U***n
发帖数: 1204 | 1 大致是，nation's top eight spenders are from the Big Ten and SEC.
http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/06/29/big-spending-ohio-state-could-change-
nickname-to-bucks-eyes/ |
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | |
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 3 the interpretation of data is wrong. the expense includes all sports,
not just football.
【在 U***n 的大作中提到】
: 大致是，nation's top eight spenders are from the Big Ten and SEC.
: http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/06/29/big-spending-ohio-state-could-change-
: nickname-to-bucks-eyes/
|
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | 4 football第一应该是texas吧？
OSU有最多varsity program，总量大也正常。不过你们football肯定投入不少倒是真的。
注意：排名如浮云。 |
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 5 this ranking probably changes every year. and if you build a new
stadium your # goes up. etc etc.
的。
【在 Y******e 的大作中提到】
: football第一应该是texas吧？
: OSU有最多varsity program，总量大也正常。不过你们football肯定投入不少倒是真的。
: 注意：排名如浮云。
|
i******a
发帖数: 121 | 6 好像是说football的。
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: the interpretation of data is wrong. the expense includes all sports,
: not just football.
|
i******a
发帖数: 121 | 7 A look at the 66 automatic qualifying BCS schools and their football
expenses for the 2008-09 school year by conference, with some analysis on
each league.
SEC
School
Expenses (in millions)
1. Auburn
$28.80
2. Alabama
$26.44
3. Tennessee
$22.96
4. Florida
$22.86
5. Louisiana State
$22.74
6. South Carolina
$19.88
7. Georgia
$19.83
8. Arkansas
$18.30
9. Vanderbilt
$14.18
10. Kentucky
$13.24
11. Mississippi State
$12.85
12. Mississippi
$9.51
My two cents: Despite having the nation's third-lowest football budget, Ole
Miss has more than held its own the past two seasons in the nation's
toughest conference with consecutive nine-win seasons and two Cotton Bowl
championships. Florida surprisingly – surprising to me, anyway – has only
the league's fourth-highest football budget, but still has won two of the
past four BCS titles. Another shocker: Vanderbilt has a bigger budget than
Kentucky, Mississippi State and Ole Miss. But it's still not even half of
Auburn's SEC-high budget. Only Ohio State spent more than Auburn, but that
hasn't translated into much recent success for the Tigers. Auburn hasn't
been to a BCS bowl since 2004. Tennessee is only outspent by Alabama and
Auburn in the SEC and turns to its third head coach in as many seasons this
fall. Has it really been 11 years since the Vols' last BCS bowl? SEC's best
bang for the buck: Florida. Most financially irresponsible: Tennessee.
Big Ten
School
Expenses (in millions)
1. Ohio State
$32.30
2. Iowa
$26.90
3. Wisconsin
$22.71
4. Penn State
$19.13
5. Michigan
$18.03
6. Michigan State
$15.86
7. Northwestern
$15.71
8. Purdue
$12.66
9. Indiana
$11.84
10. Illinois
$10.49
11. Minnesota
$9.25
My two cents: Looking for a reason Minnesota has only one victory against
Ohio State since 1981? How about the fact Ohio State's football budget is 3&
frac12; times greater than Minnesota's. There's certainly nothing golden
about the Gophers' Big Ten worst budget. Not so coincidentally, their last
winning league record came in 2003. But, hey, it could be worse: they could
be Indiana. The Hoosiers haven't had a winning league record since 1993.
Penn State's budget ranks as only the league's fourth-highest, but the
Nittany Lions' 29 league wins since 2005 are second only to Ohio State. Iowa
's budget ranks third nationally, but the Hawkeyes haven't won the league
title since a co-championship with Michigan in 2004. Big Ten's best bang for
the buck: Penn State. Most financially irresponsible: Iowa.
Big 12
School
Expenses (in millions)
1. Texas
$22.56
2. Oklahoma
$20.79
3. Nebraska
$17.93
4. Texas A&M
$16.06
5. Missouri
$15.68
6. Iowa State
$14.40
7. Kansas State
$14.01
8. Texas Tech
$13.96
9. Kansas
$13.33
10. Colorado
$13.04
11. Oklahoma State
$12.49
12. Baylor
$10.90
My two cents: Texas has the Big 12's biggest budget, but has only two league
titles in the past five seasons. Oklahoma has won the other three. Texas
Tech, with the only the league's eighth-biggest budget, has compiled 26
league victories since 2005. Only Texas and Oklahoma have more. Texas A&M's
budget is only topped by UT, OU and Nebraska, but the results on the field
haven't paid off for the Aggies. A&M has only two winning seasons since 2005
and hasn't won a bowl game since 2001. Oklahoma State may have the biggest
booster in college athletics, but T. Boone Pickens' alma mater still ranks
above only lowly Baylor for the league's smallest football budget. Big 12's
best bang for the buck: Texas Tech. Most financially irresponsible: Iowa
State. |
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 8 ok i stand corrected. but even so, it's still a very misleading stat
because a lot of budget could go to stadium expansions that won't
pay immediate dividends. let's say it takes 3 years to 5 years
to attract better recruits and show results on the field - then
you should compare on-field performance with budgets 3-5 years ago
but overall, the more you spend the better your program is. that's
common sense.
【在 i******a 的大作中提到】
: A look at the 66 automatic qualifying BCS schools and their football
: expenses for the 2008-09 school year by conference, with some analysis on
: each league.
: SEC
: School
: Expenses (in millions)
: 1. Auburn
: $28.80
: 2. Alabama
: $26.44
|
i******a
发帖数: 121 | 9 I think spending more is a good thing. it helps the economy at some point.
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: ok i stand corrected. but even so, it's still a very misleading stat
: because a lot of budget could go to stadium expansions that won't
: pay immediate dividends. let's say it takes 3 years to 5 years
: to attract better recruits and show results on the field - then
: you should compare on-field performance with budgets 3-5 years ago
: but overall, the more you spend the better your program is. that's
: common sense.
|
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | 10 不要搞得像伯克里那样要cut program就好，经济不好，还是控制好budget为妙。 |
|
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 11 hehe. the better much stat actually should be how much schools are
paying their recruits under the table. that's a much more direct and
faster way of improving performance.
another reason why this analysis is very flawed. haha
【在 i******a 的大作中提到】
: I think spending more is a good thing. it helps the economy at some point.
|
Y******e
发帖数: 20256 | 12 你来说说你们花了多少钱，哈哈。
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: hehe. the better much stat actually should be how much schools are
: paying their recruits under the table. that's a much more direct and
: faster way of improving performance.
: another reason why this analysis is very flawed. haha
|
i******a
发帖数: 121 | 13 应该不会，毕竟football一个是赚钱，另一个是球迷多，捐的多
【在 Y******e 的大作中提到】
: 不要搞得像伯克里那样要cut program就好，经济不好，还是控制好budget为妙。
|
d******d
发帖数: 1037 | 14 I have the same impression that UT ranks No. 1 in football spending. OSU is
2nd.
的。
【在 Y******e 的大作中提到】
: football第一应该是texas吧？
: OSU有最多varsity program，总量大也正常。不过你们football肯定投入不少倒是真的。
: 注意：排名如浮云。
|
z*****a
发帖数: 3809 | 15 You guys are confusing revenue with spending. UT and OSU are 1st and 2nd
in revenue generated from football.
is
【在 d******d 的大作中提到】
: I have the same impression that UT ranks No. 1 in football spending. OSU is
: 2nd.
:
: 的。
|
