C****g
发帖数: 2220 | 1 收购一部分吧？
而且卖的时候，一般都要往上抬，比流通值高
１０亿美元，只能买２０－３０％？ |
m*t
发帖数: 7490 | 2 收购都是调动银行贷款，带杠杆的
有10亿压仓，贷款20亿，总共30亿收购，看着挺靠谱的 |
T*****y
发帖数: 18592 | 3 能买成第一大股东就行
不过我很怀疑丫的
丫整个一二愣子买房
要么跟公司董事会谈
谈出董事会对收购的支持
要么发起敌意收购
和公司现有的董事会及大股东对抗
二者，你都需要给溢价
不出溢价谁尼玛卖你？
俺很怀疑丫的财力
董事会很可能不支持
而且丫如果打官司告董事会
肯定告不赢
那就更需要敌意收购
丫是一个嫩苗
不说钱够不够
玩儿就能被美国人玩儿死
就算丫真有这钱
还有美国政府那一道关
联邦政府完全可以国家安全理由，否决丫的
丫最好现在就给联邦政府谈谈去
别到事后都差不多了
让奥巴马给丫一锤子
哭都没地儿哭去
不过，俺觉得，丫就是作一次秀而已
所有的都当广告费了
【在 C****g 的大作中提到】
: 收购一部分吧？
: 而且卖的时候，一般都要往上抬，比流通值高
: １０亿美元，只能买２０－３０％？
|
T*****y
发帖数: 18592 | 4 这年头，淫根紧啊
收购贷款不好找啊
【在 m*t 的大作中提到】
: 收购都是调动银行贷款，带杠杆的
: 有10亿压仓，贷款20亿，总共30亿收购，看着挺靠谱的
|
a****r
发帖数: 12375 | 5 wjb赞助陈光标15亿
收购一部分吧？
而且卖的时候，一般都要往上抬，比流通值高
１０亿美元，只能买２０－３０％？
【在 C****g 的大作中提到】
: 收购一部分吧？
: 而且卖的时候，一般都要往上抬，比流通值高
: １０亿美元，只能买２０－３０％？
|
G****1
发帖数: 8414 | 6 就像凤姐一样在中国可以搞一搞，跑美国来，这二逼的那一套没人理。 |
l******t
发帖数: 55733 | 7 丫一拆房卖破烂的要牛屎干嘛。明显就是这么一说的事尼玛你们有没有点自己的判断力
啊。 |
M*****n
发帖数: 16729 | 8 不是全资收购吧？
能买到40%可能就是大股东了，有控股权了，想开谁就开谁
10亿搞定贷款，未尝不可。
而且关键看NYT有没有财力反收购。 |
G****1
发帖数: 8414 | 9 不入让侯赛因开个价，标哥把米雪办一办，真长脸了。 |
l********o
发帖数: 5629 | |
|
|
r**m
发帖数: 2823 | 11 侯赛因倒贴都来不及
【在 G****1 的大作中提到】
: 不入让侯赛因开个价，标哥把米雪办一办，真长脸了。
|
G****1
发帖数: 8414 | 12 那标哥赚大了，顺路带刁胖子开个黑幕三的洋荤。
【在 r**m 的大作中提到】
: 侯赛因倒贴都来不及
|
r****1
发帖数: 4301 | 13
别小看破烂生意，做生意都要本钱，只有破烂生意，不仅不要本钱，别人还倒贴钱给你
，中国女首富张茵也是做废纸生意发家的。
一般中国富豪的眼光还停留在收房产，人家光标已经有想法收媒体了，要玩意识形态。
这就是他可以发财的原因。
【在 l******t 的大作中提到】
: 丫一拆房卖破烂的要牛屎干嘛。明显就是这么一说的事尼玛你们有没有点自己的判断力
: 啊。
|
w****j
发帖数: 6262 | 14 土共可以搞搞双簧，让标哥一边骂共党，一边收购nytimes，暗中提供资金，先买下来
再说。这么点本钱恶心美帝，划算呀。
【在 r****1 的大作中提到】
:
: 别小看破烂生意，做生意都要本钱，只有破烂生意，不仅不要本钱，别人还倒贴钱给你
: ，中国女首富张茵也是做废纸生意发家的。
: 一般中国富豪的眼光还停留在收房产，人家光标已经有想法收媒体了，要玩意识形态。
: 这就是他可以发财的原因。
|
g*****a
发帖数: 1112 | 15 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-02/chinese-recycling-tyco
Chinese Recycling Tycoon Will Learn Why the New York Times Is Tough to Buy
It's no wonder the New York Times is a valuable prize, given its palpable
influence, felt daily in the U.S. and abroad. That's drawn the interest of a
Chinese businessman named Chen Guangbiao, the latest self-styled tycoon to
consider a bid for the Times. He made his riches in the recycling business
and claims to have raised enough cash — about $1 billion, according to a
story in the Times — to buy a large or controlling stake in the company.
One problem: Unlike most publicly traded companies, control over the New
York Times is not for sale.
The Ochs-Sulzberger family that has run the newspaper for the past 117 years
has an ironclad grip over the company through its Class B shares, which
aren't traded over any public markets. We covered some of this in a previous
story when another bluster-filled moneyman made similar claims.
Note a few changes from the last post that might make investors even less
likely to part with the company: The Times Co. stock is now trading at about
$16 a share, and its market value is $2.33 billion; the company recently
restored quarterly dividends to shareholders, which should net the Ochs-
Sulzbergers $3.1 million annually. It's better than nothing but far lower
than the $20 million they used to get before the recession.
Bloomberg Businessweek contributor Roben Farzad asks whether the board would
have to consider an offer that far exceeds its current share price as part
of its fiduciary duty to shareholders. It's a good question that doesn't
have a clear answer since the Ochs-Sulzbergers effectively control two-
thirds of the company's board seats. Also, the owners don't typically say
what's on their minds.
The Times Co.'s proxy does make clear that when someone purchases a share of
the Times, they're buying into its central mission: journalism. Profit is
presumed. Therefore, any bid, no matter how lucrative, would still have to
take that into consideration. Keeping in mind China's antagonism toward
journalism — the Times website is blocked there, as is Bloomberg.com —
Chen should expect to face plenty of scrutiny.
Whether a dollar value can be placed on journalism itself isn't a debate we
are prepared to delve into at the moment. Maybe ask Rupert Murdoch?
土工对外资进入媒体控制更严吧？ 好像杨澜能拉到投资办媒体，就是因为她的特殊身
份和关系
当年帮造势的传媒大亨，后来又要搞民主的，普金一个一个都收拾了 |
N*****m
发帖数: 42603 | 16 Ochs-Sulzberger family
果然是米犹媒体
a
to
【在 g*****a 的大作中提到】
: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-02/chinese-recycling-tyco
: Chinese Recycling Tycoon Will Learn Why the New York Times Is Tough to Buy
: It's no wonder the New York Times is a valuable prize, given its palpable
: influence, felt daily in the U.S. and abroad. That's drawn the interest of a
: Chinese businessman named Chen Guangbiao, the latest self-styled tycoon to
: consider a bid for the Times. He made his riches in the recycling business
: and claims to have raised enough cash — about $1 billion, according to a
: story in the Times — to buy a large or controlling stake in the company.
: One problem: Unlike most publicly traded companies, control over the New
: York Times is not for sale.
|
r****1
发帖数: 4301 | 17 光标应该请教邓文迪吧。这篇文章分析的对啊，在中国都要翻墙才能看到国外的东西。 |
