h******k
发帖数: 388 | 1 和别的popular JS framework比怎么样？有没有用过Angular的大牛给个评价？如果要
自学Angular的话有什么好的书或网站？ |
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | |
a*******o
发帖数: 290 | 3 We are using Angular to rewrite our front end. It has a very steep learning
curve. I consider myself very good with HTML and Javascript but need to
learn a lot. There is an Augular way for almost all aspects of web
development. Angular is very hot right now. However I'm not sure whether it'
ll stay on top several years from now.
To learn Angular, it's probably better to stick to its own documentation and
blogs linked from there. Books are often out of date because Angular is
still evolving fast. |
d*******r
发帖数: 3299 | 4
learning
it'
and
看着太吓人了，front end 变化这么快，这个 learning cost 还这么高
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: We are using Angular to rewrite our front end. It has a very steep learning
: curve. I consider myself very good with HTML and Javascript but need to
: learn a lot. There is an Augular way for almost all aspects of web
: development. Angular is very hot right now. However I'm not sure whether it'
: ll stay on top several years from now.
: To learn Angular, it's probably better to stick to its own documentation and
: blogs linked from there. Books are often out of date because Angular is
: still evolving fast.
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 5
learning
it'
and
多谢大牛。一直犹豫要不要学一下，看来没有必要了。上meteor算了。没必要自己跟自
己过不去。
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: We are using Angular to rewrite our front end. It has a very steep learning
: curve. I consider myself very good with HTML and Javascript but need to
: learn a lot. There is an Augular way for almost all aspects of web
: development. Angular is very hot right now. However I'm not sure whether it'
: ll stay on top several years from now.
: To learn Angular, it's probably better to stick to its own documentation and
: blogs linked from there. Books are often out of date because Angular is
: still evolving fast.
|
l*s
发帖数: 783 | 6 NG is good and after one day reading you should be able to start using it.
IMHO it's easier than Durandal.
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 和别的popular JS framework比怎么样？有没有用过Angular的大牛给个评价？如果要
: 自学Angular的话有什么好的书或网站？
|
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 7 前端就是跟错了就白学了。不像我9年前学的 spring, hibernate，现在还是主流。
【在 d*******r 的大作中提到】
:
: learning
: it'
: and
: 看着太吓人了，front end 变化这么快，这个 learning cost 还这么高
|
d******e
发帖数: 2265 | 8 angular is somehow ill-designed. look at its names choosen: dependency
injection... The weird name only make it harder to understand for a single
thing. These guys just lack of invention.
my feeling is the product is at college student course project level, some
oo blending with template processing tech... The design is not beautiful
at all.
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 和别的popular JS framework比怎么样？有没有用过Angular的大牛给个评价？如果要
: 自学Angular的话有什么好的书或网站？
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 9 What's your favor of front end framework then? Someone in our team prefers
don't use any framework just use pure javascript and JQuery.
single
【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: angular is somehow ill-designed. look at its names choosen: dependency
: injection... The weird name only make it harder to understand for a single
: thing. These guys just lack of invention.
: my feeling is the product is at college student course project level, some
: oo blending with template processing tech... The design is not beautiful
: at all.
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 10 多谢回复。我一直尽量避免做front end，实在躲不了也只有硬着头皮上了。现在公司
的architect已经基本定下front end用Angular,请问Angular有什么sample projects我
可以参考吗？
learning
it'
and
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: We are using Angular to rewrite our front end. It has a very steep learning
: curve. I consider myself very good with HTML and Javascript but need to
: learn a lot. There is an Augular way for almost all aspects of web
: development. Angular is very hot right now. However I'm not sure whether it'
: ll stay on top several years from now.
: To learn Angular, it's probably better to stick to its own documentation and
: blogs linked from there. Books are often out of date because Angular is
: still evolving fast.
|
|
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 11 我们的project是把一个旧系统移植到web上，原系统是C#(front end)+SOAP Web
Services(back end).新系统打算Web(front end)+Restful Web Services(back end). |
s***o
发帖数: 2191 | 12 angular的learning curve可以参考下图：
（这个代表learning curve也不算确切。angular基本的东西是没有learning curve的
，拿来就可以用；一些advanced features则有很深的learning curve) |
d****i
发帖数: 4809 | 13 haha, 看来Angular玩起来是高潮迭起啊。。
【在 s***o 的大作中提到】
: angular的learning curve可以参考下图：
: （这个代表learning curve也不算确切。angular基本的东西是没有learning curve的
: ，拿来就可以用；一些advanced features则有很深的learning curve)
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 14 刚看完这个录像 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9MHigUZKEM
Now I feel Angular is NEAT. :_)
【在 s***o 的大作中提到】
: angular的learning curve可以参考下图：
: （这个代表learning curve也不算确切。angular基本的东西是没有learning curve的
: ，拿来就可以用；一些advanced features则有很深的learning curve)
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 15 强烈推荐．
牛逼得一塌糊涂．
single
【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: angular is somehow ill-designed. look at its names choosen: dependency
: injection... The weird name only make it harder to understand for a single
: thing. These guys just lack of invention.
