由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Stock版 - Why Netflix Is Smarter Than Its Customers ZT
相关主题
NFLX 的MANAGEMENT蠢的没边乐。。。Blockbuster
netflix月费涨价了进点 Netflix
DVDs will be staying at netflix.comIT大公司的生存法则
NFLX该涨了吧?NFLX靠什么来维持现在的股价?
A “Spectacular Collapse”: Netflix Loses 800,000 Subscribers, Stock Plunges 35%NFLX的核心问题
大牛们,是不是要烧烧nflx了?[matta]今日股市小结 (2018/03/12)
The netflix bubbleNFLX
Blockbuster(BBI)要破产了,NetFlix(NFLX)新高NFLX intrisic problem
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: netflix话题: hastings话题: customers话题: its话题: video
进入Stock版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
d******8
发帖数: 1972
1
Why Netflix Is Smarter Than Its Customers
Rick Newman, On Tuesday September 20, 2011, 12:20 pm EDT
Video-rental service Netflix has provoked a consumer firestorm--and probably
a few business-school case studies--with its recent plan to split its
operations in two. Its traditional business of delivering DVDs by mail will
henceforth be known as Qwikster, while "Netflix" will be reserved for the
service that streams video over the Internet. Customers used to getting both
services bundled together will now have to choose one or both--and deal
with separate bills and websites.
[See why big companies are axing jobs.]
Netflix CEO Reed Hastings has butchered a sacred cow by changing something
most customers like just the way it is--his DVD-by-mail service. Once they'
ve chosen a new Netflix plan (or bolted for another service), most customers
will settle into their new routine and stop complaining. Still, consumers
are notoriously fickle about things that corporate executives often overlook
, which is why Netflix's subscriber base has fallen for the first time in
its 14-year history. The sudden smackdown of an Internet darling suggests
that Qwikster could become the New Coke of the 21st century: a change that
customers didn't ask for, which ends up a total flop.
But my bet is that the new Netflix strategy turns out more like the iPod,
which reinvigorated Apple and began a long shift away from a declining
business toward a more promising and futuristic one. Hastings is famously
fixated on obsolescence and the speed with which companies can sink in the
digital era. "You hear about companies getting long in the tooth," Hastings
said at an industry conference earlier this year. "All of these innovations
are going on every day, all around you. One day, someone could overtake you."
In a blog post explaining the latest change, Hastings mentioned AOL's dial-
up service and the now-defunct Border's bookstore chain as examples of how
companies cling far too long to past strategies that quickly become outdated
. Netflix itself helped push the Blockbuster video-rental chain into
bankruptcy, helped along by Blockbuster's own embrace of an antiquated brick
-and-mortar strategy that dragged the company down like an anchor, while
more nimble competitors soared.
[See how Netflix helped kill Blockbuster.]
Hastings is shrewd to focus so intently on the future. For the last 15 years
, the rapid pace of innovation and the deadly sin of waiting too long to
change have been the dominant story in the global economy. Companies like
Apple, Google, Facebook, IBM, and Amazon have become market leaders--and
stayed there--because they innovate relentlessly and abandon old ideas when
they're no longer useful. Laggards like Sears, Eastman Kodak, Hewlett-
Packard, General Motors, and many companies that no longer exist tend to
milk past successes too long, while stutter-stepping nervously into the
future.
The same dynamic applies to individuals in the workplace. There's plenty of
opportunity for people who keep their skills up to date and find fresh ways
to enhance their value in the marketplace for talent. But millions more
expect a prosperous future while relying on the skills of the past.
Inevitably, they're the ones who fall behind, earn less, get passed up for
promotions, and all too often end up in the unemployment line.
Hastings is so focused on the future, in fact, that he anticipated the
obsolescence of Netflix's basic offering from the moment he helped start the
company in 1997. Even then, Hastings foresaw that high-speed broadband
would replace the dial-up service popular at the time, and that streaming
over the Internet would eventually become the most common way people watched
video. He has said repeatedly that the firm is called Netflix--rather than
Mailflix or DVDs By Mail--because of its mission to deliver video over the
Internet. Establishing the mail service was merely a bridge strategy meant
to establish a brand name and customer base until video streaming took hold.
[See 4 lessons from the demise of Borders.]
There have been several developments Hastings failed to anticipate. At least
twice, for instance, Netflix developed and then killed video-player devices
, because the advent of YouTube and other types of technology made them
obsolete. Even now, there's a mad scramble for pole position in the market
for home entertainment among traditional TV networks, cable companies, the
Redbox kiosk service, and Web providers including Netflix, Hulu, Apple,
Amazon, and Facebook. Nobody's sure what the prevailing platform will be.
Even though Netflix dethroned Blockbuster, there's no guarantee it will end
up one of the ultimate winners.
But Hastings has clearly been right about the advent of video streaming,
which is just getting started. The problem may be that he's too far ahead of
his customers. Some people obviously stream video today, especially young
viewers. But many still don't, and people don't like to be forced to change.
They'd rather do it at their own pace. Apple is a phenomenal success
because it has mastered the art of guiding people toward delightful new
experiences while allowing them to feel the discoveries are their own.
Netflix has proven to be clumsier. It got impatient while trying to guide
its own customers toward video streaming. It's trying to force viewers to
adopt the technology of the future, instead of deftly helping them migrate
to it on their own.
Hastings' vision, however, isn't just for Netflix in 2011 or 2012. It's for
Netflix in 2020 and 2030. That's why the Qwikster episode is most likely a
stumble, not a face-plant. Sooner or later, Qwikster will be a quaint
throwback to the past, like eight-track tapes and Kodachrome. Many Netflix
customers may not know th
l******r
发帖数: 1642
2
No one can be smarter than the customer, period
u********e
发帖数: 4950
3
Good article

probably
will
both

【在 d******8 的大作中提到】
: Why Netflix Is Smarter Than Its Customers
: Rick Newman, On Tuesday September 20, 2011, 12:20 pm EDT
: Video-rental service Netflix has provoked a consumer firestorm--and probably
: a few business-school case studies--with its recent plan to split its
: operations in two. Its traditional business of delivering DVDs by mail will
: henceforth be known as Qwikster, while "Netflix" will be reserved for the
: service that streams video over the Internet. Customers used to getting both
: services bundled together will now have to choose one or both--and deal
: with separate bills and websites.
: [See why big companies are axing jobs.]

1 (共1页)
进入Stock版参与讨论
相关主题
NFLX intrisic problemA “Spectacular Collapse”: Netflix Loses 800,000 Subscribers, Stock Plunges 35%
麦当劳MCD有可能过$100吗???大牛们,是不是要烧烧nflx了?
青蛙也说NFLXThe netflix bubble
Netflix管理层真狠,spinoff DVD by mail了Blockbuster(BBI)要破产了,NetFlix(NFLX)新高
NFLX 的MANAGEMENT蠢的没边乐。。。Blockbuster
netflix月费涨价了进点 Netflix
DVDs will be staying at netflix.comIT大公司的生存法则
NFLX该涨了吧?NFLX靠什么来维持现在的股价?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: netflix话题: hastings话题: customers话题: its话题: video