d*b
发帖数: 21830 | 1 试了下，打开speedtest.net, download 4.5M, upload 1.2M,基本上是一般cable的水
平了。 |
n******7
发帖数: 5678 | |
d**k
发帖数: 1223 | 3 俺这儿evo月费70， 有点儿贵。iphone的话55就差不多了，不要message的话，就是那
个2G的data太恶心了。 |
G*****y
发帖数: 236 | 4 EVO is 4G, of course will cost more than a fruit. |
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 5 have fun with a 65K color display.
【在 G*****y 的大作中提到】
: EVO is 4G, of course will cost more than a fruit.
|
P****a
发帖数: 864 | 6 3g的iphone是多少的
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: have fun with a 65K color display.
|
g**e
发帖数: 6127 | 7 have fun with your 2G/month data lol
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: have fun with a 65K color display.
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 8 Fortunately I can keep my unlimited data plan LOL
Even if I can't, just if, which is not happening, for the past year I have
only one month that I used 2.5GB, others within 2GB.
【在 g**e 的大作中提到】
: have fun with your 2G/month data lol
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 9 iPhone 4 = 960x480 IPS millions of colors wide viewable angle.
【在 P****a 的大作中提到】
: 3g的iphone是多少的
|
g**e
发帖数: 6127 | 10 原来我惹到了果轮板斧，失敬失敬
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: Fortunately I can keep my unlimited data plan LOL
: Even if I can't, just if, which is not happening, for the past year I have
: only one month that I used 2.5GB, others within 2GB.
|
|
|
g**e
发帖数: 6127 | 11 你的眼睛分辨的出这么多颜色吗？没人说evo 65K color是优点
有4G吗，有8M摄像头吗，有HDMI output吗
这么比有意思吗
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: iPhone 4 = 960x480 IPS millions of colors wide viewable angle.
|
P****a
发帖数: 864 | 12 我就这个意思，才问的3g，他自作聪明回答4g。。。我就想知道evo比我现在用的3g
iphone咋样
【在 g**e 的大作中提到】
: 你的眼睛分辨的出这么多颜色吗？没人说evo 65K color是优点
: 有4G吗，有8M摄像头吗，有HDMI output吗
: 这么比有意思吗
|
g**e
发帖数: 6127 | 13 是嘛，我说ATT限制2G/mo的流量，他就说噢，我的是unlimited，而且我的流量从来没
超过2G。谁管你一个月超没超过2G啊
【在 P****a 的大作中提到】
: 我就这个意思，才问的3g，他自作聪明回答4g。。。我就想知道evo比我现在用的3g
: iphone咋样
|
a***y
发帖数: 19743 | 14 since first gen it has been millions of color.
EVO 4G is released close to iPhone 4, so they should be compared instead of
earlier version. I wouldn't compare iPhone 4 to say TP2.
【在 P****a 的大作中提到】
: 我就这个意思，才问的3g，他自作聪明回答4g。。。我就想知道evo比我现在用的3g
: iphone咋样
|
k****f
发帖数: 3794 | 15 wiki的iphone里面说了，iphone是18bit的，
不知道是指哪代的，
of
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: since first gen it has been millions of color.
: EVO 4G is released close to iPhone 4, so they should be compared instead of
: earlier version. I wouldn't compare iPhone 4 to say TP2.
|
S***r
发帖数: 12443 | 16 3.5 inch的屏幕那么高的分辨率没什么实际意义 |
w*****g
发帖数: 16352 | 17 背面设计的不好, 大大的圆圆的红红的摄像头好象屁眼.
【在 d*b 的大作中提到】
: 试了下，打开speedtest.net, download 4.5M, upload 1.2M,基本上是一般cable的水
: 平了。
|
P****a
发帖数: 864 | 18 赞屁眼
【在 w*****g 的大作中提到】
: 背面设计的不好, 大大的圆圆的红红的摄像头好象屁眼.
|
w****y
发帖数: 2501 | |
l*****e
发帖数: 16384 | 20 iphone终于变得阳刚那么一点了
电池时间很让人惊讶，以ipad的实际来看，iphone的电池应该跟标称的差不了太多。
剩下的都没啥意思，超高分辨率，ips屏幕啥的，发条短信，左右两边的人看得都那么
清楚，不好！ |
|
|
n*w
发帖数: 3393 | 21 显示模块支持多少bit颜色？如果不够高，ips能支持再高也没意义。 |
G*****y
发帖数: 236 | 22 A fly is indeed a fly no matter how many million color it has.
of
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: since first gen it has been millions of color.