: my feeling is the product is at college student course project level, some
: oo blending with template processing tech... The design is not beautiful
: at all.
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 16 举一个最简单的例子．
你可以在browser里维护一个简单的数据库／状态机．然后用*html*告诉ng怎么显示，
然后就结束了． |
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 17
感觉比meteor难学好多呀。meteor可以把database搬到browser里。在client直接操作
数据库。
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 举一个最简单的例子．
: 你可以在browser里维护一个简单的数据库／状态机．然后用*html*告诉ng怎么显示，
: 然后就结束了．
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 18 没实际用过meteor. 感觉这两个东西是互补的．
ng和其他的framework很不一样．在理想情况下，都不需要load jQuery. (不推荐用
jQuery) 所以比较容易写出四不像来．
二爷试试看？
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: 感觉比meteor难学好多呀。meteor可以把database搬到browser里。在client直接操作
: 数据库。
|
d****i
发帖数: 4809 | 19 Angular和jQuery同时用的话会有冲突吗?
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 没实际用过meteor. 感觉这两个东西是互补的．
: ng和其他的framework很不一样．在理想情况下，都不需要load jQuery. (不推荐用
: jQuery) 所以比较容易写出四不像来．
: 二爷试试看？
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 20 代码没有冲突．
在有些情况下必须用jQuery, 比如
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12197880/angularjs-how-to-ma
但是，概念上ng和其他framework非常不同． ng是把数据放在第一位,根据数据的变化
刷新ui; 其他的是把数据放到dom里，通过dom来存取数据．
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】
: Angular和jQuery同时用的话会有冲突吗?
|
|
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 21
听起来跟meteor很像，数据第一。
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 代码没有冲突．
: 在有些情况下必须用jQuery, 比如
: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12197880/angularjs-how-to-ma
: 但是，概念上ng和其他framework非常不同． ng是把数据放在第一位,根据数据的变化
: 刷新ui; 其他的是把数据放到dom里，通过dom来存取数据．
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 22
确实可以互补。据我简单的了解，angular是双向binding的，而meteor只是单向。当然
了，我也没好好看过angular，不知道一旦修改UI，马上修改数据库吗？
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 没实际用过meteor. 感觉这两个东西是互补的．
: ng和其他的framework很不一样．在理想情况下，都不需要load jQuery. (不推荐用
: jQuery) 所以比较容易写出四不像来．
: 二爷试试看？
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 23 马上修改数据．
＂Think of your model as the single-source-of-truth for your application.
Your model is where you go to to read or update anything in your application
.＂
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/5-awesome-ang
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: 确实可以互补。据我简单的了解，angular是双向binding的，而meteor只是单向。当然
: 了，我也没好好看过angular，不知道一旦修改UI，马上修改数据库吗？
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 24
application
什么时候更新数据库呢？
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 马上修改数据．
: ＂Think of your model as the single-source-of-truth for your application.
: Your model is where you go to to read or update anything in your application
: .＂
: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/5-awesome-ang
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 25 ng自己知道什么时候更新．
更细的文档看$apply, $watch.
http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.$rootScope.Scope
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: application
: 什么时候更新数据库呢？
|
s***o
发帖数: 2191 | 26 After your angular code posts to your node API successfully.
