F********r
发帖数: 878 | 1 UC Berkeley History Professor’s Open Letter Against BLM, Police Brutality
And Cultural Orthodoxy
None June 11, 2020
The following letter was allegedly written by a UC Berkeley history
professor and shared among his or her colleagues anonymously (source /
archive link):
Dear profs X, Y, Z
I am one of your colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley. I
have met you both personally but do not know you closely, and am contacting
you anonymously, with apologies. I am worried that writing this email
publicly might lead to me losing my job, and likely all future jobs in my
field.
In your recent departmental emails you mentioned our pledge to diversity
, but I am increasingly alarmed by the absence of diversity of opinion on
the topic of the recent protests and our community response to them.
In the extended links and resources you provided, I could not find a
single instance of substantial counter-argument or alternative narrative to
explain the under-representation of black individuals in academia or their
over-representation in the criminal justice system. The explanation provided
in your documentation, to the near exclusion of all others, is univariate:
the problems of the black community are caused by whites, or, when whites
are not physically present, by the infiltration of white supremacy and white
systemic racism into American brains, souls, and institutions.
Many cogent objections to this thesis have been raised by sober voices,
including from within the black community itself, such as Thomas Sowell and
Wilfred Reilly. These people are not racists or ‘Uncle Toms’. They are
intelligent scholars who reject a narrative that strips black people of
agency and systematically externalizes the problems of the black community
onto outsiders. Their view is entirely absent from the departmental and UCB-
wide communiques.
The claim that the difficulties that the black community faces are
entirely causally explained by exogenous factors in the form of white
systemic racism, white supremacy, and other forms of white discrimination
remains a problematic hypothesis that should be vigorously challenged by
historians. Instead, it is being treated as an axiomatic and actionable
truth without serious consideration of its profound flaws, or its worrying
implication of total black impotence. This hypothesis is transforming our
institution and our culture, without any space for dissent outside of a
tightly policed, narrow discourse.
A counternarrative exists. If you have time, please consider examining
some of the documents I attach at the end of this email.
Overwhelmingly, the reasoning provided by BLM and allies is either
primarily anecdotal (as in the case with the bulk of Ta-Nehisi Coates’
undeniably moving article) or it is transparently motivated. As an example
of the latter problem, consider the proportion of black incarcerated
Americans. This proportion is often used to characterize the criminal
justice system as anti-black. However, if we use the precise same
methodology, we would have to conclude that the criminal justice system is
even more anti-male than it is anti-black. Would we characterize criminal
justice as a systemically misandrist conspiracy against innocent American
men? I hope you see that this type of reasoning is flawed, and requires a
significant suspension of our rational faculties. Black people are not
incarcerated at higher rates than their involvement in violent crime would
predict. This fact has been demonstrated multiple times across multiple
jurisdictions in multiple countries. And yet, I see my department
uncritically reproducing a narrative that diminishes black agency in favor
of a white-centric explanation that appeals to the department’s apparent
desire to shoulder the ‘white man’s burden’ and to promote a narrative of
white guilt.
If we claim that the criminal justice system is white-supremacist, why
is it that Asian Americans, Indian Americans, and Nigerian Americans are
incarcerated at vastly lower rates than white Americans? This is a funny
sort of white supremacy. Even Jewish Americans are incarcerated less than
gentile whites. I think it’s fair to say that your average white
supremacist disapproves of Jews. And yet, these alleged white supremacists
incarcerate gentiles at vastly higher rates than Jews. None of this is
addressed in your literature. None of this is explained, beyond hand-waving
and ad hominems. “Those are racist dogwhistles”. “The model minority myth
is white supremacist”. “Only fascists talk about black-on-black crime”,
ad nauseam. These types of statements do not amount to counterarguments:
they are simply arbitrary offensive classifications, intended to silence and
oppress discourse. Any serious historian will recognize these for the
silencing orthodoxy tactics they are, common to suppressive regimes,
doctrines, and religions throughout time and space. They are intended to
crush real diversity and permanently exile the culture of robust criticism
from our department.
Increasingly, we are being called upon to comply and subscribe to BLM’s
problematic view of history, and the department is being presented as
unified on the matter. In particular, ethnic minorities are being
aggressively marshaled into a single position. Any apparent unity is surely
a function of the fact that dissent could almost certainly lead to expulsion
or cancellation for those of us in a precarious position, which is no small
number.
