由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military版 - 旗帜鲜明的反对菌斑复辟水下300-400米发射弹道导弹的伪科普
相关主题
Okinawa Decision Has Missile Defense Element信口聊聊毛子和土鳖的AESA
俄中谈判苏35、苏33战机交易防务新闻:美军新“宙斯盾”雷达开测 目标赶超052D
151舰被老舰“击沉”第二批苏35到货 正式形成战斗力 有了歼20歼16为何还要购买苏35?
其实中国发展雷达技术比发展隐形战斗机重要多了亨廷顿·英格尔斯造船厂
Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX)中国歼14还未露面就已让西方各国恐惧
“against钓鱼岛附近台湾的力量最强
土鳖国急了,开始同时造055大驱之003 004号舰中俄阅兵,J11东风5与苏35亚尔斯差距看超俄论
tg有没有机载AESA?配套JF-17 Block-III的有源相控阵雷达现身 接近F-22的AN/APG-77性能
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: radar话题: aesa话题: 无源话题: radars话题: more
进入Military版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
G*******n
发帖数: 6889
1
另有无源相控阵雷达比有源相控阵放热多的伪科学
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Military2/167685_0.html
m********5
发帖数: 17667
2
你们老将忘文生义,太挫了
Passive Phased Array Radar,并不是说这个Radar是passive的,这是说这个Phased
array 是passive. 也就是说array只有天线单元,自己不产生功率。
无源相控阵自己不产生辐射,但是雷达必须要有辐射,因此PPA还是必须接驳雷达,有
一个单独的功率放大器,功率经过波导分配到阵列天线。
而有源阵是只阵列每个单独的单元自带功率发生器和接收器,因此不需要功率分配器。
由于这个多余的步骤导致无源阵雷达的电功率效率要比有源阵低,波束质量要比有源阵
低,电磁波有效功率也要比有源阵低。
至于谁的热量多,我倒是不知道,反正只要是阵列,不管有源无源其效率都比一般的雷
达低,发热量大。而无源阵效率更要低得多。

【在 G*******n 的大作中提到】
: 另有无源相控阵雷达比有源相控阵放热多的伪科学
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Military2/167685_0.html

G*******n
发帖数: 6889
3
你"不知道"也敢来给伪科普撑腰
http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/17992-evolution-of-aes
"Aug 14, 2012 ... Figure 1 shows a comparison of PESA and AESA designs,
based on .... Power consumption and cooling are major issues for AESAs and
have..."
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-a-PESA-and-an-AESA-
radar
"In an AESA radar on the other hand, each milk carton sized antenna is
capable of generating its own microwave signal, as well as altering its
phase. Another difference is that, at any given time, each of the antenna
may be operating at a different frequency! Also, an AESA antenna element may
change its frequency of operation around 1000's of times per second. As a
result, the radar beam now does not operate at a single frequency, but
rather, is a very wide band signal. As the radar energy is now spread over a
huge band, instead of a precise single frequency, the enemy thinks that
this signal is simply background noise and ignores it. This is why such
radars are called LPI (low probability of Intercept) radars, and are used in
stealth fighter jets and ships. However, such radars are more costly,
require much more power, and generate lots of heat, which in turn requires
sophisticated cooling systems. "
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3117715/posts
"You get most of the operational benefits with the passive ones, but not as
long of detection range, for a couple of technical reason. More total power
and lower effective noise figure. The downside is more cost, and maybe more
weight. Cooling the beasts is a challenge too."
m********5
发帖数: 17667
4
我不知道你是自己看不懂英文,还是欺负别的老将看不懂英文
你贴出来的英文和我说的有什么区别
说无源阵不发射电磁波的是不是你们老将?!LoL

【在 G*******n 的大作中提到】
: 你"不知道"也敢来给伪科普撑腰
: http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/17992-evolution-of-aes
: "Aug 14, 2012 ... Figure 1 shows a comparison of PESA and AESA designs,
: based on .... Power consumption and cooling are major issues for AESAs and
: have..."
: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-a-PESA-and-an-AESA-
: radar
: "In an AESA radar on the other hand, each milk carton sized antenna is
: capable of generating its own microwave signal, as well as altering its
: phase. Another difference is that, at any given time, each of the antenna

G*******n
发帖数: 6889
5
你中文英文都看不懂,自己瞎编一个“无源阵不发射电磁波”稻草人,来精神撸管。。。
有源相控阵和无源相控阵,工作时哪个热量散发的比较多,你知不知道?不知道就闭嘴
。。。

【在 m********5 的大作中提到】
: 我不知道你是自己看不懂英文,还是欺负别的老将看不懂英文
: 你贴出来的英文和我说的有什么区别
: 说无源阵不发射电磁波的是不是你们老将?!LoL

1 (共1页)
进入Military版参与讨论
相关主题
配套JF-17 Block-III的有源相控阵雷达现身 接近F-22的AN/APG-77性能Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX)
歼-20隐形不输F-22 扮演蓝军吊打三代机(ZT)“against
巴基斯坦空军订购50架“枭龙”最新型号 配有源相控阵雷达土鳖国急了,开始同时造055大驱之003 004号舰
死活就是卖不出去:歼10B战机出口又告吹,孟加拉国已决定购俄制苏30SMEtg有没有机载AESA?
Okinawa Decision Has Missile Defense Element信口聊聊毛子和土鳖的AESA
俄中谈判苏35、苏33战机交易防务新闻:美军新“宙斯盾”雷达开测 目标赶超052D
151舰被老舰“击沉”第二批苏35到货 正式形成战斗力 有了歼20歼16为何还要购买苏35?
其实中国发展雷达技术比发展隐形战斗机重要多了亨廷顿·英格尔斯造船厂
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: radar话题: aesa话题: 无源话题: radars话题: more