: EVO 4G is released close to iPhone 4, so they should be compared instead of
: earlier version. I wouldn't compare iPhone 4 to say TP2.
|
G*****y
发帖数: 236 | 23 Goodluck with the tiny screen, if you can recongnize even one thousand color
on your fubar fruit
【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: iPhone 4 = 960x480 IPS millions of colors wide viewable angle.
|
s*******8
发帖数: 12734 | 24 对你真的好失望。
xx比xx强，至少2个都有指标比较吧。
although there is no easy way to test download and upload speed, you also
should know the data from speedtest is only for your reference instead of
the actual speed.
【在 d*b 的大作中提到】
: 试了下，打开speedtest.net, download 4.5M, upload 1.2M,基本上是一般cable的水
: 平了。
|
N**D
发帖数: 10322 | 25 Nokia在米国很尴尬，最好的网络是cdma,偏偏it的手机都是gsm的，摊个ATT这个crap
【在 w****y 的大作中提到】
: 别忘了N8
|
N**D
发帖数: 10322 | 26 明显屏幕大更有优势， 4.3明显好于3.5, 果轮直接忽略屏幕大小，搞分辨率
【在 S***r 的大作中提到】
: 3.5 inch的屏幕那么高的分辨率没什么实际意义
|
N**D
发帖数: 10322 | 27 ref 啥啊，有本事贴一个iphone的
【在 s*******8 的大作中提到】
: 对你真的好失望。
: xx比xx强，至少2个都有指标比较吧。
: although there is no easy way to test download and upload speed, you also
: should know the data from speedtest is only for your reference instead of
: the actual speed.
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 28 too big fo pocket
【在 N**D 的大作中提到】
: 明显屏幕大更有优势， 4.3明显好于3.5, 果轮直接忽略屏幕大小，搞分辨率
|
s*******8
发帖数: 12734 | 29 要用过才行啊。specification说明不了什么的。
【在 N**D 的大作中提到】
: ref 啥啊，有本事贴一个iphone的
|
p*****x
发帖数: 80 | 30 evo 的速度和电池寿命和iphone比怎样?
听说evo的屏幕比iphone稍大一些是么? |
|
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 31 速度等待测评
电池寿命是EVO目前各大测评最诟病的一点了。
EVO屏幕大，但是体积大，厚，重，分辨率也不如iPhone
【在 p*****x 的大作中提到】
: evo 的速度和电池寿命和iphone比怎样?
: 听说evo的屏幕比iphone稍大一些是么?
|
e***y
发帖数: 4472 | 32 4.3 vs. 3.5, 面积是1.5倍
800 x 480 vs. 960 x 640, 分辨率是62.5%, 不知如此高的像素密度有什么应用
4.8 x 2.6 x 0.5 inches 6 oz vs. 4.5 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches 4.8 oz 体积和重量差
距貌似没那么大
iphone4的屏幕面积占面板比例小了点, 上下空间较大, 如果充分利用做到4"屏, 就比
较均衡了, 高像素也更有意义
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: 速度等待测评
: 电池寿命是EVO目前各大测评最诟病的一点了。
: EVO屏幕大，但是体积大，厚，重，分辨率也不如iPhone
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 33 300+ dpi = print quality
【在 e***y 的大作中提到】
: 4.3 vs. 3.5, 面积是1.5倍
: 800 x 480 vs. 960 x 640, 分辨率是62.5%, 不知如此高的像素密度有什么应用
: 4.8 x 2.6 x 0.5 inches 6 oz vs. 4.5 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches 4.8 oz 体积和重量差
: 距貌似没那么大
: iphone4的屏幕面积占面板比例小了点, 上下空间较大, 如果充分利用做到4"屏, 就比
: 较均衡了, 高像素也更有意义
|
r****d
发帖数: 375 | 34 If you comparing speed, then I can tell you 4G is way faster than 3G. Most
of the current speed test tool such as speedtest.net one, has not been
designed to take advantage of the 4G speed (more technically, I think they
are using one TCP connection rather multiple TCP connections. If you use
ppstream or pplive, you will understand what I mean). So they get mediocre
results. To test the extreme you can get (of course depending on your
location to the closet BS and its load), you can use the teth
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: 速度等待测评
: 电池寿命是EVO目前各大测评最诟病的一点了。
: EVO屏幕大，但是体积大，厚，重，分辨率也不如iPhone
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 35 really?