I personally don’t dare speak out against the BLM narrative, and with
this barrage of alleged unity being mass-produced by the administration,
tenured professoriat, the UC administration, corporate America, and the
media, the punishment for dissent is a clear danger at a time of widespread
economic vulnerability. I am certain that if my name were attached to this
email, I would lose my job and all future jobs, even though I believe in and
can justify every word I type.
The vast majority of violence visited on the black community is
committed by black people. There are virtually no marches for these
invisible victims, no public silences, no heartfelt letters from the UC
regents, deans, and departmental heads. The message is clear: Black lives
only matter when whites take them. Black violence is expected and insoluble,
while white violence requires explanation and demands solution. Please look
into your hearts and see how monstrously bigoted this formulation truly is.
No discussion is permitted for nonblack victims of black violence, who
proportionally outnumber black victims of nonblack violence. This is
especially bitter in the Bay Area, where Asian victimization by black
assailants has reached epidemic proportions, to the point that the SF police
chief has advised Asians to stop hanging good-luck charms on their doors,
as this attracts the attention of (overwhelmingly black) home invaders. Home
invaders like George Floyd. For this actual, lived, physically experienced
reality of violence in the USA, there are no marches, no tearful emails from
departmental heads, no support from McDonald’s and Wal-Mart. For the
History department, our silence is not a mere abrogation of our duty to shed
light on the truth: it is a rejection of it.
The claim that black intraracial violence is the product of redlining,
slavery, and other injustices is a largely historical claim. It is for
historians, therefore, to explain why Japanese internment or the massacre of
European Jewry hasn’t led to equivalent rates of dysfunction and low SES
performance among Japanese and Jewish Americans respectively. Arab Americans
have been viciously demonized since 9/11, as have Chinese Americans more
recently. However, both groups outperform white Americans on nearly all SES
indices – as do Nigerian Americans, who incidentally have black skin. It is
for historians to point out and discuss these anomalies. However, no real
discussion is possible in the current climate at our department. The
explanation is provided to us, disagreement with it is racist, and the job
of historians is to further explore additional ways in which the explanation
is additionally correct. This is a mockery of the historical profession.
Most troublingly, our department appears to have been entirely captured
by the interests of the Democratic National Convention, and the Democratic
Party more broadly. To explain what I mean, consider what happens if you
choose to donate to Black Lives Matter, an organization UCB History has
explicitly promoted in its recent mailers. All donations to the official BLM
website are immediately redirected to ActBlue Charities, an organization
primarily concerned with bankrolling election campaigns for Democrat
candidates. Donating to BLM today is to indirectly donate to Joe Biden’s
2020 campaign. This is grotesque given the fact that the American cities
with the worst rates of black-on-black violence and police-on-black violence
are overwhelmingly Democrat-run. Minneapolis itself has been entirely in
the hands of Democrats for over five decades; the ‘systemic racism’ there
was built by successive Democrat administrations.
The patronizing and condescending attitudes of Democrat leaders towards
the black community, exemplified by nearly every Biden statement on the
black race, all but guarantee a perpetual state of misery, resentment,
poverty, and the attendant grievance politics which are simultaneously
annihilating American political discourse and black lives. And yet, donating
to BLM is bankrolling the election campaigns of men like Mayor Frey, who
saw their cities devolve into violence. This is a grotesque capture of a
good-faith movement for necessary police reform, and of our department, by a
political party. Even worse, there are virtually no avenues for dissent in
academic circles. I refuse to serve the Party, and so should you. The total
alliance of major corporations involved in human exploitation with BLM
should be a warning flag to us, and yet this damning evidence goes unnoticed
, purposefully ignored, or perversely celebrated. We are the useful idiots
of the wealthiest classes, carrying water for Jeff Bezos and other actual,
real, modern-day slavers. Starbucks, an organisation using literal black
slaves in its coffee plantation suppliers, is in favor of BLM. Sony, an
organisation using cobalt mined by yet more literal black slaves, many of
whom are children, is in favor of BLM. And so, apparently, are we. The
absence of counter-narrative enables this obscenity. Fiat lux, indeed.
There also exists a large constituency of what can only be called ‘race
hustlers’: hucksters of all colors who benefit from stoking the fires of
racial conflict to secure administrative jobs, charity management positions,
academic jobs and advancement, or personal political entrepreneurship.
