n********t
发帖数: 21 | 1 minqidev 发于 2018-12-13 08:40, 论坛: Chats&&华人闲话
标 题: 川普准备遣返1995年前来美国的越南难民 - Well Done
还真的开始了，之前我记得有个帖子的 NPR新闻 就讲了，川普准备遣返 越战难民，F-
L-G难民，计划生育和基督政屁，以及部分六四绿卡，当时很多人说是假新闻，没想到
真的开始了， MAGA, 川总加油，
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-moves-to-deport-vietnam-war-refugees/ar-BBQRpss?ocid=ientp
Trump Moves to Deport Vietnam War Refugees
The Trump administration is resuming its efforts to deport certain protected
Vietnamese immigrants who have lived in the United States for decades—many
of them having fled the country during the Vietnam War.
This is the latest move in the president’s long record of prioritizing
harsh immigration and asylum restrictions, and one that’s sure to raise
eyebrows—the White House had hesitantly backed off the plan in August
before reversing course. In essence, the administration has now decided that
Vietnamese immigrants who arrived in the country before the establishment
of diplomatic ties between the United States and Vietnam are subject to
standard immigration law—meaning they are all eligible for deportation.
The new stance mirrors White House efforts to clamp down on immigration writ
large, a frequent complaint of the president’s on the campaign trail and
one he links to a litany of ills in the United States
The administration last year began pursuing the deportation of many long-
term immigrants from Vietnam, Cambodia, and other countries who the
administration alleges are “violent criminal aliens.” But Washington and
Hanoi have a unique2008 agreement that specifically bars the
deportation of Vietnamese people who arrived in the United States before
July 12, 1995—the date the two former foes reestablished diplomatic
relations following the Vietnam War.
The White House unilaterally reinterpreted this agreement in the spring
of 2017 to exempt people convicted of crimes from its protections,
allowing the administration to send a small number of pre-1995 Vietnamese
immigrants back, a policy it retreated from this past August. Last week,
however, a spokesperson for the U.S. embassy in Hanoi said the American
government was again reversing course.
Washington now believes that the 2008 agreement fails to protect pre-1995
Vietnamese immigrants from deportation, the spokesperson, who asked not to
be identified by name because of embassy procedures, told The Atlantic.
“The United States and Vietnam signed a bilateral agreement on removals in
2008 that establishes procedures for deporting Vietnamese citizens who
arrived in the United States after July 12, 1995, and are subject to final
orders of removal,” the spokesperson said. “While the procedures
associated with this specific agreement do not apply to Vietnamese citizens
who arrived in the United States before July 12, 1995, it does not
explicitly preclude the removal of pre-1995 cases.”
The about-turn came as a State Department spokesperson confirmed that the
Department of Homeland Security had met with representatives of the
Vietnamese embassy in Washington, D.C., but declined to provide details of
when the talks took place or what was discussed. Spokespeople for the
Vietnamese embassy and DHS did not immediately respond to requests for
comment.
But the Southeast Asia Resource Action Center, a Washington, D.C., advocacy
group, said in a statement that the purpose of the meeting was to change the
2008 agreement. That deal had initially been set to last for five years,
and was to be automatically extended every three years unless either party
to it opted out. Under those rules, it had been set to renew automatically
next month. Since 1998, final removal orders have been issued for more
than 9,000 Vietnamese nationals.
When it first decided to reinterpret the 2008 deal, Donald Trump’s
administration argued that only pre-1995 arrivals with criminal convictions
were exempt from the agreement’s protection and eligible for deportation.
Vietnam initially conceded and accepted some of those immigrants before
stiffening its resistance; about a dozen Vietnamese immigrants ended up
being deported from the United States. The August decision to change course,
reported to a California court in October, appeared to put such moves at
least temporarily on ice, but the latest shift now leaves the fate of a
larger number of Vietnamese immigrants in doubt. Now no pre-1995 arrivals
are exempt from the 2008 agreement’s protection. That means all such people
are subject to standard immigration law, rendering them eligible for
deportation.
Many pre-1995 arrivals, all of whom were previously protected under the 2008
agreement by both the administrations of Presidents George W. Bush and
Barack Obama, were refugees from the Vietnam War. Some are the children of
those who once allied with American and South Vietnamese forces, an
attribute that renders them undesirable to the current regime in Hanoi,
which imputes anti-regime beliefs on the children of those who opposed North
Vietnam. This anti-Communist constituency includes minorities, such as the
children of the American-allied Montagnards, who are persecuted in
Vietnam for both their ethnicity and Christian religion.
The Trump administration’s move reflects an entirely new reading of the
agreement, according to Ted Osius, who served as the United States
ambassador to Vietnam from December 2014 through October 2018. Osius said
that while he was in office, the 2008 agreement was accepted by all involved
parties as banning the deportation of all pre-1995 Vietnamese immigrants.
“We understood that the agreement barred the deportation of pre-1995
Vietnamese. Both governments—and the Vietnamese-American community—
interpreted it that way,” Osius told The Atlantic in an email.
The State Department, he added, had explained this to both the White House
and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.
News of the Trump administration’s renewed hard line quickly made the
rounds on Vietnamese American social media, with advocacy groups warning of
potentially increased deportations.
“Forty-three years ago, a lot of the Southeast Asian communities and
Vietnamese communities fled their countries and their homeland due to the
war, which the U.S. was involved in, fleeing for their safety and the safety
of their families,” said Kevin Lam, the organizing director of the Asian
American Resource Workshop, an advocacy group. “The U.S. would do well to
remember that.” | j****z
发帖数: 299 | 2 赞巨巨
这才是maga，美帝拿着这些难民来当政治筹码，付出与回报太不对等，实在是没多大意
义，还不如切割他们减轻负担 | a********r
发帖数: 4013 | | M*******n
发帖数: 10087 | | c********e
发帖数: 4283 | 5 你说的这个category就没几个人
【在 a********r 的大作中提到】
: 1979年前来的大陆偷渡客也可以遣返了吧
| N****u
发帖数: 1700 | 6 必须滴
送他们回家养老多好啊
【在 M*******n 的大作中提到】
: 下一步就是遣返FLG和六四了
|
|
