l*********u
发帖数: 1660 | 1 没人达对啊。公布答案了。
The following could happen this year:
Here is the BCS ranking before the championship week:
1. Wisconsin (12-0)
2. Alabama (11-1 lost only game to No.1 LSU on Nov. 5th)
3. Arkansas (11-1 won the last game over No. 1 LSU)
4. LSU (11-1 lost the last game to No.4 Arkansas)
5. Oklahoma (11-1 lost to either Texas A&M or OSU)
6. Oklahoma State (11-1 lost to either Kansas State or Oklahoma)
7. Boise State (12-0)
8. Oregon (11-1)
9. Clemson (11-1 lost last game against USCe)
10. Notre Dame (10-2 won the last game over 1 loss No.9 Stanford)
Then in the championship week:
SEC Championship Game No. 16 Georgia upset No.2 Alabama
Big 10 Championship Game No.15 Michigan State shocked NO. 1 Wisconsin in overtime
Oregon lost the Pac-12 Championship Game
Clemson lost the ACC Championship Game
Here is the final BCS ranking before the bowl game:
1. Arkansas
2. LSU
3. Wisconsin (only dropped two spots in BCS ranking because wisconsin beat Michigan State in regular season and only lost to them overtime in the Big 10 Championship Game)
4. Oklahoma
5. Boise State
6. Oklahoma State
7. Alabama
8. Notre Dame
Now you will find there are totally 11 teams earned automatic BCS berths
1. No.1 Arkansas
2. No.2 LSU
3-8. 6 BCS conference champion (One conference could have 3 teams in BCS bowl only if 2 teams in the NCG are not the conference champion)
9. No.3 Wisconsin (The third-ranked team will receive an automatic berth if it has not already received one)
10. Notre Dame (independent Notre Dame receives an automatic berth if it finishes in the top eight.)
11. Boise State (The highest-ranked champion of a non-BCS conference will receive an automatic berth if: It is ranked in the top 12.)
下面是BCS selection rule:
certain teams are given automatic berths depending on their BCS ranking and conference, as follows:
The top two teams are given automatic berths in the BCS National Championship Game.
The champion of a BCS conference (ACC, Big 12, Big East, Big Ten, Pac-12, and SEC) is guaranteed an automatic BCS bowl bid.
Due to the "Notre Dame rule", independent Notre Dame receives an automatic berth if it finishes in the top eight.
The highest-ranked champion of a non-BCS conference will receive an automatic berth if:
It is ranked in the top 12, or
Ranked in the top 16 and higher than at least one BCS conference champion.
No more than one such team from Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, and the Western Athletic Conference shall earn an automatic berth in any year. However, a second team from one of these conferences may qualify as a BCS at-large.
No more than two teams from any one conference may receive berths in BCS games unless two non-champions from a BCS conference finish as the top two teams in the final BCS standings, in which case they will meet in the National Title Game while their conference champion will play in their conference's BCS bowl game.
The third-ranked team will receive an automatic berth if it has not already received one, if it is a member of a BCS conference, and provided that its conference has not already earned two automatic berths, if there is room.
If the third-ranked team did not require a berth using the previous provision, then the fourth-ranked team will receive an automatic berth if it has not already received one, if it is a member of a BCS conference, and provided that its conference has not already earned two automatic berths, if there is room.
答案发给板斧bsmajia了，谁回答的和我最接近，或者比我更好，就发5个野猪饭团
给版三palm也发了一份，看看我的逻辑没有啥漏洞吗？ |
x*******1
发帖数: 28835 | 2 too easy.
lsu, bama, cinci, wisc, stanford, oregon, ou, osu, bsu, clemson, |
g*********d
发帖数: 8125 | 3 count as 10
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: too easy.
: lsu, bama, cinci, wisc, stanford, oregon, ou, osu, bsu, clemson,
|
p**m
发帖数: 11571 | 4 不识数
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: too easy.
: lsu, bama, cinci, wisc, stanford, oregon, ou, osu, bsu, clemson,
|
l*********u
发帖数: 1660 | 5 没这么简单，我想了半天才想出来。呵呵
【在 x*******1 的大作中提到】
: too easy.
