由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
SanFrancisco版 - UCLA校长Gene Block关于支持SCA5和反对prop209的“雄文” (转载)
相关主题
请大家看看ucla的chancellor 有没有权利给全体ucla学生发这份邮 (转载)UCLA校长的诡计:三年国际学生数翻了一番
UCLA的官方反应转发 Jerry Brown, 民主党和平权法案(SB185&SCA5)
My open letter to Mr. Block - Just sent (转载)Prop 33 auto insurance 有什么不好?
my email to UCLA chancellorCalifornia: Falling Off the Political Cliff (转载)
UCLA 怎么回事, 大家都太不付责任了现任州长Brown否决过类似AA的法案,他会不会也把SCA5否决掉?
反SCA5,本人不能認同的一個標語my email to ULCA chancellor Gene D Block
我给UCLA Chancellor的信副州长竞选人Ron Nehring发表声明反对SCA5
UCLA校长说得很明确了:我看着这么多亚裔不爽一篇好文章:Less Academics, More Narcissism
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: our话题: diversity话题: ucla话题: students
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
d*****r
发帖数: 41
1
【 以下文字转载自 LosAngeles 讨论区 】
发信人: danxinr (丹心), 信区: LosAngeles
标 题: UCLA校长Gene Block关于支持SCA5和反对prop209的“雄文”
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 13 14:33:15 2014, 美东)
文章来自其本人的主页:
http://chancellor.ucla.edu/updates/the-impact-of-proposition-20
内中提到“The offensive flyer sent to our Asian American Studies Center”,
这里不知何指。难道亚裔会给亚裔的学习中心写offensive flyer?
以下全文:

The Impact of Proposition 209 and Our Duty to Our Students
Chancellor Block calls on UCLA faculty to re-examine the creation of an
undergraduate general education diversity requirement — and on the campus
community to foster productive conversations about racial diversity and
equity.
To the Campus Community:
Nearly two decades have passed since Californians voted to end affirmative
action in admission to public colleges and universities. Today it is clear
that we have suffered for it.
With each passing year, campuses all across our state — and, increasingly,
as copycat laws are passed, the nation — fail to accurately reflect the
growing diversity in our communities. Too often, many of our students of
color feel isolated, as strangers in their own house. Others feel targeted,
mocked or marginalized, rather than recognized and valued.
At UCLA, our students are bold, confident and among the sharpest anywhere.
We are proud when they convey their thoughts, experiences and feelings — as
they have done recently in several now-viral videos and by organizing town
halls and rallies.
Anyone still unconvinced by the true impact of Proposition 209 need only
listen to our students’ powerful first-hand accounts. Their words, of
course, are much bigger than UCLA — and it’s not surprising that they have
found a national audience. We need only to look at the remarkable and
numerous accomplishments of alumni from now-underrepresented groups who
attended UCLA before Proposition 209 to fully recognize the disservice we do
to California and our nation when other talented and deserving students are
absent from our Bruin family.
Working within the letter of the law, we have tried to address the issues
caused by Proposition 209. In recent years, UCLA has begun evaluating the
full range of each applicant’s academic and personal achievements, within
the context of opportunities and challenges each has faced. And yet we
continue to fall far short of the diversity California’s public colleges
and universities enjoyed before voters approved Proposition 209 in 1996.
While it’s important to understand that Proposition 209 is the underlying
cause of many of these issues — and a cause that some leaders in our state
are now looking to reverse — simply hoping that things will get easier is
unacceptable. We must and will continue to search for new and innovative
ways to achieve diversity within the confines of the law, but as
Californians we must also rethink a flawed policy and find a way to better
serve our students.
We must do more. We have a responsibility to do better.
Today I call upon my UCLA faculty colleagues to re-examine the creation of
an undergraduate general education requirement focused on diversity. Ours is
the only UC campus that does not have one. We have no excuses. Let’s make
this happen in 2014. While it will not impact the diversity of our campus to
the extent we would like, a diversity requirement would enrich all of our
students’ experiences here and better prepare them to live and work in a
complex global environment. We owe it to our students to effect curricular
changes that add to the understanding and appreciation of our nation’s
diversity.
I also want to assure you that our previously promised efforts to strengthen
campus diversity and equity are well underway. The Moreno Report
Implementation Committee, chaired by Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost
Scott Waugh, is fully engaged in its work and will give me a full update at
the end of this academic year. With the help of the committee, we also are
finalizing a job description for the new position of vice chancellor for
equity, diversity and inclusion, and we expect to announce the search by the
end of next quarter.
In addition, we will soon post positions for two diversity officers who will
report to the new vice chancellor and investigate any reported allegations
of racial and ethnic bias or discrimination among our faculty as well as
providing education and training.
Try as we might to overcome racism, bigotry, isolation and anger, we know we
’re going to confront them again, on our campus and in the world beyond.
The offensive flyer sent to our Asian American Studies Center recently was
another horrifying reminder. What matters is how we respond. We must support
each other. We must listen to one another.
Make no mistake: Conversations about race can be very difficult. They are
inevitably emotional. They can make people defensive. They sometimes lead to
accusations. But we cannot be afraid to have these conversations, because
they are so critically important to our university and to society. And if we
cannot have productive discussions about race here, on a campus with the
world’s thought leaders and with students committed to knowledge and
inquiry, then where can we?
While we may have different ideas on strategy, we all want a campus that
embraces and elevates each of us. And that’s why we must continue talking,
debating and looking for solutions.
Most important of all, we must learn to trust one another. I also appreciate
that trust is earned, and we must and will work harder to earn it, even
among our critics.
Sincerely,
Gene D. Block
Chancellor
February 24, 2014
k****m
发帖数: 4670
2
Too often, many of our students of
color feel isolated, as strangers in their own house.
亚裔就不是在他们的own house了
赤裸裸呀
看NBA的人们是不是以为生活在非洲呀?
k****m
发帖数: 4670
3
基本上啥也没谈,就是看着校园里亚裔多,他心里不爽了
如果想要生活中看到的多彩一些,完全可以搬家去一个比较多彩的区呀
那个时候,怕是要连滚带爬的要求跑回亚裔比较多的地方
n******n
发帖数: 12088
4
多彩等于多肤色?

