s*******y
发帖数: 167 | 1 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1997467,00.html
买这期的杂志才能看到全文，这是我今天在barber shop看杂志时看到的，于是上网找
这篇文章的信息介绍给大家。
大致内容是说以前这些著名玩家如 Phil Hellmuth Jr. 怎么在当今的live
tournaments中屡屡输给 internet 玩家的。Poker已经变成了像blackjack一样，纯关
注edge odd上去了，谁算得准，谁是赢家 |
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 2 it's a different world now. tournaments like WSOP used to only get hundreds
of players if not fewer, so phil's 11 bracelets are still big achievements
but not really that big any more. if you trace the list of best players of
200X now, it changes every year with most new faces, and very rarely you'll
see old guns.
【在 s*******y 的大作中提到】
: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1997467,00.html
: 买这期的杂志才能看到全文，这是我今天在barber shop看杂志时看到的，于是上网找
: 这篇文章的信息介绍给大家。
: 大致内容是说以前这些著名玩家如 Phil Hellmuth Jr. 怎么在当今的live
: tournaments中屡屡输给 internet 玩家的。Poker已经变成了像blackjack一样，纯关
: 注edge odd上去了，谁算得准，谁是赢家
|
s*********k
发帖数: 1989 | 3 I watched "Poker After Dark" on NBC quite a few times. Everytime Phil is the
loser on $ and dignity. He goes frsutrated and mouthie after losing
consecutively, even left the game in middle. He is too tight and has no
place against LAG (too easy to be bluffed, not a strong(-minded) player at
all). |
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 4 i don't really get these TV poker shows.
do they really play with their money AND seriously? to me, it looks more
like NBC sponsors them behind the scene and in turn they make dramas for TV
face time.
the
【在 s*********k 的大作中提到】
: I watched "Poker After Dark" on NBC quite a few times. Everytime Phil is the
: loser on $ and dignity. He goes frsutrated and mouthie after losing
: consecutively, even left the game in middle. He is too tight and has no
: place against LAG (too easy to be bluffed, not a strong(-minded) player at
: all).
|
h*******s
发帖数: 3932 | 5 Phil is indeed too tight. Ivey and durrr are the best in high stake cash
game. But this poker after dark seems not a traditional cash or tournament
game. It's closer to cash, right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poker_After_Dark
the
【在 s*********k 的大作中提到】
: I watched "Poker After Dark" on NBC quite a few times. Everytime Phil is the
: loser on $ and dignity. He goes frsutrated and mouthie after losing
: consecutively, even left the game in middle. He is too tight and has no
: place against LAG (too easy to be bluffed, not a strong(-minded) player at
: all).
|
h*******s
发帖数: 3932 | 6 high stake poker should be quite serious. some players lose than leave, dare
not rebuy..
TV
【在 f*****g 的大作中提到】
: i don't really get these TV poker shows.
: do they really play with their money AND seriously? to me, it looks more
: like NBC sponsors them behind the scene and in turn they make dramas for TV
: face time.
:
: the
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 7 i guess NBC will pay big bucks for their time, if they don't leave after
xxxK loss, then they might have to play with own money.
dare
【在 h*******s 的大作中提到】
: high stake poker should be quite serious. some players lose than leave, dare
: not rebuy..
:
: TV
|
s*********k
发帖数: 1989 | 8 They have cash-game or winner-takes-all. No idea for the deal behind.
Guess, they might buy 20K chip with 10K cash and take the half for show-up.
【在 h*******s 的大作中提到】
: Phil is indeed too tight. Ivey and durrr are the best in high stake cash
: game. But this poker after dark seems not a traditional cash or tournament
: game. It's closer to cash, right?
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poker_After_Dark
:
: the
|
s*********k
发帖数: 1989 | 9 It is on NBC but not by NBC. The pro should get some $ for that. My guess
【在 f*****g 的大作中提到】
: i guess NBC will pay big bucks for their time, if they don't leave after
: xxxK loss, then they might have to play with own money.
:
: dare
|