are
【在 r****d 的大作中提到】
: If you comparing speed, then I can tell you 4G is way faster than 3G. Most
: of the current speed test tool such as speedtest.net one, has not been
: designed to take advantage of the 4G speed (more technically, I think they
: are using one TCP connection rather multiple TCP connections. If you use
: ppstream or pplive, you will understand what I mean). So they get mediocre
: results. To test the extreme you can get (of course depending on your
: location to the closet BS and its load), you can use the teth
|
y****d
发帖数: 396 | 36 不错的分析，严重同意。
【在 e***y 的大作中提到】
: 4.3 vs. 3.5, 面积是1.5倍
: 800 x 480 vs. 960 x 640, 分辨率是62.5%, 不知如此高的像素密度有什么应用
: 4.8 x 2.6 x 0.5 inches 6 oz vs. 4.5 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches 4.8 oz 体积和重量差
: 距貌似没那么大
: iphone4的屏幕面积占面板比例小了点, 上下空间较大, 如果充分利用做到4"屏, 就比
: 较均衡了, 高像素也更有意义
|
r****d
发帖数: 375 | 37 no kidding!
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: really?
:
: are
|
f*******5
发帖数: 10321 | 38 55的计划基本就别怎么用web了。
【在 d**k 的大作中提到】
: 俺这儿evo月费70， 有点儿贵。iphone的话55就差不多了，不要message的话，就是那
: 个2G的data太恶心了。
|
s******a
发帖数: 527 | 39 说实话，本来我看到evo很是动心了一下，然后一看sprint的coverage map，就不再想
了……
are
【在 r****d 的大作中提到】
: If you comparing speed, then I can tell you 4G is way faster than 3G. Most
: of the current speed test tool such as speedtest.net one, has not been
: designed to take advantage of the 4G speed (more technically, I think they
: are using one TCP connection rather multiple TCP connections. If you use
: ppstream or pplive, you will understand what I mean). So they get mediocre
: results. To test the extreme you can get (of course depending on your
: location to the closet BS and its load), you can use the teth
|
d****t
发帖数: 1284 | 40 4.3/3.5 = 1.228571 = 1.5???
差
【在 e***y 的大作中提到】
: 4.3 vs. 3.5, 面积是1.5倍
: 800 x 480 vs. 960 x 640, 分辨率是62.5%, 不知如此高的像素密度有什么应用
: 4.8 x 2.6 x 0.5 inches 6 oz vs. 4.5 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches 4.8 oz 体积和重量差
: 距貌似没那么大
: iphone4的屏幕面积占面板比例小了点, 上下空间较大, 如果充分利用做到4"屏, 就比
: 较均衡了, 高像素也更有意义
|
|
|
r****d
发帖数: 375 | 41 I agree that the 4G coverage is still small. For those of guys who can
take advantage of 4G, that is really good. But for ppl who don't have
access to 4G, 3G from Sprint is not bad at all, way much better than ATT.
【在 s******a 的大作中提到】
: 说实话，本来我看到evo很是动心了一下，然后一看sprint的coverage map，就不再想
: 了……
:
: are
|
T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 42 aglee
ATT.
【在 r****d 的大作中提到】
: I agree that the 4G coverage is still small. For those of guys who can
: take advantage of 4G, that is really good. But for ppl who don't have
: access to 4G, 3G from Sprint is not bad at all, way much better than ATT.
|
M*****n
发帖数: 979 | 43 (4.3/3.5)^2=1.5
【在 d****t 的大作中提到】
: 4.3/3.5 = 1.228571 = 1.5???
:
: 差
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 44 some review found ATT 3G faster on average across the nation.
【在 r****d 的大作中提到】
: I agree that the 4G coverage is still small. For those of guys who can
: take advantage of 4G, that is really good. But for ppl who don't have
: access to 4G, 3G from Sprint is not bad at all, way much better than ATT.
|
d****t
发帖数: 1284 | 45
4.3对角线的话大概是2.2in x 3.7in
3.5对角线的话大概是2in x 3in
2.2*3.7 = 8.14
2*3 = 6
8.14/6 = 1.356
数学牛人帮忙看看，我算错了？
【在 M*****n 的大作中提到】
: (4.3/3.5)^2=1.5
|
D*******a
发帖数: 3688 | 46 sprint太贪心了,平白无故要多收$10。相当于两年下来$240.
