d**k 发帖数: 1223 | 1 最近local有个air show,好像给提供一个专门的spot给photographer,估计位置好些
,要多花2,30刀的样子。我现在最长的镜头就是70-200 (N+),值不值当去多花这几
十刀?还是随便找个地方算了? |
N**D 发帖数: 10322 | 2 进个tele-converter 吧
【在 d**k 的大作中提到】 : 最近local有个air show,好像给提供一个专门的spot给photographer,估计位置好些 : ,要多花2,30刀的样子。我现在最长的镜头就是70-200 (N+),值不值当去多花这几 : 十刀?还是随便找个地方算了?
|
t*******f 发帖数: 2634 | 3 70-200 is way too short for airshow.
Also you might need a camera body that focuses fast enough.
【在 d**k 的大作中提到】 : 最近local有个air show,好像给提供一个专门的spot给photographer,估计位置好些 : ,要多花2,30刀的样子。我现在最长的镜头就是70-200 (N+),值不值当去多花这几 : 十刀?还是随便找个地方算了?
|
d**k 发帖数: 1223 | 4 谢谢楼上的两位。原来想过一阵子converter,后来听说这个东西很影响对焦,而且在
非全副上似乎不怎么样。
俺比较土,还在用d200, 但是对焦我倒不是很担心:这个机器虽老,对焦速度还不错。
还有谁用过这个converter? 给说说? |
b*****e 发帖数: 14299 | 5 waste of money, not worth it if you never did air show photography before
and if you don't have big cannon. For me, taking photos of people at air
show has more fun than taking photos of flights. |
d**k 发帖数: 1223 | 6 这样儿的话基本上航展就没什么念想了
【在 t*******f 的大作中提到】 : 70-200 is way too short for airshow. : Also you might need a camera body that focuses fast enough.
|
r****x 发帖数: 56 | 7 1.4X+70-200mm should be OK for formation flight. Used my 5D + 1.4X 70-200mm
did a few time air show. Need to be close to performing air space.
For cropped D200, might be better than full frame. Make sure you compensate
the exposure accordingly. |