s***r
发帖数: 1121 | 1 仔细看了下，就第五条有意思。法官有多大可能性会判定禁止EM在公司担任高管吗？
WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that the Court enter a Final
Judgment
I.
Finding that Defendant violated the provisions of the federal securities
laws as alleged herein;
II.
Permanently restraining and enjoining Defendant from, directly or indirectly
, engaging in conduct in violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [
15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)
] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [
17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5
];
III.
Ordering Defendant to disgorge, with prejudgment interest, any ill-gotten
gains received as a result of the violations alleged herein;
IV.
Ordering Defendant to pay civil penalties pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of
the Exchange Act [
15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)
];
V.
Ordering that Defendant be prohibited from acting as an officer or director
of any issuer that has a class of securities registered pursuant to Section
12 of the Exchange Act [
15 U.S.C. § 78l
] or that is required to file reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act [
15 U.S.C
VI.
Granting such other and further relief as this Court may deem just,
equitable, or necessary | M**********l
发帖数: 68 | | h****n
发帖数: 3447 | 3 一龙这个case实在没什么可argue的。就是一龙自己胡扯，pump股价。非常简单的事实
。一龙这方面实在没什么可说的。这个case过于清晰了。犯事儿肯定没得说，犯了，这
个如果不是胡扯，哪里还有什么事儿是胡扯呢？现在就看法官怎么判量刑了。一龙没问
题肯定不现实了。就看一龙的位置能不能保住，tsla的股东，未来还需要经受心理上的
考验。
Final
indirectly
【在 s***r 的大作中提到】
: 仔细看了下，就第五条有意思。法官有多大可能性会判定禁止EM在公司担任高管吗？
: WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that the Court enter a Final
: Judgment
: I.
: Finding that Defendant violated the provisions of the federal securities
: laws as alleged herein;
: II.
: Permanently restraining and enjoining Defendant from, directly or indirectly
: , engaging in conduct in violation of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act [
: 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)
| c**u
发帖数: 14 | 4 个人觉得 应该禁止 Musk 担任任何重要职位， 专心做他的发明来造福人类。 TESLA,
spaceX, so far so good, 尤其是 superloop, 潜力巨大。 boring company 也有点
意思。
他是一个思想天才， 管理上么， 蠢材可能有点过分， 至少太理想化。 | l*********s
发帖数: 5409 | 5 我猜EM能搞成spaceX，军队里面应该有人。还是大概率罚钱了事。
【在 h****n 的大作中提到】
: 一龙这个case实在没什么可argue的。就是一龙自己胡扯，pump股价。非常简单的事实
: 。一龙这方面实在没什么可说的。这个case过于清晰了。犯事儿肯定没得说，犯了，这
: 个如果不是胡扯，哪里还有什么事儿是胡扯呢？现在就看法官怎么判量刑了。一龙没问
: 题肯定不现实了。就看一龙的位置能不能保住，tsla的股东，未来还需要经受心理上的
: 考验。
:
: Final
: indirectly
|
|