angular is a client side framework. 2-way data-binding is between your model
and DOM, nothing to do with back-end/front-end/in-the-middle-of-nowhere
database operations
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: application
: 什么时候更新数据库呢？
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 27 ng和后端的数据库没关系．
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: application
: 什么时候更新数据库呢？
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 28
嗯。这就是区别了。所以meteor要更简单很多，所以meteor不能做双向bind。不能UI一
更新就马上更新数据库，需要一个事件的产生。Angular是来了一个中间层，真正更新
数据库的时候还是要靠event驱动吧？
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: ng和后端的数据库没关系．
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 29 好比说：
嗯．筷子和碗有区别．所以碗要简单很多，所以碗不能夹东西．
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: 嗯。这就是区别了。所以meteor要更简单很多，所以meteor不能做双向bind。不能UI一
: 更新就马上更新数据库，需要一个事件的产生。Angular是来了一个中间层，真正更新
: 数据库的时候还是要靠event驱动吧？
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 30
不能这么说。都是client side MVC，所以还是有可比性的。当然也可以公用，但是不
知道必要性有多大。
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 好比说：
: 嗯．筷子和碗有区别．所以碗要简单很多，所以碗不能夹东西．
|
|
|
d*******r
发帖数: 3299 | 31 同意啊，风险比较大，站错边就不好玩了
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: 前端就是跟错了就白学了。不像我9年前学的 spring, hibernate，现在还是主流。
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 32
所以要选择一个容易学的。我看meteor就不错，上手很快。
【在 d*******r 的大作中提到】
: 同意啊，风险比较大，站错边就不好玩了
|
a*******o
发帖数: 290 | 33 Another developer set up our project structure so I didn't research what
good examples are out there. I just did a google search and found below page
. Hope it is useful to you.
http://tutorialzine.com/2013/08/learn-angularjs-5-examples/
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 多谢回复。我一直尽量避免做front end，实在躲不了也只有硬着头皮上了。现在公司
: 的architect已经基本定下front end用Angular,请问Angular有什么sample projects我
: 可以参考吗？
:
: learning
: it'
: and
|
b***e
发帖数: 1419 | 34 Similar to the JQuery UI plugins, such rigid "UI frameworks" never work in
serious consumer facing products. It is probably only good for developing
CRUD based internal tools. Real real-world problems are usually coming with
much more complicated product requirements and much more involved user
interaction specifications than what such frameworks provide and suppport.
Instead of fighting such frameworks, it is better to build your own stuff
ground up with light weight lib support such as JQuery.
Also, IMO, anything at UI layer "framework" that has a very steep learning
curve is just wrong. It is, after all, not such a complicated issue and it
should made clear to anyone without such hinderance. I believe in design
patterns, but not frameworks.
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 和别的popular JS framework比怎么样？有没有用过Angular的大牛给个评价？如果要
: 自学Angular的话有什么好的书或网站？
|
n****1
发帖数: 1136 | 35 DOM/Jquery更像MFC时代的概念, Backbone/meteor像MVC.
Angular其实类似与微软的MVVM, 把开发html5简化到了XAML的地步。 咱不能说XAML没
法做复杂UI吧，WP8都用这个。
我觉得XAML/angular最大的好处是把数据和UI设计完全分离， UI完全可以由美工单独
完成。 这种责任明确的架构必然会提高生产力。
with
it
【在 b***e 的大作中提到】
: Similar to the JQuery UI plugins, such rigid "UI frameworks" never work in
: serious consumer facing products. It is probably only good for developing
: CRUD based internal tools. Real real-world problems are usually coming with
: much more complicated product requirements and much more involved user
: interaction specifications than what such frameworks provide and suppport.
: Instead of fighting such frameworks, it is better to build your own stuff
: ground up with light weight lib support such as JQuery.
: Also, IMO, anything at UI layer "framework" that has a very steep learning
: curve is just wrong. It is, after all, not such a complicated issue and it
: should made clear to anyone without such hinderance. I believe in design
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 36 和别的popular JS framework比怎么样？有没有用过Angular的大牛给个评价？如果要
自学Angular的话有什么好的书或网站？ |
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | |
a*******o
发帖数: 290 | 38 We are using Angular to rewrite our front end. It has a very steep learning
curve. I consider myself very good with HTML and Javascript but need to
learn a lot. There is an Augular way for almost all aspects of web
development. Angular is very hot right now. However I'm not sure whether it'
ll stay on top several years from now.
To learn Angular, it's probably better to stick to its own documentation and
blogs linked from there. Books are often out of date because Angular is
still evolving fast. |
d*******r
发帖数: 3299 | 39
learning
it'
and
看着太吓人了，front end 变化这么快，这个 learning cost 还这么高
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: We are using Angular to rewrite our front end. It has a very steep learning
: curve. I consider myself very good with HTML and Javascript but need to
: learn a lot. There is an Augular way for almost all aspects of web
: development. Angular is very hot right now. However I'm not sure whether it'
: ll stay on top several years from now.
: To learn Angular, it's probably better to stick to its own documentation and
: blogs linked from there. Books are often out of date because Angular is
: still evolving fast.