【在 r****d 的大作中提到】
: I agree that the 4G coverage is still small. For those of guys who can
: take advantage of 4G, that is really good. But for ppl who don't have
: access to 4G, 3G from Sprint is not bad at all, way much better than ATT.
|
e***y
发帖数: 4472 | 47 本来对角线平方的算法是近似, 假设长宽比差不多, 肯定有误差
不过你这个, 2*3的话对角线是3.6了
【在 d****t 的大作中提到】
:
: 4.3对角线的话大概是2.2in x 3.7in
: 3.5对角线的话大概是2in x 3in
: 2.2*3.7 = 8.14
: 2*3 = 6
: 8.14/6 = 1.356
: 数学牛人帮忙看看，我算错了？
|
k****f
发帖数: 3794 | 48 iphone对角线3.5，比例是2：3
面积就是3.5*3.5/(2*2+3*3)*2*3=5.65
evo对角线是4.3，比例假定是3:5 (因为分辨率是480x800)
面积是4.3*4.3/(3*3+5*5)*3*5=8.15
最终的面积比是 1.44
你高估了iphone lcd面积
【在 d****t 的大作中提到】
:
: 4.3对角线的话大概是2.2in x 3.7in
: 3.5对角线的话大概是2in x 3in
: 2.2*3.7 = 8.14
: 2*3 = 6
: 8.14/6 = 1.356
: 数学牛人帮忙看看，我算错了？
|
d****t
发帖数: 1284 | 49 多谢。
【在 k****f 的大作中提到】
: iphone对角线3.5，比例是2：3
: 面积就是3.5*3.5/(2*2+3*3)*2*3=5.65
: evo对角线是4.3，比例假定是3:5 (因为分辨率是480x800)
: 面积是4.3*4.3/(3*3+5*5)*3*5=8.15
: 最终的面积比是 1.44
: 你高估了iphone lcd面积
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 50 second this, i compared the 3g coverage map of sprint, att before.
I agree that the 4G coverage is still small. For those of guys who can
take advantage of 4G, that is really good. But for ppl who don't have
access to 4G, 3G from Sprint is not bad at all, way much better than ATT.
【在 r****d 的大作中提到】
: I agree that the 4G coverage is still small. For those of guys who can
: take advantage of 4G, that is really good. But for ppl who don't have
: access to 4G, 3G from Sprint is not bad at all, way much better than ATT.
|
|
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 51 average on what?
speed averaged over coverage area size?
OR
average speed in the aear where both carriers have 3g coverage?
as i looked last time, att 3g has only a coverage around those very big
cities
some review found ATT 3G faster on average across the nation.
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: some review found ATT 3G faster on average across the nation.
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 52 speed
Sprint 3G coverage is not as good as VZW
and VZW is not even faster than ATT
Sprint is faster than VZW?
Of course ATT 3G coverage is spotty, but we spend most of our time where we
live everyday. Regardless of 3G, overall ATT coverage (3G and Edge) still
should be better than Sprint.
【在 f******w 的大作中提到】
: average on what?
: speed averaged over coverage area size?
: OR
: average speed in the aear where both carriers have 3g coverage?
: as i looked last time, att 3g has only a coverage around those very big
: cities
:
: some review found ATT 3G faster on average across the nation.
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 53 you mean 1 or 2 in my post?
for 1, you need to integral the speed over every location point, then
devided
by the whole area size, i think att is worst using this calculation method,
as you said its coverage is "spotty"
for 2, you just average speed over the number of times you tested. for this
one,
VZ might be the best as I heard, I never used VZ. Which one is best varis by
locations, which is related to the tower location, surrounding buildings,
and etc. But even if ATT were the best at your lo
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: speed
: Sprint 3G coverage is not as good as VZW
: and VZW is not even faster than ATT
: Sprint is faster than VZW?
: Of course ATT 3G coverage is spotty, but we spend most of our time where we
: live everyday. Regardless of 3G, overall ATT coverage (3G and Edge) still
: should be better than Sprint.
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 54 lol whatever you say
hard cold reviews are out there.
Plus due to VZW's 3G tech limitation, it will never be as fast as ATT as
long as ATT is not overwhelmed by iPhones. Not to mention Tmobile's even
faster tech than ATT's 3G.
this
by
related
【在 f******w 的大作中提到】
: you mean 1 or 2 in my post?
