while she was 8 month
pregnant and she believed he covered up the rape case. The mother told the
police she had contact DCFS many times she need help. But nobody was there
to help her. “I spoke with Davis who told me the following: S/Winnie has
had an open case with DCFS since May, Since s/Winnie’s case has been open,
s/Winnie has called DCFS numerous times for help.”
Police officer Veronica Perez, Sean Carmon, Don Preston discussed the
situation and interview mother’s roommate Gloria Carrillo, they told mother
that they are going to take Joshua Tin today, and they want the mother go
to the court, asked the judge to make order on financial assistance in order
for her to raise Joshua alone on her own. They told the mother to prepare
the need list, for instance: baby sitting, food stamps, clothing, health
insurance whatever can help her to raise Joshua on her own. Gloria Carrillo
was crying and bagged the police officer. Gloria said “ officer, please do
not take Joshua away. It is about Christmas. I think Winnie just stress out,
I can help Winnie couple of days. And Joshua is her only family” Police
officer responded to Gloria: “ you can help her couple of days, who is
going to help her the rest of the 20 years.? We need her to go to the court
so a judicial officer can make a finding on the father issue, who would be
responsible to Joshua and give her some financial help to raise Joshua alone
.”
When the social worker Gladys David finally arrived, she said we told
you to be patient, now we have to take Joshua away. On December 21, 2007,
the mother talked to Gladys Davis supervisor Robert Rodriguez, Robert said
prepare your need list and when you go to the court the next hearing on
December 26, 2007. The judge should be release Joshua on the same day.
However, the mother went for the court hearing on Dec 26, 2006, Ryan
Matienzo shows up in front of her and told her that he is the court appoint
lawyer for her, and there is no way for the judge to release Joshua back to
her in this situation. Ryan Matienzo simply had the mother fill out some
paper work if Joshua Tin is the Indian tribe child, and the PRI to indicate
that who are those family member and relative may be able to provide the
care for Joshua Tin. Mother put the presume father Judge Hiroshige on the
form. But the form is currently missing from the record. ( reporter
transcript page 3 line 14 – 25. & clerk report, page 0385 date 6-20-2008)
Ryan Matienzo did not go over any filing paper from DCFS for the charges nor
help the mother presented the need list to the court. The court asked if
the mother want to wave reading the petition, without talking to the mother,
lawyer Ryan Matienzo prompted answer for the mother: Your honor, we waive.
Enter a general denial. (reporter’s transcript, page 2, line 11 – 14)
After the hearing officer detent Joshua Tin, mother’s lawyer gave the
social worker’s paper. Mother was reading the paper in the evening when she
return back home and found social worker alleged the mother had visual
hallucinations and audio hallucinations. Based on those allegation from
Social Worker’s report, the court put Joshua Tin to detention. Winnie Tin
called Dr. Winnie Hsieh and told her that she found that social worker lied
to the court regards her mental state.
Obviously, someone arranged Ryan Matienzo show up for the mother prior to
the court hearing and arranged social worker Yumi Lim writte a false
petition. The mother believe that was arranged by judge Hiroshige to cover
up the paternity issue but claim the mother had mental issue. Social worker
Yumi Lim knowingly and intentionally make a false allegation on the mother’
s mental state and did not provide the truth on the paternity issue to the
court, social worker Yumi Lin only claim Allan Isaac is the alleged father,
but left judge Hiroshige’s name out of the alleged fathers. Both social
worker and county council had basic legal knowledge that a person who is
under a penal code cannot and do not have the constitutional right to be the
father for Joshua Tin.
The next hearing, Feb 13, 2008, The court set this case for mediation. ( RT,
page 8, line 27 – 28.)
On March 27, 2008, social worker provided the mother with Mediation
agreement. On the mediation agreement, social worker changed the father from
Alan Isaac to unknown. When mother refuse to take the mediation, the
mediator Joe threaten the mother if you do not sign this mediation agreement
, it would be a tragedy for this child.
April, 28, 2008, The court jurisdicte on this case, without clear and
convincing evidence the minor was physically and emotionally harmed and
endanger by the mother, with a letter from the mother’s psychiatrist to the
court that the mother did not have any visual hallucination’s and audio
hallucinations, the court error detention the minor Joshua Tin into the
foster system.
Since the child was detent on Dec 20, 2007, Social worker Huichi Hsieh
had arranged the mother had two hours on each visitation and twice a week,
and allow the mother talk to Joshua Tin though phone conversation by provide
her the foster parent Maria’s phone number.
In May 2008, social worker Amy Watonabe took this case, she suddenly
decided to move Joshua Tin from the original foster family Maria’s house to
a new foster family Brian Boem. Amy Watonabe also decided to reduce the
visitation from twice a week to once a week, from two hours each visit to
one hour each visit. Amy Watonabe also cutting off the phone connection
between Joshua Tin and his mother. Amy told the foster parent Brian Boem
that the visitation is confidential and asked Brian Boem did not release his
phone # to the mother.
The court ordered family reunification service for the mother. The
mother try her best to comply with the court order to reunify with her son.
The mother started attending individual counseling, and parenting class. The
mother even take the individual counseling prior court order in order to
get her son back.
The mother had emailed the new social worker Amy Watonabe many times she
wants to increase the visitation times back to two times a week. But she
got no response. According to the DCFS police, social worker should provide
the home visit to the mother on the weekly basis. But for months, the
mother did not know who is the social worker on the case. The mother had
contact to the regional manager Dr. Lock Ngyuen, and executive board of
director Rick Brian. Rick Brian request Amy Watonabe step by talk to the
mother after the visitation occurred in the foster agency.
Social worker also authorized the foster agency to write a false report
on the mother and claim that the mother try to contact the foster father’s
family doctor to find foster family address, and request the restraining
order against mother.
Social worker also pre-arranged the security guard try to hand cuff the
mother when she enter the building to visit her son and to creating a story
about the mother. One day when the security guard try to put on his black
hand glove, and try to push the mother while the mother standing in the
lobby talk on the phone with the social worker. The chief Operating officer
Jennifer Lopez just passed by and witness the whole thing.
In the trial, the mother testified that to the court, but the trial
judge believed the social worker.
During the family reunification service period, the mother and her lawyer
raised the issue to the court that the mother did not get her visits, but
the court fails to supervise on the case plan progress and enforce the
visitation for the mother. The mother also twice testified that Judge
Hiroshige had contacted her counselor by wire tapping, but the court did not
take property action on it.
In August 13, 2009, 18 month status review hearing, the mother’s
lawyer present the evidence for the mother compliance with the case plan,
she finished her parenting class, and individual counseling, argued to
release the child to the mother. But the court deny mother’s request.
During the contest, mother’s lawyer asked the mother’s therapist Mr. Sam
Ng to testify about the mother’s ability to care for her son, and Mr. Sam
Ng said he has no double that the mother is capable to care for her son. But
the court reject to release the minor to his mother’s custody due to the
mother complain that Judge Hiroshige wire tapping her phone and contact her
counselor. The mother had testify that her counselor threatened her during
a session. The mother contest “ he said if I still believe Judge Hiroshige
still has certain responsibility towards me and Josh, that my son would be (
put) into adoption. So I want to know why he (Sam Ng) has those conclusion?
Why he is threatening me? (reporter’s transcript, pg 160, line 14 -19.)
Trial court terminated mother’s family reunification service based on
mother’s believe that judge Hiroshige wire tapping her phone and approach
her counselor. The judicial officer abvously had bias on the mother due to
conflict interested of the jurisdiction. Unless the county can provide the
proof with clear and convincing evidence that return the minor to the parent
is going to danger to the minor, the law and legislation request the court
return the child’s custody back to the parent. No authority distinguishing
between insufficient evidence and abuse of discretion. Neither any authority
nor the juvenile court can rely upon factual assumption. The trial court is
mistaken about the scope of its discretion, the mistaken position may be ‘
reasonable’, nonetheless error, it is wrong on the law.
This case is not about how the mother believed Judge Hiroshige wire
tapping her phone, interfere with her counselor. This case is about her
ability to care for her son. It is parent – child relationship under the
constitution as a citizen. No court should discriminate against anybody to
take the minor out of parent control.
After the termination of the family reunification in 8-13-09 hearing,
the mother had continued the visitation with the minor in the Southern
California foster and adoption agency. The many visits are very good because
the minor and the mom had special, closed, loving relationship between them
. The mother is only person Joshua Tin knew he can depend on, and the minor
is the only family the mother had in the states. During the visit, they
singing together, they play games, they play basketball, and football in the
small room where they meet, the mother tell Joshua jokes. The mother bought
new clothes, toys, and educational material, such as computer, books for
Joshua. But none of those is in the report to the court. The mother
sincerely believed that social worker authorized the foster agency writing a
false report on the mother’s monitor visit. The mother has stored some of
the picture was taken during the visit and submit to the court as evidence
but it is not in the records. From those pictures, and video tape by the
cell phone, it can be clearly shown there is warm, loving relationship
between Joshua Tin and the mother. The foster agency had written a false
report to the court judicial officer.
The mother had request her lawyer to subpoena those important witness from
the foster agency, please see attached email date Sep 21, 2010, the mother
was very clearly asked to subpoena the therapist from the foster agency on:
1. Michael habousch, 213-365-2900
2. Ilianna Aispuro,
3. Brian Kim
4. Director from South California Foster Agency.
The mother also wants to subpoena social workers Yomi Lin, Angela Chau, Hui
Chi Hsieh, Amy Watanable, Dr. Ngyuene Loc, Yoko Parsons, and current social
worker Mary Gladys Davis, Robert Rodriguez, Assaye Tsegga. Foster parent
Israel, Maria Palcios, and Brian Boem.
The mother also want to subpoena west Covina police officer Mrs. Perez.
Her lawyer neither subpoena those witness nor prepare the mother for trial.
The mother had Marsden hearing and told the judge, her lawyer did not
prepare her for trial.
In between, August 2010 to September 2010, the mother asked the lawyer to
file a 388 to reinstated the family reunification service, but the lawyer
left for vacation without doing so.
The mother finally filed a 388 petition on her own, but the trial court deny
to hear on it and stated it is untimely.
BACKGROUND OF THE MOTHER
The birth mother Winnie Tin was a foreign student from China, She immigrated
to this country for her MBA program in 1996, she graduate from Penn state
with MBA with full scholarship in 1998. After the graduation, she launched
a job as a mortgage loan officer in Bank of America in year 2000. And she
worked for Bank of America for 4 years as a residential loan officer. When
the mortgage industrial start subprime mortgage loan, Winnie Tin moved her
career to commercial real state lending. She currently occupied as a
residential and commercial real state loan officer and runs a small mortgage
dept on her own. In 2002, while she worked for Bank of America, she met
Judge Ernest Hiroshige in a social function in Chinese Southern California
Lawyer Association. Her friend who she met in the church try to bring her
into the association so she can meet some client. However, Geoffrey could
not go to the meeting.
Mother has good education background, and her parents are professor in
Mainland China. Mother Winnie Tin is a devoted Christine and go to a local
Chinese Church.
Winnie Tin met Judge Hiroshige in the first meeting to the function. . After
10 month dating relationship, Judge Ernest Hiroshige proposed marry to her
and have a family. Jushua Tin was born under this marriage contract due to
they want to start having a family.
Mental history, Mother Winnie Tin had 4 times mental hospital record
with diagnosed with major depression in between 2005 – 2006. Due to the
relationship did not worked out between her and Judge Hiroshige. After the
counseling by her pastor and different psychologist, mother keep emotion
stable and keep working as a residential loan officer on her own. Until May
2007, Judge Hiroshige claim that mother had been violated restraining order
and had a co-worker, another judge to hear on the case, and put the mother
in the Jail for two weeks. Other than violating restraining order, mother
has no criminal history.
In May 2007, Joshua Tin end up in the social service. When the mother
was released from the Jail, DCFS put the minor back home with the mother. In
between May 2007 and December 2007, mother had contact social worker many
times request for help. But social worker initiated any help.
In two court hearing, the mother told the trail court judge that
judge Hiroshgie had been in contact with her counselor and interfere with
her in the compliance with the case plan with no fault on her. Judge
Margaret Downing did not take no action to investigate on Judge Hiroshige.
In August 13, 2009, with passive monitor visit report from the
therapist and the passive testimony from the mother and her therapist, the
court refuse to release the child back to the mother’s custody, which is an
procedure error specified I the Fourteenth amendment. There is no proof by
the county with clear and sufficient evidence that return of the minor to
parental custody would be detrimental to the minor.
Visitation under family reunification service was not implement by DCFS.
Mother’s lawyer has been raise the visitation issue to the court and
county council in numerical times that the mother did not get the visitation
or liberalized the monitor visit. The statutory procedures used for
termination of parental rights satisfy due process rights satisfy due
process requirements only because of the demanding requirements and multiple
safeguards built into the safeguards through no fault of her own, her due
process rights are compromise. Meaningful visitation is pivotal to the
parent-child relationship, even after reunification services are terminated.
Under section 366.26, subdivision © (1) (A), the Legislature has
provided a means by which even a parent to whole custody a child cannot
currently be return has a final chance to avoid termination of parental
right if she can show she had maintained regular contact and visitation with
her child, and the child can not currently be returned has a final chance
to avoid termination of parental rights if she can show she had maintained
regular contact and visitation with her child, and the child would benefit
from continuing the relationship. Obviously, the only way a parent has any
hope of satisfying this statutory exception is if she maintains regular
contact with her child. For the parent deprived of visitation, it is a
forgone conclusion that he or she is not going to be able to establish of
visitation, it is a forgone conclusion that he or she is not going to be
able to establish the exception or have any meaningful chance to avoid the
termination of parental right. A visitation order which fails to protect a
parent’s right to visit is illusory.
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AND STANDARDS OF PREJUDICE
1. THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCREATION IN REFUSING TO RELEASE THE MINOR
AFTER THE JURISDICTION AND VIOLATED APPELLANT CONSTITIONAL RIGHT PARENT
CHILD RELATIONSHIP
The court was wrong on grand to rule on the county’s petition and ignore
the evidence from this appellant to the court. The social worker filed false
petition on count B-, B-2, and G-1, and claim the mother had serious mental
issue with visual hallucinations and audio hallucinations, based on those
allegation, the mother submit a letter from her own Phycharisit that the
mother under his care and with current examination, the mother never had
those symptoms. But the social worker brought in the mother’s past hospital
record and claim the mother’s depressed so that the mother could not
render the care for her son. But the hearing judge would rule strike the
mother sufers from mental so she suffers from emotional problem which render
the mother could not take care of her son. (RT PG 67, line 1 – 5). This is
legal error. Because many people have suffer emotional problems but still
can function as a good parent.
In regards the paternity issue. The county had knowledge that Judge
Hiroshige is the presumed father, but on the initial petition, the county
put Alan Isaac’s name only on the alleged father. After the mother refused
to sign the mediation agreement, the court ordered Judge Hiroshige to come
for paternity contest to take care of his responsibility on 6/19/08, Judge
Hiroshige used his own connection and to manipulating the mother’s lawyer
to claim to put him on call as witness for mother’s character. (CT -------)
but. During the trial on 9/23/2008, the county council had Judge Hiroshige
submit the DNA report date on 7/14/03, (CT 0318) and asked the mother that
the DNA report shows that Judge Hiroshige is not the biological father. The
mother question the county council she never claim that judge Hiroshige is
the biological father. Judge Hiroshige is the presumed father.
The court decided to dismiss B-2 (RT pg 67 line 6), the court made the child
has no father for the child Joshua Tin.
The detention of minor Joshua Tin is violated the parent child relationship
against the mother’s constitutional right under fourteenth amendment.
The trial court ignored all of the clear evidence and standard proof the
mother had no mental health issue. It is clear evidence mother had open case
with DCFS in May 2007 when the mother was incarcerated in Jail, after the
mother was released from Lynwood jail, DCFS put the mother on a voluntary
family maintenance program to prevent the removal of the child Joshua Tin (
CT 0014). It is a very clear evidence that between May 2007 to December
2007, the mother had request help from social worker (CT 0008 - 0009). But
nobody from DCFS helped the mother. DCFS had very clearly picture that the
mother DO NOT have mental issue, Nor she is an abusive person and had
physically or mentally abused Joshua Tin. The social worker also had first
hand knowledge Judge Hiroshige is presumed father for Joshua Tin (CT 0008)
But the county left judge Hiroshige name out from the alleged father on the
petition.
Until 12-20-2007, DCFS response a call from child abuse hotline for welfare
check. (CT page 0008 – 0009). And the caller reported that the SCW
developed a plan to work on contacting the child’s birth father and child’
s presumed father as soon as possible to provide childcare providers to help
the mother. But the mother hung up on her during the conversation. “The
caller stated the mother was very emotional and she sounded unstable.” The
caller was worried and called back, the mother did not response to the
phone call. So the caller wants to have a welfare check on the child and the
mother.
West Covina Police Dept response the welfare check request. On Dec 20th 2007
, “ when the police officer arrival to the mother’s house, the mother had
put Joshua into asleep under a bed covers. Joshua appeared unharmed.” (CT
page 0110) The police also talk to the mother’s roommate Gloria, and she
said she did not see the mother had never mistreated Joshua.
The police officers heard the story about how the mother was raped by Alan
Isaac, judge Hiroshige left the mother while she was 8 month pregnant. And
now charged her crime by complaining she called him and violated the
restraining order, put her in the jail for two weeks. Mother also had shared
that she believed that her raped case was covered by Judge Hiroshige.
Mother also told the police that many days after she finish her work, ,
feeding Joshua, and finish the house work when she go to sleep, her whole
back was in pain because the work load. She asked Social worker to help her
if they can get provide with a baby sitter or some other help to assist her
to raise Joshua alone. So far she have not heard anything from social
worker.
The police was very sympathetic on her situation and they discuss among
themselves, they told the mother that they wanted the mother go to the court
and tell the judge what happen to her, and also asked the mother to make a
financial need list, such as baby sitting, clothing, food stamps, housing
assistance, etc, so the judge can make an order to help her. They told that
to the mother in front of her roommate Gloria Carrillo.
On December 26, 2007, lawyer did not read the petition to the mother, and
minor Joshua Tin is detent by the hearing officer. On 2/13/08, the court
offered the mother Mediation.
On March 27, 2008, the mother refused mediation because on the mediation
agreement, the county changed the alleged father from Alan Isaac to unknown,
still intentionally cover up for the truth and requested the mother agree
to put Joshua into the foster family.
On April 28, 2008, the mother testified in the court, and present her
Psychiatrist letter to the court and show to the court that she did not have
visual hallucinations and audio hallucinations.
On June 16, 2008, the court order Judge Hiroshige to testify the paternity,
Judge Hiroshige did not show up in the court hearing.
Prior to the court’s jurisdiction over the case on April 28, 2008, the
monitored visitation report sent to the court. The mother had good record on
the visitation report. The mother brought Pizza, snack, vitamins, and
Joshua’s clothes for visitation. They play puzzles together, and Joshua
though a piece puzzle, the mother try to discipline the kids and told the
kids to pick up the puzzle. Even the mother did not fell well and she still
did not want to miss the visitation, and she came and told the foster agency
she is a little bit sick that she did not want to miss the visitation, she
came to see her son. Let take look the monitor report from the foster agency
well, so the mother sometimes speak to Joshua in Chinese, and During the
Mandarin conversation Joshua started screaming, apparently he was making fun
singing in Mandarin. 2/14/08, BM’s interaction towards Joshua was
appropriate and affectionate. She was observed talking and reading a book to
Joshua. 2/21/08, BM’s interaction towards Joshua was appropriate. 2/22/08,
during this monitored visit BM brought some snacks for Joshua. She also
brought 3 warns vests for him. BM stated that it was Joshua’s clothes he
left in her home and she wants him to use it. BM’s interaction was
appropriate. She was observed playing with Joshua. BM left 10 minutes early.
2/25/08, Joshua had monitored visit with BM at Covina FFA office. Visit
went well. 2/28/08 BM was observed to be attentive with Joshua; BM brought 2
more Joshua’s outfits. BM stated that she want him to use the outfits
before it does not fit him. BM also brought snacks for Joshua. They eat the
snacks during the visit. BM brought a book and she read the book for him. BM
asked Joshua to take the book to the foster home and to read at home. On 3/
4/08, the monitored visit was OK. 3/10/08, BM was observed to be attentive
with Joshua. She brought Joshua a toy (Thomas set collection) BM was
observed helping him to set the toy. 3/13/08, monitored visit with Joshua’s
BM. BM’s interaction towards Joshua was appropriate. BM brought another
Thomas set collection for Joshua and a new outfit. 3/4/08, while Joshua is
in the pre-school, he slide down on his tummy and scratched his nose,
forehead, and some cheek and full of the blood scab. When 3/6/08, when the
mother saw the bloody scab on the minor face, nose, and forehead, she was
surprised and asked what happen, why is that happen, if the minor has been
taking to see a medical doctor. The foster agency social worker did not know
any thing. , the mother had to call the social worker from DCFS right away.
When the social worker from DCFS arrived and order the foster agency to
take Joshua to see medical doctor, and Joshua was diagnosed Acute facial
abrasion. That is basic knowledge and responsibility from the foster agency
when they take care of a child, they did not even perform their duty. And
when the mother questioned social worker if they knew the school background
is safe? Nobody knew. The mother has gone to school to check on the school’
s safety.
The mother has master degree, and she can make a rational decision compared
to many people. From 3/4/08, when Joshua had the serious accident until 3/6/
08, neither social worker nor school teacher has basic knowledge that acute
facial abrasion can be infected if did not give immediate treatment. (CT
0088 – 0089) The mother is highly educated female with a sophisticated
manner. The evidence shows the mother is attentive and affectionate to her
son.
After the incidence, the mother talked DCFS and wanted to bring Joshua Tin
back from the foster home. But the court and the county refused to help her
under prejudice.
Generally, when no specific burden is specified, preponderance of the
evidence applies. (evidence. Code $115)( In re Gerald J. (1991) 1 Cal.App.
4th 1180, 1186 (2 Cal. Rptr.2d 569). When addressing taking a minor from the
physical custody of a parent with whom the minor resides at the time the
petition is initiated, requires the court to find any of the conditions
warranting removal by clear and convincing evidence. On the standard of
proof to determine whether placement with a custodial parent would be
detrimental. Absent any other considerations, a preponderance of the
evidence standard would apply. A parent right to care, custody and
management of a child is a fundamental liberty interest protected by the
federal constitution that will not be disturbed except in extreme cases
where a parent acts in manner incompatible with parenthood. ( In re
Carmaleta B. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 482, 489); Cynthia v. Superior Court (1993) 5
Cal.4th 242, 251) The standard reflects both the weight of private and
public interest affected and a societal judgment of how the risk of error
should be distributed between the parties. In Santosky, The Supreme Court
held that due process requires a finding of parental unfitness be supported
by a minimum of clear and convincing evidence to terminated parental rights.
And here we are talking about to remove the minor out of the parental
control when the mother is a mature adult.
Here, we do not deal with the termination of parental rights but rather with
the initial denial the child be return to the custody of the parent after
the court had jurisdiction, and after the mother’s testimony that the
police officer initially removed the child because they want the mother go
to the court and had a judge make a finding on the paternity issue, and to
order the financial assistance to help the mother. The emergency social
worker intention to ask the mother to go to the court to present the needed
list on the financial assistance to be order by the court. There were never
any physical evidence and witness that the child Joshua has been mistreated
by the mother. And the mother is ready, willing and able to care for the
minor. (RT PG 55, line 21 -24),
DCFS has no clear evidence to proof that the child Joshua under the mother’
s custody would be physically and mentally detriment to the child when the
court remove the child custody from the mother. Instead, the night, the
mother needs help, she called and asked help from the councilor, and told
the councilor she is willing to wait until DCFS help her with a resolution,
“ OK. I am going to put him go to sleep tonight. We can talk tomorrow.”
( RT Page 57, line 2 – 5) and on the police report stay the same thing, the
mother put Joshua into sleep under a bed cover. Joshua is not harmed. The
evidence from DCFS is she said and he said. But the evidence from the Police
report, from the witness, mother’s roommate’s testimony is hard evidence.
There is no harm from the mother to request the county to help her when she
raised the child on her own. she tried to provide the best care and
education for the child. But it is wrong for the county did not tell the
court the truth, and it is wrong for the court to be biased against the
mother.
Section 361 provides in pertinent part:” No dependent child shall be taken
from the physical custody from his or her parents or guardian with whom the
child resides at the time the petition was initiated unless the juvenile
court finds clear and convincing evidence of any of the following:
(1) There is a substantial danger to the physical health of the minor or
would be if the minor was returned home, and there are no reasonable means
by which the minor’s physical health can be protected without removing the
minor from the minor’s parents or guardians physical custody. The fact that
a minor has been adjudicated a dependent child of the court pursuant to
subdivision (e) of section 300 shall constitute prima facie evidence that
the minor cannot be safely left in the custody of the parent or guardian
with whom the minor resided at the time of injury.”
By detention report, the evidence is the mother had a problem with judge
Hiroshige and the mother requests to help her. In the hearing , the county
counsel provide evidence the mother’s problem with Judge Hiroshige; the
problem with Godfry Isaac, Kathleen Isaac, the rapist’s father and step
mother, to whom the mother approached, told them that she was raped by his
step son, and even though her past relationship with Brian Leader from 12
years ago were all brought in against the mother. But the hearing officer
did not honor mother’s request to release Joshua nor order some financial
help to assist the mother. But blame the mother open her mouth and testify
about Judge Hiroshige is the presumed farther for Joshua Tin. The mother
still freshly remember this judge said: “we told you do not open your mouth
, here is the help I give to you: parenting class and anger management class
.” Of course those won’t appear on the transcript.
The trial court was wrong to detent Joshua Tin into the foster system and
violate the parent-child relationship, the mother asked appeal court to
review all of the evidence and dismissal all of the charges in this case.
2. JURISDICTION ISSUE WITH THE HEARING COURT – CONFLICT INTEREST AND
BIAS
The mother contest that social worker intentionally left out the paternity
issue for judge Hiroshige, the court knew it. The court had conflict
interest on the hearing of the paternity issue. The mother also had
submitted a letter from her psychariatrist on her mental issue which tells
the court she had depression in the past, but she got treatment and she is
fine to take care of her son and she moved on with her life.
The first hearing officer, had read the PRI from the mother, and already
noticed that the mother put Judge Ernest Hiroshige’s name as a presumed
father on Joshua Tin. But the court still decided to make Alan Isaac is the
father for Joshua Tin and even nobody knew where Alan is.
On March 26, 2007, DCFS present the mediation agreement and indicated the
father’s identity unknown.
On April 28, 2007, before the trial, mother’s lawyer ask the mother did not
open her mouth, it is bad. It is bad? How many men would leave their wife,
fiancé, girl friend while she was 8 month pregnant? Instead of helping her
to raise the child, but file a false police report, use the power and
connection, put the mother into the jail? And influence the public defender
told her church not to bail her out because Winnie Tin committed a crime in
America so she should face the consequence until Joshua end up into the
foster agency. Why should any person be in the jail with no evidence by
claiming she called?
However, the hearing officer order Judge Hiroshige to come in for the
paternity conference on 6-19-08 (clerk’s report, page 0194). Judge
Hiroshige did not show up. Instead, Ryan Matienzo claims to order judge
Hiroshige to be the witness.. order judge Hiroshige as he is named……. He
almost break out the “father” the name, but Ryan than proceed that to call
him to the witness on the restraining order issue. (reporter’s
transcript page 26, line 4 – 10)
After September 23, 2008, after the trail, with no witness and evidence on
the physical and emotional damage to the child, but she said and he said
from the county, the hearing officer would detent the child. Instead off
ordering financial assistance but detain the child and order the mother for
parenting class and counseling.
After the trail, the mother asked her lawyer to fill a motion to move the
case out of LA superior court. But Ryan Matienzo refused to do so.
On Nov 17, 2008, mother filed a motion asked the court to reconsider the
paternity issue. The motion was never heard in the court.
On March 18, 2010, the mother filed a motion to recusal of the hearing
officer. With the significant issue regards the hearing officer can not be
holding a fare hearing on numerical issue involved from the paternity
finding, with social worker’s did not provide the service to the mother for
family reunification, action towards arrange the visitation for Joshua,
intentionally calling police on the mother while the mother going for the
visitation than to write a report and claim the mother is wild. But the
hearing officer would ignore the issue and response the mother with a
strike statement of disqualification.
On May 27, 2010, the mother file another motion to recues all Los Angeles
County Judge. But the motion was never heard. ( In re Richard W. (1979) 91
Cal.App.3d 960 (biased judicial officer.)
In the 366.26 hearing, DCFS request to terminate mother’s family
reunification service. Despite the mother has try the best to compliance
with the case plan, she finished the parenting class, she has been start
individual counseling prior to the jurisdiction. With passive progress
visitation report, the county provide to the court. The court did not take
into considerationt, The court error terminated the mother’s family
reunification service.
In addition to the passive visitation report, on Aug 7th, 2009, the DCFS
holding another TDM meeting. During the meeting, the social worker
recongnized the mother progress reached a goal that the social worker will
be continue to provide the family reunification service and will be possibly
increase the visitation to twice a week.( clerk’s report page 0656).
During the meeting the mother request Full Time Service was offer in the
past but was not implemented, and social worker agree to offer her the
service again. The full time service was never provide to the mother, the
social worker claim because the court terminate mother’s family
reunification service, the social worker moved the monitor visitation to
Southern California Adoption Agency.
In two of the trials, the mother brought up that Judge Hiroshige wire
tapping her phone and been contacting her counselor, been influence social
worker to write a false report on the mother. The social worker did not
provide the service to the mother as follow up the court order. When the
mother brought up those issues, the hearing officer said I do not believe
you who do social worker do that to you? That is bias. The hearing officer
certainly should have done some investigation to find out if the mother’s
statements are in fact true. The court is responsible to make sure that the
family reunification service is implemented by the law.
3. PATERNITY IN ERROR BY TRIAL COURT
From May 2007, when Jushua Tin was just first time end up in the DCFS due to
the birth mother Winnie Tin was accused violating the restraining order
went to jail. After Winnie Tin was released from the Jail, Winnie Tin had
report to DCFS the history about Joshua Tin. Joshua Tin was born due to
Judge Ernest Hiroshige promised her marriage and family. DCFS already knew
that Judge Hiroshige is the presumed father for Joshua Tin but social worker
intentional left his name out from the petition. Alan Isaac is the nature
father but based on the family code 7611.5 and in addition in violation of
the penal code 261.5, Alan Isaac should not and could not have any paternity
right by law. If the county council Guillermo Barragan who has been
Juvenile Court lawyer for 30 years, they have the basic knowledge, when
there is an allegation arise the mother was raped and became pregnant, the
court should have stop right there and bring in the DA to find what is going
on. However, the court did not bring up any those issues, and erroneous
Alan Isaac to be the father for Jushua Tin.
Mother’s phone has been at-tapped by Judge Hiroshige for the past 5 years.
When the mother try to find out from any lawyer, Judge Hiroshige normally
would approach and threaten the lawyer did not take her case. Mother has
been discussed the paternity issue with her lawyer Ryan Matienzo many times,
but the issue was not raise in the court, until the mother wrote the
paternity finding on her own.
On the first court appearance, Mother provide Ryan Matienzo PRI, stated the
presume father is Judge Ernest Hiroshige, but the paper work was missing in
the clerk’s transcript. (reporter’s transcript, page 3, line 21-23) but
you can verify from the court proceeding.
During the court hearing on April 30, 2008, mother’s attorney Ryan Matienzo
represent to the court the Paternity Questionnaire to the court. (please
see attachment, which is missing from the clerk’s transcript.)
Mr. Matienzo: Your Honor, my client would like to submit a paternity
questionnaire.
The court: Okay. Thank you.
Miss Tin, I don’t have the court file. So I am going to put over the
issue of Paternity until the next court date---
Minor’s mother: OKAY
(Reporter’s transcript, page 22, line 14 – 20.)
Please refer to 04/30/2008 Minute order: DCFS ORDERS: PATERNITY FINDINGS
DEFERRED TO 6-19-2008 (clerk transcript, page 0194).
On 4/30/08, mother’s lawyer told me that the judge is going to order Judge
Hiroshige to come in for the paternity funding, but On 6-19-08 court hearing
, mother attorney Ryan Matienzo talked to the mother that Judge Hiroshige
won’t be able to come into the court for hearing due to his busy schedule.
On the reporter transcript, mother attorney Ryan Matienzo start to play game
that he is going to call Hiroshige to present to be the witness for this
case, but not present to the court for the paternity finding. (reporter
transcript, page 28, line 10-14.)
In November 17, 2008, the birth mother filed a motion for reconsideration in
the paternity finding. (clerk’s report 451-457.) But the motion was never
heard in the court. In the report, the mother indicated that in addition to
the penal code 261.5 committed by Alan Isaac, Alan Isaac did not have good
character, no stable job, has crazy life style, and does drugs.
Under the marriage agreement, Judge Hiroshige lived with the birth mother
while the child was conceived. They planning to have at least one child for
their marriage, and Judge Hiroshige welcomed Joshua Tin to the new family.
However, due to Judge Hiroshige’s own character and unethical behavior with
other woman involved in his life while he is committed to the birth mother.
The birth mother complained Judge Hiroshige behavior to his superior and
Judge Hiroshige used his power lie to the court about their relationship and
abundant birth mother Winnie Tin while she was 8 month pregnant. However,
prior to his breaking up the relationship with her, he took the father’s
role, buying the baby item, family medical book, baby clothing, for the
newborn. In that way, Judge Hiroshige acted as the father for Joshua Tin.
Under the family code 7540 and 7611, Judge Hiroshige and the birth mother
both presume that him is the father for Jushua Tin. Under family code 7611 (
b) (2) a man is presumed to be the natural father of a child if he meets
the condition even if the attempted marriage could be declared invalid only
by a court, the child is born during the attempted marriage, or the child is
born within 300 days after the termination of cohabitation.
However, the trial court make Alan Isaac to be the alleged father is an
erroneous. First of all, Alan Isaac is involved with penal code 261.5, the
sexual criminal act is pending in the DA. Secondly, Alan Isaac did not have
a stable job nor has a good character to be a role model in Joshua Tin’s
life. Trial court erroneous Alas Isaac to be the alleged father. ( In re
Keyl’s adoption 112 Cal. App. 4th 538.)
During September 23, 2008 proceedings, the birth mother testifying in the
court:
“ By Mr. Barragan:
Q: Good afternoon, Miss Tin.
Ms. Tin, we are here to adjudicate a petition that was filed on behalf
of your son, Joshua.
I’d like to ask you first of all, who is the father of Joshua?
The Witness: From my understanding, it should be Judge Hiroshige. And also,
I have been told DCFS about the whole scenario over and over. The DCFS
employee filed false information to the court.
Q. By Mr. Barragan: Why do you say Judge Hiroshige is the father of Joshua?
A. Initially, Judge Hiroshige and I were planning to get married and have a
family. And we got into a verbal argument because as a result, I found out
that he was sleeping with some other woman. He verbally abused me,
The witness: okay. And I questioned him. I said, why you discuss marriage
with me? How can you sleep with some other woman? He said, MEN’s world. Not
big beal.
Q. By Mr. Barragan: Are you saying that Judge Hiroshige is the biological
father of Joshua?
A. No. I never said that he was biological father in any paper or verbally.
I did not understand why DCFS ask him to take a paternity, for DNA test.
(reporter transcript, page 33 Line 3 to page 22;)
A marriage contract differs from other contractual relations in that there
exists a definite and vital public interest in reference to marriage
relation. In this case, Judge Hiroshige had initiated the marriage, children
and family due to his first child from previous marriage was in the serious
mental illness. He would like to have few more child with me. Mother Winnie
Tin accepted his proposal and is willing to be his wife and base on that
promise and agreement.
They had Joshua Tin and later found that he was not the biological father
for Jushua Tin. Judge Hiroshige still agree to raise Jushua Tin with the
birth mother. Evidence shows that Judge Hiroshige took the mother shopping
for the bed room linen, accompanies her to see doctor, shopping for the baby
cloth and item, took her to the hospital, buying the family medical book,
giving the birth mother money to support her and the kids. All of those
presents a marriage relation between the two. The birth mother would like
humbly request the court to reverse a decision from the trial court, Judge
Hirhshige is the presumed father for Joshua Tin.
What is the best interest for this child Joshua Tin? The court and the
county keep saying that, but their action is make this child has no father.
Or named Alan Isaac to be the alleged father for Joshua and by knowingly
that Alan Isaac has no job, do not have good character, who is a criminal.
Should the court to make a ruling that this child with no father or should
the court finding Judge Hiroshige is the legal father for Joshua Tin to take
his responsibility and to provide for the child. Each case law is very
different. Judge’s decision is based on the law and what is making sense
based on moral, ethic code.
On Nov 17th, 2008, the birth mother filed a motion for reconsideration in
the paternity finding and order DCFS change the service unit. On December
2nd, 2008, deposition, “ The court has received a motion for
reconsideration of the paternity finding and to order DCFS to change the
service unit. ( RT PG 86 line 1 to pg87, line 3. ) But the motion was never
heard in the court.
REASONNIING FOR REVIEW THE PATERNITY ISSUE
After 10 month romantic dating, the birth mother Winnie Tin accepted Judge
Hiroshige’s proposal, they lived together and planning to have a family.
Since November 2002, The birth mother Winnie Tin was lived with the presumed
father Judge Hiroshige. Until February 2003, The birth mother found out
that the presumed father was chatting on her with some one named Linda. They
had a big argument; Judge Hiroshige claim that this is man’s world and
left at 11:30 pm. The birth mother was upset and called a friend, Allan
Isaac, shared her relationship with Alan Issac. The birth mother was crying
and trying called Judge Hiroshige in Alan’s house, they were arguing on the
phone until later Judge Hiroshige hang up on her. Allan Isaac gave the
birth mother a brink, drugged her and force her to have sex, took advantage
of her that night
One month later, the nature Mother Winnie Tin informed Judge Ernest
Hiroshige on the pregnancy, and Judge Ernest Hiroshige and she both believed
he is the father for Jushua Tin. Judge Hiroshige agreed to have the baby to
the new family and took her to for marriage counseling with his pastor,
Gary Gaulton. And Judge Hiroshige had promised her that he will take care of
her and the child. However, Judge Hiroshige would still sleep with other
woman and one night after have intercourse with the birth mother Winnie Tin,
he stated that “ look, you can not have sex any way, what is the
difference I am being with other woman”. The birth mother trys to put up
with his abuse because she want the baby to have a family. Judge Hiroshige
still take his duty if he is in the good mood. He took the birth mother
Winnie Tin to the hospital, help her to shopping for food, buying baby
clothing and prepare the baby item for the baby. Judge Hiroshige knew that
night the birth mother went to Alan Isaac’s house, he said he want to make
sure that he is the biological father, After one day he took her to the
hospital for themostistical testing, the doctor told them that they can do a
DNA test with the mother’s fluite. On July 14, 2004, Judge Hiroshige and
the mother want to a clinc did a DNA test. The birth mother was shock with
the result. And she told Judge Hiroshige that the night Alan Isaac did force
her, but after the mother told him many times that she did not want. Alan
Isaac finally stopped, there is no way that Alan Isaac is the father. In
addition, Alan Isaac had vasectomy. And now the baby was not born yet, Maybe
the result was not accurate. Judge Hiroshige may still be the father for
Joshua Tin. Judge Hiroshige became very angry and he was shouting to the
mother, you still defend for him. The birth mother cried and talked to Judge
Hiroshige, we want this baby because we loved each other and we want to
have a family. Let say for instance, Alan Isaac is the biological father, we
can not have him to get involved with the child’s life anyway because his
character. Judge Hiroshige agreed stay with the birth mother Winnie Tin.
Until August 18, 2003, the birth mother Winnie Tin found Judge Hiroshige
chat on her again with the same lady. She is getting very upset and told
Judge Hiroshige that if he still going to abuse her, She is going to seek
help form presiding Judge Duck. (In Asian Culture, work and family all
mixed together, the mother want his boss to intervene to help her.)
Judge Hiroshige felt very embarrassed was the mother’s action, He did not
want to his co-worker and his supervisor to know his unethical, immoral
behavior, he misinformed the court personal and lied to the police, had
court council Brett Bianco accused the birth mother Winnie Tin had been
harassed him since February 2003 because he had break up with mother Winnie
Tin, the mother went to continue to keep relationship with him. The birth
mother Winnie Tin hired lawyer Kevin Kay to defending her, with the lawyer
and all of the evidence, Judge Hiroshige did not want to go to court the
birth mother Winnie Tin was contact by Brett Bianco who verbally threat her
to sign up the mutual agreement and abundant the birth mother Winnie Tin
while she was 8 month pregnant.
On November 21, 2003, birth mother Winnie Tin gave birth to her son Jushua
Tin in Huntington Memorial Hospital. Mother Winnie left father section blank
and did not put any body’s name on the father section in the birth
certificate.
Joshua’s name is from Joshua, because the presumed father was judge
Hiroshige, so the mother used Jushua instead of Joshua.
After the c-section, nature mother Winnie Tin got into a complicated medical
situation, she was bleeding all night, because there was no body with her,
she passed out in her patient’s room until the doctor inspect the room. The
birth mother Winnie Tin was taken into the emergency units for blood
transfusion. After the hospitalization, she had stay in the bad for over
three months. On January 30th, 2004, Judge Hiroshige called her on her birth
day, and took her to dinner to celebrate her birth day, the house keeper
can be the witness to testify that the judge Hiroshige visit the mother and
the new born with a gift. In the dinner, he said he is going to be
responsible, and wants to part of her life and the child’s life. When he
hold Joshua Tin was not his biological child, he was hurt. The mother had
apologized to him. The birth mother Winnie Tin was crying to her pastor
Jonathon Wu. Judge Hiroshige’s pastor Gary Gaulton was also involved with
the reconciliation for the relationship during the year 2004 and 2005.
In 2004, nature mother Winnie Tin asked the maternal grandmother to help her
to take care of her son. When Joshua Tin was 10 month old, birth mother had
a friend of her took Joshua to the maternal grandmother help her to raise
Joshua Tin until Joshua Tin become 3 years old. In January 2007, the birth
mother Winnie Tin brought Joshua back to USA from China. They lived in a
rental house in West Covina.