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 40
learning
it'
and
多谢大牛。一直犹豫要不要学一下，看来没有必要了。上meteor算了。没必要自己跟自
己过不去。
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: We are using Angular to rewrite our front end. It has a very steep learning
: curve. I consider myself very good with HTML and Javascript but need to
: learn a lot. There is an Augular way for almost all aspects of web
: development. Angular is very hot right now. However I'm not sure whether it'
: ll stay on top several years from now.
: To learn Angular, it's probably better to stick to its own documentation and
: blogs linked from there. Books are often out of date because Angular is
: still evolving fast.
|
|
|
l*s
发帖数: 783 | 41 NG is good and after one day reading you should be able to start using it.
IMHO it's easier than Durandal.
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 和别的popular JS framework比怎么样？有没有用过Angular的大牛给个评价？如果要
: 自学Angular的话有什么好的书或网站？
|
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 42 前端就是跟错了就白学了。不像我9年前学的 spring, hibernate，现在还是主流。
【在 d*******r 的大作中提到】
:
: learning
: it'
: and
: 看着太吓人了，front end 变化这么快，这个 learning cost 还这么高
|
d******e
发帖数: 2265 | 43 angular is somehow ill-designed. look at its names choosen: dependency
injection... The weird name only make it harder to understand for a single
thing. These guys just lack of invention.
my feeling is the product is at college student course project level, some
oo blending with template processing tech... The design is not beautiful
at all.
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 和别的popular JS framework比怎么样？有没有用过Angular的大牛给个评价？如果要
: 自学Angular的话有什么好的书或网站？
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 44 What's your favor of front end framework then? Someone in our team prefers
don't use any framework just use pure javascript and JQuery.
single
【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: angular is somehow ill-designed. look at its names choosen: dependency
: injection... The weird name only make it harder to understand for a single
: thing. These guys just lack of invention.
: my feeling is the product is at college student course project level, some
: oo blending with template processing tech... The design is not beautiful
: at all.
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 45 多谢回复。我一直尽量避免做front end，实在躲不了也只有硬着头皮上了。现在公司
的architect已经基本定下front end用Angular,请问Angular有什么sample projects我
可以参考吗？
learning
it'
and
【在 a*******o 的大作中提到】
: We are using Angular to rewrite our front end. It has a very steep learning
: curve. I consider myself very good with HTML and Javascript but need to
: learn a lot. There is an Augular way for almost all aspects of web
: development. Angular is very hot right now. However I'm not sure whether it'
: ll stay on top several years from now.
: To learn Angular, it's probably better to stick to its own documentation and
: blogs linked from there. Books are often out of date because Angular is
: still evolving fast.
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 46 我们的project是把一个旧系统移植到web上，原系统是C#(front end)+SOAP Web
Services(back end).新系统打算Web(front end)+Restful Web Services(back end). |
s***o
发帖数: 2191 | 47 angular的learning curve可以参考下图：
（这个代表learning curve也不算确切。angular基本的东西是没有learning curve的
，拿来就可以用；一些advanced features则有很深的learning curve) |
d****i
发帖数: 4809 | 48 haha, 看来Angular玩起来是高潮迭起啊。。
【在 s***o 的大作中提到】
: angular的learning curve可以参考下图：
: （这个代表learning curve也不算确切。angular基本的东西是没有learning curve的
: ，拿来就可以用；一些advanced features则有很深的learning curve)
|
h******k
发帖数: 388 | 49 刚看完这个录像 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9MHigUZKEM
Now I feel Angular is NEAT. :_)
【在 s***o 的大作中提到】
: angular的learning curve可以参考下图：
: （这个代表learning curve也不算确切。angular基本的东西是没有learning curve的
: ，拿来就可以用；一些advanced features则有很深的learning curve)
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 50 强烈推荐．
牛逼得一塌糊涂．
single
【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: angular is somehow ill-designed. look at its names choosen: dependency
: injection... The weird name only make it harder to understand for a single
: thing. These guys just lack of invention.
: my feeling is the product is at college student course project level, some
: oo blending with template processing tech... The design is not beautiful
: at all.
|
|
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 51 举一个最简单的例子．
你可以在browser里维护一个简单的数据库／状态机．然后用*html*告诉ng怎么显示，
然后就结束了． |
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 52
感觉比meteor难学好多呀。meteor可以把database搬到browser里。在client直接操作
数据库。
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 举一个最简单的例子．
: 你可以在browser里维护一个简单的数据库／状态机．然后用*html*告诉ng怎么显示，
: 然后就结束了．
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 53 没实际用过meteor. 感觉这两个东西是互补的．
ng和其他的framework很不一样．在理想情况下，都不需要load jQuery. (不推荐用
jQuery) 所以比较容易写出四不像来．
二爷试试看？
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: 感觉比meteor难学好多呀。meteor可以把database搬到browser里。在client直接操作
: 数据库。
|
d****i
发帖数: 4809 | 54 Angular和jQuery同时用的话会有冲突吗?