Given the direction our history department appears to be taking far from
any commitment to truth, we can regard ourselves as a formative training
institution for this brand of snake-oil salespeople. Their activities are
corrosive, demolishing any hope at harmonious racial coexistence in our
nation and colonizing our political and institutional life. Many of their
voices are unironically segregationist. MLK would likely be called an Uncle
Tom if he spoke on our campus today. We are training leaders who intend,
explicitly, to destroy one of the only truly successful ethnically diverse
societies in modern history. As the PRC, an ethnonationalist and
aggressively racially chauvinist national polity with null immigration and
no concept of jus solis increasingly presents itself as the global political
alternative to the US, I ask you: Is this wise? Are we really doing the
right thing?
As a final point, our university and department has made multiple
statements celebrating and eulogizing George Floyd. Floyd was a multiple
felon who once held a pregnant black woman at gunpoint. He broke into her
home with a gang of men and pointed a gun at her pregnant stomach. He
terrorized the women in his community. He sired and abandoned multiple
children, playing no part in their support or upbringing, failing one of the
most basic tests of decency for a human being. He was a drug-addict and
sometime drug-dealer, a swindler who preyed upon his honest and hard-working
neighbors.
And yet, the regents of UC and the historians of the UCB History
department are celebrating this violent criminal, elevating his name to
virtual sainthood. A man who hurt women. A man who hurt black women. With
the full collaboration of the UCB history department, corporate America,
most mainstream media outlets, and some of the wealthiest and most
privileged opinion-shaping elites of the USA, he has become a culture hero,
buried in a golden casket, his (recognized) family showered with gifts and
praise. Americans are being socially pressured into kneeling for this
violent, abusive misogynist. A generation of black men are being coerced
into identifying with George Floyd, the absolute worst specimen of our race
and species. I’m ashamed of my department. I would say that I’m ashamed of
both of you, but perhaps you agree with me, and are simply afraid, as I am,
of the backlash of speaking the truth. It’s hard to know what kneeling
means, when you have to kneel to keep your job.
It shouldn’t affect the strength of my argument above, but for the
record, I write as a person of color. My family have been personally
victimized by men like Floyd. We are aware of the condescending depredations
of the Democrat party against our race. The humiliating assumption that we
are too stupid to do STEM, that we need special help and lower requirements
to get ahead in life, is richly familiar to us. I sometimes wonder if it
wouldn’t be easier to deal with open fascists, who at least would be
straightforward in calling me a subhuman, and who are unlikely to share my
race.
The ever-present soft bigotry of low expectations and the permanent
claim that the solutions to the plight of my people rest exclusively on the
goodwill of whites rather than on our own hard work is psychologically
devastating. No other group in America is systematically demoralized in this
way by its alleged allies. A whole generation of black children are being
taught that only by begging and weeping and screaming will they get handouts
from guilt-ridden whites. No message will more surely devastate their
futures, especially if whites run out of guilt, or indeed if America runs
out of whites. If this had been done to Japanese Americans, or Jewish
Americans, or Chinese Americans, then Chinatown and Japantown would surely
be no different to the roughest parts of Baltimore and East St. Louis today.
The History department of UCB is now an integral institutional promulgator
of a destructive and denigrating fallacy about the black race.
I hope you appreciate the frustration behind this message. I do not
support BLM. I do not support the Democrat grievance agenda and the Party’s
uncontested capture of our department. I do not support the Party co-opting
my race, as Biden recently did in his disturbing interview, claiming that
voting Democrat and being black are isomorphic. I condemn the manner of
George Floyd’s death and join you in calling for greater police
accountability and police reform. However, I will not pretend that George
Floyd was anything other than a violent misogynist, a brutal man who met a
predictably brutal end.
I also want to protect the practice of history. Cleo is no grovelling
handmaiden to politicians and corporations. Like us, she is free. | m****w
发帖数: 1304 | 2 竟然看完了。看起来是位黑兄弟。希望他们系不止他一位黑哥们。可是，话都说到这份
儿上了，应该已经明白，在资本主导的社会框架里并没有真正的解决途径。说啥都没用。 | F********r
发帖数: 878 | 3 He spoke for many of us. Nobody dears to come out and show any dissent to
BLM; otherwise your job and your career will be over. Several times I think
about giving a similar speech on my retirement party. | t*****9
发帖数: 10416 | | k**u
发帖数: 10502 | 5 这种水平的文章里有很多不常用的词，用文体分析很容易确定作者吧 | F********r
发帖数: 878 | 6 I think the writing is quite typical for an English or history professor
from a good university.
