由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Tennis版 - 豆子又来医疗暂停了,哈哈
相关主题
Federer Nadal h2h Grand Slams 2:8, non clay 2:3大家可以不可以在吵架之前发表个共识?
今天John McEnroe认错了聊一聊Nadal及其硬地实力
Outside the clay, Nadal is just a average playertennis is really boring now
也说federer的h2hDavydenko is better than Nadal?
nadal还是很谦虚的纳豆对世界前8的H2H
如果让个红土球员几乎连续地拿温网说说现在的四巨头,岁月催人老
顶着锅盖说说h2h纳豆垂而不死
The End of the Innocence by Pete Bodo老费不能算GOAT
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: federer话题: nadal话题: meet话题: clay话题: failed
进入Tennis版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
H*B
发帖数: 3645
1
赢得时候就没事了
f******g
发帖数: 13917
2
这不废话,赢的时候叫什么暂停啊,
坏了自己的节奏

【在 H*B 的大作中提到】
: 赢得时候就没事了
H*B
发帖数: 3645
3
有道理,呵呵。

【在 f******g 的大作中提到】
: 这不废话,赢的时候叫什么暂停啊,
: 坏了自己的节奏

c******d
发帖数: 564
4
davefenko太准了
H*B
发帖数: 3645
5
狒狒没机会改善交战记录了

【在 H*B 的大作中提到】
: 赢得时候就没事了
c******d
发帖数: 564
6
kao
俄罗斯人太牛逼了
K****D
发帖数: 30533
7
人可是卫冕冠军阿。

【在 c******d 的大作中提到】
: kao
: 俄罗斯人太牛逼了

c******d
发帖数: 564
8
这两分太牛了
c******d
发帖数: 564
9
登科这盘拿的坚韧不拔
c******d
发帖数: 564
10
登科反手小角度真犀利
相关主题
如果让个红土球员几乎连续地拿温网大家可以不可以在吵架之前发表个共识?
顶着锅盖说说h2h聊一聊Nadal及其硬地实力
The End of the Innocence by Pete Bodotennis is really boring now
进入Tennis版参与讨论
d**f
发帖数: 293
11
Many people, incluing famous commentators like Patrick McEnroe, have said
their head-to-head record looks more and more meaningless now, since it is
so biased toward plays on clay. On non-clay surfaces, Federer has a better
record. More important, Nadal simply failed to meet Federer in so many
occasions in non-clay finals.

【在 H*B 的大作中提到】
: 狒狒没机会改善交战记录了
K****D
发帖数: 30533
12
Federer also failed to meet Nadal on clay in many occasions last
year.

better

【在 d**f 的大作中提到】
: Many people, incluing famous commentators like Patrick McEnroe, have said
: their head-to-head record looks more and more meaningless now, since it is
: so biased toward plays on clay. On non-clay surfaces, Federer has a better
: record. More important, Nadal simply failed to meet Federer in so many
: occasions in non-clay finals.

S****2
发帖数: 349
13
灯壳打得好的时候,连ff都得上厕所,ff说灯壳时不时会有20。30分钟play
incredible tennis.

【在 c******d 的大作中提到】
: 登科反手小角度真犀利
S***e
发帖数: 4426
14
数据帝怎么解释费纳有多于一半的对决在红土,而他们每年各自只有大约、
甚至不到1/4的赛事是在红土上打的?到底who fail to meet who啊?

【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Federer also failed to meet Nadal on clay in many occasions last
: year.
:
: better

K****D
发帖数: 30533
15
At the end of Federer's career, the numbers will not be that
biased.
I am not denying at present the numbers are biased. Note I said
*IN 2010* Federer failed to meet Nadal on clay multiple times.

【在 S***e 的大作中提到】
: 数据帝怎么解释费纳有多于一半的对决在红土,而他们每年各自只有大约、
: 甚至不到1/4的赛事是在红土上打的?到底who fail to meet who啊?