The relationship did not worked out between Judge Hiroshige and the birth
mother. In June 2006, the last time they saw each other, Judge Hiroshige
punched her. When the police arrival and Winnie Tin told the police officer
that he punch her, they did not arrest him. After a week, Judge Hiroshige
obtaining the restraining order against the birth mother Winnie Tin. And In
July 2006, Judge Hiroshige filed a false police report again and claimed
that the birth mother had called him and violate the restraining order.
Please see attached police report from judge Hiroshige. Judge Hiroshige used
an false tape and had his co-worker another Judge listen to the case and
left Winnie Tin’s OR and put the birth mother Winnie Tin incarcerated in
the Jail. The birth mother arranged a friend to pick up Joshua Tin. On May/
24/2007, mother’s friend was unable to help to take care of Joshua Tin
anymore and give the child back to the kindergarten where the child was
going to school. The school teacher called social worker because mother’s
friend could not help her to take care of the child any more. Joshua Tin end
up with DCFS. On May 24th 2007, the birth mother was released from Jail.
DCFS put Joshua Tin was under Voluntary Family Maintenance agreement with
the mother. During the meeting with DCFS, Winnie Tin had reported to the
social worker that how she was raped by Allan Isaac and Judge Hiroshige is
the presume father and how he left her while she was 8 month pregnant
immorally.
In between May 2007 to December 2007, the birth mother asked help from
Social worker due to the stress by fighting back the criminal prosecution,
making a living, raise Joshua along. She asked if social worker can
temporally place Joshua Tin into the presumed father’s house Judge
Hiroshige or the paternal grandfather Godfrey Isaac’s house who is well
known attorney lived in Beverly Hills (cited clerks transcript, page 0008,
Detention report.) The birth father here means Alan Isaac and the presumed
father is Judge Hiroshige but on the cover sheet of the detention report,
social working knowingly and intentionally put Allan Isaac as alleged father
only and John Dow, Social worker intentionally left out Judge Hiroshige’s
name as presume father.
Social worker had legal obligation to tell the court truth on the paternity
issue. If there is more than one father for the child, social worker should
be given all of the information to the court. However, social worker only
put the nature father’s name on the detention report and claims that the
birth mother had visual hallucination and audio hallucination, some pre-
arranged a lawyer without notice the mother and hiding the initial detention
report from the mother and put Joshua into detention. Without reading the
social worker’s court paper work, the birth mother did not have a chance to
talk to the hearing officer about the financial need list and Joshua become
the court dependence.
“The court: And you waive reading of the petition and your right and enter
a denial?
Mr. Matienzo: Yes, Your honor, we waive, enter a general denial.” (reporter
’s transcript, page 2, line 11 – 14.)
4. DCFS’S COLLBORATION WITH JUDGE HIROSHIGE
.
When the birth mother was incarcerated in May 2007, Joshua Tin ended up
in the foster home. Because it is involved with the paternity issue, social
worker did not want book Joshua Tin into the system. Even Joshua Tin got flu
with favor for over two days and social worker Yumi Lin still did not book
him in, until three days later the supervisor Kim told social worker Yumi
Lin she need to book the kids into the system and give him some medical
treatment, Otherwise if anything happen to the kid, they would have to be
responsible for it. Finally, social worker Yumi Lin booked Joshua into the
system and took him to see the doctor. When the mother was released from the
Jail, the mother was told by one of the Social worker. Joshua Tin was still
taking the medication.
Many times, birth mother Winnie Tin asked social worker for help. Social
worker did nothing besides threatening the birth mother that if Joshua Tin
went into the system and the judge would put Joshua into adoption. The truth
is Joshua Tin ever book into the system, DCFS will have to present to the
court on the paternity issue. Please see attached Mediation report offer by
DCFS, on the paternity issue social worker changed the father from Allan
Isaac to father identity is unknown.
When the day, West Covina police officers come in to BM’s residence for
welfare check and heard the story, Police officers wanted the mother put a
list things need to be help on, and go to a judge to made a ruling on it.
But DCFS would put the report that the BM has mental issue. Whatever the
depression caused by Judge Hiroshige from the past, mother had seen the
psychologist in the past, and claimed she had mental issue. The social
worker lie to the court that mother had visual hallucinations and audio
hallucinations, brought out the past and criticized the mother is depressed
with a personality disorder.
In between May 2008 to Dec 2008, social worker Hui-chi Hsieh had stopped
by in the Mother’s home and negotiated a financial settlement figure on
behalf Judge Hiroshige. The mother told Hui-chi Hsieh that the financial
settlement is strictly confidential among she, Judge Hiroshige, and the
lawyers, nobody should get involved, especially social worker has no
position on this.
In many occasions, Hui-chi Hsieh stated that if Joshua Tin was book into the
system, judge will consider to put into Joshua into adoption and his
biological father family would come in to rescue Joshua Tin from the
adoption. Based on those actions, the mother believed Judge Hiroshige
influenced social worker and merely gave the mother any help.
5. DCFS DID NOT PROVIDE SERVICE TO MOTHER
1. The social worker did not provide service to the mother after the
judge order family reunification services.
The mother started her individual counseling right before the court hearing
on this case on September 23, 2008, n order she can get her son back earlier
.
In December 15, 2008, the mother first had private counselor Patricia
Anderson as her counselor. ( clerk’s transcript page 0578), she is very
good counselor but it is too expensive.
In Feb -1-2008, mother switch to a Christian counseling Living Grace, A
Christina counseling agency with Peggy Tsui. (Clerk’s transcript page 0579.
) for lower cost.
In June 2008, Foothill Family Service offer her no fee counseling, mother
start individual counseling with Nicole Ho in order to get Joshua Tin back
home as earlier as possible. But Judge Hiroshige interfere with mother’s
counseling, mother filed a formal complaint about Nichol Ho to Helen
MorranWolf, the executive director from Foothill Family Service. (CT PG 0492
– PAGE 0494)
During the counseling session with this counselor, Nichol Ho kept want to
talk with her about Judge Hiroshige is afraid to loss his job. The birth
mother told her that she did not want to talk about the past relationship
because it is all in the past, she want to move on and talk about present.
She did not want talk about Judge Hiroshige any more. She needs to do some
individual counseling to get her son back. But the counselor keeps saying
that she felt the mother need to see a psychiatrist. The mother informed the
counselor that she was fine and she was not felt depressed nor have
difficulty to control her emotion. Her psychologist had release her from the
treatment. Finally, the mother had escalated the problem to the higher
management and the mother got kick out from the program. (clerk’s
transcript page 0492 to 0494, reporter transcript page 100, line 20, to page
101, line 15).
In late October 2008, Mother again attending Christine Living Grace
counseling by Sam Ng. Please see attached report from Sam Ng, dated on April
3, 2009. In the letter, Sam Ng had address the mother trying her best to
deal with all these hurtful experiences, from time to time, ….. yet her
religious faith helped her to stay calm again, to move on in her life. She
is now able to work regularly at her loan business and maintains good self
care. (clerk’s transcript page 0632) The mother has been made an
individual counseling on the weekly basis with this counselor.
Mother participate in parenting class and successfully graduated from the
parenting class. Please see attached certificated for the parenting class. (
clerk’s report page 0633.)
The mother believed social worker has been influence by Judge Hiroshige that
If Joshua would be put into adoption, and his natural Godfry Isaac and
Kathleen Isaac would step in to rescue the child. Judge Hiroshige did not
have to be the legal father. The reason I said that it is because there many
talks among the social worker, eg. Social worker Huichi Hsieh once said: if
the kids put into adoption, his family would come in and rescues him.
Angela Chao also said the same thing,” how can the biological father did
not want his own kids? Once the kids is going to be adopted, they would have
to come in to rescue him.” Who gave social worker those ideas about the
kids being adopted Godfred Isaac and Kathleen Isaac would be come in?
Yoko Parsons: Winnie, You want to get your son back? You could not even get
a counselor to say your emotionally stable. HaHa…..”
Social worker did not provided service to the mother. In another hand they
disconnect the service to the mother, the judge order the visitation is
going to be monitored in a therapeutic setting. However the therapeutic
setting was merely provided by the social worker. The intention is good, it
is in order help the mother to understand Joshua, to be a good parent. But
the implementation is difficult to be taking by social worker.
In May 2008, a new social worker Amy Watanabe took over the case. Amy moved
Joshua from foster Maria’s home to foster Brian Boem’s home without
notifying anybody, and just went to Maria’s house and pick up Johsua and
hurry in to move him. She ordered the foster parent did not release their
phone number to the mother. Amy canceled the phone communication between the
birth mother and the minor. And lied to the BM, and claim that the foster
parent request did not release the phone to the BM. BM had request the
foster parent to put down those as evidence to the court. Please see foster
parent Brian’s hand writing as evidence (clerk transcript, page 0496.)
Prior to Amy took over the case, the mother has monitor visit with the
minor in the foster agency for two times a week. After Amy took the case,
the visit become once a week. When the mother requesting to increase the
visitation hours. Mother was told talk to the foster agency, then the mother
talk to the social worker from the foster agency, they told the mother talk
to the social worker in the DCFS. Mother was like a ball kicked back and
forth.
DCFS did not intent to sent Joshua back to the mother. The case started on
Dec 20, 2007, September 23, 2008, the court had jurisdiction and ordered
family reunification service. One month apart, November 12, 2008, DCFS
requested to terminate the birth mother’s family reunification service and
request to terminate family reunification service. (clerk’s transcript page
0405.)
In all different times, the birth mother has request to move the case out of
Asian pacific unit due to lock of support from Social worker and conspiracy
between social worker and judge Hiroshige.
On December 26, 2007, the birth Mother request to move the case out of Asian
Pacific Unit (reporter’s transcript page 6, line 4-5).
On September 23, 2008, the birth Mother request to move the case out of
Asian Pacific Unit:
The mother says:
No. 1. I don’t have trust with DCFS Asian Pacific Units. As a result of
that, they filed a false report to the court.
No. 2. They helping intervene to --- for the financial settlement between me
and Judge Hiroshige.
No. 3. I have to complain their behavior to their supervisor. And right now,
I have allocated it to board of director, executive board of Director Rick
Brian, As a Result I feel there is corruption and conspiracy with Judge
Hiroshige. I do not feel comfortable and trust to work with Asian Pacific
Unit. ( reporter’s transcript. Page 55, line 11 - 18)
Let take look at the chorological time line in this case:
1. On Dec 26, 2007, DCFS file a petition to the court by response a phone
call for child welfare check. By not reading the DCFS’s petition to the
mother, mother’s legal council work together with DCFS put Joshua Tin into
the foster family. The mother was provide the foster parent phone number by
social worker Gladys Davis in order for the mother to communicate with
Joshua Tin on the daily basis. With the report from the foster agency, you
can see the relationship between the birth mother and child is affectionate,
attentive.
2. In May 2008, social worker Amy Watanobe took the case and she
authorize the foster father did not provide his home phone number to the
mother and to disconnect the communication between the mother and the child
Joshua Tin. (clerk’s transcript, page 0496, & page 0454, line 11- page 0455
line 2.) Than Amy told the mother that the foster family did not want to
release their phone number because it is confidential placement and the
foster family did not want to be bother by her phone call. The mother asked
the foster father Brian Boem write is done as evidence. Brian proceeded
told the mother that their family had been involved with few foster care,
they always open the kid talk to the biological family. Please see attached
hand written from the foster parent that the social worker told him did not
release his home address & phone # to the mother of Joshua Tin dated 5/2/08.
( clerk’s transcript, page 0496), Social worker also bad mouth the mother
to the foster care agency counselor Dr. Peterson and the office director
Holly Brunton. (Clerk’s transcript, page 0496). Amy has had reduce the
visitation from two times a week to one times a week while the mother is
under the family reunification service. Please see attached the information
for court officer, it outlet the foster agency written monitor visit, it
clearly shows that the visitation is scheduled twice a week in January,
February, March 2008. (clerk’s transcript, page 0131) But after Amy come on
board, Amy reduce the visit from twice a week to one times a week. ( please
see attached email between the mother and Amy Watanobe, and the mother
testimony in the 366.26 hearing.( clerk’s transcript, page 153 line 18 –
24)
3. On September 23, 2008, the court jurisdiction the case, and order the
visitation in the therapeutic setting, In between Nov 17, 2008 to December
16, 2008, the dept only arranged only one visitation but the visitation only
occurred once on 10-1-08.
4. On November 17, 2008 DCFS request to terminate birth mother
reunification service and put Joshua Tin into adoption. In DCFS report date
11/17/2008, it indicating that Joshua did not want to see his mother. Those
information is contradict from other visitation report from other therapist
in the DCFS report to the court.
service.
5. There is no visitation between July 31, 2008 to October 22, 2008 (see
attached email on October 17, 2008 and email on October 17 at 5:23 pm).
Please see the mother’s lawyer’s argument: “ Well, First of All, Mother
Objects to any termination of visitation. On September 23, 2008, This court
ordered mother to have monitored visits in a therapeutic setting. Since then
, there has been one visit at a therapeutic setting which went well. In fact
, my client maintains the therapist believed the visit went well and even
recommended more thereafter.
The report states clearly the visitations under the therapeutic was not able
to occur at any time during this period, meaning that order was not
followed. “
“My client has repeatedly asked for visits which have not honored, NOR has
her request to talk to her son. The order made by this court has not been
honored, which explains why there may have been incidents.’
“As this court knows, reunification, which my client has, involves
visitation. I must repeat, my client still has family reunification.
Termination of her visitation prior to her services being terminated only
helps DCFS’s recommendation to terminate her services because she would not
be allowed to regularly visit her son. In fact, cutting of visitation
entirely prior to her service being terminated is unnecessary and only fast-
tracks a permanent plan for adoption.
In the alternative, I would ask that the court follow its original order
which was visitation in a therapeutic setting. Doing so will allow a
continued relationship with her son and not set up for failure at a .26
hearing laer down the road. (see reporter transcript page 81 line 25 to page
82, line 3.) On December 16, 2008, DCFS again request to terminate the
family reunification service. ( clerk’s transcript 0537.)
During the trail, the mother’s lawyer and child’s lawyer argued the
following:
“ Mr. Matienzo: My client would also like the current social worker on call
as well. In addition, My client has not received any visits since October.
I would request the Dept help facilitate her getting those visits with her
son.
The court: All right. The court will put Marie Nakayama on call for that
date and ask the dept to use its best efforts to facilitate visitation for
mother with Joshua.
Ms. Eshraghi: And, Your Honor, the court did order that the visits be in a
therapeutic setting, and he just recently had intake on 12/5. So it has to
be one when the therapist deems it appropriate. (clerk’s report, page 113,
line 14-26).
Social worker’s status report shows that they merely provide visitation to
the mother after September 23, 2008. On 04/06/2009, the social worker status
report shows the visitation only occurred twice on 12/24/2008, and 2/5/2009
. ( clerk’s transcript, page 0591,) Those two visit, the mother prepared
for the visitation, “The mother brought jackets for Joshua and they were
appropriately for Joshua.” 2/5/09, visit, Mother brought clothes for Joshua
and mother’s companion also came and brought new toys for Joshua. During
the visit, mother and Joshua ate snacks, played with toys, and mother read a
book to Joshua. During the visit, mother asked Joshua about his school and
friends, and Joshua appropriately answered mother’s questions. ( clerks’s
transcript, page 0591)
On 3/11/09, the mother contact SCSW and requested a visitation with Joshua.
Again DCFS request to terminated the family reunification services as to
mother is terminated, and WIC 366.26 selection hearing is request. (clerk’s
report, page 0594).
On 4/1/09, DCFS hold a TDM meeting with the mother, The team explained to
the mother about the permanency planning for adoption for child Joshua and
that an adoption family have been identified. The mother questioned the DCFS
TDM meeting, that Joshua Tin had relative here, he had birth father and
presumed father, why DCFS worker want to place Joshua into adoption? Finally
, the team also informed birth mother to disclose any of her relatives who
might to able to provide permanent placement for the child. As a result of
the TDM meeting, the goal is for mother to provide information on her
parenting education and counseling to CSW Hanges. Mother is to also provide
CSW information on any relative who may be able to provide permanent care
for Child Joshua.
2. Social worker’s report is contradicting among itself.
After the TDM meeting, DCFS start arranged the visitation again. On May 7,
and June 17, 2009, the visitation was taken place in the mother therapist
Sam Ng’s office.” In May 7, 2009, the counselor had monitor couple of
the visit with the mother. And he had descript very good letter regards the
visitation. Let read some of the letter from this therapist: “she looked
happy when she saw her son Joshua and showed the son the food and toy items
she brought. The son also looked excited to follow her to the meeting room.
Once they both entered the room, Ms Tin realized that she had turn off her
phone. She did. She then started to take some items out of the bag to show
her son. The items she brought included a hardcover story book, some toy
items, a bottled yogurt drink, a small bag of chocolate, and three kinds of
fruit. She attempted to engage her son in a conversation by asking how was
he doing. The son responded but also tried to reach for the food. She than
coached the son that he needed to ask the son how was he doing and try to
know some of his experience at home and in school.
After a while, the mother tried to teach the son to wash his hands after
eating, and to keep the table clean. She then showed him a story book she
brought which came with a toy watch for learning how to tell time, and to
understand the time for common daily activities. The son wanted the mother
to hold him and sit on her lap as the mother read him the story. THE SON
WANTED THE MOTHER TO HOLD HIM AND SIT ON HER LAP AS THE MOTHER READ HIM THE
STORY. The mother was able to keep the son interested in the story for about
10 minutes, while he was drinking the bottled drink and eating other food
items. When the son switched his attention, and want to draw on the
blackboard, the mother tried to bring his attention back. Later she learned
to show interest in what the son like to play with. And she followed him and
get involved by asking what he was drawing and gave him verbal praises……
… When the time was running short. She showed him to clearn up threw away
the trash, and hugged him to say good bye, she also wanted him to say good
bye with a kiss on her check. He did. He looked happy during the meeting and
when leaving.
Impression: The mother was prepared to meet with her son. She brought
some toys and food items. That are generally age appropriate and healthy,
but she brought more than enough……. Both of them seem to enjoy the
interaction.” (clerk’s transcription, page 0727)
In June 17, 2009, the therapist wrote another letter to the court: “
She looked somewhat preoccupied, yet she was prepared to meet the son. She
turned off her cell phone, and showed him the food and toy items she brought
. …… After a while, the mother tried to ask the son to do some drawing.
But the son wanted to play with the new board game. The mother then TOOK THE
SON TO SIT ON HER LAP, SHOWED HIM THE STEPS, AND PLAYED WITH HIM TOGETHER
BY ROLLING THE DICE AND MOVING THE TOKENS. DURING THE GAME TIME, WHETHER HE
LIKE TO BE HOME WITH HER, HE KNOCKED HIS HEAD.( WHICH IS ERROR ON THE
THERAPIST) The son wanted the mother to bring him the computer. The mother
later did not continue the subject, and switched to talk about something
else and tried to say something funny to engage in additional conversations.
When time was running short, she showed him to clean up, threw away the
trash, and hugged him to say good bye. She also wanted him to say good bye
with a kiss on her check. He did, he looked happy during the meeting and
when leaving.
Impression: The mother was prepared to meet with her son. She brought
one toy item and some food items that are generally age appropriate and
healthy. She made some good attempts to engage the son in conversation and
play, and tried to teach the son something such as to wait, to talk, and to
teach him courtesy. Although she still showed tendency to want the son
follow her instructions, she had also learned to show interested in what the
son like to do and be interested in. Both of them to enjoy the interaction.
In addition, she still subtly told the son she wanted him come home to be
with her someday, and she had some goodies at home waiting for him.
Monitor report for another one: “ The mother quickly took her son into the
meeting room. She looked somewhat preoccupied, yet she was prepared to meet
the son. She turned off her cell phone, and showed him the food and toy
items she brought. The son started to eat the fruits she brought, and she
tried to pen the new board game she brought. ……. The mother then took the
son to sit on her lap, showed him the steps, and played with him together by
rolling the dice and moving the tokens. During the game time, the mother
also asked the son whether he like to be home with her, and said she had a
computer there waiting for him to play. The son KNOCKED HIS HEAD and wanted
the mother to bring him the computer. When time was running short, she
showed him to clean up, threw away the trash, and hugged him to say good bye
. She also wanted him to say good bye with a kiss on her cheek. He did. He
looked happy during her meeting and when leaving. (clerk’s transcript, page
0821)
On the 08/13/2009 status review report to the court the visit between July
31st to Aug 7th, Per the therapist, Mike Habousch and Illiana Aispuro, the
mother has prepare all of her visit, and the visit went well. Let read the
last two paregraph: Mother seemed a bit awkward at first with child. However
, after about 5 minutes, mother warmed up and engaged in playing games with
child, such as tossing football and playing with toy trucks. Both mother and
child were laughing and seemed enjoy themselves over all. On 08/07/09, The
mother bought a kid computer for the minor, and tired to teach the child
typing. (clerk’s transcript 0651) Please refer to Mr. Blair’s write up
for the 08/07/09, visitation attached. ( But the report was not in the court
file).
On 8/7/2009, the mother had another TDM meeting, with SCSW Rose Studebaker,
CSW Vantha Hanges, and also the TDM facilitator, despite the good visitation
report from above, the meeting try to increase mother’s visitation to
twice a week. However, the court terminated the family reunification
services.
On December 24, 2009’ 366.26 WIC report, social worker wrote the birth
mother arrival pretty much on time, on 11/17/09, Mr. Haboush told this CSW
mother arriving pretty much on time, trying pretty hard to become a mother”
They would play games and mother would use opportunities during the visit
to teach Joshua lessons. On 9/24/09, during a face to face visit, Joshua
described his visits with mother as “okay” and that they “talk and play”
during visits. When asked further questions about his visits, Joshua did
not answer questions and proceeded to play with this CSW. Then the social
worker turn around to request the court to terminate the visit between
mother and Joshua, as it precludes to the adoptive planning. (Clerk’s
report page 0677)
3. Social worker has constantly provide
the court false information
DCFS social worker claimed on the paper work that CSW had made referral to
FSP and letter to mother upon her request. And mother was referred to FSP
services in the past. However she refused the service. (clerk’s transcript
page 0652) Please see the email between the mother and social worker Yumi
Lin. Please see attached (judicial notice one)
4. Most social worker paper allegation did not have any support and or
contradicting with the fact evidence by emails
The social worker has been lied under oath to the court that they refer the
mother to the full services partnership service because the mother never
received any calls from suggest services. There is only a fax from social
worker Vantha Hanges, but that did not mean she had made those arrangement.(
Clerk’s transcript page 0660.) There is no evidence mother has refuse the
service. In stead mother has been frequently sent emails to the social
worker asking for the full time service program, and asking for the
visitation.
6. Terminated Family Reunification Service is Error
On August 13, 2009, the court have the 18 month review for argument to
return Joshua Tin back home. Mother’s attorney argued mother’s compliance
with the court-ordered case plans and her ability to care for her son.
“ The court: All right. I do not need her compliance. I have that
information. It would be her ability to care for her son that is a issue
with respect to mother’s testimony.”
The mother testify that she hold a job and owns a mortgage brokerage
company, and originated residential loan and commercial loan. And she lives
in a condo in Arcadia, which is a nice city with a good school district.
Mother’s lawyer asked:
“Q: What do you do during these visits?
A: I prepare the games, and we play the games…..
Q: Now, how does he react to you when you have the visit?
A; I call him……. He calls me mom. I present him with the gift. He is happy
to see me with those. One time, I bought him a computer and teach him how
to type ( reporter’s transcript, page 154, line 7 – 21) Which is match
with Mr. Blair’s the visitation written report dated on 08/07/2009 from the
foster agency , clerk’s transcript
page 0651).
Q: By Mr. Matienzo: During your visits, has he ever expressed a desire to
live with you?
A: Yes.
Mother’s lawyer also subpoena mother’s therapist Sam Ng, who had been
watch the visitation for the mother and the child and mother has been going
for counseling for a while.
“ Q: Mr. Ng, have you been monitoring my client’s visits with her son?
A: I did twice
Q: Okay, And you wrote a letter dated June 17, 2009; is that correct?
A: Yes. Correct.
Q: And in that letter, you stated that Joshua looked happy during the
meeting with my client; is that correct?
A: Correct.
Q: Was my client appropriate with her son during that visit?
A: I think most of the time, yes.
Q: Was he?
A: yes
Q: Was she affectionate?
A: She appeared to be, yes.
Q: Now, Do you believe ---- Do you think that her son recognizes her as
the mother?
A: yes
Q: All right. Now, the letter, you ended that by saying, “My client has
learned to show interest in what her son would like to do and be interested
in, and both of them seemed to enjoy the interaction.” That is how you
ended that letter. Right?
A: Correct. Yes.
Q: So you believe her son enjoyed her company?
A: In the session, yes, I believe so.
Q: And you also wrote a similar letter dated may 7, 2009, is that
correct?
A: yes.
Q: Again you stated that basically my client and her son enjoyed
each other’s company?
A: yes. That is one important part of what I observed during the
session.
Q: So In summary, the visits have been positive, right?
A: yes, I believe so. Right.
(repertor’s transcript, pg 177, line 9 – page 178, line18.)
On the 08/13/2009 status review report provide to the court the
visitation went well between July 31st to Aug 7th, Per the therapist, Mike
Habousch and Illiana Aispuro. The mother has prepared all of her visit with
games and food, and the visit went well. Let read the last two paragraphs:
Mother seemed a bit awkward at first with child. However, after about 5
minutes, mother warmed up and engaged in playing games with child, such as
tossing football and playing with toy trucks. Both mother and child were
laughing and seemed enjoy themselves over all. On 08/07/09, The mother
bought a kid computer for the minor, and tired to teach the child typing. (
clerk’s transcript 0651) Please refer to Mr. Blair’s write up for the 08/
07/09, visitation attached. ( But the report was not in the court file).
In this status review report, it also shows the mother’s therapist Sam
Ng had provide a good report for the court for the to visit has been
arranged by him. Please see attached report from San Ng dated on May 5, 2009
(clerk’s transcription, page 0727) , and June 17, 2009. (clerk’s
transcription, page 0728)
In those report, It clearly shows the evidence the loving, caring
relationship between the mother and the child. The child wants the mother
hold him while the mother reading him a book.
The Legislature has very carefully detailed what findings the court must
make at such a hearing. (In re Joshua S. (1986) 186 Cal. App. 3d 147, 153 [
230 Cal. Rptr. 437].) The court must first determine whether the minor is be
returned to the parent. It appears the county has the burden of proving the
negative of this issue. (? 366.2, subd. (e); In re Joshua S., supra.) If
the child is not returned, the court must determine whether there is a
substantial probability that the minor will be returned to the physical
custody of the parent within six months. If so, the court must set another
review hearing within six months. (? 366.25, subd. (c).) However, if the
court makes negative findings on both questions, it must develop a permanent
plan for the child. (? 366.25, subd. (d).)
Based on those passive report and testimony, the county council deny to
release the child back to the mother’s custody due to once the child return
the mother’s custody than child support issue will be raised. “ It’s
clear if the child were return to Miss Tin, the issue of who is your father
and who is obligated to support you and provide would be a disservice. It
would be an in justice, and it would be a detriment to this child at this
time.” ( reporter’s transcript, page 186, line 22 – 27).
Those argument are violating the parent and child relationship, and is in-
constitutional. And it is not in the best interest of the child.
In this court hearing with the passive report, it seems the county has the
burden to proving the negative of this issue. The only argument for the
county to argue is about child support issue between Judge Hiroshige and
Alan Isaac. That should not be children’s court concern.
The court error to termination the mother’s family reunification service
and refuse to return the child’s custody back to the mother. In re Kiesha
E. (1993) 6 Cal. 4th 68, 76. “Our society does recognized an ‘essential’
and ‘basic’ presumptive right to retain the care, custody, management, and
companionship of one’s own child, free of intervention by the government.
(Citations.) Maintenance of the familial bond between children and parents
– even imperfect or separated parents – comports with our highest value
and usually best serves the interests of parents, children, family, and
community. Because we so abhor the involuntary separation of parent and
child, the state my disturb an existing parent-child relationship only for
strong reasons and subject to careful procedures.”
The child’s lawyer also recommend to terminated the mother’s reunification
services. “Your honor, I am asking the court at this time to terminate
mother’s reunification services. Joshua has been doing excellent in foster
care. He is finally at a position where he is stabilizing in a good home.”
Which statement is totally against the constitutionally for the mother and
the child interested. In re Cheryl E. (1984) 161 Cal.App.3d 587. “We cannot
encourage, under the guise of ‘best interests’ or ‘home stability,’ the
arbitrary determination by a governmental agent that a well-educated ‘
professional’ couple will be better parents than ‘red-necked hillbillies’
(AW’s words, not ours) who are on welfare and have six other children.’ (
Id., at pp. 606-607.)
In re Kimberly F. (1997)56 Cal.App.4th 519. The best interests standard
cannot be a simplistic, comparison between the natual parent’s and the
caretakers household – i.e., a “simple best interest test.” (Id., at p.
529.) “ In statutory terms, the ‘simple best interest test’ provides an
imcomplete picture of ‘best interestes’ under section 388. It ignores all
familial attachments and bonds between father, mother, sister and brother,
and totally devalues any interest of the child in preserving an existing
family unit, no matter how, in modern parlance, “dysfunctional.” It fails
to account for the complexity of human existence, substituting in its stead
a one-dimensional comparison which does not adequately address the child as
a whole person, including his or her formative years with a natural parent.
After all, the Legislature used the plural, “best interests,” rather than
the singular ‘best interest’ thereby indicating a more complex standard
than a unidimensional comparison between households.” (Id., at pp. 529-530.
)
In re Randalynn G. (2002) 97 Cal. App.4th 1156, 1169. The two standards –
the section 388 best interest standard and the section 366.26 ( c ) (4)
detriment standard – are basically two sides of the same coin. What is in
the best interest of the child is essentially the same as that which is not
detrimental to the child.
John Bowlby, the world-famous psychiatrist and author of the classic
works: Attachment, Separation, and Loss offers important guidelines for
child rearing based on the crucial role of early intimate relationship. His
theory was adopt by Library of congress Catalog in publication date in 1968
In re-examining the nature of the child’s tie to his mother, traditionally
referred to as dependency, it has been found useful to regard it as the
resultant of a distinctive and in part pre-programmed set of behavior
patterns which is the ordinary expectable environment develop during the
early months of life and have the effect of keeping the child in more or
less close proximity to this mother-figure (Bowlby 1969). By the end of the
first year the behavior is becoming organized cybernetically, which means,
among other things, that the behavior becomes active whenever certain
conditions obtain and ceases when certain other conditions obtain. For
example by pain, fatigue and anything frightening, and also by the mother
being or appearing to be inaccessible. The conditions that terminate the
behavior very according to the intensity of its arousal. At low intensity
they may be simply sight or sound of the mother, especially effective being
a signal from her acknowledging his presence. At higher intensity
termination may require his touching or clinging to her. At highest
intensity, when he is distressed and anxious, nothing but a prolonged cuddle
will do. The biological function of this behavior is postulated to be
protection, especially protection from predators.
“Separation Anxiety in Children and Adolescents by Psychologist Andrew
R. Eisen and Charles E. Schaefer also dressed: “ when the child has that
bond with the mother as infant, but by any reason to separate the mother and
the child to separation, it normally will cause the result of child with
Anxiety.”
In re Philip B. (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 796, 801. “inherent in the
preference for parental autonomy is a commitment to diverse lifestyles,
including the right of parents to raise their children as they think best.
Legal judgments regarding the value of child rearing patterns should be kept
to a minimum so long as the child is afforded the best available
opportunity to fulfill his potential in society.” (see also, In re Petra B.
(1989) 216 Cal. App.3d 1163, 1170.)
The juvenile court has the statutory authority, on a proper record and
after conducting a hearing, to exercise its discretion and terminate
reunification services at any time. In doing so, the court must consider all
of the circumstances before it, and its determination must be based on
careful exercise of its discretion. In Denny H. v. Superior court (2005) 131
Cal.App.4th 1501, 1509. For children ages three and older, court-ordered
reunification services may be extended up to a maximum period of 18 months
if the court finds at the 12-month review hearing ‘that there is a
substantial probability that the children will be returned” to parental
custody or the reasonable services have not been provided.
Under section 366.26 ( c ) (2), precludes termination of parental right
on review when social services has failed to offer or provide reasonable
reunification services to a parent throughout the reunification period.
Here again, the appellant asked the review court to reconsider the
termination of the family reunification service.
The trial court failed to exercise its jurisdiction concerning visitation
As noted above, section 362.1 requires that an order placing a minor in
foster care and ordering reunification services must provide for visitation
between the parent and the minor. Here, the court ordered that family
reunification services be provided but did not make any orders regarding
visitation. Further, when petitioner requested the court to make sure the
social worker comply with the visitation order and to increasing visitation,
the court did not take any action on it.
The juvenile court may properly delegate the administration of a visitation
order to the social worker. (In re Danielle W. (1989) 207 Cal. App. 3d 1227,
1237 [255 Cal. Rptr. 344].) However, a visitation order granting the social
worker complete and total discretion to determine whether or not visitation
occurs is invalid. (Ibid.)
The Legislature has determined that such a decision must be made by the
court. Thus, the trial court's failure to make a specific order concerning
visitation was error.
7. Judge Hiroshige’s Wire Tapping
The mother believed Judge Hiroshige has been wire tapping the mother’s
phone, and interfere with her therapist, which caused the mother had switch
from two therapist, and it effect the mother to finish the counseling
program. The mother tried her best to comply with the court case plan, but
she could not finish due to Judge Hiroshige interfere with her counselor.
And the mother had testify in two court hearing regards Judge Hiroshige’s
wire tapping and illegally contact the mother’s counselor.
In December 2, 2008, restraining order hearing, child lawyer question the
mother about the counselling,
“Q: And are you currently enrolled in counseling?
A: I was enrolled in Counseling. I have the report back in October. However,
Judge Hiroshige tap into my phone, Got connection with the counselor. I had
to write three pages complaint about Nicole, the counselor. I told her, I
come over here because I want to deal with my own issues. I want to be
better to be for myself, better to be for my family. I do not want to talk
about Judge Hiroshige. It is a long time ago. My wound is already healed. I
do not want it to be open up anymore. But all of the conversation has been
release to Judge Hiroshige.”
“Finally, I wrote three pages complaint in the report. I think it is also
been attached to the board of director for the clinic. Up until now, my
phone still was tapped by judge Hiroshige. I just want to have a normal life
. What is the reason Judge Hiroshige can not leave me alone? I go to two
counselors already, all off them, Judge Hiroshige has been talking to them
” ( clerk’s transcript, page 97, line 23 – page 98, line 15.)
In September 13, 2009, 18 month status review hearing, again the mother
protest against Judge Hiroshige’s wire tapping and illegally contact her
counselor.
“A. Basically My last counselor Sam Ng ask me same questions. He said if I
still believe Judge Hiroshige still has cenerain responsibility towards me.
And Josh, and my son would be into adoption.”
Clerk Transcript page 157, line 15 – 18.page 159, line 27 -28
influence therapist. ( clerk transcript, page 0651 mother had never refused
to have any further monitor visitation as monitor by Mr. Ng
8. The Special Relationship Between
the Mother and the Child Joshua Tin
Joshua is a very special and smart kids. It is unfortunately he is born in
this unfortunate situation. When the mother sent Joshua back to China with
the maternal grandparents, mother told the maternal grandparents did not
tell Joshua who is his father because the mother worried that will affect
him emotionally.
The appellant loves Joshua, by nature it did not matter how Joshua was born,
the mother want to give the best to this boy. In this world, you have all
kind people. Good and bad, we cannot every body to be a good person act in
the good standard. The appellant can only require herself to do a right
thing, to take the responsibility, to love, to give. The appellant is very
affectionate, good, honest person, she wants to give the best to her child,
the love, the affection, the honor, the attention, to teach him to be good,
to nurture him to be honest, to give him the love and let him know he is
loved, he is wanted by his mother.
The child already knew who is his mother, and he is 7 now. Even though the
mother cannot see him now, but every week, the mother write him a love
letter and bought him a lot of gift, in his heart he knew those gift are
from his mother.
The appellant did not want this minor to think why he was put into adoption,
why his biological parent did not want him. When he become a teenager, he
would be looking for his biological family. And Joshua had already have a
family, his grandparent loves him, his aunt loves him, his causin loves him,
his uncle loves, what more we can tell Judge your honor, he is be loved by
his family. Let us to love him and give him the best.
After the court terminate the parental right, the mother start doing her
own legal research on the parent’s right and paternity funding. Legally
Allan Isaac could not and did not have the constitutional right for Joshua
Tin.
Back in year 2007, when the mother was just brought Joshua back from China
and informed his nature father Alan Isaac that Joshua is back now. Alan
wants to visit Joshua, and he drove to the mother’s house. the mother
allowed him to come in to see Joshua. However, Joshua did not have any
distinct feeling towards Alan Isaac. Alan sit on the coach, and try to close
to Joshua. Joshua looked at him and he acted very nerves. Right the way,
Joshua asked the mother in Chinese “ mom, I do not like this person, tell
him to leave.”
However, from all of the report, you can see Joshua have a very special
felling and connection with his mother. In his psychologist report from Dr.
Chia-Wen (aka Winnie) Hsieh, dated August 14, 2008: “ I have been treating
Joshua since 08/06/07 and provided mental health treatment for him
throughout his multiple placements……. In addition, he had many behavioral
issues such as aggression towards others, selectively mute (did not speak to
anyone besides few words to his mother. It was reported by school that
there was no consistent parental care for Joshua outside of the school
setting.
9. THE JUVENILE COURT’S DETERMENTAL FINDING IS NOT SUPPORTD BY
SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
Section 366.21, subdivision (f) is the statute that sets forth the procedure
the juvenile court must follow at a 12 month review hearing. That statute
provides in pertinent part:
At the permanency hearing, the court shall determine the permanent plan for
the child, which shall include a determination of whether the child will be
returned to the child’s home and, if so, when, within the time limits of
subdivision (a) of section 361.5 The court shall order the return or her
parent or legal guardian unless the court finds, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that the return of the child to his or her parent or legal
guardian would create a substantial risk of detriment to the safety,
protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child
The social worker DID NOT have the burden of establishing that detriment;
Section 366.21, subdivision ( C ) requires the social worker to file a
report with the court containing his or her recommendations for disposition
of the matter at that hearing. The statute specifi-cally requires the social
worker who recommends that the child not be returned be parental custody to
“specify why the return of the child would be detrimental to the child.”
The juvenile court made a detriment finding in this case but there is
nothing in the social worker’s report to support the finding that return to
parental custody would have been detrimental to the children. The sole
statement in the social worker’s report concerning detriment is as follow:
10.THE COURT TERMINATE THE VISITION IS AN ERROR
Section 366.26 subdivision (C ) (1 ) (A) and (C) (3), A
decision whether to grant visitation rights to a parent is independent of
any decision authorizing the termination of parental rights. Visitation may
be granted or continued to a parent during the time it takes to determine
whether parental rights should be terminated.
Section 366.26 (C) The court shall also make an order for visitation with
the
parents or guardians unless the court finds by a preponderance of the
evidence that the visitation would be detrimental to the physical or
emotional well-being of the child.
The court was wrong on terminated the visitation to the mother and the
child. The mother informed the court that social worker authorized foster
agency written a false report, and the mother had provide the picture was
taken during the visitation but without a hearing, the court deny the
visitation between the mother and the child.
The legislature very clearly stated that unless the court find clear and
convincing evidence the visitation cannot be terminated. Please see
attached picture from the mother to the court but it was not in the record,
the picture itself can tell the mother and the child had loving and caring
relation between the two. Appellant humbly asked the court to revise the
order from the trial court to terminated the visitation on this case.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth in the standard review, I asked the court of
appeal to reverse the visitation issue and sent the case to a different
jurisdiction for review on the paternity issue.
Date: January 18, 2010
Respectfully submitted
Winnie Tin
--------------------------------------------------
Wan (aka Winnie) Tin
Appellant | c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | | G**L
发帖数: 22804 | 3 给个摘要吧，太长了。看到和日本人同居，却提被白人搞，就看下去，果然生出了半白
半黄。这种情况军版不大会同情
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 这是真人真事， 请大家舆论支持。
: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
: SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
: DIVISION TWO
: Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
: )
: Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
: v. )
: Los Angeles County Superior Court )
: )
| A******D
发帖数: 1075 | 4 略读了下，不一定准确，给大家个摘要：
大陆女，父母是教授，96年全奖读penn state MBA，98年毕业，2000年银行工作，后来
改做贷款。2002年认识日本人（法官），10个月的约会后日本人求婚，两人同居，吵架
时去白垃圾男（被州里DA起诉；没好性格，没工作，疯狂的生活方式，吸毒）家求安慰
，声称被灌酒have sex，怀孕期间日本人问那天那件事，做了DNA鉴定非
父亲，大陆女求之，说或许DNA鉴定错了，那白垃圾男只进去没射。后来生出混血儿，
想要日本人养，因为他是“presumed father”；她不想那白垃圾男当father，因为一
个“犯罪的人是不能在宪法的意义上成为父亲的”（这个不理解），她总想要把日本人
列为父亲，法院和社工却总是想要把白垃圾男列为父亲。她要求政府资助养小孩，政府
可能基于她的说法认为她没条件养，拿走小孩，直到找到个父亲养，政府却不认可那日
本法官是父亲，而那白垃圾男却不知在哪里，其养父母也不愿出钱。 | l******t
发帖数: 55733 | | t***h
发帖数: 40 | 6 实情是：
社工做假的报告到法庭, 听审法官MARGUERITE DOWNING, 同流合污, 把孩子非法扣押下
来, 不让孩子的父亲, 法官 ERNEST HIROSHIGE, 出厅听审, 就这样法官一起做假, 把
孩子送去给别人领样 .
