l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | | i***f
发帖数: 10682 | 2 奔LD的都要赞!
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: LD
| l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 3
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: LD
| l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 4 还有我和娃。我的那张是LD个我示范人坐在铁轨上要怎样构图 | l***a
发帖数: 5114 | 5 IMHO, LD3>=LD2>LD4=You>>LD1=Boy pic1>Boy pic2
:P | E********n
发帖数: 14662 | 6 哥，第一张紫边严重啊，啥头啊？
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: LD
| l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 7 Sigma 50mm f/1.4. Yeah, it is bad.
【在 E********n 的大作中提到】
: 哥，第一张紫边严重啊，啥头啊？
| b*****t
发帖数: 3928 | 8 第一张，前景的树枝不够好。小桥不平衡，尽管人是直的。这种构图通常是为了增加动
感，但这里好像和动感无关。
第二张，后期过度了吧。手看似浮肿。脚在景深外，可惜。
第三张，不错，但LD的表情，或者说脸这个角度不如前面的好。
第四张，为什么大地是斜的，后面的杆子是斜的？人其实也是斜的。
最后一张，个人觉得比较好。人物的身体基本平行与镜头，所以全部在景深内。视点也
低一些，远比第二张好。 | l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 9 评的好。你是我LD派来的吧。 I was playing with camera tilt. I don't want the
horizon to be horizontal. I have taken tons of those photo already. However,
I am not sure how much rotation I shall have with camera. I think a good
guide line will be there should not be dominantly horizontal or vertical
line,
like bridge in photo 1, and 方尖碑 in 4th. Those does not work with camera
tilt.
【在 b*****t 的大作中提到】
: 第一张，前景的树枝不够好。小桥不平衡，尽管人是直的。这种构图通常是为了增加动
: 感，但这里好像和动感无关。
: 第二张，后期过度了吧。手看似浮肿。脚在景深外，可惜。
: 第三张，不错，但LD的表情，或者说脸这个角度不如前面的好。
: 第四张，为什么大地是斜的，后面的杆子是斜的？人其实也是斜的。
: 最后一张，个人觉得比较好。人物的身体基本平行与镜头，所以全部在景深内。视点也
: 低一些，远比第二张好。
| l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 10 I don't quite agree with the comments about 2 and 4. There are details need
to be fixed in 2, as you mentioned, but the composition is better than 4,
for portrait purpose.
When photo graphing with rail, leading lines from the tracks the the
greatest gift from the scene. I would argue having the leading lines
pointing towards head works better(That's what I am doing with 2, and 3)
than having the lines cutting through head.
And for camera height, a lower camera as in 4, does not bring attention to
the eyes. And the legs in the photo become the first focal point. At a
higher camera, yes the feet is out of focus, but it might now be a bad thing
.
【在 b*****t 的大作中提到】
: 第一张，前景的树枝不够好。小桥不平衡，尽管人是直的。这种构图通常是为了增加动
: 感，但这里好像和动感无关。
: 第二张，后期过度了吧。手看似浮肿。脚在景深外，可惜。
: 第三张，不错，但LD的表情，或者说脸这个角度不如前面的好。
: 第四张，为什么大地是斜的，后面的杆子是斜的？人其实也是斜的。
: 最后一张，个人觉得比较好。人物的身体基本平行与镜头，所以全部在景深内。视点也
: 低一些，远比第二张好。
| | | l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 11 The comments on 1 is quite good. I was trying to do a frame in the frame
composition. I have no idea why I cropped it like that. Let 's see the full
frame. I actually shot a bunch.
【在 b*****t 的大作中提到】
: 第一张，前景的树枝不够好。小桥不平衡，尽管人是直的。这种构图通常是为了增加动
: 感，但这里好像和动感无关。
: 第二张，后期过度了吧。手看似浮肿。脚在景深外，可惜。
: 第三张，不错，但LD的表情，或者说脸这个角度不如前面的好。
: 第四张，为什么大地是斜的，后面的杆子是斜的？人其实也是斜的。
: 最后一张，个人觉得比较好。人物的身体基本平行与镜头，所以全部在景深内。视点也
: 低一些，远比第二张好。
| l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 12 ok one more.
The original, there is a strong back light that messed up the contrast, and
cause lens flare.
Edit 1 - I would call it 小清新 style, but the face is flat, and colors are
washed out.
Edit 2 - Added an multiply layer on top of one, and I believe used blurred
green channel as mask, to bring back some color, and luminosity details on
the face.
Eidt 3 - Trying to add color variation back to the photo converting file to
LAB, and used "man from mars technique". The result is a really colorful
photo, which is not normally seen in such black light/flare condition. But,
does it look weird? or over processed?
If you guys can comment on edit 1,2,3. I would greatly appreciate it. | l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 13 yeah, I took out the building on the left. Maybe in the end, I might like
edit 1 better. 2, and 3 become more of a note to myself about what can be
done. | d*********6
发帖数: 1972 | | l*****s
发帖数: 1754 | 15 take 2, on #2
need
thing
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: I don't quite agree with the comments about 2 and 4. There are details need
: to be fixed in 2, as you mentioned, but the composition is better than 4,
: for portrait purpose.
: When photo graphing with rail, leading lines from the tracks the the
: greatest gift from the scene. I would argue having the leading lines
: pointing towards head works better(That's what I am doing with 2, and 3)
: than having the lines cutting through head.
: And for camera height, a lower camera as in 4, does not bring attention to
: the eyes. And the legs in the photo become the first focal point. At a
: higher camera, yes the feet is out of focus, but it might now be a bad thing
|
|
