由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Statistics版 - statistics and computer science, which is easier?
相关主题
Data Mining ConferenceOperations Research的PhD student求问职业规划
ucla的统计系Re: 统计/概率方面的
中国人全面占领美国统计领域的标志!文章的影响因子In statistics
[合集] 请教统计一流杂志有那些journal of multivariate analysis 这个journal怎么样?
有人了解德州的statistics program和就业情况吗?好奇问陈老师一个问题
UC Berkeley伯克利的MA Statisitcs是什么情况呀JSS 在统计学杂志的分量
能否推荐一些统计方面比较好的期刊?什么学校的stat类phd program好?
请问哪里有PCA的SAS code 啊虚心请教
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: statistics话题: cs话题: learn话题: easier话题: something
进入Statistics版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
d******a
发帖数: 15
1
many people think cs is easy to find a job and more difficult to learn than
statistics.
first statistics is not so easy to learn. if you learn it well, at least you
can find a teaching position in US college.
I do not think CS is more difficult to learn than Statistics.
if a person think CS is more difficult, or statisitcs is easy, that person
does not understand statistics at all.
two weeks ago, a statistics professor in our department told me that even in
usa, few statistics professors can tru
d*******o
发帖数: 493
2
Then what is the true basic concept of statistics? I am just curious.
b*********e
发帖数: 29
3
I love both.
For a CS, we need to tell a machine something.
For a stat, we need to tell people something.
The common idea for these two something is: This is a kind of "Something"
that they do not need to know at all. But, the "machine" and the "people"
always think that they can not be themselves without knowing this kind of "
something".
Agree with you at this point "few statistics professors can truly understand
the basic concept of statistics. "
As to the probability theory, how to understan
d******e
发帖数: 7844
4
tell machine, tell people根本没区别。
说到底都是一回事,真正关键的是看你怎么做。
看看Rutgers的Tong Zhang, CS的PhD学位,大作经常发表在AOS,JASA上。
看看Berkeley的Micheal Jordan, STAT的大牛,整天也忙着发ICML,NIPS。
我觉得Machine Learning这一块真的没什么区别,就是做是人的风格不同罢了。

understand

【在 b*********e 的大作中提到】
: I love both.
: For a CS, we need to tell a machine something.
: For a stat, we need to tell people something.
: The common idea for these two something is: This is a kind of "Something"
: that they do not need to know at all. But, the "machine" and the "people"
: always think that they can not be themselves without knowing this kind of "
: something".
: Agree with you at this point "few statistics professors can truly understand
: the basic concept of statistics. "
: As to the probability theory, how to understan

b********p
发帖数: 875
5
M. Jordan严格来说不算stat的人

【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: tell machine, tell people根本没区别。
: 说到底都是一回事,真正关键的是看你怎么做。
: 看看Rutgers的Tong Zhang, CS的PhD学位,大作经常发表在AOS,JASA上。
: 看看Berkeley的Micheal Jordan, STAT的大牛,整天也忙着发ICML,NIPS。
: 我觉得Machine Learning这一块真的没什么区别,就是做是人的风格不同罢了。
:
: understand

1 (共1页)
进入Statistics版参与讨论
相关主题
虚心请教有人了解德州的statistics program和就业情况吗?
Cornell的MPSUC Berkeley伯克利的MA Statisitcs是什么情况呀
statistics@ucf ad能否推荐一些统计方面比较好的期刊?
年底申请STAT graduate school, 请过来人给下建议和解疑请问哪里有PCA的SAS code 啊
Data Mining ConferenceOperations Research的PhD student求问职业规划
ucla的统计系Re: 统计/概率方面的
中国人全面占领美国统计领域的标志!文章的影响因子In statistics
[合集] 请教统计一流杂志有那些journal of multivariate analysis 这个journal怎么样?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: statistics话题: cs话题: learn话题: easier话题: something