她的未婚夫有把她被强暴的事情揽下来不让起诉。 这就是美国的法律。 | p****m
发帖数: 204 | 7 难为你读了，太长了。。
【在 c*********y 的大作中提到】
: 这是谁写的,怎么这么乱的关系呢。
| p****m
发帖数: 204 | 8 唉，这乱的。这个法律还真不懂。
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
: 略读了下，不一定准确，给大家个摘要：
: 大陆女，父母是教授，96年全奖读penn state MBA，98年毕业，2000年银行工作，后来
: 改做贷款。2002年认识日本人（法官），10个月的约会后日本人求婚，两人同居，吵架
: 时去白垃圾男（被州里DA起诉；没好性格，没工作，疯狂的生活方式，吸毒）家求安慰
: ，声称被灌酒have sex，怀孕期间日本人问那天那件事，做了DNA鉴定非
: 父亲，大陆女求之，说或许DNA鉴定错了，那白垃圾男只进去没射。后来生出混血儿，
: 想要日本人养，因为他是“presumed father”；她不想那白垃圾男当father，因为一
: 个“犯罪的人是不能在宪法的意义上成为父亲的”（这个不理解），她总想要把日本人
: 列为父亲，法院和社工却总是想要把白垃圾男列为父亲。她要求政府资助养小孩，政府
: 可能基于她的说法认为她没条件养，拿走小孩，直到找到个父亲养，政府却不认可那日
| A******D
发帖数: 1075 | 9
问题是那ERNEST HIROSHIGE就不是父亲，小孩的父亲是那Alan Issac。
【在 t***h 的大作中提到】
: 实情是：
: 社工做假的报告到法庭, 听审法官MARGUERITE DOWNING, 同流合污, 把孩子非法扣押下
: 来, 不让孩子的父亲, 法官 ERNEST HIROSHIGE, 出厅听审, 就这样法官一起做假, 把
: 孩子送去给别人领样 .
: 她的未婚夫有把她被强暴的事情揽下来不让起诉。 这就是美国的法律。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 10 所以要安法律办事， 两个男人都要出亭听审。
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
:
: 问题是那ERNEST HIROSHIGE就不是父亲，小孩的父亲是那Alan Issac。
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 11 既然妈妈在美国有良好的教育， 又有工作， 法庭没有权利把孩子非法拿走， 这对孩
子的伤害有多大。美国的法律只是顶给穷人的吗？ 法官高于法律。 法官可以帮助社工
作假。
政府可以不按照法律办事？ 开后门？比中国还黑。 | G**L
发帖数: 22804 | 12 为什么要审这两个人
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 所以要安法律办事， 两个男人都要出亭听审。
| a*****4
发帖数: 717 | 13 既然你认为美国比中国还黑， 你就回国去阿。 不要死皮赖脸的赖在美国。 啥道理啊
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 既然妈妈在美国有良好的教育， 又有工作， 法庭没有权利把孩子非法拿走， 这对孩
: 子的伤害有多大。美国的法律只是顶给穷人的吗？ 法官高于法律。 法官可以帮助社工
: 作假。
: 政府可以不按照法律办事？ 开后门？比中国还黑。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 14 因为审这两个人就可以揪出强暴安， 及这个日裔法官用他的权利把这个强暴安给揽下
来， 这是反法的。 另外， 这个日本法官必需在法庭上testify 他是否根这个女人求
婚之后同居把孩子生下来的， 是的话， 他就必需成但起样孩子的法律责任。 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | | A******D
发帖数: 1075 | 16
文章里面没说清楚为什么要拿走小孩，我根据上下文猜测可能是因为这个妈妈老是要
financial aid，又要求把小孩放日本人那里养，可能法院认为她没条件养小孩才拿走
的。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 既然妈妈在美国有良好的教育， 又有工作， 法庭没有权利把孩子非法拿走， 这对孩
: 子的伤害有多大。美国的法律只是顶给穷人的吗？ 法官高于法律。 法官可以帮助社工
: 作假。
: 政府可以不按照法律办事？ 开后门？比中国还黑。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 17 no, the social worker file false report regards the mother's mental status
and claim she had visual hallucinations and audial hallucinations, the
mother provide her doctor's letter she did not have those problem, but the
judge still illegally detente the child which is against the law?
Can hearing judge against the law in the court room? Make her own law to be
executed in her court room?
No , it is a crime. or you can called Court corruption.Doing a favor for a
fellow co-worker? Big problem for her own job. | G**L
发帖数: 22804 | 18 是不是强奸，要去报案，有警察立案，跟法官有什么关系？
法官求婚之后和别人生的孩子他也有养的法律责任？
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 因为审这两个人就可以揪出强暴安， 及这个日裔法官用他的权利把这个强暴安给揽下
: 来， 这是反法的。 另外， 这个日本法官必需在法庭上testify 他是否根这个女人求
: 婚之后同居把孩子生下来的， 是的话， 他就必需成但起样孩子的法律责任。
| p********n
发帖数: 2162 | 19 既然已经成为日本人或白人
为啥要来找华人求助呢 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 20 请学点法律， 中国人是一盘散沙。
【在 G**L 的大作中提到】
: 是不是强奸，要去报案，有警察立案，跟法官有什么关系？
: 法官求婚之后和别人生的孩子他也有养的法律责任？
| | | G**L
发帖数: 22804 | 21 你给讲讲相关法律吧
把小孩拿回来，再让日裔法官帮着养，难度太大，没人能帮得了
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 请学点法律， 中国人是一盘散沙。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 22
abuse office penal codo, only the DEPT of Justice or attorney general 可以起
诉： for judge Downing did not excute the law.
PENAL CODE
TITLE 8. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER 39. ABUSE OF OFFICE
Sec. 39.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(1) "Law relating to a public servant's office or employment" means a law
that specifically applies to a person acting in the capacity of a public
servant and that directly or indirectly:
(A) imposes a duty on the public servant; or
(B) governs the conduct of the public servant.
(2) "Misuse" means to deal with property contrary to:
(A) an agreement under which the public servant holds the property;
(B) a contract of employment or oath of office of a public servant;
(C) a law, including provisions of the General Appropriations Act
specifically relating to government property, that prescribes the manner of
custody or disposition of the property; or
(D) a limited purpose for which the property is delivered or received.
Added by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec. 39.015. CONCURRENT JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE OFFENSES UNDER THIS
CHAPTER. With the consent of the appropriate local county or district
attorney, the attorney general has concurrent jurisdiction with that
consenting local prosecutor to prosecute an offense under this chapter.
Added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 378, Sec. 2, eff. June 15, 2007.
Sec. 39.02. ABUSE OF OFFICIAL CAPACITY. (a) A public servant commits an
offense if, with intent to obtain a benefit or with intent to harm or
defraud another, he intentionally or knowingly:
(1) violates a law relating to the public servant's office or employment;
or
(2) misuses government property, services, personnel, or any other thing of
value belonging to the government that has come into the public servant's
custody or possession by virtue of the public servant's office or employment.
(b) An offense under Subsection (a)(1) is a Class A misdemeanor.
(c) An offense under Subsection (a)(2) is:
(1) a Class C misdemeanor if the value of the use of the thing misused is
less than $20;
(2) a Class B misdemeanor if the value of the use of the thing misused is $
20 or more but less than $500;
(3) a Class A misdemeanor if the value of the use of the thing misused is $
500 or more but less than $1,500;
(4) a state jail felony if the value of the use of the thing misused is $1,
500 or more but less than $20,000;
(5) a felony of the third degree if the value of the use of the thing
misused is $20,000 or more but less than $100,000;
(6) a felony of the second degree if the value of the use of the thing
misused is $100,000 or more but less than $200,000; or
(7) a felony of the first degree if the value of the use of the thing
misused is $200,000 or more.
(d) A discount or award given for travel, such as frequent flyer miles,
rental car or hotel discounts, or food coupons, are not things of value
belonging to the government for purposes of this section due to the
administrative difficulty and cost involved in recapturing the discount or
award for a governmental entity.
(e) If separate transactions that violate Subsection (a)(2) are conducted
pursuant to one scheme or continuing course of conduct, the conduct may be
considered as one offense and the value of the use of the things misused in
the transactions may be aggregated in determining the classification of the
offense.
(f) The value of the use of a thing of value misused under Subsection (a)(2
) may not exceed:
(1) the fair market value of the thing at the time of the offense; or
(2) if the fair market value of the thing cannot be ascertained, the cost
of replacing the thing within a reasonable time after the offense.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by
Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3241, ch. 558, Sec. 7, eff. Sept. 1, 1983.
Renumbered from Penal Code Sec. 39.01 and amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg.,
ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Amended by:
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 82, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2009.
Sec. 39.03. OFFICIAL OPPRESSION. (a) A public servant acting under color of
his office or employment commits an offense if he:
(1) intentionally subjects another to mistreatment or to arrest, detention,
search, seizure, dispossession, assessment, or lien that he knows is
unlawful;
(2) intentionally denies or impedes another in the exercise or enjoyment of
any right, privilege, power, or immunity, knowing his conduct is unlawful;
or
(3) intentionally subjects another to sexual harassment.
(b) For purposes of this section, a public servant acts under color of his
office or employment if he acts or purports to act in an official capacity
or takes advantage of such actual or purported capacity.
(c) In this section, "sexual harassment" means unwelcome sexual advances,
requests for sexual favors, or other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual
nature, submission to which is made a term or condition of a person's
exercise or enjoyment of any right, privilege, power, or immunity, either
explicitly or implicitly.
(d) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by
Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 1217, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1991, 72nd
Leg., ch. 16, Sec. 19.01(34), eff. Aug. 26, 1991. Renumbered from Penal
Code Sec. 39.02 by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1,
1994.
Sec. 39.04. VIOLATIONS OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF PERSON IN CUSTODY; IMPROPER
SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY. (a) An official of a correctional
facility, an employee of a correctional facility, a person other than an
employee who works for compensation at a correctional facility, a volunteer
at a correctional facility, or a peace officer commits an offense if the
person intentionally:
(1) denies or impedes a person in custody in the exercise or enjoyment of
any right, privilege, or immunity knowing his conduct is unlawful; or
(2) engages in sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or deviate sexual
intercourse with an individual in custody or, in the case of an individual
in the custody of the Texas Youth Commission, employs, authorizes, or
induces the individual to engage in sexual conduct or a sexual performance.
(b) An offense under Subsection (a)(1) is a Class A misdemeanor. An
offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a state jail felony, except that an
offense under Subsection (a)(2) is a felony of the second degree if the
offense is committed against:
(1) an individual in the custody of the Texas Youth Commission; or
(2) a juvenile offender detained in or committed to a correctional facility
the operation of which is financed primarily with state funds.
(c) This section shall not preclude prosecution for any other offense set
out in this code.
(d) The Attorney General of Texas shall have concurrent jurisdiction with
law enforcement agencies to investigate violations of this statute involving
serious bodily injury or death.
(e) In this section:
(1) "Correctional facility" means:
(A) any place described by Section 1.07(a)(14); or
(B) a "secure correctional facility" or "secure detention facility" as
defined by Section 51.02, Family Code.
(2) "Custody" means the detention, arrest, or confinement of an adult
offender or the detention or the commitment of a juvenile offender to a
facility operated by or under a contract with the Texas Youth Commission or
a facility operated by or under contract with a juvenile board.
(3) "Sexual contact," "sexual intercourse," and "deviate sexual intercourse
" have the meanings assigned by Section 21.01.
(4) "Sexual conduct" and "performance" have the meanings assigned by
Section 43.25.
(5) "Sexual performance" means any performance or part thereof that
includes sexual conduct by an individual.
(f) An employee of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, the Texas
Youth Commission, or a local juvenile probation department commits an
offense if the employee engages in sexual contact, sexual intercourse, or
deviate sexual intercourse with an individual who the employee knows is
under the supervision of the department, commission, or probation department
but not in the custody of the department, commission, or probation
department.
(g) An offense under Subsection (f) is a state jail felony.
(h) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under Subsection (f) that
the actor was the spouse of the individual at the time of the offense.
Added by Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 1383, ch. 618, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1979.
Amended by Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3242, ch. 558, Sec. 8, eff. Sept. 1,
1983; Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 18, Sec. 5, eff. April 15, 1987. Renumbered
from Penal Code Sec. 39.021 and amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900,
Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 1406,
Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997; Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 158, Sec. 1 to 3, eff.
Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1070, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2001;
Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 1297, Sec. 69, eff. Sept. 1, 2001.
Amended by:
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 263, Sec. 62, eff. June 8, 2007.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 263, Sec. 63, eff. June 8, 2007.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 378, Sec. 3, eff. June 15, 2007.
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 908, Sec. 43, eff. September 1, 2007.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 87, Sec. 19.003, eff. September 1, 2009.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 260, Sec. 5, eff. September 1, 2009.
Sec. 39.05. FAILURE TO REPORT DEATH OF PRISONER. (a) A person commits an
offense if the person is required to conduct an investigation and file a
report by Article 49.18, Code of Criminal Procedure, and the person fails to
investigate the death, fails to file the report as required, or fails to
include in a filed report facts known or discovered in the investigation.
(b) A person commits an offense if the person is required by Section 501.
055, Government Code, to:
(1) give notice of the death of an inmate and the person fails to give the
notice; or
(2) conduct an investigation and file a report and the person:
(A) fails to conduct the investigation or file the report; or
(B) fails to include in the report facts known to the person or discovered
by the person in the investigation.
(c) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor.
Added by Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 2510, ch. 441, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1983.
Renumbered from Penal Code Sec. 39.022 and amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg.,
ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch
. 321, Sec. 1.104, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
Sec. 39.06. MISUSE OF OFFICIAL INFORMATION. (a) A public servant commits an
offense if, in reliance on information to which he has access by virtue of
his office or employment and that has not been made public, he:
(1) acquires or aids another to acquire a pecuniary interest in any
property, transaction, or enterprise that may be affected by the information;
(2) speculates or aids another to speculate on the basis of the information
; or
(3) as a public servant, including as a principal of a school, coerces
another into suppressing or failing to report that information to a law
enforcement agency.
(b) A public servant commits an offense if with intent to obtain a benefit
or with intent to harm or defraud another, he discloses or uses information
for a nongovernmental purpose that:
(1) he has access to by means of his office or employment; and
(2) has not been made public.
(c) A person commits an offense if, with intent to obtain a benefit or with
intent to harm or defraud another, he solicits or receives from a public
servant information that:
(1) the public servant has access to by means of his office or employment;
and
(2) has not been made public.
(d) In this section, "information that has not been made public" means any
information to which the public does not generally have access, and that is
prohibited from disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code.
(e) Except as provided by Subsection (f), an offense under this section is
a felony of the third degree.
(f) An offense under Subsection (a)(3) is a Class C misdemeanor.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by
Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3243, ch. 558, Sec. 9, eff. Sept. 1, 1983; Acts
1987, 70th Leg., ch. 30, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987; Acts 1987, 70th Leg.,
2nd C.S., ch. 43, Sec. 3, eff. Oct. 20, 1987; Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 927,
Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 28, 1989. Renumbered from Penal Code Sec. 39.03 and
amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 5.95(90), eff. Sept. 1, 1995;
Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 76, Sec. 14.52, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 23 FAMILY.CODE
SECTION 7600-7606
7600. This part may be cited as the Uniform Parentage Act.
7601. "Parent and child relationship" as used in this part means
the legal relationship existing between a child and the child's
natural or adoptive parents incident to which the law confers or
imposes rights, privileges, duties, and obligations. The term
includes the mother and child relationship and the father and child
relationship.
7602. The parent and child relationship extends equally to every
child and to every parent, regardless of the marital status of the
parents.
7603. Section 3140 is applicable to proceedings pursuant to this
part.
7604. A court may order pendente lite relief consisting of a
custody or visitation order pursuant to Part 2 (commencing with
Section 3020) of Division 8, if the court finds both of the
following:
(a) Based on the tests authorized by Section 7541, a parent and
child relationship exists pursuant to Section 7540.
(b) The custody or visitation order would be in the best interest
of the child.
7604.5. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, bills for
pregnancy, childbirth, and genetic testing shall be admissible as
evidence without third-party foundation testimony and shall
constitute prima facie evidence of costs incurred for those services.
7605. (a) In any proceeding to establish physical or legal custody
of a child or a visitation order under this part, and in any
proceeding subsequent to entry of a related judgment, the court shall
ensure that each party has access to legal representation to
preserve each party's rights by ordering, if necessary based on the
income and needs assessments, one party, except a government entity,
to pay to the other party, or to the other party's attorney, whatever
amount is reasonably necessary for attorney's fees and for the cost
of maintaining or defending the proceeding during the pendency of the
proceeding.
(b) Whether one party shall be ordered to pay attorney's fees and
costs for another party, and what amount shall be paid, shall be
determined based upon (1) the respective incomes and needs of the
parties, and (2) any factors affecting the parties' respective
abilities to pay. A party who lacks the financial ability to hire an
attorney may request, as an in pro per litigant, that the court order
the other party, if that other party has the financial ability, to
pay a reasonable amount to allow the unrepresented party to retain an
attorney in a timely manner before proceedings in the matter go
forward.
(c) Attorney's fees and costs within this section may be awarded
for legal services rendered or costs incurred before or after the
commencement of the proceeding.
(d) The court shall augment or modify the original award for
attorney's fees and costs as may be reasonably necessary for the
prosecution or defense of a proceeding described in subdivision (a),
or any proceeding related thereto, including after any appeal has
been concluded.
(e) Except as provided in subdivision (f), an application for a
temporary order making, augmenting, or modifying an award of attorney'
s fees, including a reasonable retainer to hire an attorney, or
costs, or both, shall be made by motion on notice or by an order to
show cause during the pendency of any proceeding described in
subdivision (a).
(f) The court shall rule on an application for fees under this
section within 15 days of the hearing on the motion or order to show
cause. An order described in subdivision (a) may be made without
notice by an oral motion in open court at either of the following
times:
(1) At the time of the hearing of the cause on the merits.
(2) At any time before entry of judgment against a party whose
default has been entered pursuant to Section 585 or 586 of the Code
of Civil Procedure. The court shall rule on any motion made pursuant
to this subdivision within 15 days and prior to the entry of any
judgment.
7606. As used in this part, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) "Assisted reproduction" means conception by any means other
than sexual intercourse.
(b) "Assisted reproduction agreement" means a written contract
that includes a person who intends to be the legal parent of a child
or children born through assisted reproduction and that defines the
terms of the relationship between the parties to the contract. | k****y
发帖数: 4083 | 24 从你摘要看，法院和社工很公正啊。
这个外F白垃圾的根本不认为是强奸，那是公诉罪，不管小操本同意不同意起诉
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
: 略读了下，不一定准确，给大家个摘要：
: 大陆女，父母是教授，96年全奖读penn state MBA，98年毕业，2000年银行工作，后来
: 改做贷款。2002年认识日本人（法官），10个月的约会后日本人求婚，两人同居，吵架
: 时去白垃圾男（被州里DA起诉；没好性格，没工作，疯狂的生活方式，吸毒）家求安慰
: ，声称被灌酒have sex，怀孕期间日本人问那天那件事，做了DNA鉴定非
: 父亲，大陆女求之，说或许DNA鉴定错了，那白垃圾男只进去没射。后来生出混血儿，
: 想要日本人养，因为他是“presumed father”；她不想那白垃圾男当father，因为一
: 个“犯罪的人是不能在宪法的意义上成为父亲的”（这个不理解），她总想要把日本人
: 列为父亲，法院和社工却总是想要把白垃圾男列为父亲。她要求政府资助养小孩，政府
: 可能基于她的说法认为她没条件养，拿走小孩，直到找到个父亲养，政府却不认可那日
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 25 PRESUMED FATHER DEFINITION:
man is presumed to be the natural father of a child if he
meets the conditions provided in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section
7540) or Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 7570) of Part 2 or in any
of the following subdivisions:
(a) He and the child's natural mother are or have been married to
each other and the child is born during the marriage, or within 300
days after the marriage is terminated by death, annulment,
declaration of invalidity, or divorce, or after a judgment of
separation is entered by a court.
(b) Before the child's birth, he and the child's natural mother
have attempted to marry each other by a marriage solemnized in
apparent compliance with law, although the attempted marriage is or
could be declared invalid, and either of the following is true:
(1) If the attempted marriage could be declared invalid only by a
court, the child is born during the attempted marriage, or within 300
days after its termination by death, annulment, declaration of
invalidity, or divorce.
(2) If the attempted marriage is invalid without a court order,
the child is born within 300 days after the termination of
cohabitation.
(c) After the child's birth, he and the child's natural mother
have married, or attempted to marry, each other by a marriage
solemnized in apparent compliance with law, although the attempted
marriage is or could be declared invalid, and either of the following
is true:
(1) With his consent, he is named as the child's father on the
child's birth certificate.
(2) He is obligated to support the child under a written voluntary
promise or by court order.
(d) He receives the child into his home and openly holds out the
child as his natural child.
(e) If the child was born and resides in a nation with which the
United States engages in an Orderly Departure Program or successor
program, he acknowledges that he is the child's father in a
declaration under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 2015.5
of the Code of Civil Procedure. This subdivision shall remain in
effect only until January 1, 1997, and on that date shall become
inoperative.
(f) The child is in utero after the death of the decedent and the
conditions set forth in Section 249.5 of the Probate Code are
satisfied. | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 26 FAMILY.CODE
SECTION 7540-7541
7540. Except as provided in Section 7541, the child of a wife
cohabiting with her husband, who is not impotent or sterile, is
conclusively presumed to be a child of the marriage.
7541. (a) Notwithstanding Section 7540, if the court finds that the
conclusions of all the experts, as disclosed by the evidence based
on blood tests performed pursuant to Chapter 2 (commencing with
Section 7550), are that the husband is not the father of the child,
the question of paternity of the husband shall be resolved
accordingly.
(b) The notice of motion for blood tests under this section may be
filed not later than two years from the child's date of birth by the
husband, or for the purposes of establishing paternity by the
presumed father or the child through or by the child's guardian ad
litem. As used in this subdivision, "presumed father" has the meaning
given in Sections 7611 and 7612.
(c) The notice of motion for blood tests under this section may be
filed by the mother of the child not later than two years from the
child's date of birth if the child's biological father has filed an
affidavit with the court acknowledging paternity of the child.
(d) The notice of motion for blood tests pursuant to this section
shall be supported by a declaration under oath submitted by the
moving party stating the factual basis for placing the issue of
paternity before the court.
(e) Subdivision (a) does not apply, and blood tests may not be
used to challenge paternity, in any of the following cases:
(1) A case that reached final judgment of paternity on or before
September 30, 1980.
(2) A case coming within Section 7613.
(3) A case in which the wife, with the consent of the husband,
conceived by means of a surgical procedure. | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 27 读完法律之后，你就知道if Judge Downing has violated THE CALIFORNIA LAW. SHE
has no authority to detent the child that is against the law.
Abuse power is a crime in America. | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 28 Please see the email copy below, the rape case police report was forward to
DA's office, sexucial crime's office, looking into their action:
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "m******[email protected]"
To: t********[email protected]
Cc: V******[email protected]
Sent: Friday, November 5, 2010 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Wan Tin's rape case
Hello Ms. Tin,
I tried repeatedly without success to reach you at the telephone number
listed below. I reviewed the section file concerning your crime report in
the above matter involving suspect Allen Miller Levine. No criminal case was
filed in 2006 and there has been no change in the filing status since that
time. Please be assured that Judge Ernest Hiroshige is not a member of the
District Attorney's Office and he does not have any authority over its
secretarial staff or filing decisions.
Michele L. Daniels, Head Deputy
Sex Crimes Division
320 West Temple Street
Room 777
Los Angeles, California 90012
(213) 974-1611
Inactive hide details for Winnie Tin Winnie Tin
w****[email protected]>
To
m******[email protected]
cc
Subject
Wan Tin's rape case
Hi Miss Michele Daniels,
About two month ago, I had been your office to fellow up with my rapr case
and you had walked out from your office, I spoke to you in the hall way
regards my rape case, you said you would like to fellow up and to see where
is the case stand. The day when I went to your office, your receiptionist
will not transfer my call to you and I believe she was instructed by Judge
Hiroshige, my ex-boy friend, I believe that my rape case was covered up by
Judge Hiroshige, and because Judge Hiroshige is presumed father for Joshua
Tin, my son.
Please let me know what is the progress in this rape case, and if you have
been able to interview Judge Hiroshige, the judge in Dept 54, 111 N. Hill
Street, LA Superior Court, 213-974-6968.
I had called your office today and the recepitionist answer the phone, you
can reach me back at 626-840-5616.
Thanks
Winnie Tin | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 29 please see the rape case police report:
SOURCE OF ACTIVITY
On December 2n3, 2005, at approximately 1600 hours, I, Detective Ramire:t: #
25992, contacted
Confidential Victim WanT. and she agreed to come to Hollywood Station to
complete a crime report.
INVESTIGATION
WanT. arrived at Hollywood Station and staled she became pregnant a-result
of a rape, in February
003, al the hands of her ex-boyfriend, later identified as Allen Miller
Levine, who at that time
was
known as Allen Miller Isaac.
WanT.stated she was involved in a romantic/sexual relationship with Levine
in 1999 and the relationship is only for 2 month.
WanT. soon became involved in a romantic relationship with "Ernie", who is a
Superior Court Judge.
WanT. stated in February of2003 she became involved in an argument with "
Ernie" because he was
having sexual relations with an ex-girlfriend of his. WanT. contacted Levine
and went to his
residence, which at that time was located at 8908 Devlin Place, to be
comforted. WanT. described
Levine as very sexual towards her and he immediately began to take off her
clothes. WanT. at first
attempted to fight off Levine but after he disrobed her she just "gave up"
and stopped fighting.
Levine
then penetrated her vagina and stopped with out his erect penis an culated
in her vagina. WanT. fell asleep in the
bed of Levine and left the next morning. 1'J. 'V1:.'
WanT. eventually went back to her relationship with "Ernie" and soon found
out she was pregnant and
she believed "Ernie" was the father. "Ernie" did not acknowledge the child
as his and wanted
paternity established through DNA and it was determined he was not the
father of the child.
WanT. then attempted to establish paternity with Levine, and DNA confinned
he was the father of the
child, who was born on November 21St. 2003. Note: No evidence of a DNA
paternity test results
were provided by Wa11 T.
i
i.'i.
r:
j,.
WanT. went through!the Family Court system and was awarded a monthly support
amount, to which she
stated he has not paid in some time. I asked her if she listed Lev me as
the father of her child
on the crime report, and she stated she did because aternit had been
established.
I aske er 1 she ever infonned anyone of tl1c crime, during the court
proceedings, and she
stated,
· I asked her if she keijt ad%r'y or journal during theJime she was
sexually assualtcd and s hj' r
stued, .Z O
i.., o"V (,VYI(ryV. ,
;f... tH·' '-
-;:> • ,.
I asked WanT. what she bef.eved was going to happen as a result of her
eomp1etmg the crime
report"'-' 1
and she stated she wanted Levine to be arrested for what he did. l explained
to her that with the
circumstances as they were, the delay in reporting, the lack of
cooraborating evidence and no
witnesses to the incident it would be a very difficult case to win in front
of a jury. WanT. cried
and stated she wanted Levine punished for what she was goina through because
of the fact she gave
birth to a half-
>hite baby.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
CHARGE EVALUATION WORKSHEET
(TOSS)
0 Further lnllflsbgabon requested
0 Probation Violatton 1n lieu of
Rled.
;(Prosecution declined.
D.& IIO
o«Ja!CAN110 (CII OIII.RI 110.1
0 5""ot >1(9 6 .s-
hoi ---
11.0.(10> ,...,
u·"t
'Sl..SP
WIPLC'T IO.&lll
SUSPECT DATA
1<0
fi.AST·I'W1·-.f)
'I IOOCIJtCJ NO
Coot SfCOOH
c 0 E F G
kv,,ve, 4-l!tRv /'Al/.ar /<.
2
3
4
J K L M N
8 c D E F G
J K L M N
A 8 c D E F G H I J K L M N A B c 0
E F G H t
J K L M N A 8 c D E F G H I J K L
M N A B c D
E F G
·- L M N
A 8 c D E ,: (j H I J K L M N A 8 c
D E F
... n- ........., I ,_ I .-. ..-- r ,..,..
. w L/" c...--
' J-" I J
0...
"P
1)
, _ ·- '--- •·- - - ..
In subm•lflng thos maHer for consideration of a eomp111n1. wnntn
repons 01 suost ant1a11y an
avauao• e ev•cence t ucept u10 1ne
oralonlotmauon.11 any,purpot11ng to have been o•ven by me and whiCh
1s tully aM correcuy slated
above) have been subm ted lo le abov•II& mad Deputy teOpits olwh1ch
are anaehld hereto) except
lhe to11ow1nQ
The cliso III!On olth1s maner will oe fon11 uniH,Ihe eommanomg olf1eer I&
Quesls re· -
'odollllon ol the case. stahng h1s reasons on the ot thos lotm
A?73 H - 16JUitU-A•y ItOr | c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 30 找的律师太差了，单词都错了好多。
没用的事实列了一堆。 这官司能赢才怪。 | | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 31 这是妈妈自己写的上诉， 前面已经经过6 个律师拉， 听审法官都不干惹这个日本法官
， 那个律师敢惹他。 把他拉上法庭， 他就去报复别人， 只有DEPT OF JUSTICE OR
ATTORNEY GENERAL CAN DO SOME THING IN THIS CASE.
【在 c*********y 的大作中提到】
: 找的律师太差了，单词都错了好多。
: 没用的事实列了一堆。 这官司能赢才怪。
| N***Y
发帖数: 2407 | 32 这里是自由的社会，人人可以发表意见。你个共产党的狗，比TG还狠，滚出美国。
【在 a*****4 的大作中提到】
: 既然你认为美国比中国还黑， 你就回国去阿。 不要死皮赖脸的赖在美国。 啥道理啊
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 33 谁有蛋把email 拿出来， 可以提供更多的资料。 | c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 34 这种事如果实在没钱的话，找个律师做做Pro Bono， 好多重要的事实都没说清楚，杂
七杂八的写了堆。
至少应该检索几个案例出来。 这样的brief, 写上去肯定只能是 dismiss。 你到底要
告什么， 有什么事由可以告的。 | G**L
发帖数: 22804 | 35 写了一大堆，到底法庭有没有认定日裔法官是presumed father?看着是没有。
要是真想把小孩拿回来，就找家里人帮忙，会增加机会的。不想要的话，就算了。
to
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: Please see the email copy below, the rape case police report was forward to
: DA's office, sexucial crime's office, looking into their action:
: ----- Forwarded Message -----
: From: "m******[email protected]"
: To: t********[email protected]
: Cc: V******[email protected]
: Sent: Friday, November 5, 2010 4:20 PM
: Subject: Re: Wan Tin's rape case
: Hello Ms. Tin,
: I tried repeatedly without success to reach you at the telephone number
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | | c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 37 现在的案例其实跟绿帽法官一点关系都没有。
想要孩子回来，直接陈述自己跟孩子的关系， 为什么孩子被社工带走是错误。
说了一堆绿帽法官的事，他根本没审这个案件， 他再傻也应该知道无论怎样也是要回
避的
想认定父子关系， 另外起一个案子要说明一下，为什么法官带了浅绿帽子还得当孩子
的爹。
想告绿帽法官违法，直接找ATTORNEY of general. 不要掺和在这里。
一个案子就想把孩子领回，要认绿帽法官当爹，顺便把他送去监狱是不可能的。
被告的主体都不同。 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 38 对一点都不错， 听审法官没有伸张法律， 提自己同事打马虎眼， 日本法官是不是孩
子的legal father,应该有一个没有 conflict interest 的法官听审才可以。
社工作假， 听审法官有legal obligation 去起诉社工。 THAT IS THE LAW.
日本法官 有没有让社工做假， 这叫影响司法公正，obstruction of justice, that
is serious crime. Felony.
应响检查官起诉rapist, THAT IS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
在有婚约的请况下， 根其他人上床， 这叫道德败坏。声撑男人可以到处睡， 这叫没
道德。 说未婚妻大这肚子不能作爱 ， 所以他可以根其他女人上床， 这是掠待。 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 39 这就是美国的法律， obstruction of justice
USC › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 73 › § 1511
prev
next
18 USC § 1511 - Obstruction of State or local law enforcement
USC-prelim
US Code
Notes
Updates
This preliminary release may be subject to further revision before it is
released again as a final version. As with other online versions of the Code
, the U.S. Code Classification Tables should be consulted for the latest
laws affecting the Code. Those using the USCPrelim should verify the text
against the printed slip laws available from GPO (Government Printing Office
), the laws as shown on THOMAS (a legislative service of the Library of
Congress), and the final version of the Code when it becomes available.
Current through Pub. L. 112-196. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
(a) It shall be unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to obstruct the
enforcement of the criminal laws of a State or political subdivision
thereof, with the intent to facilitate an illegal gambling business if—
(1) one or more of such persons does any act to effect the object of such a
conspiracy;
(2) one or more of such persons is an official or employee, elected,
appointed, or otherwise, of such State or political subdivision; and
(3) one or more of such persons conducts, finances, manages, supervises,
directs, or owns all or part of an illegal gambling business.
(b) As used in this section—
(1) “illegal gambling business” means a gambling business which—
(i) is a violation of the law of a State or political subdivision in which
it is conducted;
(ii) involves five or more persons who conduct, finance, manage, supervise,
direct, or own all or part of such business; and
(iii) has been or remains in substantially continuous operation for a period
in excess of thirty days or has a gross revenue of $2,000 in any single day.
(2) “gambling” includes but is not limited to pool-selling, bookmaking,
maintaining slot machines, roulette wheels, or dice tables, and conducting
lotteries, policy, bolita or numbers games, or selling chances therein.
(3) “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia
, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the
United States.
(c) This section shall not apply to any bingo game, lottery, or similar game
of chance conducted by an organization exempt from tax under paragraph (3)
of subsection (c) ofsection 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, if no part of the gross receipts derived from such activity inures
to the benefit of any private shareholder, member, or employee of such
organization, except as compensation for actual expenses incurred by him in
the conduct of such activity.
(d) Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine under this
title or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both.
prev | next
(a) It shall be unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to obstruct the
enforcement of the criminal laws of a State or political subdivision
thereof, with the intent to facilitate an illegal gambling business if—
(1) one or more of such persons does any act to effect the object of such a
conspiracy;
(2) one or more of such persons is an official or employee, elected,
appointed, or otherwise, of such State or political subdivision; and
(3) one or more of such persons conducts, finances, manages, supervises,
directs, or owns all or part of an illegal gambling business.
(b) As used in this section—
(1) “illegal gambling business” means a gambling business which—
(i) is a violation of the law of a State or political subdivision in which
it is conducted;
(ii) involves five or more persons who conduct, finance, manage, supervise,
direct, or own all or part of such business; and
(iii) has been or remains in substantially continuous operation for a period
in excess of thirty days or has a gross revenue of $2,000 in any single day.
(2) “gambling” includes but is not limited to pool-selling, bookmaking,
maintaining slot machines, roulette wheels, or dice tables, and conducting
lotteries, policy, bolita or numbers games, or selling chances therein.
(3) “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia
, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the
United States.
(c) This section shall not apply to any bingo game, lottery, or similar game
of chance conducted by an organization exempt from tax under paragraph (3)
of subsection (c) ofsection 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, if no part of the gross receipts derived from such activity inures
to the benefit of any private shareholder, member, or employee of such
organization, except as compensation for actual expenses incurred by him in
the conduct of such activity.
(d) Whoever violates this section shall be punished by a fine under this
title or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both.
Source
(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title VIII, § 802(a),Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 936;
amended Pub. L. 99–514, § 2,Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 103–
322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(C),Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
References in Text
Paragraph (3) of subsection (c) ofsection 501 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, referred to in subsec. (c), is classified to section 501 (c)(3) of
Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendments
1994—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–322substituted “fine under this title” for
“fine of not more than $20,000”.
1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–514substituted “Internal Revenue Code of
1986” for “Internal Revenue Code of 1954”.
Congressional Statement of Findings
Section 801 of title VIII of Pub. L. 91–452provided that: “The Congress
finds that illegal gambling involves widespread use of, and has an effect
upon, interstate commerce and the facilities thereof.”
Priority of State Laws
Section 811 of title VIII of Pub. L. 91–452provided that: “No provision of
this title [enacting this section and section 1955 of this title, amending
section 2516 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under
this section and section 1955 of this title] indicates an intent on the part
of the Congress to occupy the field in which such provision operates to the
exclusion of the law of a state or possession, or a political subdivision
of a State or possession, on the same subject matter, or to relieve any
person of any obligation imposed by any law of any State or possession, or
political subdivision of a State or possession.”
The table below lists the classification updates, since Jan. 3, 2012, for
this section. Updates to a broader range of sections may be found at the
update page for containing chapter, title, etc.
The most recent Classification Table update that we have noticed was Tuesday
, October 23, 2012
An empty table indicates that we see no relevant changes listed in the
classification tables. If you suspect that our system may be missing
something, please double-check with the Office of the Law Revision Counsel. | N******7
发帖数: 1297 | 40 一个连自己孩子的亲爹都搞不清是谁的外F这时候想起来找华人支持了，进错门了吧。 | | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 41 日本首相说中国人不团结是真的！！！！再加上没有长鸡吧。
【在 N******7 的大作中提到】
: 一个连自己孩子的亲爹都搞不清是谁的外F这时候想起来找华人支持了，进错门了吧。
| N******7
发帖数: 1297 | 42 呵呵，现在想起来中国人要团结了。你是女的？
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 日本首相说中国人不团结是真的！！！！再加上没有长鸡吧。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 43 有关系吗？？ 中国人是一盘散沙， 在这里表先的林立尽致！！！！ | N******7
发帖数: 1297 | 44 当然有关系。是不是日本人说中国男人没JJ，所以你外F日本人和白垃圾？
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 有关系吗？？ 中国人是一盘散沙， 在这里表先的林立尽致！！！！
| C****a
发帖数: 6593 | 45 我真的是老了，为啥那个日本人给淫妇戴了绿帽子之后，还一定要去给奸夫淫妇养便宜
孩子呢？
楼主，你要是男的，你老婆跟别人偷情生的野种，你上赶着去养？ | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 46 wiretapping is federal crime. | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 47 请问你有jj ma?
【在 N******7 的大作中提到】
: 当然有关系。是不是日本人说中国男人没JJ，所以你外F日本人和白垃圾？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 48 不知道是美国人不执法， 还是中国没有法律， 看来只好外f.
【在 C****a 的大作中提到】
: 我真的是老了，为啥那个日本人给淫妇戴了绿帽子之后，还一定要去给奸夫淫妇养便宜
: 孩子呢？
: 楼主，你要是男的，你老婆跟别人偷情生的野种，你上赶着去养？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 49 看来中国男人真是没有办法根日本男人比。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 不知道是美国人不执法， 还是中国没有法律， 看来只好外f.
| N******7
发帖数: 1297 | 50 你这么关心这个干什么，找接盘？
你还是先关心关心怎么让你的绿帽日本老公养白垃圾的孩子比较现实点。我的jj倒是真
和你没什么关系。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 请问你有jj ma?
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 51 好在中国领事馆没有请你去做事。 DEPT OF JUSTICE 也没有中国人。华人与狗不得入
内 的牌字应该巨续挂。 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 52 先在才讲句人话。
【在 N******7 的大作中提到】
: 你这么关心这个干什么，找接盘？
: 你还是先关心关心怎么让你的绿帽日本老公养白垃圾的孩子比较现实点。我的jj倒是真
: 和你没什么关系。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 53 怪不的那个日本法官说有些中国男人没骨气。把一个无辜的孩子放到寄养的家庭， 对
孩子一辈子都有伤害。请问这根下面的南京大屠杀有什莫不同？？？
象你这种中国男人不就是有jj，我不知道有那个mm会要你。
是中国人的就转吧！就是点一鼠标的事。
今天日本大使来访腾讯公司。让腾讯阻止近日中国网民在网 上对日本的诋毁，并骂中
国人懦夫、不团结。被腾讯断然拒 绝，腾讯并和小日本打了一个赌, 如果在 2 周内这
个转发
400 万以上, 日本人就得向中国人道歉, 请朋友们为我们祖 国加油转发吧 ！
戰功圖：3 歲嬰兒被用刺槍挑起 bayoneting of 3 year old baby
活着的戰士被剥光腿上的肉 Carving out the leg muscles of a Chinese soldier
日本人殺了好多人才做到：在頭顱剛掉的一瞬間拍下
Falling off of a beheaded head. Numerous such shots had to be taken to
obtain this picture
母親手裏抱緊孩子。。。。可。。
這能有什麼用
Chinese mother still clutching on her baby after her head was chopped off by
Japanese soldier.
傳說中的毒氣實驗
The notoriouspoisonous gas experiment
孩子有錯嗎 What crime had the children committed?!
我不知道還能再說什麼了
What else could I say? They were all innocent children!
人心下酒，也就日本人能喝下去。Only Japanese soldiers could wash down the
heart of a martyr with sake
硫酸燒人？實驗？Scalding with acid. Torture? Experiment?
這是個娃 This was only a baby of three!
那是腸子
Chinese woman mutilated after raped. (intestine pulled out)
。。這是幸運的
Young girl tied up & raped.
革命烈士 Another female martyr
懷孕多數時間以為着生命的終結
Even pregnant women were round off for army protitues
人啊！I am also a human being!!
從他的微笑可以看出來。。這是這名日本兵的驕傲
但對於中國人來說。。。。So proud of his work!
不明白為什麼那麼多中國女孩特崇拜日本明星 I cannot
understand why young Chinese girls still crazy for Japanese actors nowadays!
無語
The proud accomplishment of the Japanese soldier!
這些可是良民，他們不相信自己會死
They never realized they were to be used as life targets!
良民被作為活靶子使用
Practicing on life Chinese civilians as targets!
看，這就是武士道
This was Japanese Bushido!
拍電影，用真人 For movie scenes---use real Chinese corpses
20 世紀的中國人是一種悲哀
Real Chinese tragedy of the 20th century
他們的願望是：來生不是中國人！
Her last wish was not to be a Chinese in her next life
你們心里在怎麼想
What are you thinking, soldier?
只有拿中國軍官的頭能換錢
Only the head of a Chinese officer could exchange for money
朋友，别哭
Don’t cry. This is only bayonet practice!
人頭展示 1
Head show 1
人頭展示 2 只恨我是中國人 Head show 2---how I hate to be Chinese!
特寫
下面那不是土，全是人 Bodies of Chinese civilians piled along
the Yangtze River River
當殺人成為習慣
Japanese soldiers enjoyed watching kill, burn, pillage & rape
他們死一萬遍够嗎？！环球网论坛<http://bbs.huanqiu.com/>
Executing these war criminals 10,000 times would not atone for their sins.
