c***z
发帖数: 6348 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Working 讨论区 】
发信人: chaoz (没钱也任性), 信区: Working
标 题: [征文] Fxxk them all
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jan 17 01:51:54 2015, 美东)
We will never win in their game. Because it is their game, where they set
the rules.
Their rules, in essence, are to gain access to jobs, promotions, funding and
contracts, etc etc through connections, rather than competence.
We need to play our game, our rules. Our rules are simple: competence wins,
in terms of job offers, promotions, funding starups and client contracts.
If the old money favors the old game, we should turn to new money; if the
new money becomes the old money, we should turn to the mass, the people, the
ultimate consumers.
In the end, we will win, when our game wins.
But when we still have to play their game, we need to play well. And the
best way to play the game is to break the game. Look how the people with
connections broke the supposed game of competence in the technology industry.
The only way to grow our competence, our only advantage, is through working
on high quality projects. And that is the real scarce resource in the
company. In order to access the resource, we need to play the game, namely,
office politics.
The alternative is job hopping, the much despised yet necessary path for
fast growth in competence.
The twisted reality is that one must be good at politics even though what he
wants is technical competence.
The only right thing to do is to twist it back, hacking through the system
of reputation and connections. In short, fake it and make it. Like I said,
the best way to play the game is to break the game. And people with
connections rather than competence have done that to us already. | i**i
发帖数: 1500 | 2 好汤。
and
【在 c***z 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Working 讨论区 】
: 发信人: chaoz (没钱也任性), 信区: Working
: 标 题: [征文] Fxxk them all
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jan 17 01:51:54 2015, 美东)
: We will never win in their game. Because it is their game, where they set
: the rules.
: Their rules, in essence, are to gain access to jobs, promotions, funding and
: contracts, etc etc through connections, rather than competence.
: We need to play our game, our rules. Our rules are simple: competence wins,
: in terms of job offers, promotions, funding starups and client contracts.
| k**********g
发帖数: 989 | 3 支持楼主开新版，天天向上（upward mobility）
【在 c***z 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Working 讨论区 】
: 发信人: chaoz (没钱也任性), 信区: Working
: 标 题: [征文] Fxxk them all
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jan 17 01:51:54 2015, 美东)
: We will never win in their game. Because it is their game, where they set
: the rules.
: Their rules, in essence, are to gain access to jobs, promotions, funding and
: contracts, etc etc through connections, rather than competence.
: We need to play our game, our rules. Our rules are simple: competence wins,
: in terms of job offers, promotions, funding starups and client contracts.
| l*********s
发帖数: 5409 | | v******y
发帖数: 84 | 5 楼主，ppt在哪儿都是最大的能力
看看中国alibaba 的CEO是谁
看看APPLE的steven jobs是CEO不是另一个做产品的stevens | v******y
发帖数: 84 | 6 楼主，ppt在哪儿都是最大的能力
看看中国alibaba 的CEO是谁
看看APPLE的steven jobs是CEO不是另一个做产品的stevens | N******K
发帖数: 10202 | 7 woz有股权有美女 还有人请他加入共济会
woz把股权分给很多员工 大家共同富裕
jobs就一个前台小丑 放出来让大家膜拜 好卖产品
对于崇拜jobs的人 我是不会和it合作的
【在 v******y 的大作中提到】
: 楼主，ppt在哪儿都是最大的能力
: 看看中国alibaba 的CEO是谁
: 看看APPLE的steven jobs是CEO不是另一个做产品的stevens
| c***z
发帖数: 6348 | 8 好像已经有一个这样的版面？
搜了一下没找到，倒是找到了这个好东西
https://chaindingcn.wordpress.com/2012/04/17/职场白领必看：年薪八十万的人来
教你办公室斗争/
【在 k**********g 的大作中提到】
: 支持楼主开新版，天天向上（upward mobility）
|
|
