a*****g
发帖数: 19398 | 1 AUGUSTA — Maine legislators on the Education Committee rejected a bill
Wednesday that would have thrown out the state’s math and English Common
Core standards.
Instead, the committee unanimously approved substitute language that makes
the process for reviewing the standards more transparent and rigorous.
Senate Chairman Brian Langley, R-Ellsworth, suggested the new language,
saying it addresses concerns about Common Core standards, which spell out
what a student is expected to learn in the two subjects in each grade.
Critics, however, say some standards aren’t developmentally appropriate for
students – teaching a particular math concept in fifth grade when some
believe it should be taught in sixth grade, for example.
“My thought is to not throw out the standards and start over. That’s not a
good place to go. But to develop a rigorous review process and go through
these standards in a constructive way,” Langley said of the bill, L.D. 1492.
“This document always seemed so rigid, not a living, breathing document. I
want it to be a living, breathing document that can change with the times,”
he said.
Also Wednesday, the committee rebuffed a bill that would have delayed for a
year having Maine students take new state assessment tests.
Both bills follow an anti-testing and anti-Common Core movement that has
been felt nationwide.
NEW AVENUE FOR PUBLIC’S VIEWS
Since 2009, 45 states, including Maine, and the District of Columbia have
adopted the standards. Since 2014, Indiana, Oklahoma and South Carolina have
dropped them. Opponents say the standards are developmentally inappropriate
and part of federal efforts to nationalize education. Advocates say having
a common set of academic standards for students in multiple states would
benefit the students and better prepare them for college or a career.
L.D. 1492, which now goes to the House for a vote, spells out a new
standards review protocol that largely reflects the current process. But it
adds some new features, including an online portal on the Maine Department
of Education website where anyone can write a comment or suggestion about
one of the state’s eight content standards for math, English, science,
social studies, languages, career and education development, health
education and physical education, and visual/performing arts.
Current law requires the department to review the standards every five years
. But under the new language introduced Wednesday, comments submitted
through the new online portal could trigger a review of any standard at any
time, at the discretion of the Maine Department of Education.
The language approved Wednesday does not require an immediate review of the
math or English standards, which are Common Core standards.
Rep. Will Tuell, R-East Machias, said he was happy with the outcome.
“I’m impressed with how you make something so complicated come together,”
Tuell told the committee after the vote. “If anything else, we turned it
into a government accountability bill, and that’s a good thing, too.”
Concerning changes to L.D. 1459, which would postpone taking assessment
tests for a year, committee members said they think Maine students should
still take new tests for math and English this spring, but that the results
shouldn’t be used to evaluate teachers or to issue A through F grades for
schools.
The committee agreed to table the bill to allow time to add language and
remove references to delaying the tests.
“I think it’s clear we can’t throw the test out. A lot of work has been
done to get where we’re at,” said Rep. Matt Pouliot, R-Augusta. “I do
think we should delay using the results for teacher evaluations and for A-to
-F evaluation of schools.”
COMPLETING TEST TO TAKE LESS TIME
Rep. Ellie Espling, R-New Gloucester, who authored the bill, said she did
not disagree with the changes, but urged the committee to wait several years
before allowing the test results to be used for teacher evaluations.
Currently, the state Department of Education plans to use this spring’s
test results as a baseline, so next year’s results could be used to
evaluate student progress.
“Using any of that data for teacher evaluations is concerning,” Espling
said. “The state should not require any of the data be used – maybe allow
districts to do it if they wished, but not require it for say, three to five
years until we’re really on board with a new test.”
Several committee members agreed, as did state education officials
testifying at the work session. But they noted that annual testing is
required by the federal government and it remains a key way to measure
student abilities.
The Maine Department of Education is using New Hampshire-based Measured
Progress Inc. to develop and administer the new math and English tests that
are replacing the Smarter Balanced test that was used for only one year. The
company also will administer the SAT for high school juniors.
The new assessment tests for third- through eighth-graders will be shorter
– the completion time will be six hours on average, compared with seven
hours for the Smarter Balanced tests last year and up to 12 hours for the
tests used before that. The SAT will take less than four hours to complete,
compared with the seven- to eight-hour test administered to juniors last
year, which included an extra component that has been eliminated.
Jaci Holmes, the federal-state legislative liaison at the state Department
of Education, said teachers could start working with practice tests on Feb.
1, and the testing window will run from March 21 through April 15. The test
results will be given to the department by June 30, she said. | a*****g
发帖数: 19398 | 2 前一段看到文章，论据是有人抱怨 Common Core推迟了学习进度
今天的论据是有人抱怨 common core提前了学习进度
这些人难道真是为了反对而反对么？
for
【在 a*****g 的大作中提到】
: AUGUSTA — Maine legislators on the Education Committee rejected a bill
: Wednesday that would have thrown out the state’s math and English Common
: Core standards.
: Instead, the committee unanimously approved substitute language that makes
: the process for reviewing the standards more transparent and rigorous.
: Senate Chairman Brian Langley, R-Ellsworth, suggested the new language,
: saying it addresses concerns about Common Core standards, which spell out
: what a student is expected to learn in the two subjects in each grade.
: Critics, however, say some standards aren’t developmentally appropriate for
: students – teaching a particular math concept in fifth grade when some
| d****g
发帖数: 7460 | 3 看了隔壁的口诀，觉得ＣＯＭＭＯＮ ＣＯＲＥ的作者肯定要气死了。
2.一个数除几位数儿歌
先看被除数最高位，高位不够多一位
除到被除数哪一位，商就写在哪一位，
不够商1就写0，商中头尾算数位，
余数要比除数小，这样运算才算对。 |
|