In fact many Japanese
nowadays still honour them as their national heroes. Until they acknowledge
the war crimes of these
criminals as the Germans did, the gulf between Japan & China can never be
bridged!
人頭展示 3
Head show 3
請大家看完後轉發給别的群體。這個没有任 何獎勵。純粹是一種良知。請大家接力下
去。 After reading this email, please forward it to all your
friends &
relatives if you conscience demands it.
Be sure to delete all the name list before sending out | s***d
发帖数: 15421 | | N******7
发帖数: 1297 | 55 原来是个没有逻辑的疯子，对不起。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 怪不的那个日本法官说有些中国男人没骨气。把一个无辜的孩子放到寄养的家庭， 对
: 孩子一辈子都有伤害。请问这根下面的南京大屠杀有什莫不同？？？
: 象你这种中国男人不就是有jj，我不知道有那个mm会要你。
: 是中国人的就转吧！就是点一鼠标的事。
: 今天日本大使来访腾讯公司。让腾讯阻止近日中国网民在网 上对日本的诋毁，并骂中
: 国人懦夫、不团结。被腾讯断然拒 绝，腾讯并和小日本打了一个赌, 如果在 2 周内这
: 个转发
: 400 万以上, 日本人就得向中国人道歉, 请朋友们为我们祖 国加油转发吧 ！
: 戰功圖：3 歲嬰兒被用刺槍挑起 bayoneting of 3 year old baby
: 活着的戰士被剥光腿上的肉 Carving out the leg muscles of a Chinese soldier
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 56 第一，这日本人不应爱该在有婚约的情形下根别人乱睡。
第二，这日本人不应该言语上ABUSE HIS GIRL FRIEND, 如果你看拉： 这日本人说男人
可以和其他的人随意上床。 你大这肚子不能做爱， 他可以随便根其他女人发泄。 你
还同情他吗？ 连畜生都不会讲这中话。
第三。 这日本人不应该把自己老婆被强暴的是给拦下来。 触犯法律。
第四， 这日本人不应该让社工做假。OBSTUCTION OF JUSTICE.
第五。 这日本人不应该和另一法官同流合污。这叫 COURT CORUPTION.
第六， 在美国， 儿童的利益， 比钱重要。 美国大部分人讲道德，所以制定的法律，
凡是在婚姻里生的孩子， THE HUSBAND 负责。
第七。 这日本人不应该窃听她的电话， 找一批中国烂崽做他的打手。你是其中之一吗？
【在 C****a 的大作中提到】
: 我真的是老了，为啥那个日本人给淫妇戴了绿帽子之后，还一定要去给奸夫淫妇养便宜
: 孩子呢？
: 楼主，你要是男的，你老婆跟别人偷情生的野种，你上赶着去养？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 57 没有骨气的中国人，我见多拉。希望你不是其中一个。
请问你同以华人与狗不得入内吗？
【在 N******7 的大作中提到】
: 原来是个没有逻辑的疯子，对不起。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 58 没有骨气的中国人，我见多拉。希望你不是其中一个。
请问你同意华人与狗不得入内 这句话吗？
【在 N******7 的大作中提到】
: 原来是个没有逻辑的疯子，对不起。
| s***d
发帖数: 15421 | 59 你这大妈也是可怜，感恩节大半夜不陪老公tshch，和我们一群losers 叫什么劲啊。LA
版，军二班，什么大马版都是你们，贴买买提还不如贴huaren是吧。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 没有骨气的中国人，我见多拉。希望你不是其中一个。
: 请问你同意华人与狗不得入内 这句话吗？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | | | | c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | | c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 62 我觉得楼主法律一点也没学好：
我就觉得美国哪个州的法律会这么扯淡带了绿帽还要替野种负责。
人家法律是presumption结婚的是父亲。 但是presumption 总是可以rebutable.
你的都已经测DNA说了不是父亲了，这个presumption 就已经不成立了。
你还赖绿帽法官要负责， 这个案子根本是不可能成立的。
你说你生下孩子，是因为那个绿帽答应你要一起抚养的。
这个合同没有书面， Statute of fraud 一般就不认这合同。
即使你这合同有书面的，法官一点好处也没用， 合同也是不成立的。
如果说你是reliable 合同，才生下这孩子， 现在孩子送走了，不是正合你意吗? | N******7
发帖数: 1297 | 63 你别费心了，要不要我把它发给我骂全中国没有男人的邮件转给你？不想再回这个贴，
只是友情提醒一下你。
【在 c*********y 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得楼主法律一点也没学好：
: 我就觉得美国哪个州的法律会这么扯淡带了绿帽还要替野种负责。
: 人家法律是presumption结婚的是父亲。 但是presumption 总是可以rebutable.
: 你的都已经测DNA说了不是父亲了，这个presumption 就已经不成立了。
: 你还赖绿帽法官要负责， 这个案子根本是不可能成立的。
: 你说你生下孩子，是因为那个绿帽答应你要一起抚养的。
: 这个合同没有书面， Statute of fraud 一般就不认这合同。
: 即使你这合同有书面的，法官一点好处也没用， 合同也是不成立的。
: 如果说你是reliable 合同，才生下这孩子， 现在孩子送走了，不是正合你意吗?
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 64 你的信息是从那里看来的？好向我们这里都没有提到？？？
华人于狗不的入内， 你同意吗？
【在 c*********y 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得楼主法律一点也没学好：
: 我就觉得美国哪个州的法律会这么扯淡带了绿帽还要替野种负责。
: 人家法律是presumption结婚的是父亲。 但是presumption 总是可以rebutable.
: 你的都已经测DNA说了不是父亲了，这个presumption 就已经不成立了。
: 你还赖绿帽法官要负责， 这个案子根本是不可能成立的。
: 你说你生下孩子，是因为那个绿帽答应你要一起抚养的。
: 这个合同没有书面， Statute of fraud 一般就不认这合同。
: 即使你这合同有书面的，法官一点好处也没用， 合同也是不成立的。
: 如果说你是reliable 合同，才生下这孩子， 现在孩子送走了，不是正合你意吗?
| c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 65 好心帮忙你解答问题，居然骂起人来的。 那些名词可都是中国常用名词。
不过还是很高兴楼主外F了， 至少少荼毒一位无辜的WSN。
怪不得法官会申请restriction, 这样的人谁还受得了。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 你的信息是从那里看来的？好向我们这里都没有提到？？？
: 华人于狗不的入内， 你同意吗？
| t***h
发帖数: 40 | 66 对拉我们现在在讲把孩子那回来？？？？法庭司法不公？？？
有几个中国男人就是要替这个日本法官讲情， 现在男人根男人上床也和法， 你要他的
电话吗？？？
我希望你可一多几个机会？？？哈哈。
【在 N******7 的大作中提到】
: 你别费心了，要不要我把它发给我骂全中国没有男人的邮件转给你？不想再回这个贴，
: 只是友情提醒一下你。
| c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 67 华人于狗不的入内， 你同意吗？
想了半天，总算明白了外F女这句话的意思了。 | t***h
发帖数: 40 | 68 请问你愿入内吗？是和法的！！！ 就站起来吧？！ | c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 69 我还是不入为好， 还是留给绿帽法官和white trash.
【在 t***h 的大作中提到】
: 请问你愿入内吗？是和法的！！！ 就站起来吧？！
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 70 有种就入内吧。
【在 t***h 的大作中提到】
: 请问你愿入内吗？是和法的！！！ 就站起来吧？！
| | | t***h
发帖数: 40 | 71 那你两方面都不行， 就比上乌鸦嘴，学学人讲话把。 | z*******3
发帖数: 13709 | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 73 所以日本法官有权利把孩子从妈妈身边拿走？？？
【在 z*******3 的大作中提到】
: 这次我想站在日本法官一边
| z*******3
发帖数: 13709 | 74 你这种妈只会祸害孩子
为了孩子好，你还是远离孩子吧
孩子真是不幸，有你这种妈
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 所以日本法官有权利把孩子从妈妈身边拿走？？？
| c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 75 好心劝楼主一下， 你把这放到的网上对你要回孩子的监护权一点帮助也没有的。
你现在要证明的是你自己精神正常和有能力抚养孩子。
而从你的brief上看不出这一点。
找个律师帮忙， 不要再纠缠日本法官了，因为他和你监护权这事一点关系也没用。
你越纠缠，只能证明你精神状态越不好。
把这事情公布到网上，只会让孩子受到更大的压力，更证明你不正常。
你快让斑竹帮忙把帖子删了， 否则也可能成为精神状态不正常的证据。 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 76 我们现在讲为什么听审法官不按法律办事， 非法把一个无辜的孩子从妈妈身边拿走的
主题，伤害一个无辜的孩子， 接果就搞出几个国男非要和这法官上床。 他的电话是
： 213-974-6968 直线。你可直接打，等你拿到 PROMOTION 时就告诉我们一声。 但是
上帝会看到你在做什么。
不是每一个国男都是这样的。看来这个法官有没有法律责任及把强暴安拦下来的问题，
就只好到国会讲拉。
【在 z*******3 的大作中提到】
: 这次我想站在日本法官一边
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 77 谢谢你的大作， 这个日本法官又可以嘲笑我一次， 看看你们略等的中国人把。 内讧。
哈哈。
【在 z*******3 的大作中提到】
: 你这种妈只会祸害孩子
: 为了孩子好，你还是远离孩子吧
: 孩子真是不幸，有你这种妈
| z*******3
发帖数: 13709 | 78 孩子和法官都是无辜的
你不是无辜的
所以让你suffer一点也是应该的
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 我们现在讲为什么听审法官不按法律办事， 非法把一个无辜的孩子从妈妈身边拿走的
: 主题，伤害一个无辜的孩子， 接果就搞出几个国男非要和这法官上床。 他的电话是
: ： 213-974-6968 直线。你可直接打，等你拿到 PROMOTION 时就告诉我们一声。 但是
: 上帝会看到你在做什么。
: 不是每一个国男都是这样的。看来这个法官有没有法律责任及把强暴安拦下来的问题，
: 就只好到国会讲拉。
| z*******3
发帖数: 13709 | 79 中国人？
你不配
讧。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢你的大作， 这个日本法官又可以嘲笑我一次， 看看你们略等的中国人把。 内讧。
: 哈哈。
| n*******w
发帖数: 6708 | 80 赞英语好
同时个这个主人公也太给中国妇女丢人了
他父母是教授，就教给她出轨，乱搞了
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
: 略读了下，不一定准确，给大家个摘要：
: 大陆女，父母是教授，96年全奖读penn state MBA，98年毕业，2000年银行工作，后来
: 改做贷款。2002年认识日本人（法官），10个月的约会后日本人求婚，两人同居，吵架
: 时去白垃圾男（被州里DA起诉；没好性格，没工作，疯狂的生活方式，吸毒）家求安慰
: ，声称被灌酒have sex，怀孕期间日本人问那天那件事，做了DNA鉴定非
: 父亲，大陆女求之，说或许DNA鉴定错了，那白垃圾男只进去没射。后来生出混血儿，
: 想要日本人养，因为他是“presumed father”；她不想那白垃圾男当father，因为一
: 个“犯罪的人是不能在宪法的意义上成为父亲的”（这个不理解），她总想要把日本人
: 列为父亲，法院和社工却总是想要把白垃圾男列为父亲。她要求政府资助养小孩，政府
: 可能基于她的说法认为她没条件养，拿走小孩，直到找到个父亲养，政府却不认可那日
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 81 comethalley,
我是真的很奇怪， 这文章标题写的是这听审的法官不安法律办事， 你们非要把这日本
法官拉进来。当然如果这日本法官有影响听审法官不执法的话， 连我隔壁的黑人儿童
都知道这叫 court corruption. 为什么我们中国男人不懂， 还要，非要做这日本人的
男朋友， 我真是搞不懂。
天下大乱， 所以我说黑人很团结， OBAMA 有100% 的黑人支持。
看来华人与狗不的入内的牌子还是要挂一段时间。
【在 c*********y 的大作中提到】
: 好心劝楼主一下， 你把这放到的网上对你要回孩子的监护权一点帮助也没有的。
: 你现在要证明的是你自己精神正常和有能力抚养孩子。
: 而从你的brief上看不出这一点。
: 找个律师帮忙， 不要再纠缠日本法官了，因为他和你监护权这事一点关系也没用。
: 你越纠缠，只能证明你精神状态越不好。
: 把这事情公布到网上，只会让孩子受到更大的压力，更证明你不正常。
: 你快让斑竹帮忙把帖子删了， 否则也可能成为精神状态不正常的证据。
| c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 82 肯定不是大陆女了，大陆女至少还知道这么乱的关系不是好事的。
而且大陆没有姓Tin的。 估计是香港人的。
【在 n*******w 的大作中提到】
: 赞英语好
: 同时个这个主人公也太给中国妇女丢人了
: 他父母是教授，就教给她出轨，乱搞了
| p******u
发帖数: 14642 | 83 是你抛弃做中国人，不是中国人抛弃了你
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: comethalley,
: 我是真的很奇怪， 这文章标题写的是这听审的法官不安法律办事， 你们非要把这日本
: 法官拉进来。当然如果这日本法官有影响听审法官不执法的话， 连我隔壁的黑人儿童
: 都知道这叫 court corruption. 为什么我们中国男人不懂， 还要，非要做这日本人的
: 男朋友， 我真是搞不懂。
: 天下大乱， 所以我说黑人很团结， OBAMA 有100% 的黑人支持。
: 看来华人与狗不的入内的牌子还是要挂一段时间。
| m*b
发帖数: 1421 | 84 ......
人家也是在帮你出主意好吧
至于这么说吗
你这么折腾于事无补，只会坏事
还不如坐下来想对策
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: comethalley,
: 我是真的很奇怪， 这文章标题写的是这听审的法官不安法律办事， 你们非要把这日本
: 法官拉进来。当然如果这日本法官有影响听审法官不执法的话， 连我隔壁的黑人儿童
: 都知道这叫 court corruption. 为什么我们中国男人不懂， 还要，非要做这日本人的
: 男朋友， 我真是搞不懂。
: 天下大乱， 所以我说黑人很团结， OBAMA 有100% 的黑人支持。
: 看来华人与狗不的入内的牌子还是要挂一段时间。
| x******g
发帖数: 33885 | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 86 对骂的好， 所以美国政府也同情我的遭遇， 来帮助我。中国领事馆也同情我帮助。
就是有几个国男为拉自身的利益表面根我做朋友， 实际替那个法官做写手。
看一下白人律师帮我免费写的 petition, 我只有到December 2012 只前可以file 到法
庭。 就碰到一批汉奸骂街：你们自己看一看国南跟白南的区分把：
WAN TIN
219 South 2nd Avenue, #D
Arcadia, California 91006
Phone: 626-343-4080
Email: w********[email protected]
WAN TIN, Petitioner In Pro Per
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
WAN TIN,
Petitioner,
vs.
LOS ANGELES COUNTRY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Respondent. Case No.:
PETITION TO SET ASIDE FRAUDULENT ADOPTION
///
///
TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:
This petition is asking the Court to set aside a wrongful adoption procured
by fraud. Petitioner, Wan Tin is the natural mother of Joshua Tin, born on
November 21, 2003. Joshua Tin was taken from his mother on December 21,
2007 and adopted in December of 2011. The child was given to Michael a
single man. Petitioner has until December of 2012 to petition the Court to
set aside the adoption. The adoption should be set aside because of
extrinsic fraud and lack of notice. Petitioner was never told her child was
put up for adoption.
Statement of the Case
Joshua Tin was given birth by the birth mother Wan (aka Winnie) Tin [
referred to also as Petitioner] on November 21, 2003 under the putative
marriage agreement between the mother and the Los Angeles County Superior
Court Judge Ernest Hiroshige in Department 54, who had proposed marriage to
the birth mother and when the child was conceived, they lived together. The
birth mother believed in his marriage proposal and accepted it in good
faith. The Petitioner lived with Judge Hiroshige while she still kept her
own place, they were about to buy a house in Marina Del Rey. One day, the
Petitioner found out that Judge Hiroshige was cheating on her. They had a
huge argument; Judge Hiroshige claimed that this is a man’s world. The
Petitioner was very hurt and after hearing his statement, the Petitioner
went to Alan Isaac’s house to share her pain. The Petitioner called Judge
Hiroshige with Alan’s home phone until Judge Hiroshige hung up on her and
never picked up her calls. Alan Isaac tried to comfort her and gave her a
drink, which had a date rape drug in it and he forced her to have sex with
him that night. The Petitioner was embarrassed to tell Judge Hiroshige the
details of the incident. She only mentioned to Judge Hiroshige that Alan
forced her. The rapist was a friend of Judge Hiroshige.
The Petitioner still lived with Judge Hiroshige. A month later, the
Petitioner informed Judge Hiroshige she was pregnant and he believed that
Joshua Tin was his child. Judge Hiroshige hated to have a child without
preparation first and then he said he did not want her to live with him any
more if she would not get an abortion. The Petitioner did not want to get an
abortion because of her age, faith, and moral values. However, after the
first trimester, Judge Hiroshige accepted the fact that a baby was coming at
any time. He said it was a blessing. Judge Hiroshige started taking
responsibility; he took the Petitioner to see a marriage counselor with his
pastor Gary Gaulton, shopping for baby items, and was planning to accompany
the Petitioner to the hospital. However, because of his own unethical
behavior, he slept with other woman as he wished. The Petitioner had argued
with Judge Hiroshige over and over why he had made a marriage agreement with
her and why he slept with other woman. Judge Hiroshige said “this is a man
’s world.” Judge Hiroshige would make a statement: “look, you cannot
have sex now, what is the difference if I sleep with someone else.” When
the Petitioner finally would not tolerate the verbal and mental abuse by
Judge Hiroshige she initiated reporting him to the presiding Judge Duke and
supervising Judge Charles McCoy. Judge Hiroshige filed a restraining order
application by lying about their relationship to the Court and prohibited
the Petitioner from going to the Los Angeles Superior Court. This was an
illegal overly broad restraining order. The Court has many bailiffs.
In August of 2003, the Petitioner had a lawyer representing her to defend
her from Judge Hiroshige’s accusations to the court administration personal
because he claimed the Petitioner harassed him from February of 2003 to
October of 2003. He had the court apply the restraining order against the
Petitioner. While the Petitioner had a lawyer representing her, the court
legal counsel Brad Binco contacted the Petitioner directly while she had a
lawyer in place. After listening to the Petitioner, Brad Binco also asked
Judge Hiroshige not to leave the Petitioner, but Judge Hiroshige was
stubborn. Finally, he had Brad Binco threaten the Petitioner and forced her
to sign the mutual agreement. Judge Hiroshige deserted the Petitioner while
she was 8 months pregnant. Judge Hiroshige admitted in the criminal trial
that he assumed he was the father of Joshua Tin. He admitted that he gave
the Petitioner a personal check to help the Petitioner raise the child.
Judge Hiroshige lied to the Court to get a restraining order against the
Petitioner. He said he only dated the Petitioner for two or three months,
but was dating the Petitioner a year and a half before the restraining order
. He also did not do any declarations to get the restraining order that
said Petitioner could not go in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Judge
Hiroshige never testified under oath.
Petitioner Winnie Tin went to the hospital and gave birth to Joshua Tin on
November 21, 2003 by herself. After the c-section, the nurse took the baby
to the Petitioner’s room at 11:00 pm. However, she started to have
excessive bleeding and nobody called the doctor until the early morning.
Petitioner almost lost her life. On the birth certificate, the Petitioner
Winnie Tin left blank the father’s name because she did not know what to do
as the baby was half white and half Asian.
The Petitioner was in bed for three months due to the complications of the c
-section, with excessive bleeding. Judge Hiroshige stopped by to see her in
the hospital on her birthday, January 30, 2004. Judge Hiroshige bought a
bottle of Japanese wine with Japanese wine glasses for the Petitioner’s
birthday and indicated that this was a selfish gift; he said he would like
to continue the relationship with the Petitioner and marry the Petitioner.
Judge Hiroshige indicated that the gift was kind of for himself. Judge
Hiroshige had met the Petitioner’s nanny on that day. Later, Judge
Hiroshige arranged his pastor Gary Gaulton to do the counseling for the
Petitioner.
During the pregnancy, Judge Hiroshige had questioned the Petitioner about
the night she went to Alan Isaac’s house, if Alan Isaac had raped her. The
Petitioner told him what happened. Judge Hiroshige requested to do a DNA
test to make sure that Joshua was his biological child. In June of 2003, the
Petitioner arranged a DNA test by using the symthinsestic fluid and sent it
to the DNA diagnostics center and they would be able to make a decision.
However, the report shows that Judge Hiroshige is not the biological father.
At the time, Judge Hiroshige and the Petitioner had a discussion. The
Petitioner told Judge Hiroshige more details about the night Judge Hiroshige
hung up on her while the Petitioner called him from Alan’s house, the
Petitioner was crying and told Judge Hiroshige that Alan Isaac gave her a
drink and forced her to have intercourse. The Petitioner also told Judge
Hiroshige that she tried to fight Alan, but she did not have any strength
and she did tell Alan many times to stop, Alan did finally stop without
ejaculating in her. In addition, Alan had had a vasectomy. So, it is
impossible that Alan Isaac is the father. The Petitioner cried to Judge
Hiroshige about the DNA report may be wrong because the child was not born
yet, we do not know for sure that Alan is the father. Secondly, if Alan is
the biological father, you know Alan’s crazy life style, how can he be the
father for this baby? In addition, Judge Hiroshige wanted a wife and several
children. Because we loved each other, we wanted to have the baby and raise
this child together. Judge Hiroshige held the Petitioner and he agreed.
Between 2005 and 2006, Judge Hiroshige and the Petitioner tried to
rekindle the relationship through Judge Hiroshige’s pastor Gary Gaulton.
But Judge Hiroshige wanted the baby Joshua Tin’s biological grandfather
Godfey Isaac and Kathleen Isaac to pay for the child’s living expenses in
order for him to marry the Petitioner. The new relationship did not work
out. In June 2006, Judge Hiroshige filed another restraining order against
the Petitioner. A month later Judge Hiroshige filed a fraudulent police
report and claimed that the Petitioner had called him with a tape recorded
conversation and violated the restraining order. The hearing officer was a
judge from Los Angeles county; a co-worker with Judge Hiroshige who put the
Petitioner r into the custody for 15 days. The only evidence was that Judge
Hiroshige claimed the Petitioner called him and violated the restraining
order.
On May 24, 2007, Joshua Tin ended up with DCFS, while the Petitioner was
incarcerated in jail. After she was released from the jail the Petitioner
went to DCFS and had the DTM meeting. In the meeting, the Petitioner told
the social worker that Joshua Tin was born due to the fact that Judge
Hiroshige wanted to have a family and proposed marriage; unfortunately,
Joshua Tin was conceived from the rape by Alan Isaac. The social worker from
DCFS had a very clear picture that Judge Hiroshige was the presumed father
for the minor and Alan Isaac is the natural father. Under the Family Code §
7611 with Penal Code §256.1, Alan Isaac did not have the constitutional
right to be the alleged father for Joshua Tin. The reason the Petitioner
never considered an abortion was because Judge Hiroshige promised to marry
her and raise the baby.
From June 2007 through December 2007, the Petitioner shared her
difficulty by raising Joshua alone with Dr. Winnie Hsieh, Joshua’s
counselor. The Petitioner had to fight a criminal prosecution, make a living
to support herself and Joshua. It was already difficult for a person to
raise a child alone, but the Petitioner had an additional work load. She
told Dr. Winnie Hsieh a lot of times, after she finished the whole day
working, doing loans, taking care of Joshua and cleaning up the house before
she went to bed her whole body was in pain. Dr. Winnie Hsieh called social
worker Huichi Hsieh and arranged a meeting among those three to see if DCFS
could arrange some financial aid for the mother, or arrange for Joshua to
live temporarily with the presumed father Judge Hiroshige, but months passed
by and DCFS did nothing.
On December 20, 2007, the Petitioner called Dr. Hsieh again, and cried, and
asked why nobody was doing anything. Dr. Hsieh told the Petitioner to be
patient. Dr. Hsieh was worried and called back the Petitioner but she did
not answer the phone. Dr. Hsieh called the child abuse hotline for a welfare
check. Please refer to the clerk’s report page 0008: “Per the referral,
approximately two weeks ago she attended a meeting with the mother and the
mother’s CSW to address possible childcare for her son……. The caller
reported that CSW developed a plan to work on contacting the child’s birth
father and the child’s presumed father as possible childcare providers. The
caller stated she tried to explain to the mother about being patient with
the DCFS process. The mother was upset and hung-up on her. So Dr. Winnie
Hsieh was worried and called back, but the mother did not answer the phone.
Dr. Winnie Hsieh called the Child Abuse Hotline for a welfare check.”
On December 20 2007, West Covina Police Officer showed up at the Petitioner
’s house for a welfare check on Joshua Tin. The Petitioner had already put
Joshua to bed. See the police report, clerk report page 0110, “I walked
into her bedroom and saw V/Joshua asleep under the bed covers. V/Joshua
appeared unharmed.” Next page 0111, “I spoke with W/Carrillo who told me
the following: W/Carrillo is S/Winnie’s roommate, W/Carrillo works at the
school V/Joshua Attends. W/Carrillo watches V/Joshua while S/Winnie is at
work. W/Carrillo has not witnessed S/Winnie mistreated V/Joshua.”
The Police officer heard the Petitioner’s story, how she was raped by Alan
Isaac, and how her boyfriend Judge Hiroshige abandoned her while she was 8
months pregnant and she believed he covered up the rape case. The Petitioner
told the police she had contacted DCFS many times because she needed help,
but nobody was there to help her. “I spoke with Davis who told me the
following: S/Winnie has had an open case with DCFS since May, Since s/Winnie
’s case has been open, s/Winnie has called DCFS numerous times for help.”
Police officer Veronica Perez, Sean Carmon, Don Preston discussed the
situation and interviewed the Petitioner’s roommate Gloria Carrillo, they
told the Petitioner that they were going to take Joshua Tin today, and they
wanted the Petitioner to go to the Court and ask the judge to make an order
for financial assistance in order for her to raise Joshua on her own. They
told the Petitioner to prepare the need list, for instance: baby sitting,
food stamps, clothing, and health insurance whatever needed to help her to
raise Joshua on her own. Gloria Carrillo was crying and begged the police
officer. Gloria said “officer, please do not take Joshua away. It is about
Christmas. I think Winnie is just stressed out; I can help Winnie a couple
of days. And Joshua is her only family.” The Police officer responded to
Gloria: “you can help her a couple of days, who is going to help her the
rest of the 20 years? We need her to go to the court so a judicial officer
can make a finding on the father issue, who would be responsible for Joshua
and give her some financial help to raise Joshua alone.”
When the social worker Gladys David finally arrived, she said we told
you to be patient, now we have to take Joshua away. On December 21, 2007,
the mother talked to Gladys Davis supervisor Robert Rodriguez, Robert said
prepare your need list and when you go to the court for the hearing on
December 26, 2007 the judge should release Joshua on the same day.
However, the Petitioner went for the court hearing on December 26, 2007and
Ryan Matienzo shows up in front of her and told her that he is the court
appointed lawyer for her, and there is no way for the judge to release
Joshua back to her in this situation. Ryan Matienzo simply had the
Petitioner fill out some paper work if Joshua Tin was the Indian tribe child
, and the PRI to indicate that who are those family member and relatives
that may be able to provide the care for Joshua Tin. The Petitioner put the
presumed father Judge Hiroshige on the form, but the form is currently
missing from the record.
Ryan Matienzo did not go over any filing papers from DCFS for the charges
nor help the Petitioner present the need list to the court. The court asked
if the Petitioner wanted to wave reading the petition. Without talking to
the Petitioner, lawyer Ryan Matienzo promptly answered for the Petitioner:
“Your honor, we waive. Enter a general denial.” After the hearing officer
kept Joshua Tin, the Petitioner’s lawyer gave the Petitioner the social
worker’s paper. The Petitioner was reading the paper in the evening when
she returned back home and found that the social worker alleged the
Petitioner had visual and audio hallucinations. Based on those allegations
from the social worker’s report, the court put Joshua Tin to detention. The
Petitioner called Dr. Winnie Hsieh and told her that she discovered that
the social worker lied to the court in regards to her mental state. The
Petitioner has never had visual or audio hallucinations.
Obviously, someone arranged for Ryan Matienzo to show up for the Petitioner
prior to the court hearing and arranged for social worker Yumi Lim to write
a false petition. The Petitioner believes that was arranged by Judge
Hiroshige to cover up the paternity issue by claiming the mother had mental
issues. Social worker Yumi Lim knowingly and intentionally made a false
allegation about the Petitioner’s mental state and did not provide the
truth on the paternity issue to the court, social worker Yumi Lin only
claimed Alan Isaac was the alleged father, but left Judge Hiroshige’s name
out of the alleged fathers. Both the social workers and county council had
basic legal knowledge that a person who is under a penal code violation
cannot and does not have the constitutional right to be the father for
Joshua Tin.
The next hearing on February 13, 2008, the court set the case for mediation.
The Petitioner was without her son from December 24, 2007 until the present
day. Judge Hiroshige asked me to falsely state that the Petitioner did not
know who the father of the child was. The Petitioner knew it had to be
Judge Hiroshige or Alan Isaac.
On March 27, 2008, the social worker provided the Petitioner with mediation
agreement. In the mediation agreement, the social worker changed the father
from Alan Isaac to unknown. When the Petitioner refused to take the
mediation, the mediator Joe threatened the Petitioner if she did not sign
the mediation agreement, it would be a tragedy for the child. The child
would be put up for adoption.
On April 28, 2008, the court made its’ order in the case, without any
evidence the minor was physically and emotionally harmed and endangered by
the Petitioner and with a letter from the Petitioner’s psychiatrist to the
court that the Petitioner did not have any visual or audio hallucinations;
the court wrongfully put the minor Joshua Tin into the foster system.
Since the child was taken on December 24, 2007, social worker Huichi
Hsieh had arranged that the Petitioner have two hours of visitation twice a
week and allow the Petitioner to talk to Joshua Tin though phone
conversation by providing her the foster parent Maria’s phone number.
In May 2008, social worker Amy Watonabe took over the case; she suddenly
decided to move Joshua Tin from the original foster family Maria’s house
to a new foster family Brian Boem. Amy Watonabe also decided to reduce the
visitation from twice a week to once a week, from two hours each visit to
one hour each visit. Amy Watonabe also cut off the phone connection between
Joshua Tin and the Petitioner. Amy told the foster parent Brian Boem that
the visitation is confidential and asked Brian Boem not to release his phone
number to the Petitioner.
The court ordered family reunification service for the Petitioner. The
Petitioner tried her best to comply with the court order to reunify with her
son. The Petitioner started attending individual counseling and parenting
class. The Petitioner even took the individual counseling the prior court
ordered in order to get her son back.
The Petitioner had emailed the new social worker Amy Watonabe many times
that she wanted to increase the visitation times back to two times a week,
but she got no response. According to the DCFS police, social worker should
provide the home visit to the Petitioner on the weekly basis, but for
months, the Petitioner did not know who the social worker was on the case.
The Petitioner had contact to the regional manager Dr. Lock Ngyuen, and
executive board of director Rick Brian. Rick Brian requested Amy Watonabe
start talking to the Petitioner after the visitation occurred in the foster
agency.
The social worker also authorized the foster agency to write a false
report on the Petitioner and claimed that the Petitioner tried to contact
the foster father’s family doctor to find the foster family address and
requested the restraining order against the Petitioner.
The social worker also pre-arranged the security guard to try to hand
cuff the Petitioner when she entered the building to visit her son and to
fake a story about the Petitioner. One day when the security guard tried to
put on his black hand glove and tried to push the Petitioner while the
Petitioner was standing in the lobby talking on the phone with the social
worker. The chief operating officer Jennifer Lopez just passed by and
witnessed the whole thing.
In the trial, the Petitioner testified to all of the above to the court,
but the trial judge believed the social worker.
During the family reunification service period, the Petitioner and her
lawyer raised the issue to the court that the Petitioner did not get her
visits, but the court refused to supervise the case plan progress and
enforce the visitation for the Petitioner.
On August 13, 2009 at an 18 month status review hearing, the Petitioner
’s lawyer presented the evidence for the Petitioner’s compliance with the
case plan; she finished her parenting class, and individual counseling, and
argued in favor of releasing the child to the Petitioner, but the court
denied the Petitioner’s request. During the hearing, the Petitioner’s
lawyer asked the Petitioner’s therapist Mr. Sam Ng to testify about the
Petitioner’s ability to care for her son, and Mr. Sam Ng said he has no
doubt that the Petitioner was capable of caring for her son. But the court
refused to release the minor to the Petitioner’s custody due to the
Petitioner’s complaints that Judge Hiroshige was manipulating the court
system. The Petitioner had testified that her counselor threatened her
during a session. The Petitioner claimed “he said if I still believe Judge
Hiroshige still has certain responsibility towards me and Josh, that my son
would be (put) into adoption. So I want to know why he (Sam Ng) has those
conclusions. Why he is threatening me?”
The trial court then terminated the Petitioner’s family reunification
service based on the Petitioner’s belief that Judge Hiroshige was
manipulating the court system. The Petitioner was being punished for
complaining about her boyfriend Judge Hiroshige. Unless the county can
provide the proof with clear and convincing evidence that return of the
minor to the parent is going to endanger the minor, the law and legislation
require the court to return the child’s custody back to the parent. No
authority exists distinguishing between insufficient evidence and abuse of
discretion. Neither any authority nor the juvenile court can rely upon false
assumptions.
This case is not about the fact that the Petitioner believed Judge
Hiroshige was manipulating the court system or interfering with her
counselor. This case is about her ability to care for her son. It is a
parent–child relationship under the constitution as a citizen. No court
should discriminate against a poor Chinese woman and take the minor out of
the parental control of the natural parent.
After the termination of the family reunification at the August 13, 2009
hearing, the Petitioner continued the visitation with the minor in the
Southern California foster and adoption agency. The many visits were very
good because the minor and the Petitioner have a special, close, and loving
relationship between them. The Petitioner is the only person Joshua Tin knew
he could depend on, and the minor is the only family the Petitioner has in
the states. During the visit, they sang together, they played games, they
played basketball, and football in the small room where they met, the
Petitioner would tell Joshua jokes. The Petitioner bought new clothes, toys,
and educational material, such as a computer and books for Joshua. But none
of that is in the report to the court. The Petitioner sincerely believes
that the social worker authorized the foster agency to write false reports
on the Petitioner’s monitored visits. The Petitioner has stored some of the
pictures taken during the visits and submitted them to the court as
evidence but they are not in the court file. From those pictures, and videos
by the cell phone, it can be clearly shown there is a warm and loving
relationship between Joshua Tin and the Petitioner. The foster agency had
written a false report to the court judicial officer. The Petitioner has
always been an excellent parent and many social workers have said so.
The Petitioner’s lawyer at the hearing failed to subpoena any witnesses
. The Petitioner’s lawyer also failed to prepare the Petitioner to testify
. The Petitioner speaks Chinese, but her lawyer never asked for an
Interpreter.
Between August 2010 to September 2010, the Petitioner asked her lawyer to
file a 388 to reinstate the family reunification service, but the lawyer
left for vacation without doing so. The Petitioner’s lawyer was afraid of
Judge Hiroshige and tried to get out of the case. The Petitioner finally
filed a 388 petition on her own, but the trial court refused to hear it and
stated it is untimely. The trial court knows Judge Hiroshige.
Background of the Petitioner
Petitioner, the birth mother of Joshua Tin was a foreign student from China;
she immigrated to this country for her MBA program in 1996. She graduated
from Penn State with a MBA with full scholarship in 1998. After the
graduation, she landed a job as a mortgage loan officer with Bank of America
in 2000. She worked for Bank of America for four years as a residential
loan officer. When the mortgage industrial started subprime mortgage loan,
Winnie Tin moved her career to commercial real estate lending. In 2002,
while she worked for Bank of America, she met Judge Ernest Hiroshige at a
social function at the Chinese Southern California Lawyer Association. Her
friend who she met in the church tried to bring her into the association so
she can meet some clients. However, Geoffrey could not go to the meeting.
The Petitioner has a good education background and her parents are
professors in Mainland China. The Petitioner is a devoted Christian and goes
to a local Chinese Church. None of this information was ever given to the
Court to stop the Court from taking away the Petitioner’s child. Again,
the court knows Judge Hiroshige.
The Petitioner met Judge Hiroshige in the first meeting at the function.
After a 10 month dating relationship, Judge Ernest Hiroshige proposed marry
to her and wanted to have a family. Joshua Tin was born under this marriage
contract because they wanted to start having a family.
About May of 2006, Judge Hiroshige kicked the Petitioner’s leg and
punched the top of her head. The Petitioner was very depressed after this
assault. Judge Hiroshige often said his ex-wife was a bitch and an idiot
and caused his son to have severe depression. Judge Hiroshige bragged about
making money telling Asians how to handle their cases in the Los Angeles
courthouse. Should he be doing this while he is a sitting Judge?
In May 2007, Joshua Tin ended up in the social service. When the Petitioner
was released from the jail, DCFS put the minor back home with the mother.
Between May 2007 and December 2007, the Petitioner had contact with the
social worker many times to request for help, but the social worker refused
any help. Judge Hiroshige told the Petitioner that he could get her son
returned to her if she waived all lawsuits against him. This was in
September of 2012. Frank Zang and Roy Ying said that Judge Hiroshige made
the same offer to them and asked them to relay the offer to the Petitioner.
Gong Chen claims Judge Hiroshige told him the Judge wants to apologize to
the Chinese Embassy in Los Angeles.
In two court hearings, the Petitioner told the trail court judge that
Judge Hiroshige had been in contact with her counselor and interfered with
her in the compliance with the case plan with no fault on her. Judge
Margaret Downing did not take any action to investigate Judge Hiroshige.
She knows Judge Hiroshige.
The Adoption in this Case Should be Set Aside because of Extrinsic Fraud.
1. The Petitioner was never notified of many of the court proceedings
against her and never given a chance to contest them. Petitioner is from
China and could not understand how the government could take away her child
without any opportunity to contest the proceedings.
2. Petitioner has never been mentally ill, a criminal, or a bad parent in
anyway. Petitioner has always been an excellent parent and a hard working
Christian woman.
3. Petitioner’s only crime has been a long, stormy, romantic, and sexual
relationship with Judge Hiroshige from 2003 until 2012. Judge Hiroshige
was never brought into Court to testify that Petitioner was a terrible
mother or an excellent mother. He never testified that Petitioner was
mentally ill or perfectly sane. In 2005, Judge Hiroshige wanted to marry
Petitioner and adopt Petitioner’s son Joshua. Judge Hiroshige got
restraining orders against Petitioner without ever testifying in Court or
filing a declaration.
4. Judge Hiroshige has a severe conflict of interest situation when he
kept jailing Petitioner by using the Los Angeles Superior Court and his
friends on the bench. Judge Hiroshige is a very powerful and popular judge
in Los Angeles and every judge and attorney in Los Angeles is afraid to make
him angry. When the Petitioner met Judge Hiroshige in 2002 he was 57 years
old and a powerful judge. The Petitioner was a very shy 35 year old
Chinese woman. The Petitioner could barely speak any English when she met
Judge Hiroshige. Judge Hiroshige used the Petitioner for his sexual
purposes and then threw her away like a piece of garbage. Judge Hiroshige
has been manipulating the courts against the Petitioner. Petitioner knows
this because Judge Hiroshige has told her he could get her child back even
now if she agrees to never speak in the future about the crimes Judge
Hiroshige has committed against the Petitioner. There is moral turpitude
when a 57 year old judge promises to marry a 35 year old Chinese woman, so
he can have sex with her. Sex can cause children and many problems.
5. In America, many cases are moved from one county to another because of
conflict of interest. If Judge Hiroshige assaults you and tried to put
your child up for adoption, shouldn’t the legal hearings be held in another
country where Judge Hiroshige is not a powerful and popular superior court
judge? How can Judge Hiroshige get restraining orders and have Chinese
people put in jail for violating those restraining orders without ever
testifying in Court or even filing a declaration regarding those restraining
order and contempt hearings. Police do not investigate crimes or accidents
by their fellow policeman. If Judges commit crimes their trial is not by
the fellow judge next door they go to another county.
6. Petitioner’s child is now being raised by a single male. How is this
better for the child then being raised by the real mother?
7. In America, there are a lot of people who hate Chinese. None the
judges or social workers involved in this case were Chinese. If you come
from China you can stay in America if you want religious freedom or more
then one child. Most of the social workers involved in this case were
Japanese like Judge Hiroshige. Petitioner’s only crime was to get involved
with a powerful popular judge that could manipulate the court to cause
Petitioner’s life to be a living nightmare.
8. Americans complain about lack of civil rights in China and unfair
legal procedures in China. People in China are very concerned about the
high crime level in America and the rude treatment of their citizens in
America. China makes most of the products in America and loans America
money every year to run the US Government. Shouldn’t the Petitioner be
treated as fairly and respectfully as Judge Hiroshige? A judge must not
only avoid any impropriety, but also any appearance of impropriety.
Petitioner respectfully requests that the Court set aside this fraudulent
adoption without due process and consideration of the huge importance of a
child being raised by his real mother. American courts learned long ago
that all things considered, the best parent for a child is his natural
parent and not a foster home or an adoption placement.
Petitioner’s parental rights were taken away by a fraudulent hearing where
Petitioner was denied the right to testify. There were no witnesses that
testified against Petitioner. Petitioner’s parental rights were terminated
by Judge Downing after reading a two page hearsay report. Petitioner seeks
a real hearing where all parties testify before a neutral judge in some
county other then Los Angeles County.
Dated: November ___, 2012 ____________________________________
WAN TIN, Petitioner In Pro Per
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
(California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 1010.6, 1011, 1013, 1013a, 2015.5)
I am a citizen of the Untied States, over 18 years of age,
employed in the County of Los Angeles, California, in which county the
within-mentioned delivery occurred. I am not a party to this action. My
business address is 2130 Huntington Drive, Suite 309, South Pasadena,
California 91030.