【在 k**u 的大作中提到】
: 这种水平的文章里有很多不常用的词，用文体分析很容易确定作者吧
| d******y
发帖数: 2787 | 7 有媒体发表这封信吗？？
I
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: UC Berkeley History Professor’s Open Letter Against BLM, Police Brutality
: And Cultural Orthodoxy
: None June 11, 2020
: The following letter was allegedly written by a UC Berkeley history
: professor and shared among his or her colleagues anonymously (source /
: archive link):
: Dear profs X, Y, Z
: I am one of your colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley. I
: have met you both personally but do not know you closely, and am contacting
: you anonymously, with apologies. I am worried that writing this email
| V*******n
发帖数: 1 | 8 这封信显然是个狗屁党写的，基本没啥拿得出手的论点，歪曲事实，全是狐狸台的
talking points。骂BLM就是猪党以下基本不用看了。 老子也没时间一一反驳，就说一
点。
文章的逻辑有典型的稻草人逻辑缺陷。自己造个靶子然后自己反驳好像很有道理。这个
靶子就是BLM和UCB都认为黑人关押率高是白人种族主义者针对黑人的结果。首先关押率
高根本不是这次运动关心的话题。运动的主要诉求是警察对黑人执法暴力，而不是执法
本身。 至于关押率，至少BLM和UBC的领导层没有认为是白人司法大规模种族主义导致
大批无辜黑人关进监狱。这显然是胡扯。 被广泛认同的观点是白人种族主义的历史性
和系统性导致长久以来黑人社区贫穷和无法正常发展，这不止在司法，也在教育医疗就
业指导等各方面。 作者完全忽视其他因素，而是盯着犯罪，尤其是黑人对黑人和其他
族裔的犯罪。 | P******r
发帖数: 273 | 9 极右狗屁党最喜欢冒充别人造谣
【在 V*******n 的大作中提到】
: 这封信显然是个狗屁党写的，基本没啥拿得出手的论点，歪曲事实，全是狐狸台的
: talking points。骂BLM就是猪党以下基本不用看了。 老子也没时间一一反驳，就说一
: 点。
: 文章的逻辑有典型的稻草人逻辑缺陷。自己造个靶子然后自己反驳好像很有道理。这个
: 靶子就是BLM和UCB都认为黑人关押率高是白人种族主义者针对黑人的结果。首先关押率
: 高根本不是这次运动关心的话题。运动的主要诉求是警察对黑人执法暴力，而不是执法
: 本身。 至于关押率，至少BLM和UBC的领导层没有认为是白人司法大规模种族主义导致
: 大批无辜黑人关进监狱。这显然是胡扯。 被广泛认同的观点是白人种族主义的历史性
: 和系统性导致长久以来黑人社区贫穷和无法正常发展，这不止在司法，也在教育医疗就
: 业指导等各方面。 作者完全忽视其他因素，而是盯着犯罪，尤其是黑人对黑人和其他
| d******y
发帖数: 2787 | 10 洗地费5美分请拿好
★ 发自iPhone App: ChinaWeb 1.1.5
【在 V*******n 的大作中提到】
: 这封信显然是个狗屁党写的，基本没啥拿得出手的论点，歪曲事实，全是狐狸台的
: talking points。骂BLM就是猪党以下基本不用看了。 老子也没时间一一反驳，就说一
: 点。
: 文章的逻辑有典型的稻草人逻辑缺陷。自己造个靶子然后自己反驳好像很有道理。这个
: 靶子就是BLM和UCB都认为黑人关押率高是白人种族主义者针对黑人的结果。首先关押率
: 高根本不是这次运动关心的话题。运动的主要诉求是警察对黑人执法暴力，而不是执法
: 本身。 至于关押率，至少BLM和UBC的领导层没有认为是白人司法大规模种族主义导致
: 大批无辜黑人关进监狱。这显然是胡扯。 被广泛认同的观点是白人种族主义的历史性
: 和系统性导致长久以来黑人社区贫穷和无法正常发展，这不止在司法，也在教育医疗就
: 业指导等各方面。 作者完全忽视其他因素，而是盯着犯罪，尤其是黑人对黑人和其他
| | | n**e
发帖数: 1296 | 11 呵呵，傻逼楼主。
【在 P******r 的大作中提到】
: 极右狗屁党最喜欢冒充别人造谣
| T***u
发帖数: 1468 | 12 未必。我们看来不常用的词，对历史学可能很常用
: 这种水平的文章里有很多不常用的词，用文体分析很容易确定作者吧
【在 k**u 的大作中提到】
: 这种水平的文章里有很多不常用的词，用文体分析很容易确定作者吧
| V*******n
发帖数: 1 | 13 文盲不会说中文麻烦滚出中文网站。你知道洗地的意思么？
【在 d******y 的大作中提到】
: 洗地费5美分请拿好
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChinaWeb 1.1.5
| m****s
发帖数: 1 | 14 UCB的老师不会写这么“老生长谈”的文章。毫无新意，只是重复狗屁党观点。 | w******g
发帖数: 189 | 15 写得非常好。关键是有勇气写很难得。在一个没有空气的屋子里睡着了的人叫不醒，需
要有义士呐喊。可怜美国的立国之本freedom of speech也越来越窄了。现在到处都是
禁忌。再过些年恐怕就跟国内差不多了。 | u***r
发帖数: 4825 | 16 一直都想说了，看不懂你写的阴文啊
Nobody dears or dares? will be over or would be over
练习写阴文的话可以买个grammerly试试
think
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: He spoke for many of us. Nobody dears to come out and show any dissent to
: BLM; otherwise your job and your career will be over. Several times I think
: about giving a similar speech on my retirement party.