S***e
发帖数: 4426
16
2010:一次红土,一次硬地。红土占50%啊。
如果以后他们每10次meet中三次左右在红土才勉强算是unbiased。

【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: At the end of Federer's career, the numbers will not be that
: biased.
: I am not denying at present the numbers are biased. Note I said
: *IN 2010* Federer failed to meet Nadal on clay multiple times.

K****D
发帖数: 30533
17
Please be scientific when reading what I wrote.
"In 2010, Federer failed to meet Nadal multiple times on clay"
is a correct statement. I am not indicating anything else.
Federer did not attend Monte Carlo, where Nadal won the final
6-0, 6-1.
Federer lost early in Rome.
Federer did meet Nadal in Madrid.
Federer lost early in Roland Garros.
So he failed to meet Nadal 3 times. Is there anything wrong with
my statement?
Since I was talking about clay strictly, I didn't bring up US Open
or Wimbledon.

【在 S***e 的大作中提到】
: 2010:一次红土,一次硬地。红土占50%啊。
: 如果以后他们每10次meet中三次左右在红土才勉强算是unbiased。

K****D
发帖数: 30533
18
Ok, I guess you have some concern about my statement that the numbers
will be less biased in the future.
The way I analyze this is:
1) With Federer's aging and projected worse
performance on clay, he will be more likely to failed to meet Nadal
on clay in the coming few years.
2) With Nadal's improvement on hard courts, he is more likely to
meet Federer on hard courts in the coming few years.
3) Both 1 and 2 will bring the numbers to be less biased.

【在 S***e 的大作中提到】
: 2010:一次红土,一次硬地。红土占50%啊。
: 如果以后他们每10次meet中三次左右在红土才勉强算是unbiased。

S***e
发帖数: 4426
19
问题是你这个statement想说明什么呢?
如果我说,in 2010, nadal failed to meet federer on hard court multiple times.
这句话本身也是correct statement。因为去年federer拿到title的几个硬地,nadal要
么没参赛,要么提前出局了。
但是这个statement对于讨论他们h2h是否biased没有任何意义啊。
我没说你的statement错误,只是说:只要他们在红土的对决次数超过他们总对决次数
的30%,这个h2h数据当中就有bias。因为他们每年参加的红土赛事都不到总数的30%。

【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Please be scientific when reading what I wrote.
: "In 2010, Federer failed to meet Nadal multiple times on clay"
: is a correct statement. I am not indicating anything else.
: Federer did not attend Monte Carlo, where Nadal won the final
: 6-0, 6-1.
: Federer lost early in Rome.
: Federer did meet Nadal in Madrid.
: Federer lost early in Roland Garros.
: So he failed to meet Nadal 3 times. Is there anything wrong with
: my statement?

K****D
发帖数: 30533
20
I wrote that in supplement to deaf's post
"More important, Nadal simply failed to meet Federer in so many
occasions on non-clay finals."
to point out that there is another aspect of the story and things
are slowing changing now.
In fact, my personal projection is that from now on till before
one of their retirements, Nadal vs Federer on hard courts H2H
record should be around 50-50. Looking at it from another angle,
it means Federer's lifetime advantage over Nadal on hard court will
be nowhere near Nadal's advantage over Federer on clay, even if
you weigh the hard courts 200% considering the longer season.

times.
%。

【在 S***e 的大作中提到】
: 问题是你这个statement想说明什么呢?
: 如果我说,in 2010, nadal failed to meet federer on hard court multiple times.
: 这句话本身也是correct statement。因为去年federer拿到title的几个硬地,nadal要
: 么没参赛,要么提前出局了。
: 但是这个statement对于讨论他们h2h是否biased没有任何意义啊。
: 我没说你的statement错误,只是说:只要他们在红土的对决次数超过他们总对决次数
: 的30%,这个h2h数据当中就有bias。因为他们每年参加的红土赛事都不到总数的30%。

