p*********y
发帖数: 2288 | | c****1
发帖数: 5654 | 2 no one is in 3100, even not WLQ/ML:-)
also 1900 to 2100 is same as 2400 to 2500... same as 2800 to 2850:-) | g****9
发帖数: 102 | 3 The rating system doesn't have universal standards.
According to the rating central websitehttp://www.ratingscentral.com/, the most updated rating for Wang, Liqin is 3103 after the asian championships.
http://www.ratingscentral.com/Player.php?PlayerID=5076
For Ma, Lin, his newest rating is 3115 after the Dragon Invitational 2009
http://www.ratingscentral.com/Player.php?PlayerID=5377 | g****9
发帖数: 102 | 4 However, players ratings between rating central and USATT are very close,
Du, Chenyi's most recent rating at the rating central is 2627 after the NA
teams (somehow, they misnamed to Norway First Leauge),
http://www.ratingscentral.com/EventDetail.php?EventID=6293#P23711
similarly, his rating at the USATT is 2631. | D***e
发帖数: 48486 | 5 积分到一定程度就没意义了
比如在美国2800，2900啥的，通过美国自己的比赛应该达不到了
【在 g****9 的大作中提到】
: However, players ratings between rating central and USATT are very close,
: Du, Chenyi's most recent rating at the rating central is 2627 after the NA
: teams (somehow, they misnamed to Norway First Leauge),
: http://www.ratingscentral.com/EventDetail.php?EventID=6293#P23711
: similarly, his rating at the USATT is 2631.
| n***y
发帖数: 15001 | |
|
