G**Y
发帖数: 33224 | |
h*****s
发帖数: 12833 | |
G**Y
发帖数: 33224 | 3 锐度摘要：
Based on those test chart images, I would say that at 28mm both lenses
perform almost identical (the 24-120 is slightly sharper).
At 50mm focal length and f/4.5 aperture I think the 24-120 performs slightly
better than the 28-300mm lens. At aperture f/5.6 I could not see any
differences between both lenses.
At 120mm f/5.6 I could not see a difference in the test charts of both
lenses. Just a note: the 28-300 test shots were actually done at 122mm, I
couldn’t fine tune the zoom to be exactly 120mm.
。。。
握着28-300我蛋很定呀。。。
Conclusion
If I have to pick one of those two lenses, I would definitely go for the
Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 ED VR. The Nikon 24-120mm f/4G ED VR will probably
deliver slightly better results, but as you saw from all the comparisons,
the difference in real life pictures is not significant. The longer zoom of
the 28-300 lens is much more useful for a “general walk around lens” and
the 4mm difference on the wide angle side is almost not noticeable in the
pictures. Did I mention that the 28-300mm lens is also cheaper by almost $
300?. The 240-120mm focal range overlaps with several other popular lenses
in the Nikon’s catalog (16-35mm, 24-70mm, 70-200mm) and if you own some of
them already, the 28-300mm will make more sense. I can also imagine that
those two lenses could be interesting even for the DX crowd, especially the
28-300mm lens because of the 1.5x crop factor. The main issue I have with
the 28-300mm lens is the hood, as shown in the video above.
【在 G**Y 的大作中提到】
: 这下high了
: http://nikonrumors.com/2010/10/24/nikon-24-120mm-f4g-ed-vr-vs-nikon-28-300mm-f3-5-5-6-ed-vr.aspx
|
C****c
发帖数: 9157 | 4 退一步说，24-70即使锐度比不过28-300，他还有全程F2.8
slightly
I
【在 G**Y 的大作中提到】
: 锐度摘要：
: Based on those test chart images, I would say that at 28mm both lenses
: perform almost identical (the 24-120 is slightly sharper).
: At 50mm focal length and f/4.5 aperture I think the 24-120 performs slightly
: better than the 28-300mm lens. At aperture f/5.6 I could not see any
: differences between both lenses.
: At 120mm f/5.6 I could not see a difference in the test charts of both
: lenses. Just a note: the 28-300 test shots were actually done at 122mm, I
: couldn’t fine tune the zoom to be exactly 120mm.
: 。。。
|
G**Y
发帖数: 33224 | 5 广角2.8不是特别有用。
但28-300本质是F/5.6起步。
从这点看，24-70，24-120（如果F/4可用的话）还是有点优势的。
【在 C****c 的大作中提到】
: 退一步说，24-70即使锐度比不过28-300，他还有全程F2.8
:
: slightly
: I
|
m****7
发帖数: 14685 | 6 28-300比24-120的锐度都差一截怎么和24-70比
【在 C****c 的大作中提到】
: 退一步说，24-70即使锐度比不过28-300，他还有全程F2.8
:
: slightly
: I
|
G**Y
发帖数: 33224 | 7 锐度上的区别其实不是特重要。
【在 m****7 的大作中提到】
: 28-300比24-120的锐度都差一截怎么和24-70比
|
d*****0
发帖数: 68029 | |
|