: lsu, bama, cinci, wisc, stanford, oregon, ou, osu, bsu, clemson,
|
f**b
发帖数: 3043 | |
s********h
发帖数: 85 | |
N*********6
发帖数: 4372 | 8 规则肯定不会自动选择11只队伍的，只有Guarantee有限的几只，然后剩下的只是
有了at large的可能性
【在 l*********u 的大作中提到】
: 没这么简单，我想了半天才想出来。呵呵
|
B****2
发帖数: 8892 | 9 ND如果剩下的比赛都赢了，还有希望。可能排在许多一负的队之前。 |
o****3
发帖数: 5100 | 10 Six automatic bid.
four one-loss teams from sec, big12, b1g, pac12.
one non-aq bsu
one independend nd.
This will be 12 teams.
Based on theory, there will be more than 14 teams. |
|
|
N*********6
发帖数: 4372 | 11 楼主是不是弄混了自动进入BCS Bowl和很大可能进入的区别?
就像你分析的，automatic 进入的只有6个冠军+one-non-aq
+排名靠前的nd，剩下的老二们都不是自动进入的，所以不存在
多于10只球队的问题，至于怎么选at large就不是你我球迷
关心的事情了，各大bowl的官员们自有妙计
【在 o****3 的大作中提到】
: Six automatic bid.
: four one-loss teams from sec, big12, b1g, pac12.
: one non-aq bsu
: one independend nd.
: This will be 12 teams.
: Based on theory, there will be more than 14 teams.
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 12 key在于，如果big east的top team ranked outside of no. 16, 其他小联盟的球队只
要排在前16就能自动入围。
【在 N*********6 的大作中提到】
: 楼主是不是弄混了自动进入BCS Bowl和很大可能进入的区别?
: 就像你分析的，automatic 进入的只有6个冠军+one-non-aq
: +排名靠前的nd，剩下的老二们都不是自动进入的，所以不存在
: 多于10只球队的问题，至于怎么选at large就不是你我球迷
: 关心的事情了，各大bowl的官员们自有妙计
|
N*********6
发帖数: 4372 | 13 我明白这个啊，top team in big east always will be guaranteed
a spot. Non-AQ的管你多少只排在前16，管你多少比big east champ
排名靠前，只能有一个AUTOMATIC berth啊
"No more than one such team from Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference
, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, and the Western
Athletic Conference shall earn an automatic berth in any year. (Note: a
second team may be eligible for at-large eligibility as noted below.)"
这个不会产生任何的问题啊，先皇的意思是？
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: key在于，如果big east的top team ranked outside of no. 16, 其他小联盟的球队只
: 要排在前16就能自动入围。
|
B******m
发帖数: 2643 | 14 那也最多只有一个garantee，最大的可能就是， top 2不是6大豪门冠军，但是是6大豪
门的球队，+一个小联盟，+ND
这样一共10个garantee spots，就不用选任何at large了。
【在 b**j 的大作中提到】
: key在于，如果big east的top team ranked outside of no. 16, 其他小联盟的球队只
: 要排在前16就能自动入围。
|
b*****a
发帖数: 14583 | |
N*********6
发帖数: 4372 | 16 对，规则的设计就是保证永远不会出现>10个AUTOMATIC berth
多出来的都是at large的，那些at large也都有各自的规则来排定
座次，不会搞乱
【在 B******m 的大作中提到】
: 那也最多只有一个garantee，最大的可能就是， top 2不是6大豪门冠军，但是是6大豪
: 门的球队，+一个小联盟，+ND
: 这样一共10个garantee spots，就不用选任何at large了。
|
h*****s
发帖数: 3289 | 17 有优先权的
跟武帝沙漠王讨论过
bcs 3th都没有automatic bid.... |
t***a
发帖数: 7982 | 18 不可能那么多自动吧，撑死了6个aq+1non-aq，+2 NCG ，也就9个 |
h*****s
发帖数: 3289 | 19 独立大队ND只要top8 也是...
【在 t***a 的大作中提到】
: 不可能那么多自动吧，撑死了6个aq+1non-aq，+2 NCG ，也就9个
|
b**j
发帖数: 20742 | 20 啊，我错了。我以为只要高于big east都能进，不知道只保证一个。
Conference
【在 N*********6 的大作中提到】
: 我明白这个啊，top team in big east always will be guaranteed
: a spot. Non-AQ的管你多少只排在前16，管你多少比big east champ
: 排名靠前，只能有一个AUTOMATIC berth啊
: "No more than one such team from Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference
: , the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, and the Western
: Athletic Conference shall earn an automatic berth in any year. (Note: a
: second team may be eligible for at-large eligibility as noted below.)"
