d*******o
发帖数: 5897 | |
D*****a
发帖数: 2847 | 2 better than Emacs? hehe
【在 d*******o 的大作中提到】
: 如果不考虑它的价钱的话。
|
d*******o
发帖数: 5897 | 3 definitely, if you take into account the learning/training cost
【在 D*****a 的大作中提到】
: better than Emacs? hehe
|
a**e
发帖数: 5794 | 4 我对lyx和bakoma都不感兴趣。
【在 d*******o 的大作中提到】
: 如果不考虑它的价钱的话。
|
v****x
发帖数: 498 | 5 texmaker 对我来说够好了。。
【在 d*******o 的大作中提到】
: definitely, if you take into account the learning/training cost
|
r****t
发帖数: 10904 | 6 i learned emacs + auctex by googling, virtually cost a bit on electrical
bill.
【在 d*******o 的大作中提到】
: definitely, if you take into account the learning/training cost
|
d*******o
发帖数: 5897 | 7 by cost I meant time you spend on learning. you don't even need to "learn"
Bakoma.
【在 r****t 的大作中提到】
: i learned emacs + auctex by googling, virtually cost a bit on electrical
: bill.
|
D*****a
发帖数: 2847 | 8 学会以后 emacs+auctex快多了
这时间不就省回来了
而且用得越熟省的时间越多
赫赫
【在 d*******o 的大作中提到】
: by cost I meant time you spend on learning. you don't even need to "learn"
: Bakoma.
|
r****t
发帖数: 10904 | 9 Bakoma probably cannot do what I am doing with auctex. In that case, the
time spent on learning is infinite, and you do need to learn Bakoma, for
example, you still need to learn tikz when using Bakoma, and there's no
guarantee that it works with Bakoma (probably not).
【在 d*******o 的大作中提到】
: by cost I meant time you spend on learning. you don't even need to "learn"
: Bakoma.
|
b****s
发帖数: 1300 | |
b*******t
发帖数: 33714 | |
