K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 1 1. Not ace-able. 手长，动作快，接一发极强。光这一点就可以减少Murray
5-10%的得分。Murray正手不行，如果一发不能导致对方回球很烂的话无法
一拍搞死。
2. Not breakable. 心理很稳定，击球强劲，破发点上要么可以一发直接得
分，要么可以接下来几拍打出致胜球。
能做到这两点的，只有Cilic, Del Potro等少数几个人。连纳豆、狒狒都只能
做到2。所以只要Cilic, Del Potro体力没有问题，对Murray都应该占上风。 |
Y*******o
发帖数: 1513 | 2 可昨天Cilic输给了Murray也
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: 1. Not ace-able. 手长，动作快，接一发极强。光这一点就可以减少Murray
: 5-10%的得分。Murray正手不行，如果一发不能导致对方回球很烂的话无法
: 一拍搞死。
: 2. Not breakable. 心理很稳定，击球强劲，破发点上要么可以一发直接得
: 分，要么可以接下来几拍打出致胜球。
: 能做到这两点的，只有Cilic, Del Potro等少数几个人。连纳豆、狒狒都只能
: 做到2。所以只要Cilic, Del Potro体力没有问题，对Murray都应该占上风。
|
t***s
发帖数: 1877 | 3 He is saving rp for Murry
【在 Y*******o 的大作中提到】
: 可昨天Cilic输给了Murray也
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 4 If Cilic was fresh it could very well be another US Open 2009.
Murray tried everything in the first set and lost at 3:6.
【在 Y*******o 的大作中提到】
: 可昨天Cilic输给了Murray也
|
r****x
发帖数: 3613 | 5 one big difference is cilic lost his cool in 2nd set, he wasn't patient enou
gh to find chance to hit, and also in some important points he made some mis
take.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: If Cilic was fresh it could very well be another US Open 2009.
: Murray tried everything in the first set and lost at 3:6.
|
h****n
发帖数: 4860 | 6 这个也太没说服力了
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: If Cilic was fresh it could very well be another US Open 2009.
: Murray tried everything in the first set and lost at 3:6.
|
y****2
发帖数: 1601 | 7 Didn't watch the match last night. Did Cilic lose because of exhaustion? |
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 8 IMO obviously so.
【在 y****2 的大作中提到】
: Didn't watch the match last night. Did Cilic lose because of exhaustion?
|
r****x
发帖数: 3613 | 9 he lost the match because he served bad, and lost cool.
【在 y****2 的大作中提到】
: Didn't watch the match last night. Did Cilic lose because of exhaustion?
|
