由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military版 - 美国加州法院作出含草甘膦转基因致癌判决的客观依据
相关主题
反转基因的重大胜利:美法院裁定草甘膦除草剂致癌,孟山都需支你不知道的转基因,老布什在孟山都,看的,听的和说的
中国13亿公民是人还是猪?也说草甘磷新研究发现孟山都 Roundup 和致命性肾病有关联
世卫组织称孟山都Roundup除草剂可能致癌世卫组织称孟山都草甘膦对人类可能致癌
中国公民控告美转基因巨头 指其除草剂或致癌孟山都除草剂基因改造的问题非常大
支持中国本土种植转基因植物的ID们Bayer买Monsanto,Monsanto该解雇80%的员工了
人民战争:墨西哥反转斗争纪实反转基因风起云涌:Monsanto的大量欺骗论文 (转载)
ZZ 转基因玉米致癌非谣言 团队获"真相揭秘者"奖贴张图,顺带着谈谈转基因的事情
炸了:美国80%以上早餐麦片含过量致癌草甘膦(Glyphosate)掐死中国转基因研究,得利的还是孟山都
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: copley话题: glyphosate话题: monsanto话题: epa话题: 草甘膦
进入Military版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
s******n
发帖数: 518
1
美国加州法院作出含草甘膦转基因致癌判决的客观依据。 (2017-07-09 00:05:32)
转载

标签: 转基因 草甘膦 加州 分类: 转基因问题讨论
2017年3月10日,加利福尼亚州法官Kristi Kapetan发出正式裁决,在加州销售的转基
因伴侣草甘膦(Roundup,中文名:农达 )都要贴上致癌标签!昨天是这个法案正式生
效的第一天。
有人要问:加州法院凭什么能作出含草甘膦转基因致癌判决?中国转转叫的孤证不立存
在吗?
我请教这方面的人士,他们大致给出了加州法院的证据如下:
1.权威的科学证据——世界卫生组织(WHO)的国际癌症研究机构(IARC) 的结论:草甘
膦可能导致癌症。
2.有可能的受害者(原告)——长期吸入孟山都草甘膦的杰克·考尔,生前患恶性肿瘤
非霍奇金淋巴瘤,夫人为原告。
3.孟山都集团有对杰克伤害的故意——法院发现了孟山都集团早就知道草甘膦的毒性,
但他们隐瞒真像,还是把这种农药卖给了像杰克·考尔这样的农民。孟山都当然成了被
告。
专业人士说,按加州的法律,如果第1条和第3条被证实确实存在,对第2条的举证责任
就转到了被告。除非孟山都能证明杰克的癌症是另有原因,否则法院只能判定孟山都是
加害者。
这就是十分完整的证据链条!根本不存在什么“孤证不立”。
参考文章:
1《WHO将除草剂草甘膦归为可能致癌物》
http://cancer.cmt.com.cn/detail/773289.html
2《美国加州65号法案的意义》
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-817414-1039407.html
3.《美法院作出关于转基因的里程碑式判决:贴上致癌标签!》
http://www.sohu.com/a/154396493_475930
参考论段:
加州的这个65号法案认定了一个重要依据:患癌致死的加州农场主杰克·考尔。杰克·
考尔在他的20英亩水果以及蔬菜农场使用草甘膦近30年,结果发现得了癌症。就此,考
尔的太太和几十位农民共同起诉孟山都公司,他们的诉讼理由是:杰克·考尔因长期接
触草甘膦,未获得相关的癌症风险提示,从而导致罹患癌症非正常死亡,这是孟山都公
司故意淡化转基因伴侣草甘膦的风险造成的。
原告的代理律师曾要求法官传唤已经在2016年离职的美国环保署高官Jess Rowland,目
的是搞清他与孟山都的不正常关系。这一要求遭到孟山都与美国环保署的反对。孟山都
甚至要求法院禁止原告将得来不易的资料公开[1]。
最近,原告律师得到美国环保署( EPA ) 已故毒理学专家Marion Copley的电子邮件等
证据。Copley在环保署供职期间,曾经根据动物试验结果,写过基本上确认草甘膦会致
癌的报告。环保署高官Jess Rowland曾经恐吓包括Copley在内的署内人员,要求更改这
个报告的内容,以达到符合孟山都等化学巨头们的商业利益。
加州法官告诉人们:转基因及伴侣草甘膦“没有一例出现问题”,是建立在孟山都拉拢
腐蚀美国环保署官员共同隐瞒危害事实的基础上的,是建立在谎言的基础上的。“转基
因隐藏着最大的跨国腐败”,这个残酷的现实再次露出了冰山一角。
看来加州法官的举动,已经使得转基因腐败在美国难以掩饰了。
最后要说明的是,加州的65号法案,有事实依据,还有国际癌症研究机构(IARC)关于转
基因伴侣草甘膦对老鼠“确定致癌”,对人类“可能致癌”的权威机构的结论。并且美
国是一个判例法国家,根据判例法制度,某一判决中的法律规则不仅适用于该案,而且
往往作为一种先例而适用于以后该法院或下级法院所管辖的案件。只要案件的基本事实
相同或相似,就必须以判例所定规则处理。这就是所谓“遵循先例”(stare decisis)
原则。加州65号法案正式发布之日,就是美国众多法院依据该法案纷纷判决转基因伴侣
草甘膦“死刑”之时。今后无论什么人,只要再说出转基因“没有一例出现问题”,人
们都会想到这不仅是无德、无信,而且是无耻、无赖。
试看谁还在坚持无德、无信,无耻、无赖吧!
