k**0
发帖数: 1 | 1 http://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1392263025323880454
Rob Lee
@RALee85
Several people have mentioned procuring the Iron Dome, but the system has
limitations, especially against a real military. A single BM-21 Grad can
launch 40 rockets in 20 seconds, a battery/battalion can launch 240 or 720
rockets in 20 seconds. No missile defenses can stop that. |
k**0
发帖数: 1 | 2 Rob Lee
@RALee85
Not to mention, missiles like the Iskander-M are designed to evade missile
defenses by maneuvering in flight. You typically need to launch multiple
interceptors for every rocket you want to counter. Even with unsophisticated
munitions, it is a numbers game that favors the offense |
k**0
发帖数: 1 | 3 Rob Lee
@RALee85
The Iron Dome makes sense for Israel, a very small country whose indirect
fires threat is mostly from slow-moving and cheap rockets, but less sense
for larger countries facing better-equipped adversaries. |
k**0
发帖数: 1 | 4 Rob Lee
@RALee85
An additional factor: offense is currently cheaper than defense when it
comes to indirect fire/UAVs vs air defenses. |
k**0
发帖数: 1 | 5 Shashank Joshi
@shashj
On the saturation of Iron Dome. "The cost of interception is high. The cost
of the interceptor missile is about $40,000-50,000. Furthermore, in some
cases, two interceptor missiles are fired at one target, which further
raises the cost of interception." https://inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/
sites/2/systemfiles/MASA5-1Eng4_Shapir.pdf |
k**0
发帖数: 1 | 6 Shashank Joshi
@shashj
"The system has a “saturation point.” It is capable of engaging a certain
(unpublished) number of targets at the same time, and no more. Additional
rockets fired in a crowded salvo could succeed in breaching defenses and
cause damage" https://inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/systemfiles/
MASA5-1Eng4_Shapir.pdf… |
r******t
发帖数: 8967 | |
p*****h
发帖数: 1369 | 8 这种多线程武器很容易猜到肯定有饱和度，一个雷达能同时跟踪几十个目标顶天了，还
靠的projectile摧毁目标，费时的很，如果是激光瞬秒还差不多 |
s*********2
发帖数: 1572 | 9 台巴子不整天吹嘘自己台积电吗，美帝和土鳖的逆差最后多少让巴子赚走了，年年上千
亿美刀，这破系统就是要它交保护费。 |
b*****2
发帖数: 11103 | |
