k******t
发帖数: 257 | 1 I got a dispute with floor in a hand like this:
Early position with KK raised to 15, middle guy all in with his 25 and
called by 2 more guys. With bad position and 2 callers I reraised 100 more
to get heads-up. The callers both rejected saying I can only complete since
all-in guy wasn't raising me with less double my bet. So floor came for the
ruling and he agreeed with them.
This is weird as all-in exceeds half of raise and I were able to do it in
foxwood.
Is there any general ruling about the |
i***g
发帖数: 80 | 2 There is a full bet rule or half bet rule for this.
Here is the detailed description:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betting_(poker)#Incomplete_bet_or_raise |
p*****l
发帖数: 399 | 3 I agree. That's what I have seen from experience. In limit games, half bet
is considered a raise, in no limit, a full bet is considered a raise.
【在 i***g 的大作中提到】
: There is a full bet rule or half bet rule for this.
: Here is the detailed description:
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betting_(poker)#Incomplete_bet_or_raise
|
p*t
发帖数: 275 | 4 you mean "wasn't raising me with less double my bet" or "was"?
since
the
【在 k******t 的大作中提到】
: I got a dispute with floor in a hand like this:
: Early position with KK raised to 15, middle guy all in with his 25 and
: called by 2 more guys. With bad position and 2 callers I reraised 100 more
: to get heads-up. The callers both rejected saying I can only complete since
: all-in guy wasn't raising me with less double my bet. So floor came for the
: ruling and he agreeed with them.
: This is weird as all-in exceeds half of raise and I were able to do it in
: foxwood.
: Is there any general ruling about the
|
