x*e 发帖数: 81 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 PKU 讨论区 】
【 原文由 oaks 所发表 】
发信人: dchli (To be is to do!), 信区: THUExpress
标 题: 1999年各高校获国家自然科学基金资助经费排名
发信站: BBS 水木清华站 (Thu Oct 21 23:15:13 1999)
排名 单位 项目 经费数(万元)
1 浙江大学 138 1790.00
2 清华大学 109 1518.4
3 北京大学 77 1126.33
4 中国科大 64 878.50
5 天津大学 57 752.60
6 南京大学 45 669.20
7 第二军医 53 |
p****k 发帖数: 18 | 2 天大南开加起来就排第三了
【在 x*e 的大作中提到】 : 【 以下文字转载自 PKU 讨论区 】 : 【 原文由 oaks 所发表 】 : 发信人: dchli (To be is to do!), 信区: THUExpress : 标 题: 1999年各高校获国家自然科学基金资助经费排名 : 发信站: BBS 水木清华站 (Thu Oct 21 23:15:13 1999) : 排名 单位 项目 经费数(万元) : 1 浙江大学 138 1790.00 : 2 清华大学 109 1518.4 : 3 北京大学 77 1126.33 : 4 中国科大 64 878.50
|
j******u 发帖数: 26 | 3 怎么加? 俺看加起来排十一..
【在 p****k 的大作中提到】 : 天大南开加起来就排第三了
|
i********a 发帖数: 186 | 4 不只第三,合并以后实力增强,可以得到更多的项目.
可惜与天津大学无关了..
【在 p****k 的大作中提到】 : 天大南开加起来就排第三了
|
l****y 发帖数: 293 | 5 数字最能说明问题。呵呵
【在 x*e 的大作中提到】 : 【 以下文字转载自 PKU 讨论区 】 : 【 原文由 oaks 所发表 】 : 发信人: dchli (To be is to do!), 信区: THUExpress : 标 题: 1999年各高校获国家自然科学基金资助经费排名 : 发信站: BBS 水木清华站 (Thu Oct 21 23:15:13 1999) : 排名 单位 项目 经费数(万元) : 1 浙江大学 138 1790.00 : 2 清华大学 109 1518.4 : 3 北京大学 77 1126.33 : 4 中国科大 64 878.50
|
g*g 发帖数: 6908 | 6 说明什么问题了?
我还是没有看明白.
【在 l****y 的大作中提到】 : 数字最能说明问题。呵呵
|
c**l 发帖数: 31 | 7 真是不错呀,原来一直说添大就顾挣钱,科研费多
但有水平的低,现在看起来水平高的也不少,钱也挺多
【在 l****y 的大作中提到】 : 数字最能说明问题。呵呵
|
y*p 发帖数: 66 | 8
//Nod Nod. It must be 11.
【在 j******u 的大作中提到】 : 怎么加? 俺看加起来排十一..
|
y*p 发帖数: 66 | 9 Have to say:
when you leave TJU, and see the other universities' peers, you have to admit
that TJU is not so good as we had thought.
【在 c**l 的大作中提到】 : 真是不错呀,原来一直说添大就顾挣钱,科研费多 : 但有水平的低,现在看起来水平高的也不少,钱也挺多
|
s**o 发帖数: 25 | 10 Not too bad either. At least I think TJU is better than some others. 【 在 ydp (nibb) 的大作中提到: 】 |
l****y 发帖数: 293 | 11 I feel all are same.
I must say one point,
if you don't respect yourself,
who else can respect you?
【在 y*p 的大作中提到】 : Have to say: : when you leave TJU, and see the other universities' peers, you have to admit : that TJU is not so good as we had thought.
|
G**T 发帖数: 388 | 12 but TJU is not as bad as I had thought. |
y*p 发帖数: 66 | 13 I remember that we felt so proud that we could enter '211' as ranking about 7
or 8. At that time, we were really thinking that our univ could enter the
toppest 10 in China. But that ranking had some factors of politics.
Ok, now, we have to face the truth, and have to ask ourseleves why TJU is
decreasing in these years so quickly? At 1995, we thought that our
Architecture and Chem Eng were ranking No. 1. However, who said so?
I was graduated from Chem Eng in TJU. I should have no reason to say ou
【在 y*p 的大作中提到】 : Have to say: : when you leave TJU, and see the other universities' peers, you have to admit : that TJU is not so good as we had thought.
|
i********a 发帖数: 186 | 14 agree!
I have old friends in Tsinghua, PKU, USTC,ZJU and some of them r also in US now.
They r really excellent guys and they earned my respect by their successes.
but neither do they or I think their success is much better than mine
only because their universities are better than mine.In some fields students
come from tju had more successes than those from other universities.
TJU has made great progress during the last 10 years, especially from 93-99.And
now it is developing with the highes
【在 l****y 的大作中提到】 : I feel all are same. : I must say one point, : if you don't respect yourself, : who else can respect you?
|