相关主题
Davydenko is better than Nadal?纳豆垂而不死
纳豆对世界前8的H2H老费不能算GOAT
说说现在的四巨头,岁月催人老感觉老费会打红土
进入Tennis版参与讨论
S***e
发帖数: 4426
21
fed在硬地对nadal的优势显然不如nadal在红土对fed的优势大。
这个没人怀疑吧。。。
但是,什么叫biased呢?就是说fed在nadal有绝对优势的红土按说只该每
10次中碰nadal不到3次,但因为fed是红土老二,所以经常以50%以上的
几率在红土碰到nadal。而在fed统治的硬地,nadal却经常fail to meet
federer。这才是这个fail to meet的由来。
如果他们在红土的对决已经是一半甚至超过一半了,何谈什么fail to meet呢?

【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: I wrote that in supplement to deaf's post
: "More important, Nadal simply failed to meet Federer in so many
: occasions on non-clay finals."
: to point out that there is another aspect of the story and things
: are slowing changing now.
: In fact, my personal projection is that from now on till before
: one of their retirements, Nadal vs Federer on hard courts H2H
: record should be around 50-50. Looking at it from another angle,
: it means Federer's lifetime advantage over Nadal on hard court will
: be nowhere near Nadal's advantage over Federer on clay, even if

K****D
发帖数: 30533
22
I feel our arguments are going at two completely X-Y directions
and there is no need to continue.
For the point you try to stress, I've already pointed out I did not
deny the current bias.
For the points I try to stress, if you deliberately avoid to talk
about them, then it's fine; if you still don't see what I was trying
to say, I just don't know how to express clearer.

【在 S***e 的大作中提到】
: fed在硬地对nadal的优势显然不如nadal在红土对fed的优势大。
: 这个没人怀疑吧。。。
: 但是,什么叫biased呢?就是说fed在nadal有绝对优势的红土按说只该每
: 10次中碰nadal不到3次,但因为fed是红土老二,所以经常以50%以上的
: 几率在红土碰到nadal。而在fed统治的硬地,nadal却经常fail to meet
: federer。这才是这个fail to meet的由来。
: 如果他们在红土的对决已经是一半甚至超过一半了,何谈什么fail to meet呢?

K****D
发帖数: 30533
23
How about this, is it clearer?
"Overall, I think Nadal has an advantage over Federer in their
H2H matches. The advantage is not as large as 14:8 due to a bias.
i.e., If they meet in all 18 important tournaments throughout the
year, Nadal will likely have a better record at year end."
Is it fair?

【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: I feel our arguments are going at two completely X-Y directions
: and there is no need to continue.
: For the point you try to stress, I've already pointed out I did not
: deny the current bias.
: For the points I try to stress, if you deliberately avoid to talk
: about them, then it's fine; if you still don't see what I was trying
: to say, I just don't know how to express clearer.

m*****r
发帖数: 3822
24
you guys funny...

【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: How about this, is it clearer?
: "Overall, I think Nadal has an advantage over Federer in their
: H2H matches. The advantage is not as large as 14:8 due to a bias.
: i.e., If they meet in all 18 important tournaments throughout the
: year, Nadal will likely have a better record at year end."
: Is it fair?

s****y
发帖数: 704
25
Fed不是还被奶粉号称土场只比博格纳豆差嘛。
【 ,在 Snape (Severus) 的大作中提到: 】
1 (共1页)
进入Tennis版参与讨论
相关主题
老费不能算GOATnadal还是很谦虚的
感觉老费会打红土如果让个红土球员几乎连续地拿温网
说菲菲对豆子占下风的都是胡扯顶着锅盖说说h2h
大家探讨一下, nadal正手没什么不能多打一些以前这样的平击呢The End of the Innocence by Pete Bodo
Federer Nadal h2h Grand Slams 2:8, non clay 2:3大家可以不可以在吵架之前发表个共识?
今天John McEnroe认错了聊一聊Nadal及其硬地实力
Outside the clay, Nadal is just a average playertennis is really boring now
也说federer的h2hDavydenko is better than Nadal?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: federer话题: nadal话题: meet话题: clay话题: failed