On November ____, 2012, I served the foregoing document described as:
PETITION TO SET ASIDE FRAUDULENT ADOPTION, on in this action by placing in a
separate sealed envelope for each addressee, as follows:
[ ] the original of the document described above addressed as follows;
[ ] true copies thereof of the document described above enclosed
addressed as follows;
[X] the original to COURT and true copies to all other parties addressed
as follows:
Office of the County Counsel Children’s Law Center
ATTN: Barragan Guillermo ATTN: Adam Crawford
201 Centre Plaza Drive, Suite 1 201 Centre Plaza Drive, Suite 1
Monterey Park, CA 91754 Monterey Park, CA 91754
Los Angeles Dependency Lawyers
ATTN: Ryan Matienzo
1000 Corporate Center, Suite 420
Monterey Park, CA 91754
[X] (BY MAIL) I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at
South Pasadena,
California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I
am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collecting and
processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. Postal
Service on the same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware
that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal
cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one (1) day after the
date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
[ ] (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused to be delivered by hand such envelope
to the offices of the addressee.
[ ] (BY FACSIMILE) I sent by facsimile transmission such document to the
offices of the addressee at the facsimile number indicated above.
Executed on November ___, 2012, at South Pasadena, California.
[x] (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
State of California that the above is true and correct.
__________________________________
【在 n*******w 的大作中提到】
: 赞英语好
: 同时个这个主人公也太给中国妇女丢人了
: 他父母是教授，就教给她出轨，乱搞了
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 87 妈妈只是要舆论支持把孩子那回来，你不语言支持也可以， 干吗非要和那日本人上床
呢？ 我已经错拉一次， 为什么几个国男就不能支持妈妈把孩子那会来呢， 非要坚持
和日本人唱一个调？
看来人心波测？？？
钱根权可以另鬼推磨！！！ | c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 88 你想要回孩子的监护权， 你要证明的是你收入稳定，精神正常和喜欢孩子。 孩子在
你这里会比现在更好。 其他乱七八糟的关系就不要写进去了。
你这上诉书里连关键孩子的是怎么想的都没有， 他是否想你？
而老是纠缠于与一些本案无关的事实。
自己碰上垃圾人就不要来骂国人。 第一和你上床有孩子又不负责任的不是国人， 第二
要接盘的也不是WSN，搞不清你为什么要这么恨国人。
你自己有教会，让教会帮忙联系找个好的律师。 找找一些NGO， 他们有些资源可以免
费给你找个较好的律师。 如果有钱的话， 也花点钱去请个好律师。 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 89 我一生按照良心做人做事。 你可以辱骂我，但是上帝有看到我的悲伤，听到我哭泣的
声音。 我可以请你出来当面指责我。 有本事出来骂我吗？。 我到想看一看庐山真面
目。
那个国男愿意根这日本法官上床， 我也替你开心， 上帝有看到你在做什么？？
谁有蛋出来？？？？ | i********k
发帖数: 675 | 90 诶，真心同情lz无法跟孩子一起生活的痛苦。这事放谁身上都会depression. lz言语偏
激也是不得已，哪有为娘的能忍受跟亲子生生分离之痛！所以别跟她计较了。中华男儿
个个是好汉，帮她想想主意怎么把孩子要回来。
Lz把父母接过来吧，有个精神依靠。
祝福！ | | | s********i
发帖数: 17328 | | e*******n
发帖数: 4912 | 92 知道认错
还是有救的嘛
大家议议
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 妈妈只是要舆论支持把孩子那回来，你不语言支持也可以， 干吗非要和那日本人上床
: 呢？ 我已经错拉一次， 为什么几个国男就不能支持妈妈把孩子那会来呢， 非要坚持
: 和日本人唱一个调？
: 看来人心波测？？？
: 钱根权可以另鬼推磨！！！
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 93 谢谢你！！！！！
这里还有中国男人分的清是非。 再美国， 我没有犯法， 没有打孩子，我的医生也证
明我没有精神病，为什么 听审法官平什么把孩子扣下来， 这法律是法官制定的吗？
法官再美国只有按照法律来执行每一个案子， 没有权利制定法律。 只有国会同过新的
法律。
我不贩毒，也不贩人， 我老老实实做人，谁有权利用政府的资源窃听我的电话做私人
的事，用 窃听我的电话？ 找一些不要脸的中国人骂我? 讲他的歪理。 孩子不是他亲
生的。但是美国的法律不是看这个， 而是看什么是对孩子最好。
不管我的孩子是怎样来到这个世界上的， 我都要他知道妈妈爱他, 世上没有人瞧不起
他，把全世界最好的给他。 你们要反对吗？ 我要为我的孩子争取他的利益， 你们要
反对吗？
把一个无辜的孩子给一个基领养？？？畜生都不会做的事？！！。
【在 i********k 的大作中提到】
: 诶，真心同情lz无法跟孩子一起生活的痛苦。这事放谁身上都会depression. lz言语偏
: 激也是不得已，哪有为娘的能忍受跟亲子生生分离之痛！所以别跟她计较了。中华男儿
: 个个是好汉，帮她想想主意怎么把孩子要回来。
: Lz把父母接过来吧，有个精神依靠。
: 祝福！
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 94 ZHAOCE073, 这是因为你没有看全文。
【在 z*******3 的大作中提到】
: 这次我想站在日本法官一边
| c*********y
发帖数: 3348 | 95 根本跟站在日本法官一边没关系， 从法律上说，你孩子跟日本法官一点关系也没有。
你的律师难道没给你说清楚的。
本来就是presumptionn of natural father, 就是说孩子出生前同居300天可以假定同
居得人是父亲， 但是父亲可以要求DNA 检查的。 但是你这孩子明显不是那法官的，
这个假定就不存在了， 他不是孩子的natural father,当然就没责任了。
你想要他负责，他当然是不乐意了。所以你把他给扯到这个案子对要抚养权不会有任何
帮助。 只是让人觉得你精神有问题。
你既然那么喜欢孩子，为什么老是到处求救，这样只会显得你没有能力抚养小孩的。
你想要回孩子，应该多写写孩子跟你的关系，而不是你和法官还有white trash的混乱
关系。 是哪个法官看到那么混乱的关系，也不会吧监护权还给你。 并且一定要冷静，
诉讼书陈述事实的地方不要加入太多的感情因素。 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 96 问题就是出在这里，我现在连孩子都看不到。 过去我通过社工给孩子买电脑，衣服，
礼物， 社工说joshua 很想我。 先在他们把我的孩子送去给这个基领养拉。 我完全见
不道孩子， 还被DA 起诉抓去做拉两个月的监狱。先在我请问：
1。 为何社工作假， 法官不起诉。
2。 我的医生写拉证明我没有精神病，法官为什么把我的孩子扣下来？？？
3。 我第一不吸毒， 第二不打孩子，我有好的工作，法官为什么把我的孩子扣下来????
4. 听审法官不置法， 为何我写信去到la county superior court, supervising
judge 没人管。
5。 为什么我的电话被窃听多年，Arcadia 警察局 及 FBI 我去多年不调查？
6。 我去每一个教会，这个日本法官就去根牧师撒谎说要根我结婚， 前后不下10 个教
会？
7。 我从不吸毒， 为和说我吸毒。
8。 为什么我被强暴的案子不起诉？？
9。 为什么会有国男只骂我？ 只是因为我和一个日本法官谈朋友？
10。 为何他可以继续窃听我的电话让我去申请工作的银行不要请我？？？
11。我只是要求舆论支持，国男就炮轰我？？？
12。 为何我在报上等广告， 这个找房子的人到我家骂我是烂女人？？？
13， 为何一些国男为拉自己的利益出买同胞？？？
14。 为何国男不同情我， 帮助我， 还要骂我。
15。 日本首像说中国人不团结是真的。 我感站出来骂这些不要脸的国男， 你敢出来
吗？？？我也不需要一些汉奸帮我？？？
16。 这个日本法官做拉孩子的父亲对这个孩子有什么不好， 为何有国男反对？？？是
出卖同胞， 还是愚昧， 无知。 还是听拉这个法官的愚见就跟着起哄？？？？
17。 Joshua 早晚都会知道他的身世， 我希望他有一天知道有一个爱他的妈妈， 为拉
他可以做两次监狱。
18。 为和这个日本法官做假的警察报告，伪造带子， 把我送到监狱里， 听审法官不
让录音带拿去检验？？？ watergate scandle , 带子伪造过， 总统也下台。 为何国
男不站出来？？？
19。 为和我只是请大家舆论支持， 就有那么多的人站住来根我辩论？？ 不要说日男
看不起你们， 就是白男也看不起你们？？ 这样的国男有谁要？？？
有那一个不要脸的国男敢站出来当面骂我吗？？？净请过招。
【在 c*********y 的大作中提到】
: 你想要回孩子的监护权， 你要证明的是你收入稳定，精神正常和喜欢孩子。 孩子在
: 你这里会比现在更好。 其他乱七八糟的关系就不要写进去了。
: 你这上诉书里连关键孩子的是怎么想的都没有， 他是否想你？
: 而老是纠缠于与一些本案无关的事实。
: 自己碰上垃圾人就不要来骂国人。 第一和你上床有孩子又不负责任的不是国人， 第二
: 要接盘的也不是WSN，搞不清你为什么要这么恨国人。
: 你自己有教会，让教会帮忙联系找个好的律师。 找找一些NGO， 他们有些资源可以免
: 费给你找个较好的律师。 如果有钱的话， 也花点钱去请个好律师。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 97 首先，如果他不根我提结婚， 我不会去生个孩子做单亲妈妈。
第二， 他没有权利把我被强暴的案子给拦下来。这是触反法律的。 他是我的未婚夫，
他应该协助我起诉对方。使我的到陪偿。 一个拉圾， 谁要他？？ 我让位！
第三， 法律说IF THE PRESUMED FATHER GO TO THE COURT AND ASK FOR THE DNA TEST
WITHIN TWO YEARS SINCE THE CHILD WAS BORN. AND IT ALSO BASE的 ON CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCE. IN THIS CASE, THE RAPIST HAS NO RIGHT TO BE THE FATHER AT ALL,
AND THE ONLY FATHER CANDIDATE IS THIS JUDGE. SO THERE IS CONCLUSIVE
PRESUMPTION OF THE PATERNITY.
第四， 社工也在递交的法庭文件里提到这个日本垃圾是孩子的 PRESUME FATHER.
第五， 不知道这个日本垃圾做拉孩子的父亲对你们这些国男有什么伤害吗？？
第六， 我一个人在美国，我当然为我的利益奋斗， 你可以选则帮我或不帮我， 但是
你没有权利为拉自己的利益出卖我。所以我请那及个骂我的国男站出来。
第七， 我是真的很AMAZE, 为何美国政府，中国政府的高极官员都同情我， 帮助我，
要司法工正。 但是这里的国男却出来骂我？？？
第八， 我们在讲司法不工正， 你们就非得讲
【在 c*********y 的大作中提到】
: 根本跟站在日本法官一边没关系， 从法律上说，你孩子跟日本法官一点关系也没有。
: 你的律师难道没给你说清楚的。
: 本来就是presumptionn of natural father, 就是说孩子出生前同居300天可以假定同
: 居得人是父亲， 但是父亲可以要求DNA 检查的。 但是你这孩子明显不是那法官的，
: 这个假定就不存在了， 他不是孩子的natural father,当然就没责任了。
: 你想要他负责，他当然是不乐意了。所以你把他给扯到这个案子对要抚养权不会有任何
: 帮助。 只是让人觉得你精神有问题。
: 你既然那么喜欢孩子，为什么老是到处求救，这样只会显得你没有能力抚养小孩的。
: 你想要回孩子，应该多写写孩子跟你的关系，而不是你和法官还有white trash的混乱
: 关系。 是哪个法官看到那么混乱的关系，也不会吧监护权还给你。 并且一定要冷静，
| c**2
发帖数: 971 | 98 爱马，你确定你中国人，别出来献丑了
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 请学点法律， 中国人是一盘散沙。
| c**2
发帖数: 971 | 99 你孩子多大了
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 问题是法官不把孩子还给妈吗。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 100 请问我什么地方给你献丑拉？ 你是中国男人？？？
【在 c**2 的大作中提到】
: 爱马，你确定你中国人，别出来献丑了
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 101 我在这里谢谢 EVELYNLIN 根 ILOVESHARK 这两个 id, 在这里讲一些正义的话。再次感
谢。
现在是这个日本垃圾让社工做假， 根听审法官腐败一起， 把孩子扣押下来做人质。
请帮我一个忙把。
谢谢
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 请问我什么地方给你献丑拉？ 你是中国男人？？？
| t***s
发帖数: 4666 | 102 你倒底懂不懂英文啊，你的律师也没给你解释这个presumed fatherhood? 还冒出个
conclusive presumption. conclusive 了就不叫presumption 了。
TEST
ALL,
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 首先，如果他不根我提结婚， 我不会去生个孩子做单亲妈妈。
: 第二， 他没有权利把我被强暴的案子给拦下来。这是触反法律的。 他是我的未婚夫，
: 他应该协助我起诉对方。使我的到陪偿。 一个拉圾， 谁要他？？ 我让位！
: 第三， 法律说IF THE PRESUMED FATHER GO TO THE COURT AND ASK FOR THE DNA TEST
: WITHIN TWO YEARS SINCE THE CHILD WAS BORN. AND IT ALSO BASE的 ON CERTAIN
: CIRCUMSTANCE. IN THIS CASE, THE RAPIST HAS NO RIGHT TO BE THE FATHER AT ALL,
: AND THE ONLY FATHER CANDIDATE IS THIS JUDGE. SO THERE IS CONCLUSIVE
: PRESUMPTION OF THE PATERNITY.
: 第四， 社工也在递交的法庭文件里提到这个日本垃圾是孩子的 PRESUME FATHER.
: 第五， 不知道这个日本垃圾做拉孩子的父亲对你们这些国男有什么伤害吗？？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 103 对不起， 我的律师是律师， 你不是律师。 我们一起研究家庭法律的条文， 所以
conclusive presumption is exiting in the family law.
你需要我把这些copy 给你吗？？？
好奇怪，我去拉 LA COUNTY SUPERVISOR BOARD MEETING, 那些5 个 supervisor 都好
仁慈， 都希望这孩子有父亲， 都希望这个日本垃圾可以做个人应该做的事。
不明白我们自己人反到都有异意。 是个人都不会让社工做假，把一个可怜的孩子放到
基老家领养。
虽然这个日本垃圾道德败坏，但最后做拉孩子的父亲，还可以提供这个孩子前半生的生
活有保障，读好的学校， 希望他以后可以好好学习， 不要象他的nature father 一样
不学无术， 专做害人的事。 （听警察说这白垃圾也有做过同样的是对其他的女人。但
是检查官到目前为止还没有起诉， 案子在检查观手里已经快10 年拉。也希望大家舆论
要求严惩罪犯） 如果强暴犯最后被起诉，陪申团最后却忍有罪的话。 他会入狱服刑。
按照美国目前的宪法，强暴犯没有宪法资格做这个孩子的父亲。
我想如果这个官司最后到 US SUPRIME COURT 的话，让这个孩子的LEGAL FATHER DO
HIS DUTY, 也让这个孩子知道不管他是怎样来到这个世界上的，每一个人都爱他， 他
的日班垃圾爸爸也爱他， 没有把他送给别人领养。 这在美国的历史上也是一个好的记
录。
我想你也会替我的孩子开心的。 你会反对这两个垃圾男人做一个人应该做的事吗？？
一个是 legal father, 但是刷嘴皮子。 推卸责任。 一个是 nature father 却是强暴
犯， 被这个legal father 给拦下来这个案子。
也请大家舆论支持正式起诉强暴犯。
谢谢
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: 你倒底懂不懂英文啊，你的律师也没给你解释这个presumed fatherhood? 还冒出个
: conclusive presumption. conclusive 了就不叫presumption 了。
:
: TEST
: ALL,
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 104 我杂就不明白为什么没有人对社工做假把一个无辜的孩子放到寄养家庭的事生气呢？？
为什么没有人对这个日本垃圾把强暴的事情拦下来生气呢？
不知到有些人是写手呢？ 还是对事情的看法是半瓶子水，你看是满， 我看是空。
为什么没有人对 检查官包纰罪犯生气呢？
我们先来谈一谈重要的事请把？ 先在不是一直谈团结， 枪口一至对外吗？？ | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 105 Noodle07,
我是在骂你 及这个 ID 不是男人.
【在 N******7 的大作中提到】
: 你别费心了，要不要我把它发给我骂全中国没有男人的邮件转给你？不想再回这个贴，
: 只是友情提醒一下你。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 106 在美国的宪法， 因为强暴犯是刑事罪犯， 所以没有人权做孩子是的夫亲。 这也是为
什么这个法官不强暴犯给拦下来的原因。但是用权利把案子拦下来这是CRIMINAL
ACTION SUBJECT FOR PROSECUTION.
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
:
: 文章里面没说清楚为什么要拿走小孩，我根据上下文猜测可能是因为这个妈妈老是要
: financial aid，又要求把小孩放日本人那里养，可能法院认为她没条件养小孩才拿走
: 的。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 107 对我是在这里发表意见， 加州的司法不公， 请问你是在骂我还是另一id?
【在 N***Y 的大作中提到】
: 这里是自由的社会，人人可以发表意见。你个共产党的狗，比TG还狠，滚出美国。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 108 我也是不懂法律， 所以像是一个傻子上拉法庭。 根据美国的儿童法，在没有正据我有
伤害孩子的请况下，美国的 govertment agency has no legal power took a child
out of parent control. 我在法庭上陈诉，West Covina police and emergency
social worker want to me to go to court for financial assistance and
paternity funding issue. The court has no power detention the child.
儿童法院的法官， county council, child's lawyer and my lawyer， they all in
the children's welfare law section, and they know the law very well.
After my testimony, the court should return my son back to me but instead
the court did not return my son and put him into the foster home. In this
legal action, the judge had voilate my civil right.
I had post penal code for abuse the office. Any public official
intentionally violate the law and to harm any private person, this action is
criminal action, ABUSE OFFICE.
My son was crying, I was crying. but they are heart less. No feelings.
Only to cover up the paternity issue and judge Hiroshige's massy personal
life, parenthood.
In the past, every court I would be loss, until I lost my right to even see
my son, in between, I had 5 lawyers, including one private council and 3
appeal lawyer. No body to write one appeal for me and they all agree with
the lower court decision.
I had gone to LA law library to study the law myself and I discover how they
all know the law but worked together to put my son into foster home.
I do not have to say my appeal with good grammar, but it is good enough with
a lot of fact and past case. It took me two month to study and put them
together. it better than most Chinese lawyer from over sea. ( per a white
lawyer, he told me there were a lot Korean and Chinese lawyer hire him to
correct the English and grammar.)
After I report this Japanese judge to LA supervisor office to cover up my
rape case, I heard a lot of government official keep the distance from this
Jap.
However, his connection still help him to wire tape my phone, and come to
chinese community spread rumor about me. and did not correct this massy
legal battle.
Recently, I had encounter with some lawyer, and I had a discussion, now I
and you, and most people on MITBBS we all live in America, the law is for
all of us, not only me, but you, him and white, Hispanic, Black, I would ask
the Government give every body a chance to have a fair trail, and the judge
on the bench can treat every one equally.
That is why I hope every body can help me to raise a voice and ask the the
court to be fair and to have a fair trail
How to implement a moral contract with actual contract, the named father has
to go to court.
我知道当一个男人发现孩子不是我们的， 是受到一定伤害。 在这里我把自己的事 讲
出来给大家听， 也是希望 Ernest 也从中学到一些工课。 第一， 他的职位是people
gave to him, 法官是一个正义的化身， 但是他在根我就婚只后， 在我们感亲很好的
情宽下， 随便根其他人上床， 这是错的。 对别人的伤害是一辈子的。
既然把这个孩子带到世界上， 要对孩子负责。 他可以非法把我从我家里抓到监狱里，
他也可也把我被强暴的案子给 cover 起来， 然后用wiretapping 我的电话的方式，
到不同的中国人社团， 去找一只狗出来咬我， 但是最后，神会出手呈罚。
人要面对自己， 也要面对别人。对自己做的事负责。 如果， 那天晚上，我质问他时
， 他给我到谦， 而不是在我哭泣的时候跳上车就走。 我也不会去 allan 家哭诉。即
便我去拉， 他也没有权力给我下药， 强暴我。 当我要起诉 ALLAN 时， Erenst 没
有权利把这个案子给拦下来。 也不需要找人告诉我， 如果我不是去拉他家就不会有这
中事发生。 我去那里都不可一有这中事发生。这是CRIME. 但是他的混蛋哲学却是一
次有一次买出去拉。
孩子是我的， 不关他是怎样来到这个世界上， 我都要给他最好的。 让他知都妈妈爱
他，对他负责， 而不是把他送人了之。 我希望他的爸爸也能认识到这一点。 人活着
不只是为拉自己也是为别人。 不是为拉名声， 而是为拉心灵。
zhaoce073 在前面提到， 这个事情不是 法官的错， 也不是孩子的错， 我也洗耳恭听
， 请讲为什么是我的错？？ 我有之改进， 无之加勉。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 对我是在这里发表意见， 加州的司法不公， 请问你是在骂我还是另一id?
| t*******d
发帖数: 1845 | 109 我呸
这种死外F还他妈做了劈腿的龌龊事情，现在想起来是中国人了？
中国人的脸都被这种垃圾丢光了
你还是在民煮渍油的美国论坛去找安慰吧
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 这是真人真事， 请大家舆论支持。
: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
: SECOND APPELATE DISTRICT
: DIVISION TWO
: Wan (aka Winnie) Tin ) Case #: B222712
: )
: Plaintiff and Respondent, ) (Sup. Ct. No. CK71139)
: v. )
: Los Angeles County Superior Court )
: )
| t*******d
发帖数: 1845 | 110 而且这只是单方面的陈述，既然声称和白垃圾是非自愿的，那为什么不起诉强奸？而且
怀上了还有脸生出来
真是世界之大，无奇不有，
早就知道日本法官和白垃圾都是极品，还要继续混下去，外发下贱真是没有底线的，现
在还腆着脸上来骂中国人不团结.....
希望这只是个粪坑
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
: 略读了下，不一定准确，给大家个摘要：
: 大陆女，父母是教授，96年全奖读penn state MBA，98年毕业，2000年银行工作，后来
: 改做贷款。2002年认识日本人（法官），10个月的约会后日本人求婚，两人同居，吵架
: 时去白垃圾男（被州里DA起诉；没好性格，没工作，疯狂的生活方式，吸毒）家求安慰
: ，声称被灌酒have sex，怀孕期间日本人问那天那件事，做了DNA鉴定非
: 父亲，大陆女求之，说或许DNA鉴定错了，那白垃圾男只进去没射。后来生出混血儿，
: 想要日本人养，因为他是“presumed father”；她不想那白垃圾男当father，因为一
: 个“犯罪的人是不能在宪法的意义上成为父亲的”（这个不理解），她总想要把日本人
: 列为父亲，法院和社工却总是想要把白垃圾男列为父亲。她要求政府资助养小孩，政府
: 可能基于她的说法认为她没条件养，拿走小孩，直到找到个父亲养，政府却不认可那日
| | | t***h
发帖数: 40 | 111 你有没有看全文？
这个日本法官把这个强暴安给拦下来，里面有这个女人写个DA 的电子邮件， 而且还把
这个女人三翻两次送到监狱， 中领事馆， 大使都接入拉。美国 DEPT OF JUTICE 也在
调查。
你就对荐一个美网站吧
【在 t*******d 的大作中提到】
: 而且这只是单方面的陈述，既然声称和白垃圾是非自愿的，那为什么不起诉强奸？而且
: 怀上了还有脸生出来
: 真是世界之大，无奇不有，
: 早就知道日本法官和白垃圾都是极品，还要继续混下去，外发下贱真是没有底线的，现
: 在还腆着脸上来骂中国人不团结.....
: 希望这只是个粪坑
| A******D
发帖数: 1075 | 112 几处不理解：
1.为什么吵架了要去白垃圾家求安慰？
2.为什么怀了白垃圾的孩子还要生下来？
3.为什么说是被强奸却不报案？为什么认为日本法官能够压下案子？
4.为什么认为日本人未婚夫应该养白垃圾的孩子？ | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 113 1. 吵拉架， 去拉白垃圾家， 并没有求安慰。 她打电话给这个法官 几次，但是这个
法官挂电话。
2。 两个人都以为是他们的孩子， 就准备结婚把孩子生下来拉。 生拉孩子之后才知道
。而且这个法官在另一法庭上成人孩子是他的。
3。 这个要问一问DA, 为何不起诉。大家都看到电子信件。 而且这个法官有道义上的
责任协助起诉。 但是他没有，反而起诉自己的未婚妻违反静止令， 把妈妈送到监狱里
两次。关于违反静止令的案子， 妈妈要求听审法官掉出这个法官的电个话账单，如果
她没有打电话给这个法官未婚夫，她要就精神赔偿。及帮她正明。因为进监狱有一个记
录，很难找到工作。
4。 根据加州的家庭法，当一个孩子在一个婚姻里生的，THE CONCLUSIVE PRESUMPTION
EXITS. 再加上，RAPIST 根一个婚姻是没有关系的。在美国的家庭法， 如果你的太太
红杏出墙搞到怀孕，THE HUSBAND would be still the father for the child.
Unless the father file the petition to the court within two years, and only
if the court fund the nature father would be more benefit to the child, the
court rarely made that decision to separate the family to give the child to
the nature father. Unless the legal husband file divorce with年 two year
statue limitation and file the petition to the court regard the paternity
issue if the judge approval it, otherwise the husband is still responsible
to the child. Because the children's court looking into what is the best
interest to the child not to the adult's benefit.
In addition to that, in this case the nature father committed a crime, he is
subject the criminal prosecution if he got convicted by the jury, he is
being sentence to the jail. To that condition, he has no right to the
child at all.
under this circumstance, the only father candidate is the judge Ernest
Hiroshige, and because he did not want people to know he had illegitimate
child that is why the reason he cover up the rape case, influence the social
worker to file the false report had conspiracy with the presiding judge,
county council, child's lawyer, and the mother's lawyer to put the child for
adoption to save this name. But his name and reputation is not important by
faking it.
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
: 几处不理解：
: 1.为什么吵架了要去白垃圾家求安慰？
: 2.为什么怀了白垃圾的孩子还要生下来？
: 3.为什么说是被强奸却不报案？为什么认为日本法官能够压下案子？
: 4.为什么认为日本人未婚夫应该养白垃圾的孩子？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | | w***1
发帖数: 9 | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 117 请大家巨续声援 - STOP ABUSE THE LAW, RETURN JOSHUA BACK TO HIS MOTHER AND
STOP FOR THE ILLEGAL KIDNAPPING.
Thanks | H********G
发帖数: 26 | | P*******h
发帖数: 226 | | x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 120
Because the woman decided to act crazy like women in China sometimes would
behave, and think that would help her getting what she wanted. But instead,
social workers used that against her and took away her right to custody.
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 既然妈妈在美国有良好的教育， 又有工作， 法庭没有权利把孩子非法拿走， 这对孩
: 子的伤害有多大。美国的法律只是顶给穷人的吗？ 法官高于法律。 法官可以帮助社工
: 作假。
: 政府可以不按照法律办事？ 开后门？比中国还黑。
| | | h******k
发帖数: 1478 | 121 你就是那个孩子妈吧.
你想要孩子就去法院告, 打官司要回来,
在这儿JJWW什么?
博同情? 那你至少得掉几颗眼泪才行.
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 看来中国男人真是没有办法根日本男人比。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 122 How do you know the fact? Where you there when social worker did whatever,
and did you saw the mother act crazy?
No, you did not. So Judge Hiroshige just hire you to write against the
mother,THAT IS EVIL!!
WHERE YOU HAD SEE THE MOTHER ACT LIKE CRAZY, HOW MUCH DO YOU GET PAID FOR
DOING THING FOR THE JUDGE TO WRITE A FALSE INFORMATION?
WHO HAS BEEN WITNESS THE MOTHER ACT CRAZY?? NO ONE. BUT EVERY BODY CAN SEE
YOU ARE THE JAPANESE JUDGE DOG TO DAMAGE YOUR OWN PEOPLE.
instead,
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: Because the woman decided to act crazy like women in China sometimes would
: behave, and think that would help her getting what she wanted. But instead,
: social workers used that against her and took away her right to custody.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 123 现在是法庭法官根着腐败的问题，所以大家都可以知道事实真相才可以呼吁政府作更正
的工作。妈妈不知道掉啦多少的眼泪，但是没有用。
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 你就是那个孩子妈吧.
: 你想要孩子就去法院告, 打官司要回来,
: 在这儿JJWW什么?
: 博同情? 那你至少得掉几颗眼泪才行.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | | d*********e
发帖数: 279 | 126 看你也挺可怜的,以前的错误也得到惩罚了,但孩子还是应该支持你要回来,但你不能在
纠缠那个judge hiroshige 是父亲的问题,上庭那么多次court 没支持你,即使这儿的
人也没有支持你一定要judge hiroshige来给孩子付抚养费,你现在需要做的是不要纠缠
过去了,你找一份工作,即使是supermarket的收银员也好,你要有一份收入,证明你能独
立养活你孩子.不要在各个地方贴post,对你什么帮助也没有,如果孩子要回来以后,在美
国比较难生存,就回国去,你至少父母可以帮你.你一直纠缠judge hiroshige的问题只会
给自己制造障碍. | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 127
同志，我不知道为什么大家非要惩罚我。我们是一家人。我从头到尾都是讲的都是美国
司法腐败。一听审法官给另一法官做假。从头到尾讲的是把一个无故的孩子做假吧孩子
从妈妈身边拿走。你们非要把社工做假的事都瞜出来。我们先谈为什么社工做假。为什
么听审法官做弊。有一个未婚子。就是因为他自己人品不好 不过在美国对法官有特别
的人格要救。不像中国人看贯拉做官的腐败。那捅到纪委
也要惩罚。我咋就不明白美国的法官就的高于法律。大家中国人非的帮外人。
请呼吁法庭工正把孩子还给妈妈。
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 看你也挺可怜的,以前的错误也得到惩罚了,但孩子还是应该支持你要回来,但你不能在
: 纠缠那个judge hiroshige 是父亲的问题,上庭那么多次court 没支持你,即使这儿的
: 人也没有支持你一定要judge hiroshige来给孩子付抚养费,你现在需要做的是不要纠缠
: 过去了,你找一份工作,即使是supermarket的收银员也好,你要有一份收入,证明你能独
: 立养活你孩子.不要在各个地方贴post,对你什么帮助也没有,如果孩子要回来以后,在美
: 国比较难生存,就回国去,你至少父母可以帮你.你一直纠缠judge hiroshige的问题只会
: 给自己制造障碍.
| p****n
发帖数: 9263 | 128 找老公呢找小日本，求安慰呢找白垃圾
走投无路终于想起来跟中国人是自己人啦？对不起，俺实在没法同情
你也知道中国男人不如日本男人，你还是去日本论坛呼吁巴
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
:
: 同志，我不知道为什么大家非要惩罚我。我们是一家人。我从头到尾都是讲的都是美国
: 司法腐败。一听审法官给另一法官做假。从头到尾讲的是把一个无故的孩子做假吧孩子
: 从妈妈身边拿走。你们非要把社工做假的事都瞜出来。我们先谈为什么社工做假。为什
: 么听审法官做弊。有一个未婚子。就是因为他自己人品不好 不过在美国对法官有特别
: 的人格要救。不像中国人看贯拉做官的腐败。那捅到纪委
: 也要惩罚。我咋就不明白美国的法官就的高于法律。大家中国人非的帮外人。
: 请呼吁法庭工正把孩子还给妈妈。
| j*******n
发帖数: 3254 | 129 哈哈
【在 p****n 的大作中提到】
: 找老公呢找小日本，求安慰呢找白垃圾
: 走投无路终于想起来跟中国人是自己人啦？对不起，俺实在没法同情
: 你也知道中国男人不如日本男人，你还是去日本论坛呼吁巴
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 130 不管是找小日本，还是中国男人， 这是缘分， 谁让小日本追的紧， 而国男从没有行
动呢。他天天大电话， 认识我的第二天就越我出去， 他给我说他是我们亚洲人的领袖
， 为我们华人做拉很多事情。我年轻幼稚。 西里糊都的。 这是缘分， 也是我的悲哀
。 我已经到欠拉很多次。
你是妈妈？ 还是待嫁中？ 都希望你好。 你也希望我好， 希望孩子早日回到我的身边
。
不过我想去日本论坛更有用， 很多日本人认识他。请问你有知道那个日本论谈吗？
或是美国论坛也可以。请你帮忙转发。
【在 p****n 的大作中提到】
: 找老公呢找小日本，求安慰呢找白垃圾
: 走投无路终于想起来跟中国人是自己人啦？对不起，俺实在没法同情
: 你也知道中国男人不如日本男人，你还是去日本论坛呼吁巴
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 131 Jakie chen,
你觉的很好笑吗？ 这种事你决的笑的出来吗？真垃圾。请你撤你的低级贴。
【在 j*******n 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 132 Doncorleone,
你不认为这个法官应该组做这个孩子的父亲， 你忍为这个法官不应该养育这个孩子，
请问在你的见解， 出拉妈妈之外， 还有谁应该样育这个孩子呢？？？ HERE I AM
COPY SOME LEGAL CASE FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT AMERICAN LAW:
The California Supreme Court's Recent Holding:
A "Presumed" Father Has Greater Rights Than a Biological One
By JOANNA GROSSMAN
l****[email protected]
----
Tuesday, Mar. 09, 2004
On March 1, in its fractured 4-3 decision in the case of In re Jesusa V.,
the California Supreme Court awarded greater rights to a child's "presumed"
father than to her biological father. (A "presumed" father is one whom the
court recognizes as having legal rights and obligations with respect to a
child, although he may or may not be the genetic father.)
The majority's ruling sparked a 72-page dissent -- and the differences of
opinion were striking. The decision raises important questions about the
importance of biology to parenthood, ones that go well beyond this
particular case.
Jesusa V.'s Complicated Family Situation
On April 1, 2001, the child known in court papers as Jesusa V. was taken
into protective custody. At the time, she was almost two years old. The City
of Los Angeles was concerned that she had been witness to "violent
confrontations" between her biological parents, and that her mother had not
been able to protect her.
The incident that precipitated the City's action was a crime by Jesusa's
biological father, Heriberto C. Heriberto had violently raped and beaten
Jesusa's mother -- who was, at the time, seven months pregnant with the
second of his children -- in the motor home that the couple and Jesusa
shared. Heriberto was subsequently arrested and jailed. He pled no contest
to the charges.
On April 4, 2001, a hearing on Jesusa's custody was held. At the hearing,
Jesusa's mother appeared, and so did her husband of eighteen years, Paul B.
-- with whom Jesusa's mother had five other children.
The couple had been separated for the past three years. During that time,
Jesusa's mother had dated, and eventually lived with, Heriberto. She had
also, at times, visited her five children at Paul's house in San Diego. When
she had, she had often brought Jesusa with her. Jesusa had lived with Paul
from time to time, bonded with him, and also developed a bond with her five
half-siblings living there.
Paul asked the Court to declare that he was Jesusa's "presumed" father and
place her with him. Later, Heriberto, while incarcerated for the rape, filed
a similar request to be declared Jesusa's "presumed" father.
Both sides stipulated in court that Heriberto was Jesusa's biological father
. However, in the end, the court declared Paul to be Jesusa's "presumed"
father and, with her mother's consent, maintained her placement with him.
Who Qualifies as a Presumed Father Under California Law?
California's parentage rules involve a complicated set of sometimes
conflicting presumptions.
First, a man is "conclusively presumed" to be the father of a child if he is
both married to and cohabiting with the mother, as long as he is not
sterile or impotent.
This was not the case with Heriberto -- he and Jesusa's mother were
cohabiting, but not married. Nor was it the case with Paul -- he and Jesusa'
s mother were married, but not cohabiting
In law, a "conclusive" presumption usually means that it cannot be rebutted.
But this presumption actually can be rebutted, within two years of the
child's birth, with blood tests showing that the husband is not the
biological father of the child.
Second, a man might also be presumed to be the father of a child on other
bases. He could be married to, but not cohabiting with the mother at the
time of the child's birth -- Paul's situation. He could attempt to solemnize
a marriage to the mother, but have it later declared invalid. Or, he could
"receive[] the child into his home and openly hold[] out the child as his
natural child" - a basis on which both Heriberto and Paul could rely.
As these examples show, these presumptions are written in such a way that
multiple men may qualify as the "presumed father" of the same child. Indeed,
that is just what happened in the case of Jesusa V. -- both men, in theory,
could have qualified as presumed fathers. It turned out to be a case of
conflicting presumptions.
These presumptions of fatherhood are rebuttable. They may be refuted "in an
appropriate action by clear and convincing evidence" -- which, again, could
include blood tests showing true biological paternity.
Resolving A Case of Conflicting Presumptions
What happens in a case of conflicting presumptions? The California Code says
that courts should give effect to the presumption that "is founded on the
weightier considerations of policy and logic."
Which claim of presumed fatherhood--Paul's or Heriberto's--better satisfied
that standard?
Plainly, Heriberto -- in jail for raping Jesusa's mother -- would not be an
ideal father. But Heriberto pointed out that he had acted as Jesusa's father
from conception through infancy, and he argued that because of this, and
because of his status as biological father, he should prevail over Paul,
nonetheless.
The juvenile court held in favor of Paul, and the California Supreme Court
agreed -- but it did so over two heated dissents. Heriberto made two basic
claims about his rights to fatherhood -- and I will consider each in turn
The Decision of the California Supreme Court: Heriberto's Statutory Claim
First, Heriberto argued that the statute itself dictates that biological
fatherhood trumps all other claims of presumed fatherhood. In his view, Paul
's admission that he was not Jesusa's biological father rebutted any
presumption of fatherhood he would otherwise have enjoyed. Thus, Jesusa had
only one presumptive (and biological) father -- Heriberto.
A majority of the California Supreme Court disagreed, however. Its ruling
was heavily based on a prior precedent, In re Nicholas H.. In that case, the
court continued to treat a man as a child's presumed father despite his
admission that he was not the biological father.
Based on Nicholas H., the majority in Jesusa V. concluded that it could do
the same thing with respect to Paul: He could be held to be a presumed
father, without being a biological father. And as a presumed father, the
majority held, the legal standard favored him over Paul.
The dissent, however, argued that Nicholas H. was a very different -- and
much easier -- case. There, it was either the presumed, non-biological
father or no father at all. Thus, it made a great deal of sense to allow the
non-biological father to be a presumed father despite the lack of genetic
ties.
The Decision of the California Supreme Court: Heriberto's Constitutional
Claim
Second, Heriberto argued that courts must treat biological paternity as
determinative of fatherhood. So if the statute does otherwise, he contended,
it should be struck down on the ground that it violates the Constitution.
There is a long line of cases recognizing that, under the U.S. Constitution,
there is a constitutionally protected liberty interest in the parent-child
relationship. Yet unwed fathers have always occupied a unique, less
protected status than other parents.
At common law, unwed fathers had no virtually no rights. Until the 1970s,
many states, for example, had statutes stating that an out-of-wedlock child
could only inherit through intestate succession from her mother because
there was no legally recognized relationship between such a child and his or
her father.
Meanwhile, states also routinely deprived unwed fathers of the right to veto
a proposed adoption of their children. In addition, they denied unwed
fathers' claims to custody and visitation rights.
But the U.S. Supreme Court came out with a series of cases in the 1970s and
1980s declaring that the Due Process Clause did protect the liberty interest
unwed fathers have in pursuing relationships with their children -- at
least in some circumstances.
Courts could not, the Supreme Court held, automatically deny unwed fathers
the rights they gave unwed mothers. But nor did they have to grant them the
same rights.
Through a line of cases, the Court developed a "paternity-plus" approach.
Under this approach, courts had to recognize the rights of unwed fathers --
but only when, in addition to proving genetic paternity, the fathers had
also done something affirmative to create or maintain a parent-child
relationship.
Based on these cases and others, Heriberto argued that the court could not
compromise his parental relationship, except upon proof that he was an unfit
parent, which was never provided
But the majority of the California Supreme Court held that declaring a
presumed father is different from terminating parental rights -- and thus,
that the precedents Heriberto cited do not apply.
Moreover, the majority explained, Heriberto never made any attempt to
formalize his paternity, through an adjudication or declaration, despite
knowing that her mother was married to someone else. It thus rejected his
constitutional claim as well.
But Justice Chin, in dissent, argued that the constitutional (and statutory)
holding in this case puts numerous father-child relationships at risk
because of "a court's subjective and discretionary determination that some
other man who qualifies as a presumed father would be a better father." He
criticized the court for refusing to give greater--maybe even conclusive--
weight to biological ties between father and child.
The Current, Ambiguous California Statue Ought to Be Amended
This case makes very clear that the relevant California statute ought to be
amended.
The statute -- with its complicated series of presumptions and rebuttals --
was drafted in an era when paternity was much more of a guessing game. Now,
when paternity testing is virtually foolproof, a new approach is needed.
Presumptions will still be necessary in the rare case when paternity tests
have not occurred, or paternity has not been stipulated. But in other cases
-- which will likely be the overwhelming majority, the legislature must
address head on the same basis question the Jesusa V. case raised: Is a
proven biological father who has not been declared unfit always the presumed
legal father of his child? Or can another man assume that status? Can, as
the majority seems to imply here, the best interests of the child trump a
biological father's claim to parenthood?
The answer to these questions may divide readers as dramatically as the
Jesusa V. case divided the California Supreme Court. Biological fatherhood
is obviously important. But so are family unity, and ensuring proper
financial and emotional support for the children. And these considerations
arguably ought to allow a woman's husband to be legally deemed, under some
circumstances, to be the father of her child -- even when he biologically is
not.
Whatever answer the California legislature gives, it ought to provide one
soon. It's not fair to families, and especially to children, to leave this
issue up in the air.
Joanna Grossman, a FindLaw columnist, is an associate professor of law at
Hofstra University. Her other columns on family law issues may be found in
the archive of her columns on this site.