: 这个不会产生任何的问题啊，先皇的意思是？
|
|
|
l*********u
发帖数: 1660 | |
e*********6
发帖数: 3453 | 22 大黄狗可能去打bama呢，他家已经输给我鸡了！SEC的冠军赛是我鸡打bama，并且这几
个队伍里边怎么没有我鸡啊！ |
h*****s
发帖数: 3289 | 23 resource
下面是我看过的 (BCS主业)
5. If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1
through 4, and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic
berth for its champion is ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Standings, that team
will become an automatic qualifier, provided that no at-large team from the
same conference qualifies for the national championship game.
http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=4819597
No.3并不是自然auto...需要前面坑没填满才auto 也就是比at-large领先一个身位而已
.. |
h*****s
发帖数: 3289 | 24 The third-ranked team will receive an automatic berth if it has not
already received one, if it is a member of a BCS conference, and provided
that its conference has not already earned two automatic berths, if there
is room
...........................if there is room.
这种情况老三就是去不了.....被催的老三...
而且就算前面坑没有填满 假如同conference已有俩支队伍auto 连at-large也不qualified 最悲
剧的老三..... |
l*********u
发帖数: 1660 | 25 谁叫你鸡的癞贴膜挂了啊
【在 e*********6 的大作中提到】
: 大黄狗可能去打bama呢，他家已经输给我鸡了！SEC的冠军赛是我鸡打bama，并且这几
: 个队伍里边怎么没有我鸡啊！
|
l*********u
发帖数: 1660 | 26 靠，厉害。果然有漏洞
qualified 最悲
【在 h*****s 的大作中提到】
: The third-ranked team will receive an automatic berth if it has not
: already received one, if it is a member of a BCS conference, and provided
: that its conference has not already earned two automatic berths, if there
: is room
: ...........................if there is room.
: 这种情况老三就是去不了.....被催的老三...
: 而且就算前面坑没有填满 假如同conference已有俩支队伍auto 连at-large也不qualified 最悲
: 剧的老三.....
|
W********s
发帖数: 2256 | 27 这个问题原来是讨论过，3rd & 4th 的保障名额是有前提的，就是还未满额。我不读楼
主的长文，就知道一定是这点搞错了。
某年Kansas State排在第三或是第四，却没弄到at large，之后规则就改成保证
3rd & 4th的位置。
【在 h*****s 的大作中提到】
: 有优先权的
: 跟武帝沙漠王讨论过
: bcs 3th都没有automatic bid....
|
m******g
发帖数: 17798 | 28 wisc will stay in top 2
and no 3 sec teams can be in the bcs bowl games
【在 l*********u 的大作中提到】
: 没人达对啊。公布答案了。
: The following could happen this year:
: Here is the BCS ranking before the championship week:
: 1. Wisconsin (12-0)
: 2. Alabama (11-1 lost only game to No.1 LSU on Nov. 5th)
: 3. Arkansas (11-1 won the last game over No. 1 LSU)
: 4. LSU (11-1 lost the last game to No.4 Arkansas)
: 5. Oklahoma (11-1 lost to either Texas A&M or OSU)
: 6. Oklahoma State (11-1 lost to either Kansas State or Oklahoma)
: 7. Boise State (12-0)
|
k*******i
发帖数: 383 | 29 big east的AQ是和ND分享的。如果ND进了，big east的最高排名很靠后的话就没有他们
的份了。
【在 l*********u 的大作中提到】
: 没人达对啊。公布答案了。
: The following could happen this year:
: Here is the BCS ranking before the championship week:
: 1. Wisconsin (12-0)
: 2. Alabama (11-1 lost only game to No.1 LSU on Nov. 5th)
: 3. Arkansas (11-1 won the last game over No. 1 LSU)
: 4. LSU (11-1 lost the last game to No.4 Arkansas)
: 5. Oklahoma (11-1 lost to either Texas A&M or OSU)
: 6. Oklahoma State (11-1 lost to either Kansas State or Oklahoma)
: 7. Boise State (12-0)
|
d*****1
发帖数: 1837 | 30 扯淡
共享的是其他的bowls
【在 k*******i 的大作中提到】
: big east的AQ是和ND分享的。如果ND进了，big east的最高排名很靠后的话就没有他们
: 的份了。
|
