|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l**********6
发帖数: 330 | 1 15年9月18日离开美国，16年3月18日回到美国，整整182天（没计算回到美国的那天）。
入境美国的时候被带到小黑屋，边境官问了我什么时候离开美国的，就说这次要在美国
多待段时间。没在护照上的入境章上写绿卡可能作废的警告。
普遍的说法是离开美国超过180天，入籍的时间会重新计算？
已经是绿卡在手，并且到16年1月份就足5年了，这样看来不是入籍可能白瞎了？
请懂行的大侠们说说，谢谢！ | S**I
发帖数: 15689 | 2 An absence of more than six months (more than 181 days but less than one
year (less than 365 days)) during the period for which
continuous residence is required is presumed to break the continuity of such
residence. This includes any absence that takes place prior to filing the
naturalization application or between filing and the applicant’s admission
to citizenship.
An applicant’s intent is not relevant in determining the location of his or
her residence. The period of absence from the United States is the defining
factor in determining whether the applicant is presumed to have disrupted
his or her residence.
An applicant may overcome the presumption of loss of his or her continuity
of residence by providing evidence to establish that the applicant did not
disrupt his or her residence. The evidence may include, but is not limited
to, documentation that during the absence:
•The applicant did not terminate his or her employment in the United
States or obtain employment while abroad.
•The applicant’s immediate family remained in the United States.&#
8203;
•The applicant retained full access to his or her United States
abode.
）。
【在 l**********6 的大作中提到】
: 15年9月18日离开美国，16年3月18日回到美国，整整182天（没计算回到美国的那天）。
: 入境美国的时候被带到小黑屋，边境官问了我什么时候离开美国的，就说这次要在美国
: 多待段时间。没在护照上的入境章上写绿卡可能作废的警告。
: 普遍的说法是离开美国超过180天，入籍的时间会重新计算？
: 已经是绿卡在手，并且到16年1月份就足5年了，这样看来不是入籍可能白瞎了？
: 请懂行的大侠们说说，谢谢！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