【在 k****m 的大作中提到】
: 基本上啥也没谈,就是看着校园里亚裔多,他心里不爽了
: 如果想要生活中看到的多彩一些,完全可以搬家去一个比较多彩的区呀
: 那个时候,怕是要连滚带爬的要求跑回亚裔比较多的地方

k****m
发帖数: 4670
5
他说,
color feel isolated,
他喜欢学校里比较像人口比例的多彩
我就比较隐讳的说,
他就喜欢居住在拥有各个族裔居住比例比较像人口比例的地方,那样就多彩了,
他就满意率
他就觉得那才是home的感觉了
他要是看NBA是不是觉得像是在非洲
所以,也要改革NBA
因为太as strangers in their own house
这就是一个彻底的借口

【在 n******n 的大作中提到】
: 多彩等于多肤色?
h********t
发帖数: 555
6
大学校长,大学教授中犹太人的比例远远的超过了他们在美国人口中的比例,但是如果
我们要求Gene Block 辞去校长的职务,把位子让给老黑或者老墨,他肯定是不会同意
的。民主党棍就是这么虚伪。
1 (共1页)
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
相关主题
一篇好文章:Less Academics, More NarcissismUCLA 怎么回事, 大家都太不付责任了
我们是否应集资请律师sue UCLA违反加州宪法prop209反SCA5,本人不能認同的一個標語
先打掉SCA5,再敲掉民主党2/3多数,接着sue UCLA违宪(prop209)我给UCLA Chancellor的信
SCA5 其实不影响老中入学UCLA校长说得很明确了:我看着这么多亚裔不爽
请大家看看ucla的chancellor 有没有权利给全体ucla学生发这份邮 (转载)UCLA校长的诡计:三年国际学生数翻了一番
UCLA的官方反应转发 Jerry Brown, 民主党和平权法案(SB185&SCA5)
My open letter to Mr. Block - Just sent (转载)Prop 33 auto insurance 有什么不好?
my email to UCLA chancellorCalifornia: Falling Off the Political Cliff (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: our话题: diversity话题: ucla话题: students