s******n
发帖数: 518
2
Health & Wellness
Mail
Letter from dead EPA scientist Marion Copley reveals Monsanto's bribes to
hide scientific evidence of glyphosate causing cancer
Erin Elizabeth
Health Nut News
Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:24 UTC
Monsanto
The Environmental Protection Agency has been involved in a number of
controversies over the years, such as the Gold King Mine spill or their
silence on the use of fracking wastewater on farmland. Now, the federal
agency is under fire for their collusion with one of the world's most evil
companies: Monsanto.
Monsanto has become infamous for their genetically modified seeds, and for
manufacturing one of the most widely used herbicides, Roundup. Their star
weed-killer has gained notoriety of its own, thanks to its toxic active
ingredient, glyphosate. While the corporate behemoth claims that the product
is safe, there is much evidence to the contrary; even the World Health
Organization has declared that glyphosate is a "probable carcinogen." But
like all soulless corporations, Monsanto has been using their prowess to
keep the lid on glyphosate's carcinogenic nature. But all good times must
come to an end, and a revealing letter from a now-deceased EPA scientist
could hopefully be the beginning of Monsanto's end.
USRTK, a non-profit working for accountability in our nation's food system,
originally uncovered a heart-breaking letter former EPA scientist Marion
Copley, who passed away from cancer. In this letter, Copley begs fellow EPA
employee Jess Rowland to protect the public from glyphosate's toxic nature,
rather than continue to cow-tow to Monsanto's influence. "For once in your
life, listen to me and don't play your political conniving games with the
science to favor the registrants. For once do the right thing and don't make
decisions based on how it affects your bonus," Copley writes.
She went on to state that Rowland and another EPA employee, Anna Lowit,
intimidated the staff on CARC (Cancer Assessment Review Committee) and
altered the MI ARC and IIASPOC final reports to favor the industry. Lowit is
still working for the EPA, and Copley's letter warns that other scientists
within the EPA may also be taking bribes.
"Your Nebraska colleague took industry funding, he clearly has a conflict of
interest. Just promise me not to ever let Anna on the CARC committee, her
decisions don't make rational sense. If anyone in OPP is taking bribes, it
is her," Copley states.
The unsealed court documents also reveal that Monsanto has been working with
scientists at the EPA to conceal the true nature of glyphosate. While the
company has denied this, an email clearly shows that Monsanto's toxicology
manager William Heydens conspired to help ghostwrite the EPA's reports on
glyphosate. Specifically, Heydens suggested that Monsanto would ghostwrite
the Exposure Tox and Genetox sections of the documents, supposedly to "keep
the cost down."
Rowland also reportedly set out to "kill" another agency's investigation of
glyphosate's toxicity. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease was
intending to conduct their own analysis of the chemical, but their report
never did surface. A Monsanto employee relayed their conversation with
Rowland via email, and quoted Rowland as saying, "If I can kill this I
should get a medal."
In her dying letter, Copley describes a number of mechanisms by which
glyphosate could cause cancer. In fact, Copley states that with the evidence
she describes, "It is essentially certain that glyphosate causes cancer."
Among the things she describes, Copley notes that glyphosate is genotoxic —
a quality she says is essential for cancer formation, and that it induces
free radical formation and causes damage to the bacterial populations of the
gut. According to Copley, because glyphosate was initially formulated as a
chelating agent, it produces many similar effects which can be toxic to
humans, suppress the immune system, and cause cancer.
Copley couldn't have been the only person at the EPA to put all the pieces
together and see the true toxicity glyphosate possesses — and it's clear
that Monsanto has done their best to obfuscate the facts on their cancer-
causing chemical. But will they face punishment for their obvious crimes?
Read more stories about glyphosate at Glyphosate.News.
1 (共1页)
进入Military版参与讨论
相关主题
掐死中国转基因研究,得利的还是孟山都支持中国本土种植转基因植物的ID们
不得过500上限!中国官方发文警告空气检测APP (转载)人民战争:墨西哥反转斗争纪实
疮破计划砍掉环保署40%科研经费,土鳖很高兴ZZ 转基因玉米致癌非谣言 团队获"真相揭秘者"奖
关于草甘膦及其他农药的危害的几个例子炸了:美国80%以上早餐麦片含过量致癌草甘膦(Glyphosate)
反转基因的重大胜利:美法院裁定草甘膦除草剂致癌,孟山都需支你不知道的转基因,老布什在孟山都,看的,听的和说的
中国13亿公民是人还是猪?也说草甘磷新研究发现孟山都 Roundup 和致命性肾病有关联
世卫组织称孟山都Roundup除草剂可能致癌世卫组织称孟山都草甘膦对人类可能致癌
中国公民控告美转基因巨头 指其除草剂或致癌孟山都除草剂基因改造的问题非常大
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: copley话题: glyphosate话题: monsanto话题: epa话题: 草甘膦