T*****y
发帖数: 18592 | 1 俄国干不过美国，战争局限在全球任何沿海区域都是
但是俄美战争，不会是局部战争
尤其影响，不会是局部影响
美国不是傻子
有人就是不信 |
u*******g
发帖数: 3300 | 2 我挖了这么多坑，刚把大家的热情鼓动起来
您老想泼凉水也得等等阿
【在 T*****y 的大作中提到】
: 俄国干不过美国，战争局限在全球任何沿海区域都是
: 但是俄美战争，不会是局部战争
: 尤其影响，不会是局部影响
: 美国不是傻子
: 有人就是不信
|
Y****N
发帖数: 8694 | 3 你老还当真了
怎么会打？太扯了
【在 T*****y 的大作中提到】
: 俄国干不过美国，战争局限在全球任何沿海区域都是
: 但是俄美战争，不会是局部战争
: 尤其影响，不会是局部影响
: 美国不是傻子
: 有人就是不信
|
s*****r
发帖数: 43070 | 4 到人家家门口打，不好说了，把毛子惹毛了，扔个蛋蛋 |
P****i
发帖数: 12972 | 5 下注吧
【在 T*****y 的大作中提到】
: 俄国干不过美国，战争局限在全球任何沿海区域都是
: 但是俄美战争，不会是局部战争
: 尤其影响，不会是局部影响
: 美国不是傻子
: 有人就是不信
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 6
【在 T*****y 的大作中提到】
: 俄国干不过美国，战争局限在全球任何沿海区域都是
: 但是俄美战争，不会是局部战争
: 尤其影响，不会是局部影响
: 美国不是傻子
: 有人就是不信
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 7 A US Russian war would look like pancakes with sausage. US would level
Russia cities like pancakes and Russian would fry US like sausages.
【在 T*****y 的大作中提到】
: 俄国干不过美国，战争局限在全球任何沿海区域都是
: 但是俄美战争，不会是局部战争
: 尤其影响，不会是局部影响
: 美国不是傻子
: 有人就是不信
|
f***r
发帖数: 2916 | 8 核武器就算了，苏联当年都不敢跟美国开打，现在的俄罗斯更不敢
【在 s*****r 的大作中提到】
: 到人家家门口打，不好说了，把毛子惹毛了，扔个蛋蛋
|
T*****y
发帖数: 18592 | 9
【在 b********n 的大作中提到】
|
f*******n
发帖数: 2665 | 10 当年是苏联跑到美国的后院古巴，现在是俄国保护自己的后院，没有退路。
【在 f***r 的大作中提到】
: 核武器就算了，苏联当年都不敢跟美国开打，现在的俄罗斯更不敢
|
|
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 11 Almost any conflict fought as force on force, conventional warfare, between
NATO and Russia, will be a modernized version of EarthOrbit-Air-Land-Sea-
UnderSea-Battle with networked information centric warfare mixed in.
The key strategic objective would be for return to antebellum_status_quo.
Return to how it was before conflict. That is before Putin invaded Crimea.
It would vital for both sides, to preserve a way for NATO and Russian
leaders/diplomats to communicate with each other, so that hostilities can be
ended at each phase, so that there is no automatic escalation. Think of
this as firebreak in interior architecture.
Should it come to hostilities, the SHOW would open with comprehensive attack
on enemies command and control, and EM spectrum nodes. I.e. satelites,
ground stations, communication vessels on sea and air. Here , to prevent
runaway escalation, attack would need to cripple the enemie's command and
control in-theater, and not target strategic command and control for each
sides strategic forces (ICBMS, strategic bombers, and SLBM submarines).
Targeting of those assets by anyone of the sides would automatically
escalate the SHOW to a potential nuclear showdown.
Next would come naval engagements. Attack submarines would attempt to sink
enemies attack and anti-ship missile submarines. Both Russia and US have SSN
's and dedicated SSGN, that carry lots of cruise missiles. Simultaneously,
or insync with naval moves, both sides would try to interdict enemie's
supply, heavy armor, artillery, and grounded aviation. Platforms used would
be med range attack aircraft, and tactical battlefield cruise, and ballistic
missiles. Unless there are really dramatic casualties on naval front, it is
at this stage that body count would start ticking up. Some of the aircraft
would be shot down by SAM, or interceptors.
Both sides would fight for air supremancy or better air dominance. F-22A vs.
SU-35. SU-27 and Mig-29's would try to intercept F-15E, Tornado, and
Typhoon fast jets. Air defense Typhoons would fight air-air with SU-27,30,35
and Mig-29. Russian MIG-31 interceptors would hunt for B-1Bs, and B-2's(
good luck!). F-22 with F-15C escorts would try to protect bombers and clear
a path. Both sides SEAD (suppression of enemy air defense) aircraft would
hunt SAM sites. Russia's best systems S-300 , S-300V, and SA-11 are mobile
systems.
So it won't be like Vietnam or Desert Storm with fixed sites. Concurrently
tactical balistric missiles would be used on force marshall area. Assuming
that NATO, at this point has a modicum of air superiority, and naval threat
is diminished, at this time lead elements of NATO ground forces would make
contact with Russians. At this point in conflict there would need to be a
cease fire, becouse once ground forces lock horns, it will be difficult to
stop, for either side. Neither NATO(USA) or Russia can afford to even
present an appearance of failure or defeat.
P.S. The above scenario is not a linear progression with simple deliniations
. But a gradual smooth transition. |
f***r
发帖数: 2916 | 12 没退路也不敢打，你当这个世界上到处都是希特勒这种疯子吗？
【在 f*******n 的大作中提到】
: 当年是苏联跑到美国的后院古巴，现在是俄国保护自己的后院，没有退路。
|
b****l
发帖数: 23606 | 13 你是说奥巴马敢打，奥巴马是希特勒这种疯子？
【在 f***r 的大作中提到】
: 没退路也不敢打，你当这个世界上到处都是希特勒这种疯子吗？
|
m********8
发帖数: 7463 | 14 元首是疯子？
无知真可怕
【在 f***r 的大作中提到】
: 没退路也不敢打，你当这个世界上到处都是希特勒这种疯子吗？
|
f***r
发帖数: 2916 | 15 你脑子好，美帝航母要开来了，回头俄罗斯就往美国丢核弹，你不跑路还在这里灌水？
【在 m********8 的大作中提到】
: 元首是疯子？
: 无知真可怕
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 16
【在 m********8 的大作中提到】
: 元首是疯子？
: 无知真可怕
|
f***r
发帖数: 2916 | 17 没人敢打，顶多常规战争，打不过吃亏就认了，现在没那个领导人有胆量挑起核战争。
普京要是敢挑起核战争，俄罗斯那些权贵就先把普京做了
【在 b****l 的大作中提到】
: 你是说奥巴马敢打，奥巴马是希特勒这种疯子？
|