| l*******k
发帖数: 922 | 17 这封信是作者通过另外两个黑人教授发出来的。那两个教授已经证明了作者的身份。
UCB 历史系的信就是掩耳盗铃。 | l*******k
发帖数: 922 | 18 你才是在胡扯。用监狱关押率高来证明黑人受到了白人的不公平待遇是BLM最常引用的
论据之一。你个SB连你主子的文章都不好好读一读，小心下次献菊花被爆菊。
【在 V*******n 的大作中提到】
: 这封信显然是个狗屁党写的，基本没啥拿得出手的论点，歪曲事实，全是狐狸台的
: talking points。骂BLM就是猪党以下基本不用看了。 老子也没时间一一反驳，就说一
: 点。
: 文章的逻辑有典型的稻草人逻辑缺陷。自己造个靶子然后自己反驳好像很有道理。这个
: 靶子就是BLM和UCB都认为黑人关押率高是白人种族主义者针对黑人的结果。首先关押率
: 高根本不是这次运动关心的话题。运动的主要诉求是警察对黑人执法暴力，而不是执法
: 本身。 至于关押率，至少BLM和UBC的领导层没有认为是白人司法大规模种族主义导致
: 大批无辜黑人关进监狱。这显然是胡扯。 被广泛认同的观点是白人种族主义的历史性
: 和系统性导致长久以来黑人社区贫穷和无法正常发展，这不止在司法，也在教育医疗就
: 业指导等各方面。 作者完全忽视其他因素，而是盯着犯罪，尤其是黑人对黑人和其他
| P******r
发帖数: 273 | 19 Proof?
【在 l*******k 的大作中提到】
: 这封信是作者通过另外两个黑人教授发出来的。那两个教授已经证明了作者的身份。
: UCB 历史系的信就是掩耳盗铃。
| x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 20 which two african american prof? name? 轮子就造谣的本事。
【在 l*******k 的大作中提到】
: 这封信是作者通过另外两个黑人教授发出来的。那两个教授已经证明了作者的身份。
: UCB 历史系的信就是掩耳盗铃。
| | | V*******n
发帖数: 1 | 21 一码归一码。这次游行的目的就是警暴，和黑人犯罪率没有任何直接关系，你少来给狐
狸台当复读机，非常傻逼，也骗不了任何有脑子的。
黑人里有没有说黑人关押率高是白人故意把无辜黑人关押才是关键，至少这个意见绝对
不是主流，连在黑人内部也不是。 只有狐狸台不断造谣放大这个傻逼观点，属于典型
的政治宣传伎俩。
至于你的菊花，还是你自己去戳，老子没兴趣。
【在 l*******k 的大作中提到】
: 你才是在胡扯。用监狱关押率高来证明黑人受到了白人的不公平待遇是BLM最常引用的
: 论据之一。你个SB连你主子的文章都不好好读一读，小心下次献菊花被爆菊。
| r**e
发帖数: 714 | 22 这封信现在没有多少人会冷静地看完， 也只有等大家平静以后才会有人讨论。 | F********r
发帖数: 878 | 23 It was my typo to put "Nobody dears", so what? I am not writing for my
English class, so I don't need to double check. Also "would
be over" is better than "will be over". But did you really not understand
what I said?