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 没实际用过meteor. 感觉这两个东西是互补的．
: ng和其他的framework很不一样．在理想情况下，都不需要load jQuery. (不推荐用
: jQuery) 所以比较容易写出四不像来．
: 二爷试试看？
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 55 代码没有冲突．
在有些情况下必须用jQuery, 比如
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12197880/angularjs-how-to-ma
但是，概念上ng和其他framework非常不同． ng是把数据放在第一位,根据数据的变化
刷新ui; 其他的是把数据放到dom里，通过dom来存取数据．
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】
: Angular和jQuery同时用的话会有冲突吗?
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 56
听起来跟meteor很像，数据第一。
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 代码没有冲突．
: 在有些情况下必须用jQuery, 比如
: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12197880/angularjs-how-to-ma
: 但是，概念上ng和其他framework非常不同． ng是把数据放在第一位,根据数据的变化
: 刷新ui; 其他的是把数据放到dom里，通过dom来存取数据．
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 57
确实可以互补。据我简单的了解，angular是双向binding的，而meteor只是单向。当然
了，我也没好好看过angular，不知道一旦修改UI，马上修改数据库吗？
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 没实际用过meteor. 感觉这两个东西是互补的．
: ng和其他的framework很不一样．在理想情况下，都不需要load jQuery. (不推荐用
: jQuery) 所以比较容易写出四不像来．
: 二爷试试看？
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 58 马上修改数据．
＂Think of your model as the single-source-of-truth for your application.
Your model is where you go to to read or update anything in your application
.＂
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/5-awesome-ang
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: 确实可以互补。据我简单的了解，angular是双向binding的，而meteor只是单向。当然
: 了，我也没好好看过angular，不知道一旦修改UI，马上修改数据库吗？
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 59
application
什么时候更新数据库呢？
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 马上修改数据．
: ＂Think of your model as the single-source-of-truth for your application.
: Your model is where you go to to read or update anything in your application
: .＂
: http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/5-awesome-ang
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 60 ng自己知道什么时候更新．
更细的文档看$apply, $watch.
http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.$rootScope.Scope
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: application
: 什么时候更新数据库呢？
|
|
|
s***o
发帖数: 2191 | 61 After your angular code posts to your node API successfully.
angular is a client side framework. 2-way data-binding is between your model
and DOM, nothing to do with back-end/front-end/in-the-middle-of-nowhere
database operations
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: application
: 什么时候更新数据库呢？
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 62 ng和后端的数据库没关系．
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: application
: 什么时候更新数据库呢？
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 63
嗯。这就是区别了。所以meteor要更简单很多，所以meteor不能做双向bind。不能UI一
更新就马上更新数据库，需要一个事件的产生。Angular是来了一个中间层，真正更新
数据库的时候还是要靠event驱动吧？
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: ng和后端的数据库没关系．
|
P********l
发帖数: 452 | 64 好比说：
嗯．筷子和碗有区别．所以碗要简单很多，所以碗不能夹东西．
【在 p*****2 的大作中提到】
:
: 嗯。这就是区别了。所以meteor要更简单很多，所以meteor不能做双向bind。不能UI一
: 更新就马上更新数据库，需要一个事件的产生。Angular是来了一个中间层，真正更新
: 数据库的时候还是要靠event驱动吧？
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 65
不能这么说。都是client side MVC，所以还是有可比性的。当然也可以公用，但是不
知道必要性有多大。
【在 P********l 的大作中提到】
: 好比说：
: 嗯．筷子和碗有区别．所以碗要简单很多，所以碗不能夹东西．
|
d*******r
发帖数: 3299 | 66 同意啊，风险比较大，站错边就不好玩了
【在 g*****g 的大作中提到】
: 前端就是跟错了就白学了。不像我9年前学的 spring, hibernate，现在还是主流。
|
p*****2
发帖数: 21240 | 67
所以要选择一个容易学的。我看meteor就不错，上手很快。
【在 d*******r 的大作中提到】
: 同意啊，风险比较大，站错边就不好玩了
|
a*******o
发帖数: 290 | 68 Another developer set up our project structure so I didn't research what
good examples are out there. I just did a google search and found below page
. Hope it is useful to you.
