D**s
发帖数: 6361 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: gemini2012 (双子AB), 信区: USANews
标 题: khan: 宪法必须服从sharia
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 2 22:05:40 2016, 美东)
Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the
Sharia’
by PAUL SPERRY2 Aug 2016
Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M.
Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man
-made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his
Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald
Trump.
In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a
seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles
out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro
-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani
dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.
Khan speaks admiringly of Brohi’s interpretation of human rights, even
though it included the right to kill and mutilate those who violate Islamic
laws and even the right of men to “beat” wives who act “unseemly.”
As Pakistani minister of law and religious affairs, Brohi helped create
hundreds of jihadi incubators called madrassas and restored Sharia
punishments, such as amputations for theft and demands that rape victims
produce four male witnesses or face adultery charges. He also made insulting
the Muslim prophet Muhammad a crime punishable by death. To speed the
Islamization of Pakistan, he and Zia issued a law that required judges to
consult mullahs on every judicial decision for Sharia compliance.
Khan, who says he immigrated to the U.S. in 1980 to escape Pakistan’s “
military rule,” nonetheless spoke admiringly of Brohi in his review of his
speech. He praised his remarks even though Brohi advocated for the
enforcement of the medieval Sharia punishments, known as “hudood” (
singular “hadd”), that were later adopted and carried out with brutal
efficiency by the Taliban in neighboring Afghanistan.
“Divinely ordained punishments have to be inflicted,” Brohi asserted, “
and there is very little option for the judge called upon to impose Hadd, if
facts and circumstances are established that the Hadd in question has been
transgressed, to refuse to impose the punishment.”
Of course, such cruel and unusual Sharia punishments, ranging from stonings
and floggings to beheadings, would be a flagrant violation of the Eighth
Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Western society is built on individualism and secularism, concepts enshrined
in the Constitution. But Brohi scoffs at them, arguing, “The individual
has to be sacrificed. Collectivity has a special sanctity attached to it in
Islam.”
Brohi goes on to argue that human rights bestowed by Islam include the right
of men to “beat” their wives.
“The best statement of the human rights is also to be found in the address
delivered by the prophet [Muhammad] so often described as his last address,
” Brohi said, quoting: “ ‘You have rights over your wives and they have
rights over you. You have the right that they should not defile your bed and
that they should not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows
you to put them in separate rooms and to beat them but not with severity.’ ”
In his book review, Khan takes no issue with Brohi’s shocking
interpretation of human rights. In fact, he claims Brohi “successfully”
explains them and argues his points “convincingly.” (The review, which
lists Khan as “director” of an Islamic center in Houston, was published in
the Texas International Law Journal.)
“The keynote speech of Dr. A.K. Brohi, former Pakistani minister of legal
and religious affairs, is a hallmark in this book,” Khan writes. “It
successfully explains the Islamic concepts of ‘right’ and ‘just’ in
comparison to their Christian and Judaic counterparts.”
Adds Khan: “Brohi argues convincingly for the establishment of a moral
value system before guarantees can be given for any kind of rights. To
illustrate the point he notes, ‘There is no such thing as human right in
the abstract.’”
In other words, Khan concurs that human rights can only be guaranteed
through the establishment of Sharia’s moral and legal code.
Khan provides his own advocacy for Sharia law in a separate academic paper
titled “Juristic Classification of Islamic Law,” which he also wrote in
1983, while studying in Saudi Arabia.
“The invariable and basic rules of Islamic law are only those prescribed in
the Shari’ah,” Khan writes. “All other juridical works… must always be
subordinated to the Shari’ah.”
He explains that Sharia is derived from the Quran and Sunnah, and that the
Quran “is the absolute authority from which springs the very conception of
legality and every legal obligation.”
Khan then notes that Quranic law includes “constitutional law.”
“Family law is laid down in 70 injunctions; civil law in another 70; penal
law in 30; jurisdiction and procedure in 13; constitutional law in 10;
international relations in 25; and economic and financial order in 10,” he
said.