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 看你也挺可怜的,以前的错误也得到惩罚了,但孩子还是应该支持你要回来,但你不能在
: 纠缠那个judge hiroshige 是父亲的问题,上庭那么多次court 没支持你,即使这儿的
: 人也没有支持你一定要judge hiroshige来给孩子付抚养费,你现在需要做的是不要纠缠
: 过去了,你找一份工作,即使是supermarket的收银员也好,你要有一份收入,证明你能独
: 立养活你孩子.不要在各个地方贴post,对你什么帮助也没有,如果孩子要回来以后,在美
: 国比较难生存,就回国去,你至少父母可以帮你.你一直纠缠judge hiroshige的问题只会
: 给自己制造障碍.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 133 doncorleone,
还有个问题， 如果一个没有人格， 不副责任的日裔法官，怎么得到那么多的国男的支
持？ 希望法律不公正。 希望孩子没有父亲？ 相反。帮我的大不分是白人呢？
请问他有付你钱吗？ 当然他有让一些日本的黑社会经常跟踪我。 不过我相信我有我的
神在照顾我。
我不知道你是谁，但是我不需要别人用你的名来威胁我。 这个案子打到 US supreme
court, 这个日裔法官只回身败明列。 法律是为一些不服责任的人制定的。
谢谢
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 看你也挺可怜的,以前的错误也得到惩罚了,但孩子还是应该支持你要回来,但你不能在
: 纠缠那个judge hiroshige 是父亲的问题,上庭那么多次court 没支持你,即使这儿的
: 人也没有支持你一定要judge hiroshige来给孩子付抚养费,你现在需要做的是不要纠缠
: 过去了,你找一份工作,即使是supermarket的收银员也好,你要有一份收入,证明你能独
: 立养活你孩子.不要在各个地方贴post,对你什么帮助也没有,如果孩子要回来以后,在美
: 国比较难生存,就回国去,你至少父母可以帮你.你一直纠缠judge hiroshige的问题只会
: 给自己制造障碍.
| j*******n
发帖数: 3254 | 134 在国内时，想起碰到的一个女2b。当时俺正在买冷饮，一个小孩把手放进我的裤兜里，
我使劲捂住，小孩立刻把手缩回去了，小孩他妈站在旁边，立刻说我没爱心，而且追着
我的屁股说了二十遍。你妈的，烦死了。
楼主，说实话，你和这个女2b有一拼啊！ | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 135 Jackie,
看拉你的问章， 实在缺乏逻辑。 一个是小孩把手放进你的裤兜里， 多大年龄， 是调
皮捣蛋，还是偷东西？ 这是一个有问题的小孩子。妈妈缺爱子心且说你态度不好。 如
果是个3 岁的小孩， 你会问一问这个孩子干吗把手放在你的裤兜， 吧孩子交给妈妈处
理。如果小孩易经6 岁， 你还是应该把孩子叫个妈妈处理。
现在我们讨论的是法庭法官腐败把一个孩子从她的妈妈身边合法的抢走的问题。 不顾
对孩子的伤害。 违反人权的问题， 听审法庭腐败的问题把她同事的legal father
legal right and obligation cover up 的问题。
你哈哈笑的是这个孩子饱受惊吓在别人家张大？ 当妈妈每次看到社工的抱告， 社工探
访这个孩子的时候， 发先这个孩子总是藏在寄养家庭的一张床下， 因为孩怕。 孩子
半夜从惊吓里号啕大哭醒。 孩子从一个开心的小朋友变为心里有障有的孩子， 这就是
你笑的原因吗？？？
有一个牧师去拉俄罗斯喧教10 年， 他分享即使现在很都中国人在俄罗斯做生意，留学
，但是俄罗斯人只是看中国人是一群有钱的乡下人。那我想请问你是否同意这中说发呢
？ 你是一个有钱的乡下人？
这个妈妈找老公找拉日本人， 有那里的道德失丧？？ 但是被人欺, 在国外受到侮辱，
所以一些国男及国女可以用你找拉日本老公， 去日本人那里找支持，可见一些国人的
道德之低下。我们道想看看说这些话的人可以自报真实姓名吗？ 既然是论谈， 妈妈是
真人真事， 做为国人你看到自己的同胞受到侮辱，不进不愤狠那几个腐败的法官， 反
到责备这个妈妈， 既然你说你那么爱国， 请问你在美国生活干吗呢？？ 回国把。 这
是最新的根检查官的对话， 请问你有兴趣去追问吗？？
From: Michele Daniels
To: Winnie Tin
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Wan Tin's rape case 2005 LAPD DR N0. 0506-34965
Good morning, Ms. Tin:
I no longer oversee the Sex Crimes Division. Therefore, I am forwarding your
e-mail to my successor in the Sex Crimes Divsion, Head Deputy District
Attorney Carol Burke.
You should contact Ms. Burke for any further information about or
consideration of the referenced LAPD report.
Michele Daniels
Inactive hide details for Winnie Tin Winnie Tin
w****[email protected]>
To
"m******[email protected]"
cc
"a*************[email protected]" , "a****[email protected]
"
Subject
Re: Fw: Wan Tin's rape case 2005 LAPD DR N0. 0506-34965
Dear Michelle,
I brought Attorney General and Dept of justice on the email as well, Please
kindly let me know why you would not prosecuting Allan Isaac???
Thanks
Winnie Tin
From: "m******[email protected]"
To: t********[email protected]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Wan Tin's rape case 2005 LAPD DR N0. 0506-34965
Dear Ms. Tin:
My office has not received any new information from the Los Angeles Police
Department concerning the 2005 LAPD DR report number 0506-34965 which sets
forth your description of being assaulted in 2003 by Allen Miller Levine.
The status of the investigation remains unchanged. Judge Hiroshige is not
listed as either a suspect or witness to Mr. Levine's acts. My office has
not been in contact with the judge. The judge works for the state court
system and is not an employee or supervisor in the District Attorney's
Office. He has no influence over my office's review of the investigation,
and has not given any instructions to my staff about the handling of the
above investigation.
If you have any new information for investigators, you should provide it
immediately to LAPD's Hollywood Division.
Michele Daniels, Head Deputy
Sex Crimes Division
Office of the District Attorney
320 West Temple Street
Room 777
Los Angeles, California 90012
(213) 974-1611
Winnie Tin
To
Michele Daniels
cc
Subject
Fw: Wan Tin's rape case
Dear Mrs Daniels,
Please kindly let me know if you have been able to contact Judge Hiroshige
yet on my rape case ever isnce the last time I have been contact you on Nov
1st 2010. Please kindly see the email below.
Please let me knwo what is the progress on my rape case. What you planning
to do.
Thanks
Winnie Tin
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Winnie Tin
To: m******[email protected]
Sent: Mon, November 1, 2010 7:46:07 PM
Subject: Wan Tin's rape case
Hi Miss Michele Daniels,
About two month ago, I had been your office to fellow up with my rapr case
and you had walked out from your office, I spoke to you in the hall way
regards my rape case, you said you would like to fellow up and to see where
is the case stand. The day when I went to your office, your receiptionist
will not transfer my call to you and I believe she was instructed by Judge
Hiroshige, my ex-boy friend, I believe that my rape case was covered up by
Judge Hiroshige, and because Judge Hiroshige is presumed father for Joshua
Tin, my son.
Please let me know what is the progress in this rape case, and if you have
been able to interview Judge Hiroshige, the judge in Dept 54, 111 N. Hill
Street, LA Superior Court, 213-974-6968.
I had called your office today and the recepitionist answer the phone, you
can reach me back at 626-840-5616.
Thanks
Winnie Tin
【在 j*******n 的大作中提到】
: 在国内时，想起碰到的一个女2b。当时俺正在买冷饮，一个小孩把手放进我的裤兜里，
: 我使劲捂住，小孩立刻把手缩回去了，小孩他妈站在旁边，立刻说我没爱心，而且追着
: 我的屁股说了二十遍。你妈的，烦死了。
: 楼主，说实话，你和这个女2b有一拼啊！
| w***1
发帖数: 9 | 136 这个jackie 真是王八蛋， 这种事还笑的出来。 网上真有一些人混账。又不感露真实
姓名， 瘪三。 | t***o
发帖数: 19256 | 137 靠
给人带绿帽还让想让人做便宜爹帮养杂种
没成功了骂人日本垃圾
确实JP
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 我在这里谢谢 EVELYNLIN 根 ILOVESHARK 这两个 id, 在这里讲一些正义的话。再次感
: 谢。
: 现在是这个日本垃圾让社工做假， 根听审法官腐败一起， 把孩子扣押下来做人质。
: 请帮我一个忙把。
: 谢谢
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 138 请巨续舆论支持把孩子还给母亲。 谢谢。
【在 w***1 的大作中提到】
: 这个jackie 真是王八蛋， 这种事还笑的出来。 网上真有一些人混账。又不感露真实
: 姓名， 瘪三。
| x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 139
这不就是你做事像精神病的表现吗。说话做事东拉西扯的，在决定抚养权的庭审中要求
无关的判决，任何人和你的想法不一样，立刻就说他肯定是参与了一个针对你的阴谋，
这还能让法官觉得你精神正常？
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: How do you know the fact? Where you there when social worker did whatever,
: and did you saw the mother act crazy?
: No, you did not. So Judge Hiroshige just hire you to write against the
: mother,THAT IS EVIL!!
: WHERE YOU HAD SEE THE MOTHER ACT LIKE CRAZY, HOW MUCH DO YOU GET PAID FOR
: DOING THING FOR THE JUDGE TO WRITE A FALSE INFORMATION?
: WHO HAS BEEN WITNESS THE MOTHER ACT CRAZY?? NO ONE. BUT EVERY BODY CAN SEE
: YOU ARE THE JAPANESE JUDGE DOG TO DAMAGE YOUR OWN PEOPLE.
:
: instead,
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 140 有些人比畜生都不如。
第1， 有些中国人不是人， 比如你是一个。所以日相说中国人不团结是真的， 就是你
搞的。
第2， 向你这种傻逼是偷渡来的吗？ 如果你没有读全文，又 不懂法律， 建议你会去
把全文读一下。不要做汉奸上来献丑。
第3， 任何法庭，法官不做任何的精神科鉴定。只有医生做。 医生说妈妈没有精神病
， 而且比你思想健康。 所以法官没有权利扣押孩子。
第4， 向你这种傻逼我们以经不知道怎样回答你， 法官没有权利不按照法律办事， a.
不能违法扣留孩子， 如果妈妈没有伤害孩子， 法官违法不按法律办事， 这是违背宪
法， 也要受到法律的制裁。 b. 儿童法院的法官有义务执行责任。把孩子的父亲叫上
法庭受审。
第5， 劝你该拉你姓 为hiroshige 在发言好吗？真不要脸。
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: 这不就是你做事像精神病的表现吗。说话做事东拉西扯的，在决定抚养权的庭审中要求
: 无关的判决，任何人和你的想法不一样，立刻就说他肯定是参与了一个针对你的阴谋，
: 这还能让法官觉得你精神正常？
| | | x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 141
a.
you have just demonstrated your mental instability.
Oh, a legal tip for you: Your doctor's testimony doesn't make a Judge's
decision. It's only one side of the story. In the absence of opposing
testimony, and without you behaving in ways that suggest mental instability
in court, he probably would have ruled that you were mentally sound.
However, you probably ruined your case by your performance in court.
If you can't behave rationally, then don't expect other people treat you as
a rational person.
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 有些人比畜生都不如。
: 第1， 有些中国人不是人， 比如你是一个。所以日相说中国人不团结是真的， 就是你
: 搞的。
: 第2， 向你这种傻逼是偷渡来的吗？ 如果你没有读全文，又 不懂法律， 建议你会去
: 把全文读一下。不要做汉奸上来献丑。
: 第3， 任何法庭，法官不做任何的精神科鉴定。只有医生做。 医生说妈妈没有精神病
: ， 而且比你思想健康。 所以法官没有权利扣押孩子。
: 第4， 向你这种傻逼我们以经不知道怎样回答你， 法官没有权利不按照法律办事， a.
: 不能违法扣留孩子， 如果妈妈没有伤害孩子， 法官违法不按法律办事， 这是违背宪
: 法， 也要受到法律的制裁。 b. 儿童法院的法官有义务执行责任。把孩子的父亲叫上
| m**n
发帖数: 9010 | 142 检察官认为没有case, 不起诉, 与法官有什么关系?
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 请学点法律， 中国人是一盘散沙。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 143 Before you change your last name to be Hiroshige III, I do not have to
answer your question.
Writing in English can not approve you are not a Japanese dog. I would
suggest you a new name: Kishu inu Hiroshige III.
The reason I say thrid, because you are third generation. 孙子。
Writing in English could not change your slavery mentality.
thanks Japanese 奴才。
instability
as
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: a.
: you have just demonstrated your mental instability.
: Oh, a legal tip for you: Your doctor's testimony doesn't make a Judge's
: decision. It's only one side of the story. In the absence of opposing
: testimony, and without you behaving in ways that suggest mental instability
: in court, he probably would have ruled that you were mentally sound.
: However, you probably ruined your case by your performance in court.
: If you can't behave rationally, then don't expect other people treat you as
: a rational person.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 144 Muon,
这是个很好的问题。 法官是指那个日裔法官吗？ 如果是的话， 原因有( 推理）：
第一， Hiroshige had LAPD or one of the government agency illegally wire
tapping her phone for the past 10 years. He had approach to mother's friend
and telling her friend, she is a bad woman and bitraid him and have sex
with other man, so in that way, he had all of the excuse for himself not to
be responsible for the child because him is not the biological father.
2nd, by American law, for rape case, once the victim report the rape case to
a judicial officer, the criminal case would be automatically be reviewed
and be refer for the prosecution. Judge Hiroshige did nothing during the
time he was with the mother during her pregnancy nor telling her to go make
a police report for prosecution. Lawyer, judicial officer are the court
officers, when they sworn in as the officer for the court, they had their
duty to be honest and executing the law in the best their knowledge and
capbility, not to cover it up.
3rd, the rapist had told the detective he never had sex intercourse with the
mother and also told the mother's private attorney, he did not have
physical sex intercourse with her. However, the DNA shows he is the
biological father for the child. The evidence ( a child ) to show the jury
that is no dult this man had sex intercourse with this woman. why not the DA
not to prosecuting a crime?
Any body behind this??
【在 m**n 的大作中提到】
: 检察官认为没有case, 不起诉, 与法官有什么关系?
| w***1
发帖数: 9 | | t***l
发帖数: 96 | 146 真尼玛搞笑
大晚上跑别人家去喝酒 喝完被强暴 骗3岁小孩子呢？
还想让便宜爸爸出钱养孩子，太天真了吧 也是美帝这还能让你提出这个要求 回国还真
没听说国内什么时候便宜爸爸还要出钱。。
还是楼上兄弟说得实在 在法庭上不要像怨妇一样 就想着拖你的未婚夫下水 找到稳定
工作 写实际点的东西 让法官认为你即使做单亲妈妈 也能够尽到监护责任 这样拿到孩
子。别扯你那两个男人 说不定越扯法官越觉得你是2 2货怎么能养孩子 不是把孩子养2
了。。。 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 147 首先， 请你自重，没有谁跑去别人家和酒。 而是对方在喝的水中下药。。。。。
你真他不是中国男人， 向你这种中国男人站出来讲话， 让任何的其他国家的男人齿笑
中国男人。
你可以报一报你的真实姓名吗？ 可齿的一个人? 有蛋讲话， 就有蛋承认。
养2
【在 t***l 的大作中提到】
: 真尼玛搞笑
: 大晚上跑别人家去喝酒 喝完被强暴 骗3岁小孩子呢？
: 还想让便宜爸爸出钱养孩子，太天真了吧 也是美帝这还能让你提出这个要求 回国还真
: 没听说国内什么时候便宜爸爸还要出钱。。
: 还是楼上兄弟说得实在 在法庭上不要像怨妇一样 就想着拖你的未婚夫下水 找到稳定
: 工作 写实际点的东西 让法官认为你即使做单亲妈妈 也能够尽到监护责任 这样拿到孩
: 子。别扯你那两个男人 说不定越扯法官越觉得你是2 2货怎么能养孩子 不是把孩子养2
: 了。。。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 148 tywjl,
在给你一点忠告， 美国的 CIA 及 中国的间谍都在网上， 你要是不想被美国人齿笑你
中国男人没 jj, 就请你不要把所有中国男人的脸都丢尽。 真不知道你妈你爸光生不
养呢？
养2
【在 t***l 的大作中提到】
: 真尼玛搞笑
: 大晚上跑别人家去喝酒 喝完被强暴 骗3岁小孩子呢？
: 还想让便宜爸爸出钱养孩子，太天真了吧 也是美帝这还能让你提出这个要求 回国还真
: 没听说国内什么时候便宜爸爸还要出钱。。
: 还是楼上兄弟说得实在 在法庭上不要像怨妇一样 就想着拖你的未婚夫下水 找到稳定
: 工作 写实际点的东西 让法官认为你即使做单亲妈妈 也能够尽到监护责任 这样拿到孩
: 子。别扯你那两个男人 说不定越扯法官越觉得你是2 2货怎么能养孩子 不是把孩子养2
: 了。。。
| z******8
发帖数: 1225 | 149 楼主需要冷静下来，
也许当一潭水静下来时，答案就在你眼前了，
bless 妈妈接回孩子 | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 150 谢谢。 明明是这两个美国烂男人都有问题，加上听审法官根这腐败犯法， 非有几个不
要脸的中国id, 要去肯日本人的屁股， 连中国人的脸都不要拉。 真是有人生没人样的。
【在 z******8 的大作中提到】
: 楼主需要冷静下来，
: 也许当一潭水静下来时，答案就在你眼前了，
: bless 妈妈接回孩子
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 151 所以， 法官可以不用出庭受审？？？
在美国， 对法官的人品要就比对一班人高， 但是当法官反错时， 也是根其他人一样
出庭受审。
谢谢
的。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢。 明明是这两个美国烂男人都有问题，加上听审法官根这腐败犯法， 非有几个不
: 要脸的中国id, 要去肯日本人的屁股， 连中国人的脸都不要拉。 真是有人生没人样的。
| m**n
发帖数: 9010 | 152 您的"第一", 您说的Hiroshige多坏多坏, 干了多少坏事, 与rape案完全无关.
您的"2"与"3", 与我的问题(检察官不起诉与法官有什么关系)完全无关.
同学, 做到不要所答非所问, 有那么难么?
检察官都决定不起诉, 您还非要一口一个rape.
您先把这个问题说明了, 再说别的吧.
friend
to
to
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: Muon,
: 这是个很好的问题。 法官是指那个日裔法官吗？ 如果是的话， 原因有( 推理）：
: 第一， Hiroshige had LAPD or one of the government agency illegally wire
: tapping her phone for the past 10 years. He had approach to mother's friend
: and telling her friend, she is a bad woman and bitraid him and have sex
: with other man, so in that way, he had all of the excuse for himself not to
: be responsible for the child because him is not the biological father.
: 2nd, by American law, for rape case, once the victim report the rape case to
: a judicial officer, the criminal case would be automatically be reviewed
: and be refer for the prosecution. Judge Hiroshige did nothing during the
| z********2
发帖数: 3556 | 153 不是自己的孩子，为什么要养？
想养也是自愿的啊，比如妻子带着前夫或未婚生的孩子。
这是人情而不是义务！
一定要扯上小倭当父母，我都觉得你精神有问题！
如果你平时不当自己是国人，那就不要出事了才来求助！
就像尊重是相互的一样，要国人帮助你也是相互的。 | m********5
发帖数: 17667 | 154 一直没搞懂这个法官为何要为这个孩子负责...
就算当日是强奸，应该也和这个法官没有关系吧？
此女想要回孩子申请aids自己养，又让没有血缘的法官付钱？我估计这官司太难打了吧
...
社工有病没事去拆散别人母子么？我感觉没这么有空...
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: doncorleone,
: 还有个问题， 如果一个没有人格， 不副责任的日裔法官，怎么得到那么多的国男的支
: 持？ 希望法律不公正。 希望孩子没有父亲？ 相反。帮我的大不分是白人呢？
: 请问他有付你钱吗？ 当然他有让一些日本的黑社会经常跟踪我。 不过我相信我有我的
: 神在照顾我。
: 我不知道你是谁，但是我不需要别人用你的名来威胁我。 这个案子打到 US supreme
: court, 这个日裔法官只回身败明列。 法律是为一些不服责任的人制定的。
: 谢谢
| m**n
发帖数: 9010 | 155 此女连最基本的, 指控孩子生父强奸的案子, 检察官都不肯立案.
可到了这儿, 就把这说成版上钉钉的事似的了.
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 一直没搞懂这个法官为何要为这个孩子负责...
: 就算当日是强奸，应该也和这个法官没有关系吧？
: 此女想要回孩子申请aids自己养，又让没有血缘的法官付钱？我估计这官司太难打了吧
: ...
: 社工有病没事去拆散别人母子么？我感觉没这么有空...
| m********5
发帖数: 17667 | 156 我想她是不是花了太多精力在搞臭两个男人上，反而忽略了对小孩的照顾
因此社工想方设法想帮小孩脱离她
我觉得没啥关系的社工专门来害她不太可能，当然我只草草看了一下
整个案子的卷宗我们也不可能看到，也就没啥好讲的了
前面说白男撒谎问题，其实他记录这么差，想到一个法官女人告他强奸，也可能吓到乱
说话的可能。
总之是很同情小孩的，大人的事情真说不太清楚; 如果小孩能给一对较好的夫妇收养，
生父是罪犯的档案成年以前封起来，也未尝不是好事。
【在 m**n 的大作中提到】
: 此女连最基本的, 指控孩子生父强奸的案子, 检察官都不肯立案.
: 可到了这儿, 就把这说成版上钉钉的事似的了.
| m********5
发帖数: 17667 | 157 强奸是真是假我们不知道
检察官是不是枉法，我们这里也不可能说清楚
在版上只可能用常理判断，如果你说那么多“公仆”都对一个不太相干的弱女子搞压迫
，这里面感觉又没多大利益纠葛，似乎有点太玄了，在大陆估计还有点可能。
如果白男老爸是什么牛X的家伙，可能还能炒得有点可信度
【在 m**n 的大作中提到】
: 此女连最基本的, 指控孩子生父强奸的案子, 检察官都不肯立案.
: 可到了这儿, 就把这说成版上钉钉的事似的了.
| L**S
发帖数: 7833 | 158 只能说傻逼外F女
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
: 略读了下，不一定准确，给大家个摘要：
: 大陆女，父母是教授，96年全奖读penn state MBA，98年毕业，2000年银行工作，后来
: 改做贷款。2002年认识日本人（法官），10个月的约会后日本人求婚，两人同居，吵架
: 时去白垃圾男（被州里DA起诉；没好性格，没工作，疯狂的生活方式，吸毒）家求安慰
: ，声称被灌酒have sex，怀孕期间日本人问那天那件事，做了DNA鉴定非
: 父亲，大陆女求之，说或许DNA鉴定错了，那白垃圾男只进去没射。后来生出混血儿，
: 想要日本人养，因为他是“presumed father”；她不想那白垃圾男当father，因为一
: 个“犯罪的人是不能在宪法的意义上成为父亲的”（这个不理解），她总想要把日本人
: 列为父亲，法院和社工却总是想要把白垃圾男列为父亲。她要求政府资助养小孩，政府
: 可能基于她的说法认为她没条件养，拿走小孩，直到找到个父亲养，政府却不认可那日
| L**S
发帖数: 7833 | | j***d
发帖数: 644 | 160 什么乱七糟八的
这女的一看就有问题，找个比自己大２０岁的明知人品很烂日本人当劳工，又去白垃圾
家＂诉苦＂被＂强奸＂，还生下来了。难道全世界的男人都死光了只剩这两个？
跑来装可怜被识破于是大骂国男。
况且这些都还是女方的一面之辞，事实究竟如何恐怕这里是找不到的，不过这女的一定
是极品。 | | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 161 mitbbs2715, 会答你的问题：
the white man's father is Godfred Isaac, a well known USA lawyer. per unkown
info, his first wife is a Fed court judge , 2nd wife , the white guy's mom.
, who passed away, his current wife kathearen isaaac, lawyer of court appeal
. the Japanese judge wants the white guy's family to pay child support
because they live in beverly hills.
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 强奸是真是假我们不知道
: 检察官是不是枉法，我们这里也不可能说清楚
: 在版上只可能用常理判断，如果你说那么多“公仆”都对一个不太相干的弱女子搞压迫
: ，这里面感觉又没多大利益纠葛，似乎有点太玄了，在大陆估计还有点可能。
: 如果白男老爸是什么牛X的家伙，可能还能炒得有点可信度
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 162 为什么法官让一个单身的基老去领养一个小孩。
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 我想她是不是花了太多精力在搞臭两个男人上，反而忽略了对小孩的照顾
: 因此社工想方设法想帮小孩脱离她
: 我觉得没啥关系的社工专门来害她不太可能，当然我只草草看了一下
: 整个案子的卷宗我们也不可能看到，也就没啥好讲的了
: 前面说白男撒谎问题，其实他记录这么差，想到一个法官女人告他强奸，也可能吓到乱
: 说话的可能。
: 总之是很同情小孩的，大人的事情真说不太清楚; 如果小孩能给一对较好的夫妇收养，
: 生父是罪犯的档案成年以前封起来，也未尝不是好事。
| p****n
发帖数: 9263 | 163 法官没有逼一个基佬去领养一个小孩吧？
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 为什么法官让一个单身的基老去领养一个小孩。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 164 小姐请问你上床时的感觉同常好不好？？
法庭上是看证据， 不是感觉。你感觉社工没这么有空做假。。。。。 但他们已经做假
的证据确做， 法官要平感觉定案呢？ 还是根据证据起诉做假的社工呢？
等你根其他男人上床之后会来根我们谈谈你的感觉。 然后我们在谈这个案子的时候谈
证据。先在不用没有 JJ 的wsn， 换拉谈感觉的女人 ID。
等你和那个日裔法官上拉船之后， 会来告诉我们你的感觉， 然后告诉我们他JJ的尺寸
， 我们就知道你的感觉真不真实。。。
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 一直没搞懂这个法官为何要为这个孩子负责...
: 就算当日是强奸，应该也和这个法官没有关系吧？
: 此女想要回孩子申请aids自己养，又让没有血缘的法官付钱？我估计这官司太难打了吧
: ...
: 社工有病没事去拆散别人母子么？我感觉没这么有空...
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 165 内幕不料解。
【在 p****n 的大作中提到】
: 法官没有逼一个基佬去领养一个小孩吧？
| s***d
发帖数: 15421 | 166 你这是和搞法律的人对付上了，通过法律手段基本是没戏了。
unkown
mom.
appeal
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 内幕不料解。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 167 MITBBS2715,
你所有的讲话都是站在对立的立场， 然后有希望这个孩子还是被别人领养。 如果你是
个女人的话， 小心生的孩子没屁眼。 人在做天在看。 小心会有抱应。
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 我想她是不是花了太多精力在搞臭两个男人上，反而忽略了对小孩的照顾
: 因此社工想方设法想帮小孩脱离她
: 我觉得没啥关系的社工专门来害她不太可能，当然我只草草看了一下
: 整个案子的卷宗我们也不可能看到，也就没啥好讲的了
: 前面说白男撒谎问题，其实他记录这么差，想到一个法官女人告他强奸，也可能吓到乱
: 说话的可能。
: 总之是很同情小孩的，大人的事情真说不太清楚; 如果小孩能给一对较好的夫妇收养，
: 生父是罪犯的档案成年以前封起来，也未尝不是好事。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 168 mitbbs7125,
你如果读不懂英文， 问问其他人， 那里到底写的是什么， 不要在这里谈感觉。 下次
你专门写一片问章去谈一谈你的感觉， ok? OR 贴张照片， 让着里的男人都谈谈对你
的感觉好不好。 敢吗？？
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 一直没搞懂这个法官为何要为这个孩子负责...
: 就算当日是强奸，应该也和这个法官没有关系吧？
: 此女想要回孩子申请aids自己养，又让没有血缘的法官付钱？我估计这官司太难打了吧
: ...
: 社工有病没事去拆散别人母子么？我感觉没这么有空...
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 169 LJQS,
请问你妈妈是个女人吗？？ 回家用这句话骂她， 她一定很值得。
【在 L**S 的大作中提到】
: 只能说傻逼外F女
| t***o
发帖数: 4265 | 170 你认为这个孩子的birth父亲是谁？
这个孩子该由谁养？
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 既然妈妈在美国有良好的教育， 又有工作， 法庭没有权利把孩子非法拿走， 这对孩
: 子的伤害有多大。美国的法律只是顶给穷人的吗？ 法官高于法律。 法官可以帮助社工
: 作假。
: 政府可以不按照法律办事？ 开后门？比中国还黑。
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 171 jietd,
请问你不觉的这事情很可怜吗？ 你没有感觉？ 不管这个女人怎样择友不善。 你有什
么决的一定要痛恨她呢？ 血浓于水。
我们骂的是那几个出卖同胞利益的汉奸。 如果你不是， 就请住口如果你还有良心的话。
日相看拉你们几个写的一定会对席主席讲， 看看你的国民？？？
【在 j***d 的大作中提到】
: 什么乱七糟八的
: 这女的一看就有问题，找个比自己大２０岁的明知人品很烂日本人当劳工，又去白垃圾
: 家＂诉苦＂被＂强奸＂，还生下来了。难道全世界的男人都死光了只剩这两个？
: 跑来装可怜被识破于是大骂国男。
: 况且这些都还是女方的一面之辞，事实究竟如何恐怕这里是找不到的，不过这女的一定
: 是极品。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 172 MITBBS2715,
请问你有听说过 Godfrey Isaac 这个人吗？ 没有的话， 会去查一查在来发言。
谢谢
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 强奸是真是假我们不知道
: 检察官是不是枉法，我们这里也不可能说清楚
: 在版上只可能用常理判断，如果你说那么多“公仆”都对一个不太相干的弱女子搞压迫
: ，这里面感觉又没多大利益纠葛，似乎有点太玄了，在大陆估计还有点可能。
: 如果白男老爸是什么牛X的家伙，可能还能炒得有点可信度
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 173 世界上的每一个孩子都是上帝的礼物， 是最真贵的。 不管他们是在什么样的请况下出
生。 没有人应该抛弃他。 在这种请况下， 最好是三个人都负责。 让这个孩子感觉他
所有的parents 都爱他，而且对他负责。 不管他是怎样来到这个世界上，孩子不应该
受到惩罚。如果白垃圾是提不起来的烂泥。 那么， 法官，及这个女人要承担起养育下
一代的责任及义务。 按照当今的美国法律上，经过法庭的审核, 如果证据他是这个孩
子的presumed father, 他必须去做法律上要求他做人的最基本的责任。 另外，按照做
人的道义上，这个法官也要需要膳养这个孩子。 加上妈妈。
成年人不仅要对自己的行为负责， 也要对别人负责。
所有的心理学家都以经证明， 当孩子跟自己的亲生父母生活心理是最健康的成长。何
况， 这个母亲愿意为拉这个孩子牺牲自己， 去养育这个孩子。 而且， 这个母亲也受
过良好的教育， 有很好的工作， 为什么要把一个无辜的孩子从母亲的怀中抢走， 只
是因为一个法官的名誉因他自己的行为做成的错误，去惩罚一个孩子？？
if you read previous legal case, the biological father or birth father did
not play a big rule in the children's court, his nature father is the birth
father, his legal father is the father who legally responsible to raise him
until 18. That is big difference in the legal responsibility.
【在 t***o 的大作中提到】
: 你认为这个孩子的birth父亲是谁？
: 这个孩子该由谁养？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 174 tango, 这个问题问的很好：
世界上的每一个孩子都是上帝的礼物， 是最真贵的。 不管他们是在什么样的请况下出
生。 没有人应该抛弃他。 在这种请况下， 最好是三个人都负责。 让这个孩子感觉他
所有的parents 都爱他，而且对他负责。 不管他是怎样来到这个世界上，孩子不应该
受到惩罚。如果白垃圾是提不起来的烂泥。 那么， 法官，及这个女人要承担起养育下
一代的责任及义务。 按照当今的美国法律上，经过法庭的审核, 如果证据他是这个孩
子的presumed father, 他必须去做法律上要求他做人的最基本的责任。 另外，按照做
人的道义上，这个法官也要需要膳养这个孩子。 加上妈妈。
成年人不仅要对自己的行为负责， 也要对别人负责。
所有的心理学家都以经证明， 当孩子跟自己的亲生父母生活心理是最健康的成长。何
况， 这个母亲愿意为拉这个孩子牺牲自己， 去养育这个孩子。 而且， 这个母亲也受
过良好的教育， 有很好的工作， 为什么要把一个无辜的孩子从母亲的怀中抢走， 只
是因为一个法官的名誉因他自己的行为做成的错误，去惩罚一个孩子？？
if you read previous legal case, the biological father or birth father did
not play a big rule in the children's court, his nature father is the birth
father, his legal father is the father who legally responsible to raise him
until 18. That is big difference in the legal responsibility.
【在 t***o 的大作中提到】
: 你认为这个孩子的birth父亲是谁？
: 这个孩子该由谁养？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 175 sayid,
你说对拉， 所以才希望大家用正义的呼声， 要求政府解决这几个有问题的法官 及 “
公仆”。
司法面前人人平等。就不明白这个日裔法官怎么可以高于法律， 不受到法律的约束？
？因为有他的同事法官帮忙。所以， 不用出庭。 难道法律只是给老百姓社的吗？
又在网上设几个 ID 帮他写文章， 混谣黑白， 好想大家都不会读英文， 就只需要他
们在那里接释。 还就有一些没人格的中国人去做这事。
希望大家帮忙。 呼吁司法工证。 谢谢
【在 s***d 的大作中提到】
: 你这是和搞法律的人对付上了，通过法律手段基本是没戏了。
:
: unkown
: mom.
: appeal
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 176 In addition, this case involved with a district judge's paturnity issue, the
hearing should be handle by a federal court judge. Do you think most of the
LA county judge and LA county councile did not know the law?
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: sayid,
: 你说对拉， 所以才希望大家用正义的呼声， 要求政府解决这几个有问题的法官 及 “
: 公仆”。
: 司法面前人人平等。就不明白这个日裔法官怎么可以高于法律， 不受到法律的约束？
: ？因为有他的同事法官帮忙。所以， 不用出庭。 难道法律只是给老百姓社的吗？
: 又在网上设几个 ID 帮他写文章， 混谣黑白， 好想大家都不会读英文， 就只需要他
: 们在那里接释。 还就有一些没人格的中国人去做这事。
: 希望大家帮忙。 呼吁司法工证。 谢谢
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 177 mitbbs2715, 你真是太聪明， 社工想方设发使孩子脱离母亲，这句话正中要害。社工
没有任何权利在任何情况下想方设发是孩子脱离母亲， 而是想方设法帮助受害者。 你
是蠢呢， 还是无知？
【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 我想她是不是花了太多精力在搞臭两个男人上，反而忽略了对小孩的照顾
: 因此社工想方设法想帮小孩脱离她
: 我觉得没啥关系的社工专门来害她不太可能，当然我只草草看了一下
: 整个案子的卷宗我们也不可能看到，也就没啥好讲的了
: 前面说白男撒谎问题，其实他记录这么差，想到一个法官女人告他强奸，也可能吓到乱
: 说话的可能。
: 总之是很同情小孩的，大人的事情真说不太清楚; 如果小孩能给一对较好的夫妇收养，
: 生父是罪犯的档案成年以前封起来，也未尝不是好事。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 178 xuansu, 说你傻， 你还带这上网上拉：
本来孩子被送到儿童法院就是要鉴定孩子父亲的问题， 结果父亲问题没有鉴定，社工
就在报告里大写妈妈精神有问题，第一次写孩子有两个父亲，不小心把法官大人的名子
写上去拉，赶紧修该，mediation 我们（社工）就写孩子没有父亲把。妈妈不同意，
出庭讲实话， 听审法官听完后，跟着放屁：‘ 告诉你不要开口讲实话，我们要照顾我
们法官形象的问题， 我来做个决定， 法律是这样写的， 但是我黑女人刚上任的法官
三吧火， 我可以在我的法庭里制定一个我的法律，把孩子扣下来， 以后看看再说。法
律我不关，我也不执行，在我的court room 制定个我的法律去执行。” 我们黑人
翻身拉， 我们可以做法官，做总统，就多给我们几个board of equalization, 看我上台
后是怎样修理美国的。 哈哈，你不服，你上诉。我们本来老H就不
知道父亲是谁， 我们只知道妈妈就好拉。 关你中国人家庭文化，白人文化， 家庭的
完整对下一代的影响， 我先把我的官位做好，和同事搞好关系。 这个日本人不就是初
你之外谁拉其他人吗？ 对你有一定的伤害，造成今天的结局，我们害人大部分都不知
道父亲是谁。 别谈拉，法律没有那么工正的，我们做拉几百年奴隶，虽然平反拉，但
是谁来付我们的在债？ 所以我们也来欠别人的债， 你儿子在寄养家庭长大受点伤害，
将来精神不健康，不是什么大不了的， 我们害人还死拉很多呢。
先在美国政府看这他们这批法官， 终于醒悟到这个不是一个个案的问题， 而是在他们
的司法系统存在营私舞弊成风的问题。
美国不是那一个人的， 美国是属于我们每个人生活在这个国家的。如果我们中国人移
民到美国来寻找更好的生活， 我们也希望这个国家会更好。希望我们中国人顾全大局
，帮着这个妈妈寻回公道。也发出正义的呼声。司法公正。
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: a.
: you have just demonstrated your mental instability.
: Oh, a legal tip for you: Your doctor's testimony doesn't make a Judge's
: decision. It's only one side of the story. In the absence of opposing
: testimony, and without you behaving in ways that suggest mental instability
: in court, he probably would have ruled that you were mentally sound.
: However, you probably ruined your case by your performance in court.
: If you can't behave rationally, then don't expect other people treat you as
: a rational person.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 179 在给你看一看法官是怎样的rational:
xuansu, 说你傻， 你还带这上网上拉：
本来孩子被送到儿童法院就是要鉴定孩子父亲的问题， 结果父亲问题没有鉴定，社工
就在报告里大写妈妈精神有问题，第一次写孩子有两个父亲，不小心把法官大人的名子
写上去拉，赶紧修该，mediation 我们（社工）就写孩子没有父亲把。妈妈不同意，
出庭讲实话， 听审法官听完后，跟着放屁：‘ 告诉你不要开口讲实话，我们要照顾我
们法官形象的问题， 我来做个决定， 法律是这样写的， 但是我黑女人刚上任的法官
三吧火， 我可以在我的法庭里制定一个我的法律，把孩子扣下来， 以后看看再说。法
律我不关，我也不执行，在我的court room 制定个我的法律去执行。” 我们黑人
翻身拉， 我们可以做法官，做总统，就多给我们几个board of equalization, 看我上台
后是怎样修理美国的。 哈哈，你不服，你上诉。我们本来老H就不
知道父亲是谁， 我们只知道妈妈就好拉。 关你中国人家庭文化，白人文化， 家庭的
完整对下一代的影响， 我先把我的官位做好，和同事搞好关系。 这个日本人不就是初
你之外谁拉其他人吗？ 对你有一定的伤害，造成今天的结局，我们害人大部分都不知
道父亲是谁。 别谈拉，法律没有那么工正的，我们做拉几百年奴隶，虽然平反拉，但
是谁来付我们的在债？ 所以我们也来欠别人的债， 你儿子在寄养家庭长大受点伤害，
将来精神不健康，不是什么大不了的， 我们害人还死拉很多呢。
先在美国政府看这他们这批法官， 终于醒悟到这个不是一个个案的问题， 而是在他们
的司法系统存在营私舞弊成风的问题。
instability
as
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: a.
: you have just demonstrated your mental instability.
: Oh, a legal tip for you: Your doctor's testimony doesn't make a Judge's
: decision. It's only one side of the story. In the absence of opposing
: testimony, and without you behaving in ways that suggest mental instability
: in court, he probably would have ruled that you were mentally sound.
: However, you probably ruined your case by your performance in court.
: If you can't behave rationally, then don't expect other people treat you as
: a rational person.
| L**S
发帖数: 7833 | 180 傻逼外f才怕人骂，心虚呗
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: LJQS,
: 请问你妈妈是个女人吗？？ 回家用这句话骂她， 她一定很值得。
| | | L**S
发帖数: 7833 | 181 椰子教徒就喜欢把自己的东西强加给别人，垃圾
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 世界上的每一个孩子都是上帝的礼物， 是最真贵的。 不管他们是在什么样的请况下出
: 生。 没有人应该抛弃他。 在这种请况下， 最好是三个人都负责。 让这个孩子感觉他
: 所有的parents 都爱他，而且对他负责。 不管他是怎样来到这个世界上，孩子不应该
: 受到惩罚。如果白垃圾是提不起来的烂泥。 那么， 法官，及这个女人要承担起养育下
: 一代的责任及义务。 按照当今的美国法律上，经过法庭的审核, 如果证据他是这个孩
: 子的presumed father, 他必须去做法律上要求他做人的最基本的责任。 另外，按照做
: 人的道义上，这个法官也要需要膳养这个孩子。 加上妈妈。
: 成年人不仅要对自己的行为负责， 也要对别人负责。
: 所有的心理学家都以经证明， 当孩子跟自己的亲生父母生活心理是最健康的成长。何
: 况， 这个母亲愿意为拉这个孩子牺牲自己， 去养育这个孩子。 而且， 这个母亲也受
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 182 你们家的女人你可骂“傻逼”， 所以，请你会家对你家的女性大声喊。在请你专告你
妈妈， 她没有把你叫好， 所以你那么抵挡。
【在 L**S 的大作中提到】
: 傻逼外f才怕人骂，心虚呗
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 183 xuansu:
再谈rational:
1. 请问你订婚拉之后， 会不会因为你未婚妻工作忙，就随便在外面偷腥？ 这种行为
是 rational?
2. 偷腥被抓到， 很冷静的讲， ‘你哭拉， 可以表现出来你还是很爱我的。不过，
这是男人的世界， 我男人在外面睡个女人是天经地义。很晚拉， 会家把。 有事明天
再说' 这些话是不是很rational?
3. 听拉这些话， 气的娃娃叫， 这不是rational. 看你们中国女人就是没有日本女人
能忍耐。
4。 有孩子拉， 去堕胎把。 不用但心是否杀掉个婴儿， 母体受伤， 现在我不认为适
合要孩子。
5。 6个月身孕，不能做爱， 所以我在外面找个女人怕什么？男人有需要。这话是不
是很理性？
6。 关你死活， 怀孕8 个月， 到法庭找我老板谈，我就申请静止令， 让你不能进法
院。 把你一个大肚婆扔下， 管你死活。rational action???
