由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Returnee版 - 方舟子说berstein不懂啥叫剽窃,看berstein的公开信 (转载)
相关主题
U.S. public to demand an apology from Fang ZZ,counterfeiting (转载)[合集] 把公司的软件代码带回国
Berstein8月21日给方舟子的公开信 (转载)谈谈物价贴到底影响到谁?
方舟子被指控剽窃密歇根州立教授著作,翻译发表没有征求原作者(转载)为啥有人把国内妖魔化?
续:美国教授再次公开信严斥方舟子剽窃,附英文信原件 (转载)Re: 绿卡到底有什么用?
中国社会的credit成本比较高Another Bumper Year for Chinese Science
驳:浙江大学:你真的是中国第一吗?!NASA又抓了个老中 (转载)
Bernstein原著和方舟子剽窃文的对应分析ZT (转载)期望工资填多少
海内外156位学人就刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件致中国社会科学院研究生院的公开信有绿卡了,请问海归了怎么保留身份?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: berstein话题: my话题: your话题: plagiarism
进入Returnee版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
s********n
发帖数: 26222
1
【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: smokinggun (硝烟), 信区: Military
标 题: 方舟子说berstein不懂啥叫剽窃,看berstein的公开信
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Aug 25 01:47:24 2011, 美东)
Dear Shi-min Fang,
Thank you for admitting your error in failing to cite my article in your
initial online essay, and for the apology regarding it. I do not, however,
believe that your response adequately addresses the points I made in my open
letter. The issue is not a matter of a missing citation, which, since you
have corrected it, would be a minor matter indeed. The issue is that you
have appropriated my entire argument and most of the examples that I use to
support it. Whether we want to label this "plagiarism" or "copyright
infringement" or some combination of the two is irrelevant. The fact is that
you did not alter my argument in any way; you did not mix it or modify it
with other peoples's arguments; and you presented it in exactly the same
order and (and here I must insist on this) using the same language. Now you
add the additional insult in arguing that I am mis-using the concepts of
plagiarism and copyright infringement in making my accusations. And you do
so without justifying this attack upon my supposed ignorance. So how,
exactly, do you define plagiarism and copyright infringement? At what point
did you inquire of me or of Oxford University Press the right to use a large
portion of my article, or even to popularize it?
Please note that I am sending this to all of the people who have expressed
interest in this issue. As I said in my open letter to you, I want to use
this as an educational forum. Your attempt to prevent those who you consider
your "enemies" from having a voice in this discussion undermines the
openness with which I approached you and is counter-productive.
Sincerely,
Bob Root-Bernstein
1 (共1页)
进入Returnee版参与讨论
相关主题
有绿卡了,请问海归了怎么保留身份?中国社会的credit成本比较高
深圳opening?驳:浙江大学:你真的是中国第一吗?!
从海归海不归谈中国人的人生哲学Bernstein原著和方舟子剽窃文的对应分析ZT (转载)
这样分析美国和国内的生活现状可以吗?海内外156位学人就刘菊花硕士论文涉嫌抄袭事件致中国社会科学院研究生院的公开信
U.S. public to demand an apology from Fang ZZ,counterfeiting (转载)[合集] 把公司的软件代码带回国
Berstein8月21日给方舟子的公开信 (转载)谈谈物价贴到底影响到谁?
方舟子被指控剽窃密歇根州立教授著作,翻译发表没有征求原作者(转载)为啥有人把国内妖魔化?
续:美国教授再次公开信严斥方舟子剽窃,附英文信原件 (转载)Re: 绿卡到底有什么用?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: berstein话题: my话题: your话题: plagiarism