Khan defers to an early Islamic jurist who ruled: “For every issue
concerning a Muslim, either there is a binding text (of the Shariah) that
rules it, or there is a guidance that may indicate the way to truth. If
there is a text, then the Muslim has to follow it.”
A devout Muslim, Khan also cites two radical Muslim Brotherhood figures as
scholarly sources — Said Ramadan and Muhammad Hamidullah.
Though described by the Clinton camp and media as a “Pakistani-American
lawyer,” less known is Khan’s an acknowledged expert on Sharia law
doctrine. His 13-page article, which was published in the Houston Journal of
International Law, has been cited in dozens of Islamic law articles and has
been used in college syllabi for Islamic law courses as recently as 2013.
By comparison, his expertise in American constitutional law is barely
evident. In fact, there appears to be few if any legal citations in federal
or state court records for Khan, who describes himself on his business
website (removed Tuesday from the Internet) as “attorney at law.”
Even so, Khan questioned Trump’s understanding of the Constitution, calling
him “ignorant” and suggesting that if he had studied it he would never
propose imposing a temporary ban on Muslim immigration to protect the nation
from ISIS and other terrorist infiltrators.
“Let me ask you: have you even read the United States Constitution? I will
gladly lend you my copy,” a visibly angry Khan bellowed, while waving a
pamphlet version in the air.
It’s not immediately clear if Khan has ever repudiated his earlier support
for the anti-Constitutional principles of Sharia law. Searches turn up no
subsequent writings or statements to that effect. Attempts to reach Khan by
phone and email were unsuccessful.
For now, the most patriotic Muslim in America, according to media myth-
making, remains Khizr Muazzam Khan, the father of a fallen American soldier
who claims to hold the Constitution so dear he keeps a copy in his breast
pocket.
But what does he really believe? His Islamist writings offer a window into
his ideological thinking — and the view is a contradictory and highly
disturbing one, especially in light of the fanfare he has received.
Paul Sperry is a former Hoover Institution media fellow and author of
Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/08/02/khizr-khan-constitution-sharia/ | s*x
发帖数: 8041 | | T****i
发帖数: 15191 | 3 我还以为他是土耳其的什么领导人。
man
his
Donald
【在 D**s 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
: 发信人: gemini2012 (双子AB), 信区: USANews
: 标 题: khan: 宪法必须服从sharia
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 2 22:05:40 2016, 美东)
: Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the
: Sharia’
: by PAUL SPERRY2 Aug 2016
: Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M.
: Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man
: -made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his
| r******e
发帖数: 8925 | 4 你这样的，你国内山东臭老坦子亲戚也看不上你，挺大人了，44岁，读了个破JB狗屄生
物博士，出来挣得还没有美国通下水道的工人多，撑死跟黑人工资差不多，还不反思反
思？你说白了不适合念书，应该别出国，学个蓝翔技校出来就工作，早早孝敬你父母是
王道，否则也不会全家人连你家里蹲内老坦儿侉娘们都瞧不起你了，这个版上我对山东
人印象都不错，但自从出了你这么个不识抬举的侉老帽儿，我是越来越觉得你一颗老鼠
屎坏了一锅山东人的好粥，你还是多琢磨琢磨出去做做卫生 捡捡瓶子 多给你70多岁久
病缠身的父母寄些钱吧，论坛里随便一个都不比你赚的少，还都比你年轻，要啥有啥，
你那破生物狗屄博士学历在菌斑就是一坨屎，被人嘲笑的一文不值。你不要浪费生命在
这里撕逼发帖了，你乡下老坦儿家里蹲媳妇过两天买卫生巾的钱都没了！！ 你快去奔
命吧
【在 T****i 的大作中提到】
: 我还以为他是土耳其的什么领导人。
:
: man
: his
: Donald
| k*******g
发帖数: 7321 | 5 这个真地得支持trump了，这个木木老爹已经亮剑了 | s******r
发帖数: 5309 | 6 总有傻逼把这种轮子的宣传转到买买提来。信这个还不如信李大师。 |
|