7. 生孩子大出血， 查点没死掉， 有不是我把你能怀孕的， 找那个孩子的亲爹爹。
他负责。这些话很rational?
8. rapist father is Godfrey Isaac? 他有钱？ lLET ME MAKE A DEAL WITH HIM: hi
, CAN YOU pay the child support
, in order for me to finish the marriage agreement WITH YOU. that is
rational decision??
9. Mr. Isaac, here is a little problem, your son raped my finance, I am hold
down for the prosecution for now and we
got your grandson, can you pay for the child support? I am not the
biological father, The child is your family's blood. No deal?
10. 法律说是我负责？ 先把你抓到监狱里在说， 看你还要不要我负责。 做个假的警
察报告， 我用政府的资源起诉你。我们政府有千军万马， 想请律师打官司， 你化钱
请律师， 律师听我的指示写状子，听审法官是我的朋友。 我一手控制你的律师，一手
控制听审法官，打一场让你输一场。就是欺负你新移民，不懂法律， 加上你们中国人
不团结，找几个中国的小子， 答应给点好处， 搞到你内讧， 没人帮助你。看定你中
国人就是不团结。
11。 wire tapping is illegal, 这个消息不能透漏， 赶紧叫 LA 斑竹 south park
把贴子撤下来。 我的妈， 查点被这披中国人料解到美国的法律。我根这几个LAPD都要
进 fed jail 20 +years.
12。2007 年5 月 我把我的未婚妻， 抓到监狱， 孩子落到社工的手里， 不妙， 孩子
到拉DCFS， 就要送到儿童法院， 爸爸妈妈都要出庭受审。赶紧让社工先不要把孩子
BOOK 到法院去。 否则我还是要出庭受审. 孩子生病， 不要看医生，等等， 让我赶进
把妈妈从监狱里放出来在说。
13。 社工不要把这事说出来， 留点面子把。 不要上法庭，孩子我养。我据续盖住。
没人知道 我有一个私生子是最好， 我要面子又自私。
14。 据续盖住，女人你不听话， 我就用法律来修理你。我做拉假的警察报告， 检查
官是我的统一战线的战友， PUBLIC DEFENDER part of the government system. LA
COUNTY JUDGES, MY FRIEND,LET ME USE MY CHAMBER PHONE NUMBER TO INFORM THEM.
15. 看你一个女人能怎样？ 养孩子， 赚钱，打官司。 我在据续找我的朋友HARRSE 你
。 受不了， 哭拉，工作累到病拉，浑身痛， 有人报警， 我的天那， 孩子被警察抓
到法院拉。 我的名字根那个 ALLAN 的名子都写上去拉。 赶紧，请MEDIATOR 来， 让
社工讲， 妈妈承认不知道孩子的父亲是谁？？然社工写妈妈精神失常。 丛2007，5月
， 道07 年的12 月，社工已经知道妈妈精神很正常， 没关系，没有法官， 警察会写
起诉报告。 我认识他们的顶头上司。
16。 妈妈TESTIFY, 听审法官， 叫我出庭， 我不能出庭，我太丢面子拉。 我是JUDGE
, 我不能让别人知道我在她怀孕，根她有婚约， 在她怀孕是抛弃她的事情让别人到知
道。 来赶紧， 叫来听审法官给点面子把。这就是rational.
17. 出庭， 我来根妈妈打官司，反正有律师，听审法官都会帮我， 自己人。 带子改
造过， 没问题。我是 judge, 带子改造过一样用做听审的证据。 water gate scandal
不能用在我身上， 我们是同一条战壕里的战友， 请你保护我。不能让你的同行到下。
有过一关。这是rational.
18, 我就知道会有中国人要做狗的， 让他们自己互咬把。 看看谁愿意根我合作拿好处
的。所以有人就替我说话，‘ 妈妈你不够rational.’ 多好笑。 一群傻瓜，我让你们
自相残杀。哈哈， 我又过一关。哦
19。 中国领事馆出面， 怎没办？这是我们家事。我也是受害者， 孩子不是我亲生的
为什么要我养？ 我请人替我伸冤。 你们中国人自己说说， 为什么孩子不是我亲生的
， 我要养。 我们就在私下讲把。 不要上法庭。 我是受害者， 美国的法律不能包括
我。
20。 再拖个 7， 8 年， 我就退休拉， 你们也都老拉。孩子也长大拉不用我养拉，
我们就sayangnala . 一群中国的傻猪。。。 哈哈
instability
as
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: a.
: you have just demonstrated your mental instability.
: Oh, a legal tip for you: Your doctor's testimony doesn't make a Judge's
: decision. It's only one side of the story. In the absence of opposing
: testimony, and without you behaving in ways that suggest mental instability
: in court, he probably would have ruled that you were mentally sound.
: However, you probably ruined your case by your performance in court.
: If you can't behave rationally, then don't expect other people treat you as
: a rational person.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 184 人不完美，我们都反错， 但是有人说： 对不起， 让我把做错的事情该过来。 有人说
让我把这个事情真相盖下来。 请问大家这应该怎样做？
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: xuansu:
: 再谈rational:
: 1. 请问你订婚拉之后， 会不会因为你未婚妻工作忙，就随便在外面偷腥？ 这种行为
: 是 rational?
: 2. 偷腥被抓到， 很冷静的讲， ‘你哭拉， 可以表现出来你还是很爱我的。不过，
: 这是男人的世界， 我男人在外面睡个女人是天经地义。很晚拉， 会家把。 有事明天
: 再说' 这些话是不是很rational?
: 3. 听拉这些话， 气的娃娃叫， 这不是rational. 看你们中国女人就是没有日本女人
: 能忍耐。
: 4。 有孩子拉， 去堕胎把。 不用但心是否杀掉个婴儿， 母体受伤， 现在我不认为适
| x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 185
你感情受伤好理解，生气有理由。但是你以为在法庭上法官有必要听你的磨叽就大错特
错了。絮絮叨叨不停的说一件事，总是认为某个，或者某几个人合伙在针对你进行一场
阴谋，是典型的精神分裂的表现。不管你的医生给你做了什么证明，你表现不正常，那
么法官就可以认定你精神不正常。你在法庭上次次输，原因就是你以为别人都需要考虑
你的情绪，而实际上没人有那个耐心。
撒泼打滚的闹在中国行得通，能起到作用。而在美国，你如果不能理智的和法庭交流，
你就干脆别去和法庭打交道。不然你官司越打越输得多。说白了吧，别人是在利用法律
，你则是不仅无法用正确的法律手段，反而是用自己的表现坐实了别人对你的指控。不
管你有什么道理，别人是多么没有道理，法律上你是输了。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: xuansu:
: 再谈rational:
: 1. 请问你订婚拉之后， 会不会因为你未婚妻工作忙，就随便在外面偷腥？ 这种行为
: 是 rational?
: 2. 偷腥被抓到， 很冷静的讲， ‘你哭拉， 可以表现出来你还是很爱我的。不过，
: 这是男人的世界， 我男人在外面睡个女人是天经地义。很晚拉， 会家把。 有事明天
: 再说' 这些话是不是很rational?
: 3. 听拉这些话， 气的娃娃叫， 这不是rational. 看你们中国女人就是没有日本女人
: 能忍耐。
: 4。 有孩子拉， 去堕胎把。 不用但心是否杀掉个婴儿， 母体受伤， 现在我不认为适
| p****j
发帖数: 492 | 186 看了你这么多回复，你确实失去了理智
好多人都建议你冷静下来，好好考量如何减小自己的损失
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: xuansu:
: 再谈rational:
: 1. 请问你订婚拉之后， 会不会因为你未婚妻工作忙，就随便在外面偷腥？ 这种行为
: 是 rational?
: 2. 偷腥被抓到， 很冷静的讲， ‘你哭拉， 可以表现出来你还是很爱我的。不过，
: 这是男人的世界， 我男人在外面睡个女人是天经地义。很晚拉， 会家把。 有事明天
: 再说' 这些话是不是很rational?
: 3. 听拉这些话， 气的娃娃叫， 这不是rational. 看你们中国女人就是没有日本女人
: 能忍耐。
: 4。 有孩子拉， 去堕胎把。 不用但心是否杀掉个婴儿， 母体受伤， 现在我不认为适
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 187 xuansu,
请问你有看到这个妈妈在法庭上的表现吗？ 没有， 所有你的写作都是你的假设THAT
IS CALLED BULLSHIT.
用你的假设写的像是真的一样。WHY DO YOU BULLSHIT WITH YOUR MOUTH? 真不要脸到
家拉。
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: 你感情受伤好理解，生气有理由。但是你以为在法庭上法官有必要听你的磨叽就大错特
: 错了。絮絮叨叨不停的说一件事，总是认为某个，或者某几个人合伙在针对你进行一场
: 阴谋，是典型的精神分裂的表现。不管你的医生给你做了什么证明，你表现不正常，那
: 么法官就可以认定你精神不正常。你在法庭上次次输，原因就是你以为别人都需要考虑
: 你的情绪，而实际上没人有那个耐心。
: 撒泼打滚的闹在中国行得通，能起到作用。而在美国，你如果不能理智的和法庭交流，
: 你就干脆别去和法庭打交道。不然你官司越打越输得多。说白了吧，别人是在利用法律
: ，你则是不仅无法用正确的法律手段，反而是用自己的表现坐实了别人对你的指控。不
: 管你有什么道理，别人是多么没有道理，法律上你是输了。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 188 SO, SUANSU,
Hear is the deal, if the judge hire you or other people attack the fact
again, I will have the mother to draw his pines size on the website. people
will all found out why small dog is always bark.
so stop doing that, conspiracy is a Federal Crime, and the goverment are
investigating on those. And you stop bullshit because you neither read the
whole report nor in the court room, stop bullshit.
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: 你感情受伤好理解，生气有理由。但是你以为在法庭上法官有必要听你的磨叽就大错特
: 错了。絮絮叨叨不停的说一件事，总是认为某个，或者某几个人合伙在针对你进行一场
: 阴谋，是典型的精神分裂的表现。不管你的医生给你做了什么证明，你表现不正常，那
: 么法官就可以认定你精神不正常。你在法庭上次次输，原因就是你以为别人都需要考虑
: 你的情绪，而实际上没人有那个耐心。
: 撒泼打滚的闹在中国行得通，能起到作用。而在美国，你如果不能理智的和法庭交流，
: 你就干脆别去和法庭打交道。不然你官司越打越输得多。说白了吧，别人是在利用法律
: ，你则是不仅无法用正确的法律手段，反而是用自己的表现坐实了别人对你的指控。不
: 管你有什么道理，别人是多么没有道理，法律上你是输了。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 189 还有一点， tell the judge, the more he hire people to cover up his wrong
doing, the more people would know it. Stop right now, before more damage
happens. That is it!!!
The more here you bullshit, the more information people would be find out
what he said, what kind person he is. A judge is above all that.
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: 你感情受伤好理解，生气有理由。但是你以为在法庭上法官有必要听你的磨叽就大错特
: 错了。絮絮叨叨不停的说一件事，总是认为某个，或者某几个人合伙在针对你进行一场
: 阴谋，是典型的精神分裂的表现。不管你的医生给你做了什么证明，你表现不正常，那
: 么法官就可以认定你精神不正常。你在法庭上次次输，原因就是你以为别人都需要考虑
: 你的情绪，而实际上没人有那个耐心。
: 撒泼打滚的闹在中国行得通，能起到作用。而在美国，你如果不能理智的和法庭交流，
: 你就干脆别去和法庭打交道。不然你官司越打越输得多。说白了吧，别人是在利用法律
: ，你则是不仅无法用正确的法律手段，反而是用自己的表现坐实了别人对你的指控。不
: 管你有什么道理，别人是多么没有道理，法律上你是输了。
| x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 190
我不用看。看你的表现就知道了。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: xuansu,
: 请问你有看到这个妈妈在法庭上的表现吗？ 没有， 所有你的写作都是你的假设THAT
: IS CALLED BULLSHIT.
: 用你的假设写的像是真的一样。WHY DO YOU BULLSHIT WITH YOUR MOUTH? 真不要脸到
: 家拉。
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 191 日本狗， 看你做狗都不够格。 那是appeal, stupid, all of the fact are from the
transcript. Stupid.
Testimony is under oath. Stupid.
Social worker's report is based on the fact, when they lied and the mother
approved they lied and hearing officer should take sanction.
That is the law.
Writting a false appeal can be sanction by the justice, stupid?!
Why do you come to this country in order for you to became a worth quality
dog?
You had organized a club in this MITBBS, why do not you post every thing
what you wrote into your club to see your member would vote you out?
what do you study in America? political science elementary school?
Do you have a bold to write, would you be bold to expose your name as well?
【在 x****u 的大作中提到】
:
: 我不用看。看你的表现就知道了。
| G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 192 he's helping you, but you are whoring persecutory delusion and calling him
names. this is not helping you. if i were the judge or a member of the jury,
i wont send the poor kid to the custody of a paranoid mother. i'd rather
put the kid away in the system.
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: Before you change your last name to be Hiroshige III, I do not have to
: answer your question.
: Writing in English can not approve you are not a Japanese dog. I would
: suggest you a new name: Kishu inu Hiroshige III.
: The reason I say thrid, because you are third generation. 孙子。
: Writing in English could not change your slavery mentality.
: thanks Japanese 奴才。
:
: instability
: as
| G*****7
发帖数: 1759 | 193 第一， Hiroshige had LAPD or one of the government agency illegally wire
tapping her phone for the past 10 years. He had approach to mother's
friend and telling her friend, she is a bad woman and bitraid him and
have sex with other man, so in that way, he had all of the excuse for
himself not to be responsible for the child because him is not the
biological father.
exactly. and because of the damage done to your character by such evidence (
which may as well be legally obtained through a hired PI),
you wont get much sympathy from social either.
if he had tried to push the case through, others are gonna say he's trying
to influence the pd and da anyway. i don't think he had any wrong-doing here
. if was you who knewn about the rape but did not report in a timely manner.
maybe he's speaking the truth, and you raped him or collected his semen
without him knowing.
Nope, if so it will be a murder case, not nut case. | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 194 First, I do not think he is helping anybody here beside spread rumors.
How he knew the mother's performance in the court room? he was not present?
UNLESS HE IS CREATING A STORY.
2ndly, the court REPORTER documented all of the testimony, including the
judge's ruling. The mother's testimony, social worker's report, expert's
testimony or letter to the court. The court can only base on the factual
information present to the court to make a decisions according to on the
law.
3rd, JUDGE DO NOT MAKE A LAW IN AMERICA, THE LAW MAKER OR LEGISLATURE MAKE
LAW. THE JUDGE CAN ONLY EXECUTE THE LAW!!!
jury,
【在 G*****7 的大作中提到】
: he's helping you, but you are whoring persecutory delusion and calling him
: names. this is not helping you. if i were the judge or a member of the jury,
: i wont send the poor kid to the custody of a paranoid mother. i'd rather
: put the kid away in the system.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 195 TO answer your question:
1. Hiroshige had cheat on the mother or his fiance, which had the court
transcription document his own testimony by he claim he did not have other
woman in his house to make a police call, and HE claim he MADE THE CALL BY
HIMSELF, but
the police report shows that the other woman Linda Inouey called LAPD, her
name is on the police report. With those legal documentation there is an
approval
he is a lier, cheater, and dishonest person. and with his 26 years single
man history, there have been numerical woman history in his life, the
character issue is a legal approval. Want have sex, get married. don't just
want get free milk. there is nothing free.
2. with the court documentation to approval his character, is different from
hire a private investigator to make any report against the mother. He can
even have you and other people here to write on his behalf...
3. if he cheat and lied to his fiance, when she told him the very 2nd day,
he DOES has legally obligation to inform the mother to make a police report.
As a presiding judge, he had legal obligation to do what is on his best
knowledge. But, if because he is trying to protect his own character and
personal life, privacy, to cover up the rape case. so that he can claim his
should not be responsible for any thing. THAT IS WRONG.
even with out rape case conviction, he is still responsible any way. IT IS
BETTER TO MAKE A APOLOGY INSTEAD OF COVER IT UP.
IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE COURT TRANSCRIPTION, AND POLICE REPORT. WE CAN
PROVIDE TO YOU.
THANKS
(
【在 G*****7 的大作中提到】
: 第一， Hiroshige had LAPD or one of the government agency illegally wire
: tapping her phone for the past 10 years. He had approach to mother's
: friend and telling her friend, she is a bad woman and bitraid him and
: have sex with other man, so in that way, he had all of the excuse for
: himself not to be responsible for the child because him is not the
: biological father.
: exactly. and because of the damage done to your character by such evidence (
: which may as well be legally obtained through a hired PI),
: you wont get much sympathy from social either.
: if he had tried to push the case through, others are gonna say he's trying
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 196 By the way, how do you know Hiroshige hire a private investigator, he told
you???? | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 197 就看一看这里的几个中国id的所做所为， 中国根日本大起来的话， 中国不一定会赢。 | w***h
发帖数: 3343 | 198 只有对背叛自己民族的人狠，这民族才有希望。
如果每一个女的都以外F为荣，看到中国人就神气，中国跟日本打起来的话，中国一定
会输
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 就看一看这里的几个中国id的所做所为， 中国根日本大起来的话， 中国不一定会赢。
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 199 请问外F是背叛自己的民族吗？？？？？
婚姻是私人的事，和被叛民族是两个不同的概念。
谢谢
【在 w***h 的大作中提到】
: 只有对背叛自己民族的人狠，这民族才有希望。
: 如果每一个女的都以外F为荣，看到中国人就神气，中国跟日本打起来的话，中国一定
: 会输
| e*c
发帖数: 642 | 200 看你这么唧唧呜呜实在不得不说：
这里有三个案件：白男强奸案，日男抚养金案和孩子监管权案。
你得分个轻重缓急一个一个打。对孩子监管权一案，你需要一份稳定
工作和住所，以证明你有能力独立抚养孩子。白男也好日男也好与此
案无关。
对日男抚养金一案，找一个好的离婚律师。应该能要些钱来。好的律
师收费高昂，你要有稳定工作才能支付。孩子的事与此案无关。
对白男强奸一案，你是否立即报案并由法医提取证据？是否有其他人
证或物证？即便没有，你也可以找个好律师要点赔偿。好的律师收费
高昂，你懂的。孩子和日男的事与此案无关。
你希望这里的人帮你，你得给个理由。自尊自爱才能得到别人的爱护
自立自强才能得到别人的帮助。
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 请问外F是背叛自己的民族吗？？？？？
: 婚姻是私人的事，和被叛民族是两个不同的概念。
: 谢谢
| | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 201 谢谢
【在 e*c 的大作中提到】
: 看你这么唧唧呜呜实在不得不说：
: 这里有三个案件：白男强奸案，日男抚养金案和孩子监管权案。
: 你得分个轻重缓急一个一个打。对孩子监管权一案，你需要一份稳定
: 工作和住所，以证明你有能力独立抚养孩子。白男也好日男也好与此
: 案无关。
: 对日男抚养金一案，找一个好的离婚律师。应该能要些钱来。好的律
: 师收费高昂，你要有稳定工作才能支付。孩子的事与此案无关。
: 对白男强奸一案，你是否立即报案并由法医提取证据？是否有其他人
: 证或物证？即便没有，你也可以找个好律师要点赔偿。好的律师收费
: 高昂，你懂的。孩子和日男的事与此案无关。
| d*****e
发帖数: 7368 | 202 For woman, YES!!!
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 请问外F是背叛自己的民族吗？？？？？
: 婚姻是私人的事，和被叛民族是两个不同的概念。
: 谢谢
| r**m
发帖数: 2823 | 203 can't agree more
【在 w***h 的大作中提到】
: 只有对背叛自己民族的人狠，这民族才有希望。
: 如果每一个女的都以外F为荣，看到中国人就神气，中国跟日本打起来的话，中国一定
: 会输
| r**m
发帖数: 2823 | 204 这里有些人不认为日本法官该养那孩子也是私人事情， 和民族不团结
两个不同的概念
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: 请问外F是背叛自己的民族吗？？？？？
: 婚姻是私人的事，和被叛民族是两个不同的概念。
: 谢谢
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 205 In your opinion, Chinese woman can only marry to Chinese man? So that is
they all love their country???
【在 d*****e 的大作中提到】
: For woman, YES!!!
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 206 首先，这里谈的是把孩子还给妈妈，听审法官舞弊的问题，主题没有谈，反倒谈论着个
日本法官是否应负责养孩子的问题， 这是第二步。
孩子被他们扣在一个单身基的家里，对孩子一辈子都是一个伤害！！！
这个日本法官是否对孩子有赡养的义务，还是有进过法庭的审核，如果是的话，那也对
孩子也是一间好事。
现在谈的是司法公证的问题，司法是不是只用在老百姓身上呢？？ 法律是不是每个人
都要遵守呢？还是法官不用面对法律？
法官可以烂权？法官可以在自己的court room 制定自己的法律游戏？？
同时社工可以撒谎？可以帮着个法官作假？
如果不行，那么就请法律公正对待每一个出庭的litgan, 而不是营私舞弊。
【在 r**m 的大作中提到】
: 这里有些人不认为日本法官该养那孩子也是私人事情， 和民族不团结
: 两个不同的概念
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 207 only because you two have low confidence and selffish. And do not hope other
can be good.
【在 r**m 的大作中提到】
: can't agree more
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 208 edc,
回答你另一个问题，这个妈妈自己一人来美国读书，从一下飞机那天就开始工作，靠自
己的勤奋，刻苦，赢得学位，找到工作。请问在那里没有自尊自爱，自强自立呢？
那个日本法官用它的权势，想把这个女人放到监狱就放监狱，用监狱作为家法，这对吗
？有谁把自己未婚妻被强暴的案子会给cover 下来呢？？ 这已经超出家庭法的范围。
这是犯罪。
他到目前为止还俱虚窃听这个妈妈的话，俱虚骚扰她，她去银行审请工作，还让银行不
请她，这对吗？难道这不是犯法吗？为什么这个妈妈申请静止令， 听审法官不批？而
且不回避？
请问这对吗？？？
【在 e*c 的大作中提到】
: 看你这么唧唧呜呜实在不得不说：
: 这里有三个案件：白男强奸案，日男抚养金案和孩子监管权案。
: 你得分个轻重缓急一个一个打。对孩子监管权一案，你需要一份稳定
: 工作和住所，以证明你有能力独立抚养孩子。白男也好日男也好与此
: 案无关。
: 对日男抚养金一案，找一个好的离婚律师。应该能要些钱来。好的律
: 师收费高昂，你要有稳定工作才能支付。孩子的事与此案无关。
: 对白男强奸一案，你是否立即报案并由法医提取证据？是否有其他人
: 证或物证？即便没有，你也可以找个好律师要点赔偿。好的律师收费
: 高昂，你懂的。孩子和日男的事与此案无关。
| d*********e
发帖数: 279 | 209 你这个女人怎么乱骂人,这儿不管是反对你的还是给你出主意的,没人认识你的两个垃圾
男人,你这样的表现如果我是法官也不会把孩子判给你,跟你那个垃圾法官一点关系都没
有,我也不太相信社工要什么好处把你孩子从你身边夺走,从你的表现来看,她完全有理
由相信你是神经病,你如果想要回孩子,不要在这么胡搅蛮缠了,屁用也没有.象前面我给
你出的主意,你好好找份工作,不要认为全世界都在迫害你,clean yourself up,才有希
望要回孩子,否则你再缠十年都没用. | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 210 the mother's phone has been illegally wiretapped for the past 10 years, by
this Japaness Judge, BY THOUGH DOING THIS, HE APPROACH THE MOTHER'S ROMMATE,
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE, CO-WORKER, MORE DOCUMENTATION WOULD BE PROVIDED.
如果你不认为社工有犯法，你没有看到法律文件。这个法官是否有找到你来写文件，只
有你知道。
在这里我看到好的中国人，他们帮忙转发文件，希望有争议的呼声。也有在法官的指示
下出来陷害自己同胞的。请问你是其中哪一个？
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 你这个女人怎么乱骂人,这儿不管是反对你的还是给你出主意的,没人认识你的两个垃圾
: 男人,你这样的表现如果我是法官也不会把孩子判给你,跟你那个垃圾法官一点关系都没
: 有,我也不太相信社工要什么好处把你孩子从你身边夺走,从你的表现来看,她完全有理
: 由相信你是神经病,你如果想要回孩子,不要在这么胡搅蛮缠了,屁用也没有.象前面我给
: 你出的主意,你好好找份工作,不要认为全世界都在迫害你,clean yourself up,才有希
: 望要回孩子,否则你再缠十年都没用.
| | | d*********e
发帖数: 279 | 211 你还是整天在胡搅蛮缠,从理性的角度上说他为什么要wiretap你,他能达到什么目的?你
有证据证明吗?如果有证据找DA,一个小法官不可能能一手遮天的,你也不要说你那个孩
子的birth father是rapist,你当时没告,后来prosecutor也decline to prosecute,在
法律上来说他不是felon,你在这边胡搅蛮缠没有任何意义.你还是好好想想找个工作养
活自己,象正常人一样生活,至少让法庭认为你能给孩子更好的生活,恕我直言,从我们现
在看到的,你完全没这个能力过正常的生活,还要带好一个孩子. | k***n
发帖数: 1682 | 212 这个女的有什么好值得同情的？
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
: 略读了下，不一定准确，给大家个摘要：
: 大陆女，父母是教授，96年全奖读penn state MBA，98年毕业，2000年银行工作，后来
: 改做贷款。2002年认识日本人（法官），10个月的约会后日本人求婚，两人同居，吵架
: 时去白垃圾男（被州里DA起诉；没好性格，没工作，疯狂的生活方式，吸毒）家求安慰
: ，声称被灌酒have sex，怀孕期间日本人问那天那件事，做了DNA鉴定非
: 父亲，大陆女求之，说或许DNA鉴定错了，那白垃圾男只进去没射。后来生出混血儿，
: 想要日本人养，因为他是“presumed father”；她不想那白垃圾男当father，因为一
: 个“犯罪的人是不能在宪法的意义上成为父亲的”（这个不理解），她总想要把日本人
: 列为父亲，法院和社工却总是想要把白垃圾男列为父亲。她要求政府资助养小孩，政府
: 可能基于她的说法认为她没条件养，拿走小孩，直到找到个父亲养，政府却不认可那日
| d***o
发帖数: 7006 | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 214 Why do u think the mother has not cabable to rise her kid. She has a good
job. She makes enough like engieer.
From where u claim she can not raise her own kids?
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 你还是整天在胡搅蛮缠,从理性的角度上说他为什么要wiretap你,他能达到什么目的?你
: 有证据证明吗?如果有证据找DA,一个小法官不可能能一手遮天的,你也不要说你那个孩
: 子的birth father是rapist,你当时没告,后来prosecutor也decline to prosecute,在
: 法律上来说他不是felon,你在这边胡搅蛮缠没有任何意义.你还是好好想想找个工作养
: 活自己,象正常人一样生活,至少让法庭认为你能给孩子更好的生活,恕我直言,从我们现
: 在看到的,你完全没这个能力过正常的生活,还要带好一个孩子.
| z*******3
发帖数: 13709 | | y***o
发帖数: 145 | 216 他这个翻译不精确， 需要读英文班才行。
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: 这个女的有什么好值得同情的？
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 217 to get a lawyer to settle? please see that is how much the mother has spend
on all of her lawsuit, that is how many lawyers we have been going though.
Lawyers took money and did nothing, TOOK MONEY AND DID NOTHING!!!!
FILE COMPLAINT TO JUDICIAL PERFOMANCE COMMISSION, NOTHING HAPPENED!!! FILE
TO BAR ASSOCIATION, NOTHING HAPPENING.
WHERE IS JUSTICE???!!!!
Restraining order application: Case # GQ008930
Additional Declaration
that is the restraining order the mother file to the court, and the hearing
officer did not
After the initial application was filed, there were continuous wiretapping
and stalking activities by Mr. Ernest Hiroshige.
I believed Mr. Hiroshige approach to my my new tenant Frnk Castellanos, who
was reply a rental ad I post on the crag list on Sept 2nd 2012. Mr. Frank
Castellanos is a new tenant who had apply the plaintiff’s rental ad from
the crag list. And had him pass on threatening message to me on Sept 6th
2012. Frank Castellanos was step by to see the room on Sept 2nd , Me and
my friend Gary interview him and he signed the lease agreement me on the
same day. We scheduled him to pick up the key on Sept 6th. On 9-6, Frank
Castellanos called me around 7:00 pm and came to pick up the door key, he
started the conversation and he said I look upset and what he can do to help
me to move on with my life? We sit down, and he start saying that the
judge is a well- known judge and he probably is well connected, nobody is
going to do anything to him in the legal system. Let see what we can do to
help you to move on with your life? He said how about to make him to
apologize to you in a court room? And give you $500,000 for the damage? I
did not answer him. And he continued and said that the reason judge
Hiroshige did not help to prosecuting the rapist Alan Isaac, is because that
is a family matter, he did not wanted people to know what is going on with
his personal life and had a mixed baby because his fiancé was raped and
caused the pregnancy by that Jewish guy. And he said you should understand
why he act that way. I did not answer him.
Friday, September 7th, Frank Castellanos moved in, I was helping him in the
garage. I told him that judge Hiroshige wire-tapping my phone and approached
to all of my roommates in the past, made everybody tired off his’ demand,
no body stay with me for too long and move out quickly. The defendant by
wire-tapping my phone and pass on the threatening comment to me. I said I
don’t think he really is going to kill me because I want the financial
settlement for what he did to me, Frank answered: “ He may will kill you.”
I look at him and was very shocked. (The lease agreement is attached as
exhibit one.)
There is another stalking matter recently by the defendant Mr. Hiroshige. On
September 1st, the
plaintiff Tin, went out with a friend to get massage . In the massage place
, the plaintiff saw a Chinese guy also walked into the massage place. The
plaintiff Tin remembered his face, because him had a very different looking.
Around 9:45 pm, the plaintiff Tin was taking a walk in Santa Anita Park
around the tennis court, same time talk to my girl-friend Men Ying Chen on
the phone, this same guy also walking into the tennis court face toward me
and sit on the bench. I knocked my head to him to be polite, suddenly I
remember this face. On the phone with Men Ying Chen, plaintiff Tin shared
with her this guy was stalking her and she has been seeing him around. I
walked three turns around the tennis court, he was just sit on the bench
watch me. Later on the plaintiff Tin saw him walk over to his car in the
parking lot, I fellow him and on the phone I asked Men Ying Chen to write
down his car license plate, 6JVD253. I also text it to Men Ying’s cell
phone. Men Ying suggest me to go confront him and took a picture. Few
minutes later, him walked out with a lady from the car. They walk towards me
while I was sit down in one of the tennis court bench. She staired at me
and after they pass by, she turn her head back still look at me. When they
walked almost a circle towards me, I walked toward in front of them, they
quickly try to walk away from me. I walked over and asked, I said Sir, you
look familiar today. I saw you every place I went, I saw you in the message
place this afternoon around 5:00 pm. I question him and his friend: Are you
following me and stalking me? He turned his head toward me, I quickly took
a picture off him and they did not answer it but quickly walk away. (please
see attached Exhibit two).
In the past, The defendant Mr. Hiroshige had approach all of my pastor where
I attendant church. On Aug 26th, I attended First Evangelical Church San
Gabriel, CA. and talked to the pastor Joshua Cheng after the Sunday Service,
I share the history why I am looking for a new church due to Mr. Hiroshige
, he was chatting on me with another woman, lying to the court get
restraining order abandon me while I was 8 month pregnant, use DRE to harass
me and closed my company, file a false report to malicious prosecution
and put me in the jail for two weeks in 2007, while I was in the jail my son
end up in the foster home with DCFS, influenced social worker to file false
report to the court to claim I had mental issue and cover up his paternity
issue, working with hearing judge to put my son for adoption which him is
the presumed father (between 2007 and 2011), get my BoA case dismissed from
the court by influence my attorney and hearing judge, wire-tapping my phone
and approach to every single customer and friend of mine, FBI agent David
Tse, GanMei said they were investigate on this but no prosecution were ever
filed and Arcadia police, Bob Anderson, the lieutenant refuse to take the
report on the wire-tapping for investigation and prosecution, hire people
stalking me, and spreading rumors to my friend about me. Recently Judge
Hiroshige worked with DA from Long Beach, to plotting a crime against me,
involved with my public defender and the court hearing judge to claim I had
a mental problem, and influence the psychologist to write a false report to
the court dept. 95, to claim I am incompetent to stand in trail., worked
with the Dept. 95 Judge try to put me in the Hospital for the rest of my
life and try to put me on medication, influence the psychiatrist Mrs. Wang
to diagnosis I need to be on medication or to be hospitalized, influenced
the mortgage bank in which I worked not to fund my loan. Every church I go,
when I share my story with the pastor, he will have the pastel staff to say
we do not thrust what you said to harm me. If I said I am willing to
provide the legal court paper, they will say we do not understand the law
and English. For all of the above reasons, I am looking for a church where
the pastor won’t afraid a judge, be able to help me a little bit.
After the conversation, the pastor Joshua Cheng said no pastor should afraid
a pastor, and thank you for trusting him by sharing the information with
him, In addition to that he said in Chinese and he said do not push him (Mr.
Hiroshige ) too hard because your life and safety are more important!!! !
Over here I think this pastor means do not ask for too much financial
settlement, be careful of your life.
Again for above reasons, I request the court to give me a permission to
recording any unlawful conversation for Mr. Hiroshige relating a
threatening comment to me, and step him to illegally wire-tapping my phone,
restraining him to contact any of my friends, my business associates, my
pastors, any association or professional business organization I involved
with. Step him to looking into my DRE license though any source to contact
the company where I work for. And have him had 52 weeks mental health class.
Background
The defendant Mr. Ernest Hiroshige proposed the plaintiff Winnie Tin for
marriage and family back in year 2003. Plaintiff Tin accepted Mr. Hiroshige
’s proposal. The plaintiff Tin was living with the defendant Mr. Hiroshige
while they were planning to get married. Unfortunately, the plaintiff Tin
found defendant was chatting on her with another woman named Linda, (police
report is attached as exhibit three.)But Judge Hiroshige testify in the
court that himself called 911. The plaintiff and defendant got into a huge
argument over this issue, and Mr. Hiroshige claimed that this is a man’s
world and man can sleep around. The plaintiff went to Allan Isaac’s house
for help. In his house, the plaintiff Tin called the defendant Mr. Hiroshige
, they were argued over the phone. The defendant Mr. Hiroshige hang-up on on
the plaintiff. Mr. Allan Isaac gave the plaintiff a drink and later Alan
Isaac against the plaintiff’s willingness to have sex. The defendant told
Alan Isaac that she did not want him. And the plaintiff pass out after that.
The second day, the defendant Mr. Hiroshige asked the plaintiff if Alan
Isaac took advantage off her while they were having a problem. The plaintiff
was embarrassed and did not tell him the completed story. A month later,
after the plaintiff discover she was pregnant. The plaintiff and
defendant both believe they are the biological parent for the child, Joshua
Tin. Mr. Hiroshige took Miss Tin for marriage counseling with his pastor
Gary Goulton from Mission valley Methodist church in San Gabriel. However,
Mr. Hiroshige’s mentality believe he should be control over everything, he
felt the relationship has some problem , not a good time to have a child,
defendant Mr. Hiroshige told the plaintiff Tin, he did not want a child now,
and asked the plaintiff Tin to get an abortion. The plaintiff Tin did not
want to have an abortion. In order to have the plaintiff to get an abortion,
the defendant, Mr. Hiroshige, start to play game and told the plaintiff
that the relationship is over, ask the plaintiff to move out his condo.
Three month pass by the plaintiff did not get an abortion. The defendant
came back try to marry to the plaintiff. However the defendant have double
standard, one hand he try to get married, but another hand he still sleep
with Linda or whoever. He told the plaintiff: “LOOK, YOU CAN NOT HAVE SEX
NOW WHAT THE DIFFERENCE IF I SLEEP WITH OTHER PEOPLE.” When the plaintiff
Tin finally tired off his abuse, Tin went to see defendant’s boss, but the
defendant Mr. Hiroshige quickly filed the restraining order application (
marked as exhibit FOUR), By lying to the court. The plaintiff response the
restraining order application with factual data information about their
dating relationship, not as the defendant stated on the application,. The
response marked as exhibit five. When the plaintiff and the defendant went
though the trial, all of the response are true and correct information by
Defendant Mr. Hiroshige’s testmoney. In Aug 2003, defendant Mr. Hiroshige
had his attorney Brad Bianco used thread and forced the Plaintiff to signed
the mutual agreement, marked as exhibit six, The defendant Mr. Hiroshige
abundant the plaintiff while she was 8 month pregnant. Jushua Tin was born
in Nov 21, 2003, birth certificate marked as exhibit seven. The plaintiff
went to the hospital by herself gave birth to Joshua Tin, due to excessive
bleeding and luck of care, the plaintiff almost die in the hospital, please
see the picture of plaintiff after she weak up 6 days in ICU.
In January 31, 2004, the defendant Mr. Hiroshige came back to celebrate the
plaintiff’s 36 birth day, and try to renew the relationship, DEFENDANT
bought plaintiff a birth day gift, market as exhibit eight. when the
defendant saw Joshua Tin, he left plaintiff again. The plaintiff believed
the defendant started illegally wiretapping her cell phone, home phone ever
since beginning of year 2004.
Between 2004 to 2006, the defendant and the plaintiff try to reconcile the
relationship though Judge Hiroshige’s pastor Gary Goulton, but the
reconciliation was failed. In June, 2006, defendant filed a restraining
order against plaintiff with no reason. In July, 2006, Defendant Mr.
Hiroshige filed a false police report and claim the plaintiff violated the
restraining order, and try to prosecuting Miss Tin . Plaintiff decided to
fight with the prosecution, Defendant Hiroshige saw the plaintiff try to
fight with the case, defendant made another false tape and claim the
plaintiff violate the court order, and had his co-worker another judge hear
on this case, to have Miss Tin arrested in the court hearing, Joshua Tin end
up in the foster home with DCFS.
In order not going to the children’s court for the paternity issue, the
defendant finally permitted tin’s friend Ted Herman to put up the bill
bond for plaintiff. After the plaintiff Tin was release from the jail,
Joshua Tin was release back to the plaintiff Tin. The plaintiff is working
on fighting with her criminal charges, working on making money, and taking
care off Joshua Tin. Without any support, the plaintiff had asked the social
worker for help. But month pass by, social worker did nothing to help her,
but claim they are trying to work with defendant Mr. Hiroshige, the
presumed father to make an arrangement. On Dec. 20th, the plaintiff called
Joshua’s psychologist for help. The plaintiff was upset and hang-up on the
psychologist. When the psychologist called back, the plaintiff did not
answer the phone, the psychologist decided to call DCFS and the West Covina
police for welfare check. When West Covina police arrival the plaintiff’s
residence, the plaintiff Tin had put the child to bad, the plaintiff told
the police officer, Miss Veronica Perez, Mr. Sean Carmon, Mr. Don Preston,
what happened to her, why the defendant left her while she was 8 month
pregnant, and why the police did not prosecuting the rapist. The police
ask the plaintiff few questions, they talked among themselves and came back
talked to plaintiff in front of the plaintiff’s roommate Gloria Cavillo
that they want the plaintiff go to the court ask the judge for financial
assistance to help her to raise the child on her own, and to have a judge to
order a paternity founding. The second day, the emergency social worker
told the plaintiff again to prepare the need list so she can go to the court
and ask the hearing judge to make a ruling.
When plaintiff came into the court, Lawyer Ryan Matienzo came in and asked
if plaintiff has any relative or friend to place Joshua Tin. Judge Ernest
Hiroshige is named as presumed father on the relative information sheet,
marked as exhibit nine. Social worker only file Alan Isaac as the father
for Joshua Tin. On March 27, 2008, DCFS offer Mediation Agreement, marked as
exhibit ten, on the mediation agreement, they offer Joshua’s father
unknown, and ask the plaintiff agree to put Joshua into the foster home.
Plaintiff rejected the offer. On the trail, the plaintiff present the
written letter from her roommate Gloria Cavillo, and ask the judge for
financial help and paternity funding. after the trail, the hearing judge
decided to put Joshua Tin to the foster home and offer the mother with the
family reunification program. The presiding judge said we told you do not
open your mouth, you want help, here I am going to order you counseling and
parenting class. The plaintiff believe that the defendant Mr. Hiroshige had
influence the social worker did not provide any service to the plaintiff
see attached hand written information by the foster parent , Amy Watanabe
Informed Brian not to provide his phone number to the mother date 5/2/08,
marked under exhibit Ten and by wiretapping her phone, approached and
influenced most of her counselor not to provide good report for her.
Eventually have the plaintiff lost her visitation right, later lost her
parental right. The plaintiff had few lawyers to represent her in the
children’s court, Ryan Matienzo, and Mark Massey, but none of them had
helped her, but chose to co-operated with Mr. Hiroshige to have a conspiracy
to put child Joshua Tin for adoption. The plaintiff’s appeal for the
visitation right is attached for review, marked as exhibit eleven. And the
plaintiff’s appeal for parental right is attached, marked as exhibit twelve
.
Mark Massey took $5,000 from plaintiff and promised to get the case
dismissed and get the child back to plaintiff. After Mr. Massey took the
money and the file from the plaintiff, he never return the plaintiff’s
phone call. On the hearing day, Mark Massey showed up in the court, and he
asked the plaintiff to agree to put Joshua Tin for adoption. The mother was
cried in the court room, and asked the judge to dismiss her lawyer Mark
Massey. Mr. Mark refused to return Miss Tin’s phone call to return the
whole file back to her. Mr. Mark Massey and Mr. Hiroshige was thinking by
asking the plaintiff turn the whole file to Mark Massey so that plaintiff
would not have any evidence for her to do her appeal for the conspiracy.
That is why you saw there are a lot of court paper were missing from the
court file.