: for 1, you need to integral the speed over every location point, then
: devided
: by the whole area size, i think att is worst using this calculation method,
: as you said its coverage is "spotty"
: for 2, you just average speed over the number of times you tested. for this
: one,
: VZ might be the best as I heard, I never used VZ. Which one is best varis by
: locations, which is related to the tower location, surrounding buildings,
: and etc. But even if ATT were the best at your lo
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 55 lol, what ever you say, nothing is related to the coverage issue,
i dont know why you reply our discussion on coverage.
we are NOT talking about speed, which is essencially a YMMV issue.
lol whatever you say
hard cold reviews are out there.
Plus due to VZW's 3G tech limitation, it will never be as fast as ATT as
long as ATT is not overwhelmed by iPhones. Not to mention Tmobile's even
faster tech than ATT's 3G.
this
by
related
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: lol whatever you say
: hard cold reviews are out there.
: Plus due to VZW's 3G tech limitation, it will never be as fast as ATT as
: long as ATT is not overwhelmed by iPhones. Not to mention Tmobile's even
: faster tech than ATT's 3G.
:
: this
: by
: related
|
l******o
发帖数: 2649 | 56 isn't local coverage also very YMMV?
【在 f******w 的大作中提到】
: lol, what ever you say, nothing is related to the coverage issue,
: i dont know why you reply our discussion on coverage.
: we are NOT talking about speed, which is essencially a YMMV issue.
:
: lol whatever you say
: hard cold reviews are out there.
: Plus due to VZW's 3G tech limitation, it will never be as fast as ATT as
: long as ATT is not overwhelmed by iPhones. Not to mention Tmobile's even
: faster tech than ATT's 3G.
: this
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 57 coverage maps shown in carriers' official websites are not YMMV
of coz, if you want to argue, anything is ymmv, even god.
isn't local coverage also very YMMV?
【在 l******o 的大作中提到】
: isn't local coverage also very YMMV?
|
U*G
发帖数: 364 | 58 en, it doesnt make sense at all to charge ppl who can't take the advantage
of 4g
【在 D*******a 的大作中提到】
: sprint太贪心了,平白无故要多收$10。相当于两年下来$240.
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 59 4g is a joke now, for most people, 纯粹是为了广告效应,
这和att搞个iphone 3gs的用意差不多, 都是为了吸引大家的眼球
en, it doesnt make sense at all to charge ppl who can't take the advantage
of 4g
【在 U*G 的大作中提到】
: en, it doesnt make sense at all to charge ppl who can't take the advantage
: of 4g
|
a*f
发帖数: 5682 | 60 和ATT比一比吧.
ATT 每月80可以买什么Plan?
【在 D*******a 的大作中提到】
: sprint太贪心了,平白无故要多收$10。相当于两年下来$240.
|
|
|
r****d
发帖数: 375 | 61 Could you explain why 4G is a joke now?
advantage
【在 f******w 的大作中提到】
: 4g is a joke now, for most people, 纯粹是为了广告效应,
: 这和att搞个iphone 3gs的用意差不多, 都是为了吸引大家的眼球
:
: en, it doesnt make sense at all to charge ppl who can't take the advantage
: of 4g
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 62 只有几个大城市有coverage, 所以除非你就在这几个城市里生活....
Could you explain why 4G is a joke now?
advantage
【在 r****d 的大作中提到】
: Could you explain why 4G is a joke now?
:
: advantage
|
N**D
发帖数: 10322 | 63 on top of mammoth mountain, can use tp2 watering bbs using 3G
【在 f******w 的大作中提到】
: 只有几个大城市有coverage, 所以除非你就在这几个城市里生活....
:
: Could you explain why 4G is a joke now?
: advantage
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 64 我说的是4g, sprint的3g coverage还是不错的
on top of mammoth mountain, can use tp2 watering bbs using 3G
【在 N**D 的大作中提到】
: on top of mammoth mountain, can use tp2 watering bbs using 3G
|
N**D
发帖数: 10322 | 65 under the line: ATT has zero data, no edge, no 3g, at all.
【在 f******w 的大作中提到】
: 我说的是4g, sprint的3g coverage还是不错的
:
: on top of mammoth mountain, can use tp2 watering bbs using 3G
|