【在 u***r 的大作中提到】
: 一直都想说了，看不懂你写的阴文啊
: Nobody dears or dares? will be over or would be over
: 练习写阴文的话可以买个grammerly试试
:
: think
| F********r
发帖数: 878 | 24 There are only three African American professors in Berkeley's history
department, and only one is a man. From the writing, I feel the author is a
man. The author wants to be anonymous, so it is possible he/she forged his
identity by pretending he was one of the professors in the department. As
he said, and you will agree, once his identity is revealed, his career would
be over.
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: which two african american prof? name? 轮子就造谣的本事。
| l*******k
发帖数: 922 | 25 http://twitter.com/wil_da_beast630/status/1271301272491171840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1271301272491171840&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Funcoverdc.com%2F2020%2F06%2F12%2Fuc-berkeley-history-professors-open-letter-against-blm-police-bru
这两个professor一个是Tom Sowell,一个是Wilfred Reilly。前者是斯坦福的，后者
Kentucky State University的。作者的文章里提到了这两人：
Many cogent objections to this thesis have been raised by sober voices,
including from within the black community itself, such as Thomas Sowell and
Wilfred Reilly. | F********r
发帖数: 878 | 26 Actually this article is being deleted from social media. Yesterday when I
searched it online, the first result indicated that it had been removed. So
I got the article from the second result, but later on the second result
also indicated it had been removed.
【在 d******y 的大作中提到】
: 有媒体发表这封信吗？？
:
: I
| F********r
发帖数: 878 | 27 Hey, not 傻逼 you. Are you happy?
【在 n**e 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵，傻逼楼主。
| F********r
发帖数: 878 | 28 Ask yourself the question, "Did I engage in the straw man?" And think
before you answer.
【在 V*******n 的大作中提到】
: 这封信显然是个狗屁党写的，基本没啥拿得出手的论点，歪曲事实，全是狐狸台的
: talking points。骂BLM就是猪党以下基本不用看了。 老子也没时间一一反驳，就说一
: 点。
: 文章的逻辑有典型的稻草人逻辑缺陷。自己造个靶子然后自己反驳好像很有道理。这个
: 靶子就是BLM和UCB都认为黑人关押率高是白人种族主义者针对黑人的结果。首先关押率
: 高根本不是这次运动关心的话题。运动的主要诉求是警察对黑人执法暴力，而不是执法
: 本身。 至于关押率，至少BLM和UBC的领导层没有认为是白人司法大规模种族主义导致
: 大批无辜黑人关进监狱。这显然是胡扯。 被广泛认同的观点是白人种族主义的历史性
: 和系统性导致长久以来黑人社区贫穷和无法正常发展，这不止在司法，也在教育医疗就
: 业指导等各方面。 作者完全忽视其他因素，而是盯着犯罪，尤其是黑人对黑人和其他
| F********r
发帖数: 878 | 29 Don't focus on my English. It is not important. Focus on the writing I
quoted. BTW, do you find pleasure finding other people's typos? I bet that
makes you feel you are better and proud, right?
【在 u***r 的大作中提到】
: 一直都想说了，看不懂你写的阴文啊
: Nobody dears or dares? will be over or would be over
: 练习写阴文的话可以买个grammerly试试
:
: think
| d******y
发帖数: 2787 | 30 你让大家投票，你个猪党饭帖子不是给历史系洗地上来说人是假教授？网站你家开的？
会不会中文你说了算？
【在 V*******n 的大作中提到】
: 文盲不会说中文麻烦滚出中文网站。你知道洗地的意思么？
| | | F********r
发帖数: 878 | 31 It does not matter if the author is a real professor. What is important is,
he voiced his dissent to political correctness and BLM, though anonymously,
that a lot of us do not dare to say.
【在 d******y 的大作中提到】
: 你让大家投票，你个猪党饭帖子不是给历史系洗地上来说人是假教授？网站你家开的？
: 会不会中文你说了算？
| s********i
发帖数: 17328 | | u***r
发帖数: 4825 | 33 我一点pleasure都没有啊
你写的阴文比一般人强多了！不过就是总觉得看得不顺啊，影响阅读效果，说句老实话
，大部分时候还好，但是有时候会读着难受，不知道什么原因
你买个Grammarly,就你这么高的水平，一个月就可以提高很快
我今天无聊，手贱，帮你在Grammerly上查了一下，大部分都是80多分的水平，真不错
了！你将来要是改改读得更通顺，不是对大家都好么
除非有歧义，我以后也不会对你的英文说什么了
that
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: Don't focus on my English. It is not important. Focus on the writing I
: quoted. BTW, do you find pleasure finding other people's typos? I bet that
: makes you feel you are better and proud, right?
|
|