For the child custody issue with Joshua Tin, the plaintiff study the law by
herself, and found out it is a common practice that no government agency and
power can take a child away from the parental control unless there were
hard evidence the parent had detrimental damage to a child has been discover
. However, there has no lawyer to help her to get her child back. There were
additional three appeal lawyer’s did not do anything on the appeal. They
are Nicole Alexandra William for case # B222712, she claim there is no issue
to appeal???!!! Eliot Lee Grossman for case # B218467 claim there were no
issue for appeal and he could not reach the plaintiff on her cell phone. The
plaintiff’s cell phone was not changed in the past ten years. Nicole
Alexandra Williams for case #B211220, again claim there were no appeal issue
. No one did anything. Finally, Nealy Gold did a good appeal on behalf the
plaintiff , In her appeal, Gold argue there is another potential father did
not called to the court, but the justice in court of appeal division2 get
the case though out the court and claim that Judge Hiroshige is not the
presumed father. Because Justice Katherine Todd had 30 years long term
relationship with Mr. Hiroshige.
Judge Hiroshige himself testify in the court that him believe himself is the
father for Joshua Tim. The transcript is attached and marked as exhibit
thirteen. Though out this child custody case, Judge Hiroshige was not only
influence the social worker to file the false report to the court, but he
also involved with the foster agency’s worker, and the plaintiff’s
counselor, Nichole Ho, Dr.Dianne Puchbauer, and Sam Ng not to provide honest
report for the plaintiff Tin.
The social worker involved to file the false information to the court
including:
1. Yumi Lin and Miss Gladys Davis filed the initial report to claim the
plaintiff has visual hallucination and audio hallucination, see initial
filing, marked as exhibit fourteen. However, the plaintiff also provide to
the court the plaintiff’s Doctor Howard Askins letter, who is penal
psychiatrist doctor for the court, had wrote a letter to dress to the court
the plaintiff’s had no visual hallucination and audio hallucination while
in the past care or present time. The letter is attached as exhibit fifteen.
2. In year 2008, Amy Watanabe requested the foster parent Brian Brium not
to release his phone number to the plaintiff and to cut off the daily
connection between the plaintiff and her son Joshua Tin. The foster parent
Brian Brium hand written note to the plaintiff is attached. Marked as
exhibit 16.
3. Social worker Vanta Hanges testify Joshua Tin did not recognized the
plaintiff as his mother. The plaintiff was terminated the family
reunification program, but the plaintiff was still allow to have the
visitation in the southern California Adoption agency for the visitation,
the picture and the video recording was present to the court as evidence,
but they were all missing from the court file. The picture marked as exhibit
17.
4. On May 10th, 2010, social worker Mari Nakayama filed false report to
the court to request the restraining order on behalf Joshua Tin. In the
application, it claim that Joshua Tin saw the plaintiff standing by in his
school and him is terrified by seeing her. After that, plaintiff believe
that the social worker had coached the child to say him is terrified and
scare of the plaintiff, the application marked as exhibit 18.
5. Southern California worker Michael Haboush has been perjury himself on
the bench for the parental right termination hearing. After the plaintiff
turn in the photo was taken in the agency, in the picture, it shows that the
mother and the child had loving relationship by huge each other, by hold
down to each other, by playing game together. Those pictures had oppose
position against Mr. Michael Haboush’s testimony. The hearing judge still
terminated the plaintiff’s parental right.
6. When the plaintiff Tin finished the request counseling class and
parenting class by the judge, the plaintiff Tin request the court to return
the child back to her custody. But the court, the county council, the child
’s attorney did not agree to return the child back to the mother. They
claim once the child was return back home, the issue who should be paying
for child support would be come up in the family court. In order not to have
either Mr. Hiroshige nor Mr. Alan Isaac to be responsible for child
support, they decided to put the child for adoption. Marked as exhibit 19.
No one would care for the mother and child’s wellbeing, everyone knows it
is not good for the mother to separate from the child, the separation is not
good either for the child nor is good for the mother.
The child custody issue is on the stage for appeal to US SUPERIM COURT.
In the past eight years, Mr. Hiroshige had wire tapped plaintiff’s
phone and pass on threat common though her friends, her roommates, her
pastors, business associates, and bad mouthing the plaintiff Tin to them
and keep the plaintiff away from her friends, try to isolated Tin from the
society, use DRE harassing Tin at work, if Tin did not do what Mr. Hiroshige
wants, he would use a different way shut down her business. For instance
he had DRE worker Nicholas Cane to call all of my employees relating to them
this company is under continue investigation, and scared my broker and
employee away, hicking into her email to contact the people who Tin want to
hire, have them not to work for Tin. Wire tapping her work phone and cell
phone, and contacted her customer Wu-Sun Chia, and Cecilia Chia to go DRE
complaint about Tin, and disburse her commission check though a court case.
Case # 08C03767 ( exhibit 20) even Tin did a one million loan for them and
the loan is fund and closed by the agreement with the lender. But the court
disbursed the commission with out Tin’s present in the court hearing.
The defendant Mr. Hiroshige is using his office and abused his power to
interfere with plaintiff Tin’s life and prosecuted Tin in any way he wanted
and there are some DAs, lawyers, and public officers and police officers
who would work with him:
1. The plaintiff Tin believed Mr. Hiroshige had contact Tin’s lawyers on
her Bank of America case, to have them to settle my case for $25,000.00
without her permission. Please see attached settlement offer from Marcus
Mancini ( exhibit 21), email from Debra Opri ask me to take the $25,000
settlement, (exhibit 22), to have them not to representing me, and drop my
case from the court. And he worked with the presiding judge to get my case
dismissed from the court, have court of appeal division 2 kick out my appeal
. Please see attached court copy with my HR record indicating the local BofA
management refuse to pay my maternity leave marked as exhibit 23, by BofA
police every single employee is entitle to the a paid maternity leave
depending on the sonority. The BofA local management retaliated against
plaintiff due to plaintiff report her manager hired his girl- friend,
double paid her salary compare to the same position, use bank’s money pay
her over time which she did not work. Instead, BofA fired the plaintiff but
not her.
BofA’s HR had provide to Marcus Mancini for the HR record when the
Plaintiff Winnie Tin had request paid maternity leave and told HR the
regional management refuse to pay her, please see the deposition for Vincent
Castle, on page 106, Vincent Castle answer woman entitle to paid maternity
leave, page 016 line16 – 22, and those HR record for Wan Tin produced from
the beginning of the trail was sent to Marcus Mancini in the beginning of
the case, that was testify by Bofa lawyer Frankudakis on page 112 line 3-9,
and page 113 line 22-23 Mark as exhibit 24. Mr. Hiroshige did not care what
happen to the other people but only about him, and himself. Another reason
him did not want the case go on trial, is after defendant Mr. Hiroshige left
the plaintiff Tin while she was 8 month pregnant, the plaintiff Tin went
to the hospital by herself and had c-section, got into a complication and
had excessive bleeding, almost die in the hospital. Please see attached
picture for the plaintiff in the incentive care units, Marked as exhibit 25.
With all of the above reasons, the plaintiff had a major depression from a
being a beautiful woman to became a single mother with a baby in the foreign
country. please see the picture when the plaintiff just graduated from the
MBA program, marked as exhibit 26. The defendant chose to left the
plaintiff and felt embarrassed the child was not a Japanese decent, and the
defendant believe that is an embracement to him going to the public. In
addition, defendant Mr. Hiroshige worried if the case ever go on the trial,
BoA lawyer would bring out the hospital record to argue that Mr. Hiroshige
should be responsible for half of that, so it is better to get the case
dismissed.
In this case, the plaintiff Tin had those lawyers who had taken the money
from me but co-operate with judge Hiroshige to get my case dismissed:
a. Marcus Mancini; 50% fee split (with draw from the case after received
the HR record BofA refuse to pay the plaintiff Tin maternity leave.)
b. Debra Opri, $10,500.00 ( with draw the case under Mr. Hiroshige’s
influence and ask the plaintiff to take the $225,000 offer from BofA).
c. Paul Cheng: $5,000.00
d. Susan Hartley: $34,140.00 (drop off the case in the middle of the
hearing)
e. Ernest Ching: $1,500.00
f. Thomas Hoegh: $5,000.00 ( under Mr. Hiroshige’s influence, took $5,
000 from the plaintiff Tin, but did not represent the client but took the
money.)
g. Frazee Laron: $35,000.00
h. ------------------------------------------
i. Total: $91,140.00
2. After defendant Mr. Hiroshige decided he did not want this
relationship, instead of helping plaintiff to raise a child. But the
defendant chose to file false police report start malice prosecution in
order to get rid of a problem, not to pay the child support or almonry. He
filed a false police report , marked as exhibit 27, claim the plaintiff call
him to violated the court order in July 2006. The plaintiff worked with the
prosecutor Sandra Streeter to have a hearing with his co-worker, another LA
court judge to put the plaintiff in the jail for over two weeks. The case #
is 6CA25854. In this case, defendant Mr. Hiroshige contacted plaintiff Tin
’s lawyer Bob Hartmann pass on the threaten comment, not to prepare the
case well, not to represent me well in the trail, not to subpoena his phone
record and not to subpoena all of the witness, because Mr. Hiroshige had
tempered with those witness by wire-tapping Tin’s phone approach every
single one of them, And influence the prosecutor Ms. Sandra Streeter not
to provide the altered tape for examination and allow them to use as the
evidence to convict the plaintiff for a crime, the letter dress to Mrs.
Sandra Streeter from Bod Hartmann to get the tape for the examination is
attached and marked as exhibit 28. The court, the DA, plaintiff’s attorney
worked together have the plaintiff convict crime.
Attorney who had involved in this case, but did not representing me well on
this case:
Daniel Milchiker: public defender, had knowledge the tape had alteration,
chose do nothing.
Kate Hardie: public defender, had knowledge the tape had alteration, chose
do nothing.
David Herriford: $7,500.00 (did nothing, but make a motion to have this case
move out of LA county court house.)
Bob Hartmann: $15,000.00 ( help to have defendant to convicted crime.)
Bail amount: $5,960.00 (cause to the defendant)
AB Audio lab for examination of the tape: $740.00
John Perroini: public defender
3. On Child custody issue, Mr. Hiroshige named as presumed father (
marked as exhibit 29), but him influence Tin’s lawyer Ryan Matienzo not to
subpoena him to come into the court for the paternity founding conference,
and influence social worker to file a false report to the court on plaintiff
’s mental status, conspiracy with the presiding judge Margret Downing to
put Tin’s son into the foster home and eventually put him for adoption.
When the case went court of appeal, second district, division two, the
hearing justice are friends of his, and they worked together to determined
that Mr. Hiroshige should not be the father and deny my visitation right
appeal, opinion is attached (exhibit 30), The termination of parental
right also went to the court of appeal, 2nd division, the opinion is
attached for review. (exhibit 31) but they deny that appeal as well. The
plaintiff’s bank of America case was though out from this court of appeal
divicion 2. Opinion is attached as exhibit 32. ease see picture of Judge
Hrioshige and his 30 years history friend Justice Doi Todd. (exhibit 33) Now
, the appeal on the way to US. Supreme Court.
Ryan Matienzo: Public defender
Mark Massey: $5,000
Nichole Alexandra Williams: appeal lawyer ( did nothing on her case.)
Eloit Lee Grossman: appeal lawyer (did nothing on her case.)
Nealy Gold: appeal lawyer ( she is only one did a good job)
Jack Conway: $1,500.00 appeal lawyer, try to convict the plaintiff judge
Hiroshige did not do any thing wrong about the wire tapping in front of
Faith Huang, Hope international church.
4. Mr. Hiroshige also fails to report the rape case. As a judicial
officer, he had legal obligation to report a crime, but he chosen not. In
addition, I believe him worked with Hollywood police dept, and DA prosecutor
cover up the crime, not to prosecuting. Nor police neither DA ever
interview Mr. Hrioshige even Mr. Hiroshige’s name is on the police report.
Please see attached police report for rape. Market as exhibit 33, but no
DA or detective every interview him.
Attorney involved with this case:
Jane Blissert
Michele Daniels
John Moulin
However all of the DA got promotion in the past two or three years.
5. The plaintiff believed Mr. Hiroshige influence the adoptive parent to
file a false police report, to accuse Tin try to kid napping plaintiffs’
son Joshua Tin, and later on work with the prosecutor to prosecuting the
plaintiff for a crime without any further investigation and notification to
the plaintiff. To file a criminal charge, but sent the court paper to the
wrong address. Have the court issue the bench warrant. The plaintiff Tin
was arrest on the street while she was driving to her boyfriend Jay Smouse’
s house and police stop her for the checking on the drunk driving and found
out there is an arrest warrant. Tin booked in the long beach police dept.
and Tin’s new boy friend bail her out. Tin requested a trial. The first
public defender refuse to give her the copy of her file, and refuse to give
her his name. The plaintiff asked for a Marsden hearing by talk to the
presiding judge, Judge Chet Taylor had personal knowledge about Tin’s
previous case for a misdemeanor charges filed by Mr. Hiroshige and the
plaintiff had been over 50 hearing, and went to three days trial with Mr.
Hiroshige, But Judge Taylor instead off excuse himself from hearing this
case, but decided to transfer the case from dept. 8 to dept. 95 for the
mental evaluation. For 2 minutes evaluation, the court doctor decided the
plaintiff was not able to stand in trail, and the court put the plaintiff as
outpatient client for competence training. The competence question is not
about half hour questions. Mr. Hiroshige contact the plaintiff’s
psychiatrist Miss Wang, the first meeting with Ms. Wang, she had start to
negotiated the financial settlement on behalf judge Hiroshige, with only
one meeting, the psychiatrist Miss Wang, decided that the plaintiff need to
be on medication. And later on, the court decided Miss Tin need to be put in
the hospital for medical treatment. Miss Tin requested her attorney Kathy
Hirano to provide all of the report for her review before going to the court
for a hearing, and request her lawyer Kathy to extend the court day. But
Kathy did not follow the plaintiff’s instruction. Tin notify the court that
issue and told the court that she is going to change the lawyer. But on
June 18th, 2012, Arcadia police officer came in to the client residence
without see her driver license, they arrest her. Book her name under Winnie
Tin. The plaintiff yiell at her roommate Pauline Ye to get her cell phone
to call her family and friend, to let them know what is going on with her.
but Winnie’s roommates WERE UNDER JUDGE HIROSHIGE’S COUNTROL, NONE OF THE
ROOMMATE EITHER CALLED HER FAMILY NOR HER FRIEND to inform them.
The HEARING judge put the plaintiff for the competence training in the jail
for two month. The booking number is 3197587. During the jail time, the
psychologist Dr. Hilsberg had evaluation, and she saw the plaintiff the
first time, she said she personally felt the plaintiff is competent to stand
trial. However, she said the court felt the plaintiff should take some
medication, and the report she wrote to the court is totally from MAKING UP
A STORY. The report sounds like the plaintiff is a psychotic, the court
order Dr. Mitchell for the 2nd evaluation if the plaintiff need to be on the
medication. Dr. Mitchell saw the plaintiff and after few questions with the
answer from the plaintiff, Dr. Mitchell felt something was wrong WITH the
report from Dr. Hillsberg. And he made the conclusion, that the plaintiff
did not need medication. After Dept 95 re-instated the plaintiff’s mental
status, the plaintiff went back to the Long Beach courthouse, report to
dept. 8. The plaintiff requests her public defender Leslie Allenby to ask
the judge for O.R. because the plaintiff had her bill bond set up already.
But her public defender Leslie Allenby requests the plaintiff to plea guilty
. In the normally stand, if the client offer for the mental court, the time
in the hospital and jail time would be part of the client settlement instead
that offer the plaintiff the sentence: not guilty but temporary insanity,
the DA offer the client for no contest, which means the plaintiff would not
sue for the victim of damage in the future. Judge Hiroshige, Judge Chat
Taylor, plaintiff’s public attorney, DA, worked together plotting a crime
against the plaintiff.
Attorney who represent the plaintiff:
Male attorney did not willing to provide his name in Long beach court
Leslie Allenby: public defender
Kathy Hirano: public defender, a Jananess lawyer in dept 95
Lynn Todai: Public Defender in Dept 95
Omar Hazel: public defender in Dept 95 who never see the plaintiff but file
fewmotion for the plaintiff.
The plaintiff was told by her customers that the judge had approach to them
, those customers are Ada Scott, John Liang, Shi Ming Chang, and more ………
………………….. Almost every single customer. Every single friend , every
association the plaintiff attend, Mr. Hiroshige approach to them. Judge
Hiroshige also approach to plaintiff’s friend, her current boyfriend Jay
Smouse, all of Tin’s personal firend, those action left the plaintiff had
no friend. The one want to be associated with the plaintiff want to get some
benefit from this relationship, the one did not want to get involved is
afraid ……………………..
There are people from the church who said they are afraid to give their
phone # to the plaintiff, there are people from the fullgussple said they
are afraid give the plaintiff their phone number, there are Chinese student
who hang out on the weekend, Mr. Hiroshige wire tapping her phone and
contact those people as well, no one want to release their phone number to
the plaintiff, but they say you know where we are having a party, just come
to joint us.
Is that is how we life in America? No police officer, no DA would do the
right thing to help the plaintiff?
The plaintiff believe the motivation the defendant do all of those is while
the plaintiff was pregnant, she and the defendant did the DNA test per the
defendant request, after the DNA test result show that the defendant was not
the biological father, the plaintiff told what happen that night in Alan’s
house, after Defendant hang-up the phone, Alan force her. But the defendant
fails to report the rape case to the proper chanel for the prosecution. In
addition, the defendant is the presume father for the child, but the
defendant hold a public office position, did not want to raise the child who
is mixed baby.
The plaintiff believe the defendant contact her the pastors, where the
defendant attend the church service, and the defendant understand it is a
common sense and moral obligation to take care of a child, and put a child
into the foster home is immoral, it is detrimental to a child. So that, the
defendant approach to the pastel staff in the church and claim that he
wanted to worked out and get married, it is the plaintiff did not want marry
to him, Influence the church pastor approach to the plaintiff, and have the
small group leader talk to her marriage issue when she had never share any
thing with those small group people, to isolate the plaintiff from her small
group, and leave the plaintiff has no support. Those pastors including:
Pastor Lee, Pastor Faith Hwang, and Pastor Ho from Hope international in
Arcadia,
Pastor Andrew Chen form New life Christian center, Miss Tin had talk to
Pastor Andrew Chen that she had the knowledge, Mr. Chen was approach by
Judge Hiroshige by he wire tapping her phone. Pastor Chen agreed with her.
When Tin ask him to testify, he said you have to get what you want, right?
Pastor Daniel Chen, Pastor Jo Jo Huang from Mandarin Baptist Church
Alhambra. When the plaintiff just join this church, and joint the small
group, there is a brother last name with Gu met the plaintiff, the first
night, he start talk to the plaintiff about her marriage with Mr. Hiroshige,
the plaintiff did not know his last name at the time when he approach to
her, so she asked what is your name? What do you do? Who are you? Mr. Gu
could not answer all of the questions, and the plaintiff get up and left.
Later, Mr. Gu told Pastor Jo Jo Huang and Richard Po of this incidence and
he said that he did not think he should be the person approach to Miss Tin
on her relationship issue with Mr. Hiroshige.
Pastor Auda from Musonic Church in Pasadena, Miss Tin confront of him that
he is a pastor he should not serve a judge, Pastor Auda hang up on her.
Pastor Stephen Lu, Passion international. On June 10th, Miss Tin called
Pastor Stephen Lu to help her to get a place to stay to escape the arrest,
Pastor Stephen Lu instead ask Miss Tin to work out the relationship but
marry to Mr. Hiroshige. Is that make any sense to any body? To marry to some
one who try to put her in Jail???
Chairman: David Hong , Passion international
Roy Ying: Full gospel business fellowship, after the plaintiff was released
from the jail, he said we have no way to help you, Winnie, pray about it, if
you want to child back, or you want money back or you want freedom. The
first time I met him and him had already knew that the judge is not the
biological father, he asked me why should the judge responsible for the
child if he is not the biological father? I answer by the law and by
morality. Alan is the rapist, by law he could not ever have the
constitutional right to be the father, and the only father candidate is
Judge Hiroshige. I said how do you know Judge Hiroshige was not the father,
Roy could not answer it. Who told him about it? And I said the judge wire-
tapping my phone contact every one who I associated, did him contact you?
Roy answer with a question: did him contact me? I answer only you and him
knew about it. Roy’s face is very embrassed.
The plaintiff first time discovered the wire-tapping was in 2007, from
her friend Michelle Wang. After Mr. Hiroshige told the plaintiff to forget
about him. The plaintiff met a nice young doctor Patel, who was introduce to
Michelle Wang, plaintiff’s friend and Michelle Wang start asked about the
plaintiff if she want to be with Judge Hiroshige or the Dr. Patel. The
plaintiff said not the judge. Michelle Wang is a personal friend, had first-
hand knowledge about plaintiff with judge Hiroshige, she know that judge had
spent nights over plaintiff’s place during her pregnancy, and oven she
was surprise the judge still want to have sex with plaintiff even she is
pregnant with a baby. And she said she is willing to testify in the court to
help her. However, Michelle’s attitude changed and start to yield at
Plaintiff you are a bad woman, you had taken the blood simple ask so many
man to do a DNA test. The plaintiff asked Michelle how she knows about the
DNA test between her and Judge Hiroshige and Alan Isaac, since she had not
disclose to her about the DNA test. Michelle said you will never found out
how she and Judge Hiroshige was connected. Later Lawyer Vincent Chang knows
about the conversation as well.
1. In 2008, the plaintiff moved to Arcadia, she had a business associate
Ming Wen Lee who is the realtor from Cold Well Banker Arcadia, Ming Wen one
time, told to the plaintiff: Winnie you should not discuss money with Judge
Hiroshige while he initiated the marriage. Winnie asked Ming Wen that is
very private information how do you know about it? So the judge contact you,
right?
2. John Liang, my friend and customer, who also had being contact by
Judge Hiroshige. The plaintiff ask if it is right for Mr. Hiroshige wire
tapping my phone to contact him, John Liang said no.
3. In December 2008, the plaintiff had a business meeting with Gary Brown
for her bank of American case, during the meeting, Gary Brown start talk to
the plaintiff about the relationship with the judge. And Plaintiff question
him if that is right for Judge Hiroshige wire tapping her phone and contact
Gary Brown? Plaintiff told her lawyer Bob Hartmann, that she had tapped
record the conversation. Per the instruction from Judge John Conley, the
plaintiff went to FBI to report the illegal wire tape. The plaintiff talk to
David Tseng regards the wiretapping by Judge Hiroshige and the meeting with
Gary Brown. David Tseng refused to prosecute but told the plaintiff
recording a conversation is illegal.
4. My friend, Jay Smouse who admitted to me that Judge Hiroshige had
approached to him by wire tapping my phone. And in the trip to San Francisco
to hire a lawyer, my host Haining and her husband were both are devoting
Christian and graduated with a PHD, where I met in the church told me that
everything what I told my boy-friend Jay Smouse, Judge Hiroshige knows about
it. And Jay Smouse may not be the right person to marry to. I ask Haining,
how she fund out about Judge Hiroshige whose about that, she could not
answer it. Please see attached Judicial notice to court of appeal. Market as
exhibit 32
5. During a conversation with Pastor Peter Chung from the Mandarin
Baptist church in Alhambra, Pastor Andrew Chen were approached by Judge
Hiroshige and Pastor Andrew Chen told the small group people to discuss
about my marriage with Miss Do and brother Du. Brother Du admitted in front
of the Richard Pu, and Pastor Jo Jo Huang that him should not be the right
person to talk to me with my marriage. Miss Do also talked to me one day,
why do I hate Judge Hiroshige so much? She said that in front of bother
Simon and brother XXX. Those activities happen around 08-06-2011. I have not
told anybody about my personal relationship in the public at that time.
Please see attached letter to verify those activities.
6. In around April 2012, I went to Passion International Christian Church
in Cerritos, after my attendance with the Sunday service, I talked to
pastor Stephen Lu, he walked away from me for emergency. The brother Peter
Chen came over to me and ask me to leave, he said nobody in this church
will help me if I do not leave, He will call the police on me. I told the
chairman David Hong, what him did and what judge Hiroshige did to me in the
past, David Hong said that is a crime for Him wiretapping phone to stalk you
, he apologized for Peter Chen’s action and welcome me to come back to the
church again. On June 10, 2012, I called Pastor Stephen Lu again, and met
him in the church. After he learn Judge Hiroshige left me while I was 8
month pregnant, making a false report put me in the jail in 2007, and
influence social worker file a false report to the court, had conspiracy
work with the presiding judge put my son into the foster home, closed my
business, and now he is trying to plotting a crime to put me back in the
jail, I need some help. Surprisingly, Pastor Stephen Lu suggested me to
married to him, if according to the bible. And later David joint the
conversation, David suggest the same thing. Pastor Stephen Lu said the judge
is not going to pay any financial settlement with you because you made him
had terrible reputation, that only thing he (the judge) can do is getting
married. And David also said if you married to someone else, you may be have
more problem during the marriage. With kids from two broken families,
financial issues, may not be a good idea to get married with other person.
So it is better to work out the relationship with Judge Hiroshige.
7. Francis Su, a professor from Clearmont College had admitted to me
about judge Hiroshige wiretapping my phone. He applogized tome about his
accusation that I had revenge to Judge Hiroshige, I questioning him what I
did to revenge the Judge, he could not answer it and he said he took that
back.
8. Pastor Auda admitted Judge Hrioshige wire tapping my phone.
9. Sam Ng, a Christian Counselor from Living Grace, during a counseling,
Mr. Ng claim that If I still believe Judge Hiroshige is the presume father
to my son and is responsible to my son, My son Joshua Tin would be put for
adoption.
10. Julia Wang, Cross culture travel agency, when I looking for the help
from her as we part of the same business association, Judge Hiroshige
approach to her and asked her to help to negotiated on the financial
settlement. As soon as I saw her and she said Winnie you have to consider
for other people, such as the judge only has a job, he did not have that
much money, if he offers you the $1.5 to $2 million, you should take the
money and move on. And also you should thinking about for Mr. Isaac’s
family, they can not offer you $5 million for the damage for what his son
did to you. Who approach to Julia Wang on all of those information??
11. In June 2012, the plaintiff asked Julia Wang to help her with her new
criminal charges, and Julia Wang reply that if you did not ask for the
financial settlement, you would not go to the jail. The email is attached as
marked exhibit. Why the new criminal charges has anything to do with the
financial settlement between Judge Hiroshige and Winnie Tin? Only Julia Wang
can answer that with Mr. Hiroshige, Julia Wang is subpoena go the court for
testify.
Recently, the plaintiff learn from her broker Arron Lin Li, the mortgage
bank had deny all of the plaintiff’s loan and put their license for
suspension. In the past, Mr. Hiroshige had approach to every single broker
the plaintiff Tin worked with. The name would be provided upon the court
request.
With all above activities, the plaintiff request the court to issue the
protective order, that Mr. Hiroshige should not and cannot ever wire tapping
Miss Tin’s cell phone, home phone, work phone, though which to contact any
her friend, pastor, people from church, business associate, lender, DRE
supervising government agency, or police dept to harass. But the defendant
can contact the plaintiff by a peaceful letter or though an att
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 你这个女人怎么乱骂人,这儿不管是反对你的还是给你出主意的,没人认识你的两个垃圾
: 男人,你这样的表现如果我是法官也不会把孩子判给你,跟你那个垃圾法官一点关系都没
: 有,我也不太相信社工要什么好处把你孩子从你身边夺走,从你的表现来看,她完全有理
: 由相信你是神经病,你如果想要回孩子,不要在这么胡搅蛮缠了,屁用也没有.象前面我给
: 你出的主意,你好好找份工作,不要认为全世界都在迫害你,clean yourself up,才有希
: 望要回孩子,否则你再缠十年都没用.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 218 很奇怪， 你的思路也很特别， 干吗不回国，那么爱国， 中国在引进大批的流学生。
【在 w***h 的大作中提到】
: 只有对背叛自己民族的人狠，这民族才有希望。
: 如果每一个女的都以外F为荣，看到中国人就神气，中国跟日本打起来的话，中国一定
: 会输
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 219 xiedong,
在请问你加入美国籍拉吗？ 如果是的话， 你就更出买祖国拉。谁是卖国贼呢？你来美
国不是追求更好的生活吗？ 又有谁看到这个妈妈就是因为媚外呢？ 或是只是缘分呢？
【在 d*****e 的大作中提到】
: For woman, YES!!!
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 220 当然有正据， 否则为什么会指责他呢？那么多的客人， 朋友告诉妈妈这个法官在窃听
她的电话， 没有的话， 不需要无中生有， 谁干吗要陷害别人呢？please those
three emails below so you can see why he is doing that: thanks.
这个法官不仅窃听， 而且已经都拉fbi LOS ANGELES, no one to investigate. here
is another email for you to review, you can also request to attorney
general office, or to DEPT OF JUSTICE. or ask guys from LA, they all know
that and they were approached by this judge's troop.
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Winnie Tin
To: John Perroni iii
Cc: "a*************[email protected]" ; "askdoj@usdoj
.gov"
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:29 PM
Subject: wire tapping on my cell phone and continue to harrase me with my
work
John,
Judge Hiroshige continue harrase me by wire tapping my phone and had my
broker not to hire me. On Monday, he approach to Dona Liu, and her phone
number is 626-965-5500. She said only if I go to tell Judge Hiroshige I did
not want the financial settlement and get my son back, she would work with
me again.
The other broker in Orange county also ask me if I would marry to Judge
Hiroshige or not, and she did not want me to work with them until I finish
my problem with him
I had the children's court hearing soon, with out job I would be starving to
death, I would never get my son back.
with out a job, I would be die starving soon. Please help me with this issue.
Thanks
Winnie Tin
Sr. Loan officer
NMLS: 258384
cell: 626-343-4080
efax: 626-701-3360
MBA, over 10 years mortgage lending experience
residential mortgage, 30 yrs fixed 3.875%, 15 yrs fixed 3.375%
Apartment, office, warehouse, hotel refinance
* * * * * * * * * * *
NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments contain confidential information
that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
must not review, retransmit, print, copy, use or disseminate it. Please
immediately notify us by return e-mail and delete it. If this e-mail
contains a forwarded e-mail or is a reply to a prior email, the contents may
not have been produced by the sender and therefore we are not responsible
for its contents.
This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail. It is the recipient's
responsibility to take measures to ensure that this e-mail is virus free,
and no responsibility is accepted by ACLG for any loss or damage arising in
any way from its use.
* * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * *
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Winnie Tin
To: John Perroni iii
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 4:47 PM
Subject: Judge Hiroshige continue wire tapping my phone and ask me to move
back to Hk
Winnie Tin
Sr. Loan officer
NMLS: 258384
cell: 626-343-4080
efax: 626-701-3360
MBA, over 10 years mortgage lending experience
residential mortgage, 30 yrs fixed 3.875%, 15 yrs fixed 3.375%
Apartment, office, warehouse, hotel refinance
* * * * * * * * * * *
NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments contain confidential information
that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
must not review, retransmit, print, copy, use or disseminate it. Please
immediately notify us by return e-mail and delete it. If this e-mail
contains a forwarded e-mail or is a reply to a prior email, the contents may
not have been produced by the sender and therefore we are not responsible
for its contents.
This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail. It is the recipient's
responsibility to take measures to ensure that this e-mail is virus free,
and no responsibility is accepted by ACLG for any loss or damage arising in
any way from its use.
* * * * * * * * * * *
---- Forwarded Message -----
From: Winnie Tin
To: John Perroni iii
Cc: "a*************[email protected]" ; "askdoj@usdoj
.gov" ; "r********[email protected]" ; "
3*****[email protected]" <3*****[email protected]>; "s*[email protected]"
chineseroundtable.org>
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 12:05 PM
Subject: Judge Hiroshige's wire tapping
John,
I would like ask you to help me to get an restraining order against judge
Ernest Hiroshige continue wire tapping my phone and approach to the Chinese
leader in the Chinese community. He recently approach to Mr. Roy Ying, the
President in the west LA chapter from Full Gospel Business Men's fellowship
international Mr. Roy Ying asked what is the response from Chinese consulate
when he initiated that he would like to appologize to me in front of the
general consul from China, he pass on those message though Gong Chen, an
christian fellow from San Gabriel evangilical church. In addition, Roy Ying
asked me do I want my child back or I want the money for the demage he
caused in my life. He imply that if I dropped off all of my charges against
him in the future, he would be use his influence to get my son back......
On Sunday, Novber 4th, a Chinese well known lady, Sue Zhang invited me to
see a performance from a disable Chinese people from over sea. I met Roy
Ying and another brother from Full Gospel, that brother's name unknown until
Nov 6th I met him in Dr. Lin Asseblly raising party. He gave me his
business card. On that day I just leanred his name as Davide He. In the past
, many times, I has asked the business card from him and ask people in that
group, but many of them had refuse to give me their name and phone number.
It is very interesting, David He shared a story with me. David said Winnie,
why do you call bother Huang and accused him push you and you are going to
file a charge against him? I answer him, I said big brother, until today, I
did not know who you are and what is your name, and that brother is my first
time met him. I do not know his first name and last name, I did not know
yours either. How can I file a police report and accuse him any thing? In
addition, I only knew you and Roy Ying from Full Gospel, when I sat down
talk to you in the theater, the person come over and ask me to leave, you
were talking to me, you did not sent that person over to me, right??? who
did that??? The only other person is Roy Ying.
In addition, when I get up and left you, I met Mrs Sue Zhang, I was talking
to her and she like talk to me as well. But the same guy walk over to me and
he push me to leave, I had start to yield at him do not touch me. Mrs. Sue
is the witness this guy grabbed my arm and try to drag me out. You share
with me the guy's name is Huang, Dao Ming, I am coping all of the relevant
person on this email.
You claim that the person called you last night and claim that I called him
and threaten him I am going to file a police report to prosecuting him. I
said that is a rumor, if I did not know who him is, how can I call him and
prosecuting him???
Now, I really want to prosecuting him, please provide his name, phone number
and home address, I would like to make a report on him.
Based on those information, the attorney general, Dept of Justice, and Sue,
Richard are all on the email.
I would like first to get a restraining order against Judge Ernest Hiroshige
continue to harruse me in the public, autherize people to harruse me in the
public.
Winnie Tin
Sr. Loan officer
NMLS: 258384
cell: 626-343-4080
efax: 626-701-3360
MBA, over 10 years mortgage lending experience
residential mortgage, 30 yrs fixed 3.875%, 15 yrs fixed 3.375%
Apartment, office, warehouse, hotel refinance
* * * * * * * * * * *
NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments contain confidential information
that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
must not review, retransmit, print, copy, use or disseminate it. Please
immediately notify us by return e-mail and delete it. If this e-mail
contains a forwarded e-mail or is a reply to a prior email, the contents may
not have been produced by the sender and therefore we are not responsible
for its contents.
This notice is automatically appended to each e-mail. It is the recipient's
responsibility to take measures to ensure that this e-mail is virus free,
and no responsibility is accepted by ACLG for any loss or damage arising in
any way from its use.
* * * * * * * * * * *
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 你还是整天在胡搅蛮缠,从理性的角度上说他为什么要wiretap你,他能达到什么目的?你
: 有证据证明吗?如果有证据找DA,一个小法官不可能能一手遮天的,你也不要说你那个孩
: 子的birth father是rapist,你当时没告,后来prosecutor也decline to prosecute,在
: 法律上来说他不是felon,你在这边胡搅蛮缠没有任何意义.你还是好好想想找个工作养
: 活自己,象正常人一样生活,至少让法庭认为你能给孩子更好的生活,恕我直言,从我们现
: 在看到的,你完全没这个能力过正常的生活,还要带好一个孩子.
| | | l********a
发帖数: 1424 | 221 终于有人把这一团浆糊的事情说明白了。
看得我舒服多了。
谢谢啊！
【在 e*c 的大作中提到】
: 看你这么唧唧呜呜实在不得不说：
: 这里有三个案件：白男强奸案，日男抚养金案和孩子监管权案。
: 你得分个轻重缓急一个一个打。对孩子监管权一案，你需要一份稳定
: 工作和住所，以证明你有能力独立抚养孩子。白男也好日男也好与此
: 案无关。
: 对日男抚养金一案，找一个好的离婚律师。应该能要些钱来。好的律
: 师收费高昂，你要有稳定工作才能支付。孩子的事与此案无关。
: 对白男强奸一案，你是否立即报案并由法医提取证据？是否有其他人
: 证或物证？即便没有，你也可以找个好律师要点赔偿。好的律师收费
: 高昂，你懂的。孩子和日男的事与此案无关。
| d*********e
发帖数: 279 | 222
他那个理解还是有误，there is no divorce case, they were never married,不得不
说这个女人脑子被驴踢了,做的事情非常人所能理解.
【在 l********a 的大作中提到】
: 终于有人把这一团浆糊的事情说明白了。
: 看得我舒服多了。
: 谢谢啊！
| l********a
发帖数: 1424 | 223 嗯哪，我也注意到了。不过离婚律师还是可以找，让楼主去跟律师弄个明白还是可以的。
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
:
: 他那个理解还是有误，there is no divorce case, they were never married,不得不
: 说这个女人脑子被驴踢了,做的事情非常人所能理解.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 224 AlfredMD,
这是要就求大家帮忙把孩子那回来的信， 但是被你一发言总结， 就正个离普。 首先
这个女人去拉这个白男家， 哭诉事情的经过，并打电话和他的未婚夫讲道理，但是法
官把电话挂断，女的在哭， 白男给拉她一杯饮料而且在药里下药， 她也从来根本就不
同意白男有性交， 而是白男强迫她， 再加上在喝的饮料里下药， 她没有体力反抗。
后来在她的要求下停下来。 这是正个事件的发生经过是。 这个法官可以抛弃她， 但
是没有权利不只不帮他， 而且三反5次把这个女的放在监狱里。 不只心理上略带， 而
且加上用他的行政手段摧残她。 这是错的。
次女有告诉她的未婚夫那天晚上发生的事， 但是他做为一界法官不仅没有去备案， 而
且还去根强暴犯的父亲谈 deal， 这是错的。
DEAL 没有谈成，就把一肚子的怨气发在这个女人身上， 这是错的。
这两家都有钱有施， 欺负一个弱女子， 这个女的一生都被毁掉拉。 不只不帮她， 反
而接二连三的把她无缘无辜的放在监狱里， 这是错的。
【在 A******D 的大作中提到】
: 略读了下，不一定准确，给大家个摘要：
: 大陆女，父母是教授，96年全奖读penn state MBA，98年毕业，2000年银行工作，后来
: 改做贷款。2002年认识日本人（法官），10个月的约会后日本人求婚，两人同居，吵架
: 时去白垃圾男（被州里DA起诉；没好性格，没工作，疯狂的生活方式，吸毒）家求安慰
: ，声称被灌酒have sex，怀孕期间日本人问那天那件事，做了DNA鉴定非
: 父亲，大陆女求之，说或许DNA鉴定错了，那白垃圾男只进去没射。后来生出混血儿，
: 想要日本人养，因为他是“presumed father”；她不想那白垃圾男当father，因为一
: 个“犯罪的人是不能在宪法的意义上成为父亲的”（这个不理解），她总想要把日本人
: 列为父亲，法院和社工却总是想要把白垃圾男列为父亲。她要求政府资助养小孩，政府
: 可能基于她的说法认为她没条件养，拿走小孩，直到找到个父亲养，政府却不认可那日
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 225 Have you ever read Marvin V Marvin, this is a well known case in family law,
in this case, 女的也没有嫁给 Mr. Marvin， 但是因为mr. marvin 说quied your
job, come with me, I will support you. Finally the court order Mr. Marvin to
pay her alimoney.
这个女人遇到的问题是，未婚夫是法官， 他用他职位收买所有提她做事的律师。 这个
妈妈已经化拉10 几万， 去打官司， 打一场， 输一场， 再加上听审法官的合作，及
同流合污， 帮助这个日本法官掩盖事实。 控制法庭的听审程序。 所以这个妈妈在回
在网上求救。 希望大家舆论支持司法公正。
看拉这个女人的email, 及前面的讨论， 你就知道， 这个法官据续窃听她的电话， 扫
饶她的正常生活， 不让她找到工作， 没有工作，她就没有办法生活，同时 又在网上
找人散布谣言， 说这个妈妈懒惰不工作。在这个法官无辜找Arcadia 警察把这个妈妈
抓到la county jail 时， 他们没有逮扑令。请问谁可以在美国可以随便抓人到监狱里
呢？
好在这个妈妈也有一些好朋友， 马上伸出正义的手， 你来我们这里上班。但是还是有
些问题， la county 的法官还要据续听审这个案子吗？
11 月30 日， 这个妈妈刚申请把孩子还给妈妈，而且要求听审发庭从LA COUNTY COURT
专到其他COUNTY法庭，但是法庭没有做。这样开庭的话， 也是没有把孩子 那回来。
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
:
: 他那个理解还是有误，there is no divorce case, they were never married,不得不
: 说这个女人脑子被驴踢了,做的事情非常人所能理解.
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 226 请舆论据续支持政府惩罚这些没有道德的律师， 收拉别人的钱不办事。这是道德的问
题加上腐败。
谢谢
law,
to
【在 y***o 的大作中提到】
: Have you ever read Marvin V Marvin, this is a well known case in family law,
: in this case, 女的也没有嫁给 Mr. Marvin， 但是因为mr. marvin 说quied your
: job, come with me, I will support you. Finally the court order Mr. Marvin to
: pay her alimoney.
: 这个女人遇到的问题是，未婚夫是法官， 他用他职位收买所有提她做事的律师。 这个
: 妈妈已经化拉10 几万， 去打官司， 打一场， 输一场， 再加上听审法官的合作，及
: 同流合污， 帮助这个日本法官掩盖事实。 控制法庭的听审程序。 所以这个妈妈在回
: 在网上求救。 希望大家舆论支持司法公正。
: 看拉这个女人的email, 及前面的讨论， 你就知道， 这个法官据续窃听她的电话， 扫
: 饶她的正常生活， 不让她找到工作， 没有工作，她就没有办法生活，同时 又在网上
| y***o
发帖数: 145 | 227 星期二，December 18, 出庭，LA， children's court 法官听审petition to put the
faudulant child adoption case aside. The mother request to requst all of
the LA COUNTY JUDGE in order to have a fair hearing. |
|
