boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
SanFrancisco版 - 重磅炸弹:UC 录取和入学数据分析
相关主题
体会到媒体的力量了
SCA5 其实不影响老中入学
mercury news 的文章--脑残的ABC又给民主党做打手来了
亚裔在大学入学时被压制的实质和应对策略
UCLA 1993~2012本科入学不完全统计
不能争取政治平等,就别怪外嫁
我对Mercury News文章的回应
为反SCA-5提供一点数据
UC 数据 -- 大家议议对我们最好的解释是什么
真为华裔长脸,看看谁在反对SCA5
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: american话题: asian话题: latino话题: admission话题: white
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
m*******n
发帖数: 338
1
花了一个晚上的时间,我发现了几个非常有用的数据点。会是强烈的论据。和议员见面
的同学们可以用。
文件在这里:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/SiliconValleyChineseAssociation/
232411136882485/
下面是COPY PASTE:
=============
UC Admission and Enrollment Data Analysis (1996 - 2010)
By Melatonin (feel free to use)
From analyzing the data, I have these important conclusions:
- Chicano/Latino group is competing with White, not Asian American
- Asian American has high enrollment is not because admission policy
All data come from this file:
http://data.universityofcalifornia.edu/student/admissions/data-
I take the whole UC data instead of each campus.
I take these years: 1996, 1997, 2010. This is because Prop 209 is
implemented in 2007, so it can compare with 1996 data, and 2010 is the most
recent data in this file.
Please note the ‘Admit Rate’ in the file is admission rate among number of
applicants in their respective ethnic group, this percentage remains fairly
constant so I don’t use it. Instead I compute the two numbers: admission
percentage among all students, and enrollment percentage among all students.
Admission Percentage Among All Students
1996 1997 2010
African American 1687/43300 = 3.9% 1633/44738 = 3.65% 3191/79051 =
4.03%
Asian American 13736/43300 = 31.72% 14558/44738 = 32.54% 25611/
79051 = 32.4%
Chicano/Latino 5885/43300 = 13.59% 5877/44738 = 13.14%
16346/79051 = 20.68%
White 17999/43300= 41.57% 19067/44738 = 42.62% 25422/79051 = 32.16%
This shows:
- Prop209 only caused very small decline in Chicano/Latino group (<0.5%),
and the admission rate has actually gone way up at year 2010.
- Asian American admission rate remains the same (e.g. no benefit from
Prop 209)
- Latino group admission rate goes up while White group goes down.
Enrollment Percentage Among All Students
1996 1997 2010
African American 903/24127 = 3.74% 948/24986 = 3.79% 1293/35337 = 3
.65%
Asian American 8709/24127 = 36.1% 9097/24986 = 36.41% 14079/35337 =
39.84%
Chicano/Latino 3245/24127 = 13.45% 3165/24986 = 12.67% 7302/35337 =
20.66%
White 9262/24127 = 38.39% 10048/24986 = 40.21% 9470/35337 = 26.8%
This shows:
- Latino students percentage is going up (13.45% to 20.66%)
- Asian American students percentage is big (almost 40%). Compared with
low White data, this might be the whole purpose of this SCA-5 bill.
However, if you related these two tables together, you can see that the high
Asian American enrollment rate is not because there’s admission policy
that favors Asian American (since admission rate remains the same), it’s
because Asian Americans when admitted, most of them go to study.
For Latino group, their admission and enrollment rate is steadily going up.
For White group, both of the rates goes down, they are not as competitive as
Latino groups, and they have a fair amount of students that don’t enroll
once admitted.
As conclusion:
- Don’t take Asian American as scapegoat
- Find out why Latinos are doing better and better, and the white group
can learn from it.
c******a
发帖数: 4400
2
better formatting
Enrollment Percentage Among All Students
1996 1997 2010
African American 3.74% 3.79% 3.65%
Asian American 36.1% 36.41% 39.84%
Chicano/Latino 13.45% 12.67% 20.66%
White 38.39% 40.21% 26.8%
m*******n
发帖数: 338
3
有空的话帮我核对一下数据和结论。准备去约PAUL。大家尽管用。
a****2
发帖数: 1458
4
white 这么少了?

【在 c******a 的大作中提到】
: better formatting
: Enrollment Percentage Among All Students
: 1996 1997 2010
: African American 3.74% 3.79% 3.65%
: Asian American 36.1% 36.41% 39.84%
: Chicano/Latino 13.45% 12.67% 20.66%
: White 38.39% 40.21% 26.8%

l*****k
发帖数: 1059
5
Prop 209 不是1996年通过的吗?

【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 有空的话帮我核对一下数据和结论。准备去约PAUL。大家尽管用。
d**u
发帖数: 240
6
做研究精神可嘉,不过那些发起、投赞成票的政客们基本没有底线,这些数据它们很清
楚。

【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 花了一个晚上的时间,我发现了几个非常有用的数据点。会是强烈的论据。和议员见面
: 的同学们可以用。
: 文件在这里:
: https://www.facebook.com/groups/SiliconValleyChineseAssociation/
: 232411136882485/
: 下面是COPY PASTE:
: =============
: UC Admission and Enrollment Data Analysis (1996 - 2010)
: By Melatonin (feel free to use)
: From analyzing the data, I have these important conclusions:

q****x
发帖数: 7404
7
As conclusion:
- Don’t take Asian American as scapegoat
- Find out why Latinos are doing better and better, and the white group
can learn from it.
重磅个鬼。这什么狗屁结论啊。政客会承认这法案是take Asian American as
scapegoat?

【在 m*******n 的大作中提到】
: 花了一个晚上的时间,我发现了几个非常有用的数据点。会是强烈的论据。和议员见面
: 的同学们可以用。
: 文件在这里:
: https://www.facebook.com/groups/SiliconValleyChineseAssociation/
: 232411136882485/
: 下面是COPY PASTE:
: =============
: UC Admission and Enrollment Data Analysis (1996 - 2010)
: By Melatonin (feel free to use)
: From analyzing the data, I have these important conclusions:

1 (共1页)
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
相关主题
真为华裔长脸,看看谁在反对SCA5
不要再对任何民主党人有任何幻想
SCA5 僵尸复活
[美国]美国加州将立法 扩大非法移民福利
AA重回michigan -- 新种族主义.
Sunnyvale 的潜力
san ramon的学区
MSJHS学生自杀
University of California Student Demographics
印度同事帮我扩散了say No to SCA5
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: american话题: asian话题: latino话题: admission话题: white