http://tutorialzine.com/2013/08/learn-angularjs-5-examples/
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 多谢回复。我一直尽量避免做front end，实在躲不了也只有硬着头皮上了。现在公司
: 的architect已经基本定下front end用Angular,请问Angular有什么sample projects我
: 可以参考吗？
:
: learning
: it'
: and
|
b***e
发帖数: 1419 | 69 Similar to the JQuery UI plugins, such rigid "UI frameworks" never work in
serious consumer facing products. It is probably only good for developing
CRUD based internal tools. Real real-world problems are usually coming with
much more complicated product requirements and much more involved user
interaction specifications than what such frameworks provide and suppport.
Instead of fighting such frameworks, it is better to build your own stuff
ground up with light weight lib support such as JQuery.
Also, IMO, anything at UI layer "framework" that has a very steep learning
curve is just wrong. It is, after all, not such a complicated issue and it
should made clear to anyone without such hinderance. I believe in design
patterns, but not frameworks.
【在 h******k 的大作中提到】
: 和别的popular JS framework比怎么样？有没有用过Angular的大牛给个评价？如果要
: 自学Angular的话有什么好的书或网站？
|
n****1
发帖数: 1136 | 70 DOM/Jquery更像MFC时代的概念, Backbone/meteor像MVC.
Angular其实类似与微软的MVVM, 把开发html5简化到了XAML的地步。 咱不能说XAML没
法做复杂UI吧，WP8都用这个。
我觉得XAML/angular最大的好处是把数据和UI设计完全分离， UI完全可以由美工单独
完成。 这种责任明确的架构必然会提高生产力。
with
it
【在 b***e 的大作中提到】
: Similar to the JQuery UI plugins, such rigid "UI frameworks" never work in
: serious consumer facing products. It is probably only good for developing
: CRUD based internal tools. Real real-world problems are usually coming with
: much more complicated product requirements and much more involved user
: interaction specifications than what such frameworks provide and suppport.
: Instead of fighting such frameworks, it is better to build your own stuff
: ground up with light weight lib support such as JQuery.
: Also, IMO, anything at UI layer "framework" that has a very steep learning
: curve is just wrong. It is, after all, not such a complicated issue and it
: should made clear to anyone without such hinderance. I believe in design
|
|
|
r***y
发帖数: 4379 | 71 --Angular其实类似与微软的MVVM
嗯, 跟我看法一样. 就象个增肥了的 knockout
【在 n****1 的大作中提到】
: DOM/Jquery更像MFC时代的概念, Backbone/meteor像MVC.
: Angular其实类似与微软的MVVM, 把开发html5简化到了XAML的地步。 咱不能说XAML没
: 法做复杂UI吧，WP8都用这个。
: 我觉得XAML/angular最大的好处是把数据和UI设计完全分离， UI完全可以由美工单独
: 完成。 这种责任明确的架构必然会提高生产力。
:
: with
:
: it
|
l**********n
发帖数: 8443 | 72 design pattern比framework重要。 |
l**********n
发帖数: 8443 | 73 angularjs directive is the only cool thing |
l**********n
发帖数: 8443 | 74 In angujarjs, you can use jquery like this:
If jQuery is available, angular.element is an alias for the jQuery function. |
l**********n
发帖数: 8443 | 75 这些framework基本半天就能掌握了，都是大同小异。 |
l**********n
发帖数: 8443 | 76 靠，angular的陷阱还真不少。Beware that using angular.module('myModule', [])
will create the module myModule and overwrite any existing module named
myModule.
This is so stupid. |
l**********n
发帖数: 8443 | 77 angular的module定义得很错乱啊，
比如
return angular.module('myApp', [
'ngRoute',
'myApp.controllers',
'myApp.filters',
'myApp.services',
'myApp.directives'
]);
you would expect that myApp is a module, and controllers is a property of
myApp, but the truth is that myApp.controllers is another module name which
is totally independent of myApp.
not mention so many predefined naming of variables, which you have to look
up in the documentation to figure out what they represent. |
l**********n
发帖数: 8443 | 78 by the way, requirejs is much better and the industry standard to organize
js code on the client side. |
l**********n
发帖数: 8443 | 79 花了一个晚上，终于搞清楚，angular的module和requirejs的module是并行的两个系统
，用requirejs管理文件，用angular的module管理controller。 非常简单。 |
