由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Stock版 - Why Chinese stocks leave US investors vulnerable ZT
相关主题
这个也许是今天不少中概股跌的原因中概这回算是完蛋了,以后也别想来美上市了
NBG联想到BABA中概跌幅可能尚未过半
中国的互联网公司都在假洋鬼子的手里 (转载)中概暴跌的原因,明了了!
AMR flight attendants the industry's highest paid.关于VIE的深度报道
支付宝引发的中概的VIE的合法性问题转 【证监会VIE报告:称对国家安全已形成严重威胁】
sina 瀑布?这次的VIE事件可能是好中概的买入机会
SINAI'm impressed by SINA
微薄辟谣了。。。为什么这么疯狂的搞中概
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: chinese话题: china话题: companies话题: investors话题: marine
1 (共1页)
d******8
发帖数: 1972
1
Why Chinese stocks leave US investors vulnerable
Associated Press
By PAUL WISEMAN and MARCY GORDON 21 hours ago

.
.
.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Something about the deal smelled fishy.
Related Stories

China Marine Food Group Ltd., a Chinese company then on the New York Stock
Exchange, spent $27 million in January 2010 to acquire a firm whose main
asset was "algae-based drink know-how." The weird thing: Three months
earlier, the beverage formula had been valued below $8,800.
But when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission tried to review the
deal, it got nowhere. The company's Chinese accounting firm refused to
provide documents. And the SEC has been stymied since.
And China Marine? Its share price topped $8 in 2010. It's now around 12
cents.
The case represents a cautionary tale for investors eager to invest in
Chinese companies on American exchanges. Chinese companies like Alibaba,
whose initial public offering this year set a record high, operate under lax
standards compared with other stocks on U.S. exchanges. That means higher
risks for investors.
Worries about the risks of Chinese stocks also emerged from a recent
Associated Press investigation of Tianhe Chemicals Group Ltd. When that
Chinese company went public in June, the U.S. investment banking powerhouse
Morgan Stanley helped it raise $654 million from foreign investors. But
Tianhe's stock has lost 39 percent since allegations emerged that it had
exaggerated the value of its business.
"The protections that are often taken for granted are just not there," says
Joseph Carcello, an accounting professor at the University of Tennessee.
More than 100 Chinese companies were suspended or kicked off U.S. exchanges
in 2011 and 2012, most of them for failing to file timely financial reports.
These companies, including China Marine, had exploited a legal loophole so
they could merge with American shell companies. By doing so, they elude much
of the SEC oversight that comes from selling shares on U.S. markets for the
first time.
About two dozen of these companies have also been hit with SEC fraud or
accounting charges. Yet the investigations have stalled because the
companies' audit papers are in China — beyond the SEC's reach.
There are currently about 100 Chinese companies trading on the NYSE and the
Nasdaq Stock Market.
China restricts foreign investment in some businesses. To bypass that hurdle
, Alibaba and many other Chinese companies deploy a structure called a "
variable interest entity" or VIE.
It works like this: The company listed on the U.S. exchange isn't the actual
Chinese company. Rather, it's a holding company, typically based in a tax
haven like the Cayman Islands. Foreign investors have no say in the company'
s management.
As a result, Chinese managers can restructure a company in ways that
threaten investors. Alibaba CEO Jack Ma, for instance, spun off Alibaba's
payment service into a company he controlled without telling Yahoo, a major
investor in Alibaba.
The VIEs are also legally dubious in China. In 2011, a Chinese panel
rejected a contract between Taiwan-based GigaMedia and a Chinese gambling
business that GigaMedia thought it controlled through a VIE. The manager of
the gambling business had seized documents required to operate in China. And
GigaMedia could do nothing.
In 2012, China's Supreme People's Court threw out contracts a Hong Kong
businesswoman had used to dodge Chinese rules to invest in a Chinese bank.
It cited agreements that "conceal illegal intentions."
Beijing could invoke similar reasoning to one day ban all VIEs, potentially
imposing huge losses on American and other foreign investors, analysts say.
China bars U.S. inspectors from audits done by Chinese accounting firms —
in order, it says, to protect its state secrets. This means most Chinese
stocks on U.S. exchanges don't comply with American law.
"It's a very serious problem," says James Doty, chairman of the Public
Company Oversight Accounting Board.
Experts say Beijing likely fears the documents would confirm suspicions that
Chinese companies are delinquent on loans from state-owned banks or are
involved in corruption. Its stance has hobbled U.S. investigations of stock
fraud.
Consider the China Marine case. Shares in the snack and beverage firm began
trading on U.S. markets in 2007. U.S. investigators grew suspicious over
China Marine's $27 million purchase of most of a company that was built
around a drink formula it had bought a year earlier for just $8,776.
Had China Marine's accounting firm reviewed the deal? If so, had it
determined the value of the acquisition?
Problem was, the accounting firm wouldn't turn over the papers. And China
Marine's stock price plunged.
Two years ago, the SEC sued the China affiliates of the Big Five accounting
firms, saying U.S. law required them to provide the documents. In January,
an SEC administrative law judge agreed and barred the firms from auditing U.
S.-traded companies.
The accounting oversight board is pursuing a deal with China to obtain the
audits, an effort that Doty has made a high priority. Without a deal, more
Chinese companies could be forced off U.S. markets. And more investors would
be burned.
Many analysts doubt it will come to that. Chinese companies want access to
American capital. And American investment firms and stock exchanges want the
fees they earn when Chinese stocks list on U.S. exchanges.
In the meantime, the stocks trade on American markets without offering
investors the protections they're supposed to enjoy.
For now, warns Dartmouth University finance professor Anant Sundaram,
Chinese stocks aren't safe: "I would not invest in those stocks. Period."
d******8
发帖数: 1972
2
看来是一块臭肉坏了满锅汤。所以还是尽量不碰中概为好。
z**m
发帖数: 3080
3
这还不好。
short所有中股。
w**k
发帖数: 6722
4
<<<<一>>>>块臭肉?
this is just tip of the iceberg

【在 d******8 的大作中提到】
: 看来是一块臭肉坏了满锅汤。所以还是尽量不碰中概为好。
1 (共1页)
相关主题
为什么这么疯狂的搞中概支付宝引发的中概的VIE的合法性问题
百度怎么不反弹?sina 瀑布?
ZZ 浑水变脸考虑买进中国概念股 分析称做空已退潮SINA
EDU暴跌,有了解VIE的来说说要不要入一点呢?微薄辟谣了。。。
这个也许是今天不少中概股跌的原因中概这回算是完蛋了,以后也别想来美上市了
NBG联想到BABA中概跌幅可能尚未过半
中国的互联网公司都在假洋鬼子的手里 (转载)中概暴跌的原因,明了了!
AMR flight attendants the industry's highest paid.关于VIE的深度报道
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: chinese话题: china话题: companies话题: investors话题: marine